h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2013, 04:02:09 PM |
|
did u update caps client already? diff is very low now
No. Has the dev decided on a fork? I see that the github is no longer listed in his posting, but now the source is a zip download. Seems fishy, and I'm not sure I want to be burned again, but I'll check it out.
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
July 29, 2013, 04:10:38 PM |
|
do u make your own calculations or do u trust coinchoose?
coinchoose isnt right always. f.e. nvc blockreward is wrong atm
I do my own calculations. My NVC block reward is correct. Being fixed now as I understand the magic formula for block reward.
|
|
|
|
Cryptos2go
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 04:29:50 PM |
|
did u update caps client already? diff is very low now
No. Has the dev decided on a fork? I see that the github is no longer listed in his posting, but now the source is a zip download. Seems fishy, and I'm not sure I want to be burned again, but I'll check it out. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.440
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 29, 2013, 05:09:01 PM Last edit: July 29, 2013, 06:30:02 PM by fredeq |
|
So I got the cgwatcher, very nice program, actually it boosted my output by 10Kh per card somehow with the same settings I always input configuration as argument line and that way it works with cgwatcher perfectly. I started to meddle a bit with *.conf type of configuration(my first time) and I have a problem. What I did was just import line arguments, it made a conf settings then I exported it to conf file. When I start mining with profile that uses conf file my gpu usage is 95% for all cards instead of 99% (when I use argument config). Any thoughts? E:I have created conf file directly from cgminer, works with 99% load this way.
|
|
|
|
vingaard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
|
|
July 29, 2013, 05:59:26 PM |
|
Please... could anyone explain me this?... I have recorded my earnings sheets in order to see how the pool works, and there are some data I can't understand... As you can see I have saved data for differents times (with my poor 7850 ) The data I've remarked tell us that balance is constant so, all immature BTC that desappear from inmature cell must appear in unexchanged cell... no? it means that desappear from immature cell up to 0.00123874 BTC but the increase in unexchanged cell is only 0.00007399 BTC, on the other hand, balance cell remains with the same value... so... can anyone explain me this?... I mean I can understand that from unexchanged cell to balance cell will exist a variation due to different sales but I can't understand from immature and unexchanged cell (because I suppose that we don't take into account orphaned blocks in immature cell) Thanks in advance (I suppose I'm wrong somewhere in my argument but I don't know where ) Uuuups... and... I'm sorry for my english
|
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:17:25 PM |
|
Is there any issue with using the same bitcoin address (username) across all my miners?
Thanks.
JR
|
|
|
|
xminerx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
quickest cross blockchain transactions
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:39:26 PM Last edit: July 29, 2013, 11:05:57 PM by xminerx |
|
Over the last 8 hours I've had 18.4% rejected shares
|
|
|
|
Kuroth
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:42:24 PM |
|
1.57 Rejects for me over last 24 hrs.
|
|
|
|
ocmoho
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:43:11 PM |
|
Is there any issue with using the same bitcoin address (username) across all my miners?
Thanks.
JR
Shouldn't be im doing the same with no problems
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:51:02 PM |
|
it means that desappear from immature cell up to 0.00123874 BTC but the increase in unexchanged cell is only 0.00007399 BTC, on the other hand, balance cell remains with the same value... so... can anyone explain me this?
There may be a bug right now that makes the balance column lag. So it's displaying the balances from a few minutes ago.
|
|
|
|
CoinBuzz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:55:56 PM |
|
H2o> any news from the VARDIFF problem?
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:58:08 PM |
|
H2o> any news from the VARDIFF problem?
I'm not going to fix that. It didn't seem like a simple fix. The real test is comparing low diff to high diff, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:04:44 PM |
|
I'm running about 1200 kHash and just started mining MilddleCoin network. After about 10 minutes I've had like 13 accepts and 1 reject and lots of Stratum from pool 0 detected new block. Am I actually mining anything much? Gonna try for a few days and see how it averages against single coin mining. Unless I'm not actually mining much right now.
Thanks.
JR
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:07:52 PM |
|
I'm running about 1200 kHash and just started mining MilddleCoin network. After about 10 minutes I've had like 13 accepts and 1 reject and lots of Stratum from pool 0 detected new block. Am I actually mining anything much? Gonna try for a few days and see how it averages against single coin mining. Unless I'm not actually mining much right now.
Thanks.
