trinsic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 24, 2013, 11:58:58 PM |
|
Did you update your wallet in the past few days?
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 12:57:17 AM |
|
i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?
anyone knows why?
Updated wallet? Correct blockchain?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
bitspill
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 06:08:59 AM |
|
That is called luck ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Maybe if they had 51 of the last 100 blocks I would be more concerned or if this "pattern" were to continue
|
|
|
|
c4shm3n
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 07:13:23 AM |
|
i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?
anyone knows why?
Updated wallet? Correct blockchain? i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well. This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer.
|
,╓▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄╓ ╓▄█████████████████▄╖ ╓▄█████▀▀'▒,,,,,╠'▀▀█████▄, ,▓███▀╜,▄▄███████████▄▄,╙▀████╖ ▄███▀ ▄█████▀▀"``╙"▀▀█████▄ ▀███▄ ▓███╜╓████▀ ,▄▄█████▄▄, ▀████,╙███▌ ▓███`╔███▀ ╓▓███▀▀▀▀▀████╖ ▀███@"███▌ ]███▌┌███▌ ▐███ ███▄ ▐███ ▐███, ▐███ ▐███ .███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ▐███ ▐███ '███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ]███@╙███@ ▀██▌ ,▄██▌ ▐███ ▐███` ▓███ ▐███▄ ╙██▀╩ 9███╜ ╔███▀,███▌ ████,╙███▌ ▓███╜,████ ▀███▄ ▀╜ ▀▀ ▄███▌ ╙████▄, ╓▄████╜ ╙█████▄▄╓, ,╓▄▄█████▀ ▀▀█████████████████▀▀ '▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀'
| CloakCoin | CloakCoin Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digitalcurrency | Enigma Chat | Bitcointalk | Twitter | Forum | Facebook | VK | Reddit | CloakTV | Instagram | Faucet
|
|
|
|
Max Guevara
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Quark developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 07:20:54 AM |
|
i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?
anyone knows why?
Updated wallet? Correct blockchain? i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well. This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer. Try this: 1. Backup wallet 2. Run the wallet with "-salvagewallet" option, e.g. quarkcoin-qt -salvagewallet
3. Unconfirmed balance should be available again.
|
|
|
|
c4shm3n
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 09:31:52 AM |
|
i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?
anyone knows why?
Updated wallet? Correct blockchain? i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well. This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer. Try this: 1. Backup wallet 2. Run the wallet with "-salvagewallet" option, e.g. quarkcoin-qt -salvagewallet
3. Unconfirmed balance should be available again. thank you ! this helps out! now works!
|
,╓▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄╓ ╓▄█████████████████▄╖ ╓▄█████▀▀'▒,,,,,╠'▀▀█████▄, ,▓███▀╜,▄▄███████████▄▄,╙▀████╖ ▄███▀ ▄█████▀▀"``╙"▀▀█████▄ ▀███▄ ▓███╜╓████▀ ,▄▄█████▄▄, ▀████,╙███▌ ▓███`╔███▀ ╓▓███▀▀▀▀▀████╖ ▀███@"███▌ ]███▌┌███▌ ▐███ ███▄ ▐███ ▐███, ▐███ ▐███ .███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ▐███ ▐███ '███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ]███@╙███@ ▀██▌ ,▄██▌ ▐███ ▐███` ▓███ ▐███▄ ╙██▀╩ 9███╜ ╔███▀,███▌ ████,╙███▌ ▓███╜,████ ▀███▄ ▀╜ ▀▀ ▄███▌ ╙████▄, ╓▄████╜ ╙█████▄▄╓, ,╓▄▄█████▀ ▀▀█████████████████▀▀ '▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀'
| CloakCoin | CloakCoin Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digitalcurrency | Enigma Chat | Bitcointalk | Twitter | Forum | Facebook | VK | Reddit | CloakTV | Instagram | Faucet
|
|
|
|
stonefoz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 10:22:54 AM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 10:45:20 AM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf Nice, keep up the good work.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Majormax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 11:41:49 AM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf Thanks for that ! ..sent 4400 QRK Are you working on any other QRK projects or services ?
|
|
|
|
Neisklar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 12:37:59 PM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf Nice one. For groestl512 the AES extensions in modern cpus could be used: http://bench.cr.yp.to/impl-hash/groestl512.htmlCurrently thats a wthing i'm working on, or at least started, but there is currently to much other stuff to be done:(
|
BTC: 1LZQkJCojCiomDb1FdFXN5g1Gtc6n95acB - QRK: QRrcffSmb6jqw6RmZLtJ6skg71AXRG3S6y
|
|
|
Neisklar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 01:06:26 PM |
|
Nevermind now, couldn't get the damn thing to work. ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) What was the problem?
|
BTC: 1LZQkJCojCiomDb1FdFXN5g1Gtc6n95acB - QRK: QRrcffSmb6jqw6RmZLtJ6skg71AXRG3S6y
|
|
|
ig0tik3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 01:15:36 PM |
|
intresting statistic from p2p pool ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs020.radikal.ru%2Fi723%2F1308%2F27%2F52de6eb21d4a.jpg&t=665&c=FnN02RF9h6KNwQ) gpuminer or botnet???
|
|
|
|
aymar_est
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 01:46:09 PM |
|
Anyone able to get payout from this pool? My shares has not been get paid so far.
|
|
|
|
bitspill
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 01:58:49 PM |
|
Anyone able to get payout from this pool? My shares has not been get paid so far. 50 kh/s received shares for first hour, 46 blocks, but then they stopped coming so I went back to solo for now
|
|
|
|
ZirconiumX
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 03:56:21 PM |
|
Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.
Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.
As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.
Matthew:out
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 04:04:08 PM |
|
Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.
Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.
As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.
Matthew:out
well, almost any CPU thats worth it has AES-NI support, a simple check in the configure script can handle it while in the code its handled with #ifdef ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
ZirconiumX
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 05:49:50 PM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf Is this faster than the other quarkcoin cpuminer? By a long shot, yes. I get an 85% speedup from using it. Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.
Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.
As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.
Matthew:out
well, almost any CPU thats worth it has AES-NI support, a simple check in the configure script can handle it while in the code its handled with #ifdef ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) So you've never heard of the Core 2 family then? At least two people in this thread use Core 2 based Xeon chips. For £35 each, they are a bargain. Matthew:out
|
|
|
|
aymar_est
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 06:06:28 PM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf Is this faster than the other quarkcoin cpuminer? By a long shot, yes. I get an 85% speedup from using it. So do you know how to solo mine with that miner?
|
|
|
|
shazbits
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 07:00:03 PM |
|
Is it normal that my QRK address doesn't show up in the p2pool payments page? Been mining (with accepted shares) for a couple of hours but I don't see my address in their payment page nor in the block explorer and no incoming transactions.
|
|
|
|
mrmanager
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 25, 2013, 11:53:18 PM |
|
Finally put my code up on github. https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerI'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner. Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer. I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar. BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf I cannot get it to compile. I'm on Ubuntu 13.04 and I get stuck at: "checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes ./configure: line 5534: syntax error near unexpected token `,' ./configure: line 5534: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'" Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|