hamburgerhelper
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2013, 07:42:28 PM |
|
Ok, so where's this week's chump change?
|
|
|
|
fractal02
|
|
November 23, 2013, 08:05:38 PM |
|
I believe I've updated the entire website. Please kindly let me know if I missed something stupid... I'll fix it immediately.
Thank you LabRat for the update I'm excited to see what you and your "Anonymous" partner can get from Hardware sellers. It's a smart move. Jointed cash flow can do wonders
|
|
|
|
bittymitty
|
|
November 23, 2013, 08:24:02 PM |
|
Can you clarify the following : http://www.labratmining.com/currentHashrate.php"Hashrate: 5.45 TH/s + 15.5TH/s mining for additional hardware" and "The current in hand hashrate is averaging ~25TH/s. (Updated: 11/23/2013)" There seems to be a 4TH/s difference from these two statements? Do we have a total of 21TH/s or 25TH/s ?
|
|
|
|
MaxwellsDemon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 187
Merit: 109
Converting information into power since 1867
|
|
November 23, 2013, 08:39:46 PM |
|
Can you clarify the following : http://www.labratmining.com/currentHashrate.php"Hashrate: 5.45 TH/s + 15.5TH/s mining for additional hardware" and "The current in hand hashrate is averaging ~25TH/s. (Updated: 11/23/2013)" There seems to be a 4TH/s difference from these two statements? Do we have a total of 21TH/s or 25TH/s ? Seems to be addressed here: We currently have 21TH up, another 2 I just got in from Dave and a couple TH in BFL gear I'm moving.
Should total ~25TH of which all but 5.25-5.5TH will be mining for hardware.
|
We're hunting for Leviathan, and Bitcoin is our harpoon.
|
|
|
M31
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:29:05 PM |
|
0.00037
correct?
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:31:31 PM |
|
0.00037
correct?
My math says 0.000404983 BTC/bond. grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:32:32 PM |
|
I believe I've updated the entire website. Please kindly let me know if I missed something stupid... I'll fix it immediately.
Could please tell us from whom are you going to buy future hardware from , bitfury is good but their shipment delays to us have cost us dear , how about picking-up 2nd hand KNC gear from people bailing out of mining. At this time it is undecided, but I'm in contact with multiple suppliers. Other than Bitfury & BFl gear , have you made any pre-order deals with any other manufacturers ie. cointera , hashfast , I would also request you to please look into Vitrual Mining corp, you could probably have a word with VMC CEO Ken slaughter on this forum to see if you can make a deal work with them because I believe VMC has got prototype chip in hand already hashing. VMC ?!? Are you insane...we already lose time and money, buying vaporware doesn't help... Second hand KNC ? Overpriced...LRM miss the boat...end of line. For the moment Cointerra and/or maybee Clam ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=343856.0 ) can be a good choice. LOL 55nm & i am Insane , sure bro At some point LRM will have to sell gear which doesnt cut it any more , 55nm doesnt bode well. Please do your research before saying that 55nm doesn't cut it... I'm pretty sure BitFury is more power efficient at 55nm than KnC at 28nm............
|
|
|
|
goddardnet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:32:52 PM |
|
Dividends received, many thanks.
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:35:36 PM |
|
Can you clarify the following : http://www.labratmining.com/currentHashrate.php"Hashrate: 5.45 TH/s + 15.5TH/s mining for additional hardware" and "The current in hand hashrate is averaging ~25TH/s. (Updated: 11/23/2013)" There seems to be a 4TH/s difference from these two statements? Do we have a total of 21TH/s or 25TH/s ? As I stated in an update today, there are a couple TH of BFL being moved and 2TH of BitFury not set up as of this second that I just got in... So... both...
|
|
|
|
M31
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:36:18 PM |
|
0.00037
correct?
My math says 0.000404983 BTC/bond. grnbrg. Right you are.. I was having a fantasy that I had more bonds than I really do... Thanks LR!
