[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[eule]

Totally did not want to bash PhenixEx, but the moron sellers. I hate if they do such useless stuff like 1 btc per qrk, indeed more volume is the only solution.

[Conqueror]

Totally did not want to bash PhenixEx, but the moron sellers. I hate if they do such useless stuff like 1 btc per qrk, indeed more volume is the only solution.

Try to sell some for normal price, I will buy few from you to kick it up 

[eule]

Tomorrow, today was the Fuckparade and i am pretty fucked up.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J2sLMP7Qqw 

[Vlad2Vlad]

Totally did not want to bash PhenixEx, but the moron sellers. I hate if they do such useless stuff like 1 btc per qrk, indeed more volume is the only solution.

What? Who would pay 1 BTC per Quark?  Seems pointless.

[Guido]

official Quark Coin community facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/quarkcoin

get it liked!

[Conqueror]

Tomorrow, today was the Fuckparade and i am pretty fucked up.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J2sLMP7Qqw 

I am sure you will like this:
http://www.neatorama.com/2012/02/26/techno-viking-action-figure/#!iuPk9

[Promethium]

10,000 QRK sent
let me know you got it?

never know, may buy you a car one day!
if quark gets to $1 each one day

btw, is the image on a transaperent background? would be cool to have a couple different sizes if possible so people can maybe use on their sites
couple smaller maybe, one bigger
no worries if too much hassle, appreciate work

Thanks, transfer received!
$1 Quark is not such a fantasy, we have a sound base and community support will build.
Unable to upload full size for some strange reason, links to the others follow:
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-240x180_zps12b5ea6e.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-160x120_zps6171c597.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-80x60_zps5e139fcc.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-32x24_zps0f0d8d49.gif


Cheers.

[Promethium]

@quarkcoin @Guido

outstanding!
simply outstanding

whats your qrk wallet addy?

think will add to site whatever its amazing
cheers

Thanks for your words of support.
QRK Wallet: QaPp6tk9byzzEpAorweN1LpnFktGqavEtd

Why did you choose a down quark and not one of the other 6 variations? 

I just used the one adopted for the wallet, no other reason!

[digit]

10,000 QRK sent
let me know you got it?

never know, may buy you a car one day!
if quark gets to $1 each one day

btw, is the image on a transaperent background? would be cool to have a couple different sizes if possible so people can maybe use on their sites
couple smaller maybe, one bigger
no worries if too much hassle, appreciate work

Thanks, transfer received!
$1 Quark is not such a fantasy, we have a sound base and community support will build.
Unable to upload full size for some strange reason, links to the others follow:
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-240x180_zps12b5ea6e.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-160x120_zps6171c597.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-80x60_zps5e139fcc.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-32x24_zps0f0d8d49.gif


Cheers.

this looks awesome! is it free to for anyone to use now?

[Dps23]

It just started...only way to add volume is to trade But I believe it is promising exchange worth to try, they just finished chat system, added bunch of new coins, affiliate system works well and API is also working...I see lot of progress and development

almost perfect exchange unfotunately so far it is missing one quite important ingredience..... there is no volume.....
and without volume it is quite a problem....
but I must admit that it is well done but they should offer something to attract people and liquidity, I tried to bought several coins but of course so far without success. And I am thinking of sending my funds away....
In this initial period they should offer eg trading of new coins which are not possible to trade anywhere else or low fees or some special news for cryptocoin community otherwise I dont know why I should put my money and enable them liquidity with my funds....

[Guido]

10,000 QRK sent
let me know you got it?

never know, may buy you a car one day!
if quark gets to $1 each one day

btw, is the image on a transaperent background? would be cool to have a couple different sizes if possible so people can maybe use on their sites
couple smaller maybe, one bigger
no worries if too much hassle, appreciate work

Thanks, transfer received!
$1 Quark is not such a fantasy, we have a sound base and community support will build.
Unable to upload full size for some strange reason, links to the others follow:
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-240x180_zps12b5ea6e.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-160x120_zps6171c597.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-80x60_zps5e139fcc.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-32x24_zps0f0d8d49.gif


Cheers.

awesome, thanks for these

[BChydro]

For scrypt mining (and scrypt-jane) it takes 65536 hashes to get a share of diff 1. It also takes 65536 shares (diff 1) for every point of difficulty to find a block. This doesn't seem to be the case for QRK. Does anyone know these values for QRK?

[Spoetnik]

be nice to get uncle_bobs newest git code to work.. GCC on windows throws compiler errors. *STILL

can ANYONE get it to build ?

this is the best code base ? or should i go with the other one ?

here is my build log..

