[ANN][CSC] CasinoCoin - The Premiere Coin for Casino Gaming | Kimoto Enabled!

[casinocoin]

Well there is your problem you or no one wants to fix the bug

I've messaged 3 different persons who can and am waiting for a response from 2 and one is currently offline who has said he can add DGWv2.
If I could do it I would so enough with saying that. I did not create the coin transcoder did and he left. Im not a programmer.

It's not as simple as one may think, can add you to the git so you can make the code changes..

Ill even provide a 0.05 BTC bounty for the first person to make the changes @ the new GIT repo

[1715153641]

1715153641

[1715153641]

1715153641

[1715153641]

1715153641

[1715153641]

1715153641

[1715153641]

1715153641

[staplezjay]

Well there is your problem you or no one wants to fix the bug

I've messaged 3 different persons who can and am waiting for a response from 2 and one is currently offline who has said he can add DGWv2.
If I could do it I would so enough with saying that. I did not create the coin transcoder did and he left. Im not a programmer.

It's not as simple as one may think, can add you to the git so you can make the code changes..

Ill even provide a 0.05 BTC bounty for the first person to make the changes @ the new GIT repo

.im a programer but not c++
Thank you so much I understand what you guys are doing is hard and waithing for transcoder is not an option

[GoldSeal]

Ok I pulled from https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin and this looks like the section where I can insert a new diffmode. I haven't written C++ in a while, but it this isn't looking overly complicated to me. Compiling on linux won't be an issue at all for me. The only concern I have is that I have is that the darkcoin code relies on encountering a future block to switch diff mode in an effort to allow the majority of clients to upgrade. Obviously, this is a bit difficult in the situation we're in with the blockchain not progressing normally right now. If anyone has any ideas on how to deal with the stuck blockchain issue, I don't see why I couldn't get a working version of casioncoin going with v2 in short order. I don't fully understand why the blockchain is stuck I guess. I'd like to make sure whatever fix we put in place will be reliable.

Code:

root@alpha01:/usr/src/darkcoin/src# grep -nr DiffMode ./*
./main.cpp:1634:        int DiffMode = 1;
./main.cpp:1636:            if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 16) { DiffMode = 4; }
./main.cpp:1639:            if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 68589) { DiffMode = 4; }
./main.cpp:1640:            else if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 34140) { DiffMode = 3; }
./main.cpp:1641:            else if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 15200) { DiffMode = 2; }
./main.cpp:1644:        if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1645:        else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1646:        else if (DiffMode == 3) { return DarkGravityWave(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1647:        else if (DiffMode == 4) { return DarkGravityWave3(pindexLast, pblock); }
root@alpha01:/usr/src/darkcoin/src# grep -nr DarkGravityWave ./*
./main.cpp:1485:unsigned int static DarkGravityWave(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock) {
./main.cpp:1562:unsigned int static DarkGravityWave3(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock) {
./main.cpp:1646:        else if (DiffMode == 3) { return DarkGravityWave(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1647:        else if (DiffMode == 4) { return DarkGravityWave3(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1648:        return DarkGravityWave3(pindexLast, pblock);
root@alpha01:/usr/src/darkcoin/src# cd ../../CasinoCoin/src
root@alpha01:/usr/src/CasinoCoin/src# grep -nr DiffMode ./*
Binary file ./casinocoind matches
./main.cpp:1294:	int DiffMode = 1;
./main.cpp:1297:		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 100) { DiffMode = 2; }
./main.cpp:1301:		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 227000) { DiffMode = 2; }
./main.cpp:1304:	if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
./main.cpp:1305:	else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
Binary file ./obj/main.o matches
root@alpha01:/usr/src/CasinoCoin/src# 

Going through the diff now from darkcoinproject/darkcoin and casinocoin. Looks like the section dealing with subsidy will need to be adapted to the darkcoin version since we want to preserve historical balance and diff calculations for casinocoin. There is also an algorithms library that needs to be pulled in. Also changes to block.CheckBlock. Seems to hae more parameters in darkcoin's src.

Hey one thing we need to do after the new code comes out is go through and break out many of these sections better. Everything shouldn't be jammed into main.cpp like this with hard coded values everywhere.

[staplezjay]

yah transcoder is a messy coder and i think the only way to get past the block is mine the shit out of it
will this code stop another hard fork forever? as far as we know, Iv been reading about KGW bug  and alot of dif stuff about it,

1 person says kgw exploit was attacked by a hacker
2 person says kgw bug is caused by one some one with low-hash-miner jumps around into multi-pools with high-off-hash-miners and it makes a difficult swing and vice versa if a pool if full of cpu miners and a cubeminer comes in.
3 mine or dont mine that is the question
(im gonna stay mining at e-pool)

[JohnnyM]

Cuddenr diff is 540.1266326904297. If we all can throw some decent hashing power, we can try to get this block done.
With  1x ATI Radeon R280X (750Kh/s):
Expected Time per Block:   35 days 19 hours
Probability of a Block in 7 days:   17.76%
Probability of a Block in 14 days:   32.37%
Probability of a Block in 30 days:   56.75%

For 100x ATI Radeon R280X:
Expected Time per Block:   8 hours 35 min
Probability of a Block in 1 hour:   10.99%
Probability of a Block in 6 hours:   50.26%
Probability of a Block in 12 hours:   75.26%
Probability of a Block in 1 day:   93.88%
Probability of a Block in 2 days:   99.63%

So, maybe "Just Do IT"

[Kovaks]

I am in e-pool. Go all finding block!

