[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[trinsic]

Did you update your wallet in the past few days?

[1714784063]

1714784063

[1714784063]

1714784063

[1714784063]

1714784063

[Lauda]

i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?

anyone knows why?

Updated wallet?
Correct blockchain?

[bitspill]

5 blocks in a row for the P2Pool, not good. Is that almost a 51% attack?

https://i.imgur.com/tcBwsk7.png

That is called luck

Maybe if they had 51 of the last 100 blocks I would be more concerned or if this "pattern" were to continue

[c4shm3n]

i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?

anyone knows why?

Updated wallet?
Correct blockchain?

i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well.

This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer.

[Max Guevara]

i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?

anyone knows why?

Updated wallet?
Correct blockchain?

i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well.

This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer.

Try this:

1. Backup wallet

2. Run the wallet with "-salvagewallet" option, e.g.

Code:

quarkcoin-qt -salvagewallet

3. Unconfirmed balance should be available again.

[c4shm3n]

i have send 2000 QRK from my windows QT-Wallet to another adress and i dont get any confirmation in wallet it shows since 6h 0 of 6 confirmation?

anyone knows why?

Updated wallet?
Correct blockchain?

i send before i have it updated it didnt work and then i downloaded new version of qt and nothing happend with last big transfer so i tested and send a 0.01 qrk but it the same no confirmations as well.

This times qt want a transfer fees this wasnt in past, but still have no confirmation and no transfer.

Try this:

1. Backup wallet

2. Run the wallet with "-salvagewallet" option, e.g.

Code:

quarkcoin-qt -salvagewallet

3. Unconfirmed balance should be available again.

thank you !

this helps out!

now works!

[stonefoz]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

[Lauda]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

Nice, keep up the good work.

[Majormax]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

Thanks for that !  ..sent 4400 QRK

Are you working on any other  QRK projects or services ?

[Neisklar]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

Nice one.

For groestl512 the AES extensions in modern cpus could be used:
http://bench.cr.yp.to/impl-hash/groestl512.html

Currently thats a wthing i'm working on, or at least started, but there is currently to much other stuff to be done:(

[Neisklar]

Nevermind now, couldn't get the damn thing to work. 

What was the problem?

[ig0tik3d]

intresting statistic from p2p pool



gpuminer or botnet???

[aymar_est]

No, this is not a new qt wallet, only a standalone miner that mines more efficiently than the miner built into the qt wallet. You keep your current qt wallet application and wallet.dat file the same.

See this thread for using the miner on the p2pool:

http://forum.quarkcoin.org/Thread-Quark-Mining-Pool-Creation-Needed?pid=74#pid74

It's basically:

Code:

minerd_xyz.exe [b]-a quark[/b] -t <numthreads> -o http://176.221.46.81:8372 [b]-u <youquarkaddress>[/b]

This pool takes cucrrently 3% fee, which you can verify yourself:
http://176.221.46.81:8372/fee

Please also inform you about how p2pool works, esp about that fake difficulty:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Payout_logic
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

----snip---

Putting the hash_init-stuff outside of the loop isn't gaining anthing in cpuminer

Anyone able to get payout from this pool?

My shares has not been get paid so far.

[bitspill]

No, this is not a new qt wallet, only a standalone miner that mines more efficiently than the miner built into the qt wallet. You keep your current qt wallet application and wallet.dat file the same.

See this thread for using the miner on the p2pool:

http://forum.quarkcoin.org/Thread-Quark-Mining-Pool-Creation-Needed?pid=74#pid74

It's basically:

Code:

minerd_xyz.exe [b]-a quark[/b] -t <numthreads> -o http://176.221.46.81:8372 [b]-u <youquarkaddress>[/b]

This pool takes cucrrently 3% fee, which you can verify yourself:
http://176.221.46.81:8372/fee

Please also inform you about how p2pool works, esp about that fake difficulty:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Payout_logic
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

----snip---

Putting the hash_init-stuff outside of the loop isn't gaining anthing in cpuminer

Anyone able to get payout from this pool?

My shares has not been get paid so far.

50 kh/s received shares for first hour, 46 blocks, but then they stopped coming so I went back to solo for now

[ZirconiumX]

Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.

Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.

As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.

Matthew:out

[K1773R]

Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.

Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.

As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.

Matthew:out

well, almost any CPU thats worth it has AES-NI support, a simple check in the configure script can handle it while in the code its handled with #ifdef

[ZirconiumX]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

Is this faster than the other quarkcoin cpuminer?

By a long shot, yes. I get an 85% speedup from using it.

Something I've only just noticed: the Quarkcoin splash screen has a copyright year of 20,013.

Huh. I guess Quarkcoin really *is* the future.

As for AES-NI - don't forget that code won't run on processors that don't support it.

Matthew:out

well, almost any CPU thats worth it has AES-NI support, a simple check in the configure script can handle it while in the code its handled with #ifdef

So you've never heard of the Core 2 family then?

At least two people in this thread use Core 2 based Xeon chips. For £35 each, they are a bargain.

Matthew:out

[aymar_est]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

Is this faster than the other quarkcoin cpuminer?

By a long shot, yes. I get an 85% speedup from using it.

So do you know how to solo mine with that miner?

[shazbits]

Is it normal that my QRK address doesn't show up in the p2pool payments page?
Been mining (with accepted shares) for a couple of hours but I don't see my address in their payment page nor in the block explorer and no incoming transactions.

[mrmanager]

Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

I cannot get it to compile. I'm on Ubuntu 13.04 and I get stuck at:

"checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
./configure: line 5534: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5534: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'"

Any help would be appreciated.