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:36:52 PM |
|
0.00037
correct?
My math says 0.000404983 BTC/bond. grnbrg. grnbrg hits it perfect every week... Sorry M31... you lowballed it.
|
|
|
|
bigasic
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:45:26 PM |
|
OUCH!!! I hope this is the calm before the storm.... I figured we would be low, but wow, that was low.. (dividends, i mean)
|
|
|
|
mboehler
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:49:23 PM |
|
OUCH!!! I hope this is the calm before the storm.... I figured we would be low, but wow, that was low.. (dividends, i mean)
The next two weeks should be even lower. But the week after that should be nice!
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:54:22 PM |
|
If my records are correct... LRM has now paid out BTC808.91411207 to bondholders. Lets have a party when it breaks 1000?
|
|
|
|
bigasic
|
|
November 23, 2013, 09:59:45 PM |
|
did i see that right? is there a bond holder that received 7 coins?
|
|
|
|
Ashitank
|
|
November 23, 2013, 10:21:42 PM |
|
Thanks for the update Lab_rat , I hope your able to add more hardware sooner & at more frequent rate
|
|
|
|
rustyh17
|
|
November 23, 2013, 10:21:52 PM |
|
Fellow LabRatonians, Updated analysis spreadsheet for 11/23/13 report: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bw3222MuvkMCMmI0TFFFNXUybUk&usp=sharingSummary: 1. DivROI = 10.76% to date <---- this is based on 0.15 BTC/share price 2. Current total has MH/sh = 93.5 <---- we get 75% of this (please note that this does not account for bad luck) 3. Current total GH/s = 5,185.92 <---- this is a time averaged, no variance, rough value (we get 75% of this) 4. The Difficulty projections are based on http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty5. $/BTC is based on blockchain.info chart data. 6. 08/24/13 GH/s hash rate jump was not real, rather based on accidently paying double dividends. 7. DivROI shown is cumulative week to week.
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
November 23, 2013, 11:02:50 PM |
|
did i see that right? is there a bond holder that received 7 coins?
No there wasn't it included the return address in there. blockchain does that every once in a while.
|
|
|
|
Frankthechicken
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2013, 11:07:35 PM |
|
Anyone want to wildly guess divs per share for 12/14/13 ?
I love guessing. We have two difficulty adjustments between now and then which we don't know for sure when exactly they happen. I figure roughly minus 20% total. Plus 5 days at 7x our current hashrate. I think it would be best to apply that estimate to today's dividend. I'm not sure using the last div as a basis is accurate since I think it included the accrued of the unclaimed? So... using two weeks ago of 0.000557995, today might be around .00047? ((.00047 * 0.80)*(2/7 of a week))+((.00047*0.80)*7x hashrate*(5/7 of a week)) Maybe 0.001987? Okay... so .00047 was probably fairly accurate minus the bad luck. However, I must revise due to a stray word in a very important place It was interpreted as we'd end up with 35 TH/s this round of hardware not 25 TH/s so looks like we'll see around 0.001397. Less, but still nice. Time will tell Glad to see the Lab_Rat droppings show up in the wallet today. (Are we the only ones that call the dividends that?)
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
November 23, 2013, 11:10:06 PM |
|
did i see that right? is there a bond holder that received 7 coins?
No there wasn't it included the return address in there. blockchain does that every once in a while. It's the way Bitcoin works. Inputs have to be allocated in full to a transaction. If you have an address A: - B sends 2BTC to A
- C sends 2BTC to A
- D sends 2BTC to A
Address A now has a balance of 6 BTC. If A now sends 5 BTC to E, the transaction has inputs of - 2BTC from A (from tx B)
- 2BTC from A (from tx C)
- 2BTC from A (from tx D)
and outputs of - 5BTC to E
- 1BTC to A (Or, depending on the wallet client, "change address" F)
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
|