JR
That's normal to see a bunch of "detected new block" in between accepts, occasionally. It means we're mining LKY or something. If you're concerned, check how your rejected MH/s looks compared to everyone else's. If it's on par, then you're fine.
|
|
|
|
ranlo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:09:38 PM |
|
I'm running about 1200 kHash and just started mining MilddleCoin network. After about 10 minutes I've had like 13 accepts and 1 reject and lots of Stratum from pool 0 detected new block. Am I actually mining anything much? Gonna try for a few days and see how it averages against single coin mining. Unless I'm not actually mining much right now.
Thanks.
JR
That's normal to see a bunch of "detected new block" in between accepts, occasionally. It means we're mining LKY or something. If you're concerned, check how your rejected MH/s looks compared to everyone else's. If it's on par, then you're fine. 4.3434 1.4820 Accept | Reject MH/s...
|
|
|
|
Cryptos2go
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:10:03 PM |
|
It was a good few days. I'm averaging about .145 btc/day. Looking forward to the better optimizations for the faster coins. This pool is already averaging 80+% of my normal returns (BTC) which is pretty good considering the market, add in the convenience and lower risk I'd say it's well worth it.
Thanks for the great pool!
|
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:12:26 PM |
|
I'm running about 1200 kHash and just started mining MiddleCoin network. After about 10 minutes I've had like 13 accepts and 1 reject and lots of Stratum from pool 0 detected new block. Am I actually mining anything much? Gonna try for a few days and see how it averages against single coin mining. Unless I'm not actually mining much right now.
Thanks.
JR
That's normal to see a bunch of "detected new block" in between accepts, occasionally. It means we're mining LKY or something. If you're concerned, check how your rejected MH/s looks compared to everyone else's. If it's on par, then you're fine. 4.3434 1.4820 Accept | Reject MH/s... Thanks for the reply. I assume with a 512k difficulty I shouldn't put my CPU miners into this pool? I have a couple beefy systems that are pulling like 80 khash each on the CPU so is better than a lot of CPU's but wondering if here it won't be valuable with the difficulty. And FYI I'm not paying for the power so CPU mining is nothing off my back or pocketbook. Thanks. JR
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:14:33 PM |
|
Thanks for the reply. I assume with a 512k difficulty I shouldn't put my CPU miners into this pool? I have a couple beefy systems that are pulling like 80 khash each on the CPU so is better than a lot of CPU's but wondering if here it won't be valuable with the difficulty. And FYI I'm not paying for the power so CPU mining is nothing off my back or pocketbook.
Thanks.
JR
I believe that the difficulty makes no difference in profits. Just how often an accepted share comes up. So I say put your CPUs on it.
|
|
|
|
ranlo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:20:51 PM |
|
I'm running about 1200 kHash and just started mining MiddleCoin network. After about 10 minutes I've had like 13 accepts and 1 reject and lots of Stratum from pool 0 detected new block. Am I actually mining anything much? Gonna try for a few days and see how it averages against single coin mining. Unless I'm not actually mining much right now.
Thanks.
JR
That's normal to see a bunch of "detected new block" in between accepts, occasionally. It means we're mining LKY or something. If you're concerned, check how your rejected MH/s looks compared to everyone else's. If it's on par, then you're fine. 4.3434 1.4820 Accept | Reject MH/s... Thanks for the reply. I assume with a 512k difficulty I shouldn't put my CPU miners into this pool? I have a couple beefy systems that are pulling like 80 khash each on the CPU so is better than a lot of CPU's but wondering if here it won't be valuable with the difficulty. And FYI I'm not paying for the power so CPU mining is nothing off my back or pocketbook. Thanks. JR I don't know... I average 10-20% rejects usually with 10x 7950's, =/. I've seen some other people's stats are a fraction of that so I have no idea what's going wrong. On my local system (1x 7950) I'm at around 11.8% rejects right now.
|
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:18:12 AM |
|
H2odysee, sure heard this a lot but you gotta do something with your website. I strictly use an ipad and finding my stats is a pain in the arse. I had to email myself my bitcoin address. Then have to keep going to my email, copying the address and going back to the webpage and searching for it. Next time i want to check it reload the page, go to my email, copy the address again, search the page in safari. Even if you could make an option where you can pass a parameter in the URL and only return your own would be an improvement: http://middlecoin.com/mystuff.php&address=<bitcoin address> Note I know the greasemonkey script that was done but doesn't work on my ipad. Thanks. JR
|
|
|
|
|