[staplezjay]

I am in e-pool. Go all finding block!

me 2 on and of but I wana do bitcoil

[CartmanSPC]

The miners who are on this coin when the diff breaks will get a bunch of really low diff blocks so there's some incentive for them.

I'm afraid that without the fix the blockchain could get stuck again so I'm kind of torn between breaking the hold (by solving the block) or letting it be until we can get it fixed. Although the best thing for the coin would be to break this hold ASAP so we can get transactions flowing again.

[kruug]

Although the best thing for the coin would be to break this hold ASAP so we can get transactions flowing again.

Honestly, I would say that's the best right now.  Get the faith back into the coin.  It's going to take a lot of work to get the hold broken, so while we're breaking the chain, upgrade the wallet/fix the issue at the same time!

[Spakler]

The miners who are on this coin when the diff breaks will get a bunch of really low diff blocks so there's some incentive for them.

I'm afraid that without the fix the blockchain could get stuck again so I'm kind of torn between breaking the hold (by solving the block) or letting it be until we can get it fixed. Although the best thing for the coin would be to break this hold ASAP so we can get transactions flowing again.

In that case, i activated Bitraise.me again. Lets get this coin up & running again!

[veertje]

I think we might do a total relaunch of Casinocoin as soon as all is well and adjusted. Should attract a lot of new people too. Than CSC is reborn again!

[kruug]

In that case, i activated Bitraise.me again. Lets get this coin up & running again!

Signed up to add my power to your pool, but still waiting on the confirmation e-mail.

When I start my miner, I get this error:

[2014-05-16 15:18:57] JSON-RPC call failed: [
   -3,
   "Method 'subscribe' not found for service 'mining'",
   "Traceback: <class 'stratum.custom_exceptions.MethodNotFoundException'>: Method 'subscribe' not found for service 'mining'\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py:81:callWithContext\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/posixbase.py:586:_doReadOrWrite\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/tcp.py:199:doRead\n/root/stratum/stratum/protocol.py:192:dataReceived\n--- <exception caught here> ---\n/root/stratum/stratum/protocol.py:238:lineReceived\n/root/stratum/stratum/services.py:13:_handle_event\n/root/stratum/stratum/services.py:75:call\n"
]


Sorted.

I think we might do a total relaunch of Casinocoin as soon as all is well and adjusted. Should attract a lot of new people too. Than CSC is reborn again!

Is there someway that we can get the CSC subreddit unlocked?

[casinocoin]

Thanks for mining guys ive got my little bit of hashpower going!

We have a member of the community going to make the required updates to our code (hoping today or the next)
At what block should we fork, im thinking the next one as the difficulty is very high and it's likely it will take 3+ days to find the next block.
OR we can do it sometime in the future a few hundred blocks down.


Hmm are you trying to solo mine currently?

As well I have no idea who locked the sub reddit but i started a new one here http://www.reddit.com/r/casinocoins/


What is everyones thought on merged mining as well?
Mine say ltc along side CSC. It incentives people to mine for both as CSC is a very big money maker for some, and could bring some new people into the picture who will hold and gamble with the coins.

[CartmanSPC]

What is everyones thought on merged mining as well?
Mine say ltc along side CSC. It incentives people to mine for both as CSC is a very big money maker for some, and could bring some new people into the picture who will hold and gamble with the coins.

Wow, there's a thought! I like...

Also, we solved the block! Back in business for now

See the low diff (0) for a while after...congrats to the miners. Well deserved:

[Spakler]

Also, we solved the block! Back in business for now

I was wondering, could my pool have anything to do with this? I think we found the last block before  everything got stuck:
https://bitraise.me/index.php?page=statistics&action=round&height=440127

I just restarted everything (casinocoin deamon, stratum server and stuff like db and webserver), and now it all gets synced again¿

[veertje]

Someone should inform litebit, that we are running again! Nice that the block is found so soon.

[Spakler]

Someone should inform litebit, that we are running again! Nice that the block is found so soon.

I just sent them a tweet.

[veertje]

Someone should inform litebit, that we are running again! Nice that the block is found so soon.

I just sent them a tweet.

They just removed CSC, hope they add it again after the tweet.

I also have send them a message by the contact-form.

[casinocoin]

Ok perfect!! So next block obv wont be for the fork we will have to have it done sometime in the future.

@Cartman do you like the idea as it could be done before the next hardfork release of the wallet.

Glad to get things going again going to take casinocoincity out of maintenance mode awaiting on a reply for the code changes(digishield will be added)

[CartmanSPC]

I don't know how merged mining would work but that is a separate deal than fixing the difficulty calculation. Was thinking the at the hashrate from LTC could protect the coin simply due to the sheer size.

Sounded like a good idea but how have the coins fared that have merged mining with BTC? I really don't know enough about it to comment. I recall that the LTC dev suggested that DOGE change their coin to be merge mined with them but they scoffed at the idea.