Code:

$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -fno-strict-aliasing -I./
compat/jansson -I/c/mingw64/include   -msse4.1 -O3 -MT minerd-quark.o -MD -MP -M
F .deps/minerd-quark.Tpo -c -o minerd-quark.o `test -f 'quark.c' || echo './'`qu
ark.c
quark.c: In function 'quarkhash':
quark.c:95:13: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer targe
t type [enabled by default]
quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

mv -f .deps/minerd-quark.Tpo .deps/minerd-quark.Po
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99  -msse4.1 -O3   -o minerd.exe minerd-cpu-miner
.o minerd-util.o minerd-sha2.o minerd-sha2-arm.o minerd-sha2-x86.o minerd-sha2-x
64.o minerd-scrypt.o minerd-scrypt-arm.o minerd-scrypt-x86.o minerd-scrypt-x64.o
 minerd-quark.o minerd-grso.o -L/c/mingw64/lib -lcurl -lwldap32 -lws2_32 compat/
jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread -lws2_32
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `grsoTransform'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.text+0x1170): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.text+0x3d0): multiple definition of `grsoOutputTransforma
tion'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.text+0x7d0): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x0): multiple definition of `grsoT7'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x70): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x800): multiple definition of `grsoT6'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x1000): multiple definition of `grsoT5'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x1070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x1800): multiple definition of `grsoT4'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x1870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x2000): multiple definition of `grsoT3'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x2070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x2800): multiple definition of `grsoT2'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x2870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x3000): multiple definition of `grsoT1'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x3070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x3800): multiple definition of `grsoT0'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x3870): first defined here
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [minerd.exe] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2

[Promethium]

10,000 QRK sent
let me know you got it?

never know, may buy you a car one day!
if quark gets to $1 each one day

btw, is the image on a transaperent background? would be cool to have a couple different sizes if possible so people can maybe use on their sites
couple smaller maybe, one bigger
no worries if too much hassle, appreciate work

Thanks, transfer received!
$1 Quark is not such a fantasy, we have a sound base and community support will build.
Unable to upload full size for some strange reason, links to the others follow:
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-240x180_zps12b5ea6e.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-160x120_zps6171c597.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-80x60_zps5e139fcc.gif
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae214/promethium00/Quark-Rotating-32x24_zps0f0d8d49.gif


Cheers.

this looks awesome! is it free to for anyone to use now?

Use and distribute as you see fit.

[stonefoz]

be nice to get uncle_bobs newest git code to work.. GCC on windows throws compiler errors. *STILL

can ANYONE get it to build ?

this is the best code base ? or should i go with the other one ?

here is my build log..

Code:

$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -fno-strict-aliasing -I./
compat/jansson -I/c/mingw64/include   -msse4.1 -O3 -MT minerd-quark.o -MD -MP -M
F .deps/minerd-quark.Tpo -c -o minerd-quark.o `test -f 'quark.c' || echo './'`qu
ark.c
quark.c: In function 'quarkhash':
quark.c:95:13: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer targe
t type [enabled by default]
quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

quark.c:124:13: warning: right shift count >= width of type [enabled by default]

mv -f .deps/minerd-quark.Tpo .deps/minerd-quark.Po
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99  -msse4.1 -O3   -o minerd.exe minerd-cpu-miner
.o minerd-util.o minerd-sha2.o minerd-sha2-arm.o minerd-sha2-x86.o minerd-sha2-x
64.o minerd-scrypt.o minerd-scrypt-arm.o minerd-scrypt-x86.o minerd-scrypt-x64.o
 minerd-quark.o minerd-grso.o -L/c/mingw64/lib -lcurl -lwldap32 -lws2_32 compat/
jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread -lws2_32
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `grsoTransform'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.text+0x1170): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.text+0x3d0): multiple definition of `grsoOutputTransforma
tion'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.text+0x7d0): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x0): multiple definition of `grsoT7'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x70): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x800): multiple definition of `grsoT6'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x1000): multiple definition of `grsoT5'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x1070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x1800): multiple definition of `grsoT4'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x1870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x2000): multiple definition of `grsoT3'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x2070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x2800): multiple definition of `grsoT2'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x2870): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x3000): multiple definition of `grsoT1'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x3070): first defined here
minerd-grso.o:grso.c:(.rdata+0x3800): multiple definition of `grsoT0'
minerd-quark.o:quark.c:(.rdata+0x3870): first defined here
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [minerd.exe] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/code/quarkminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Makefile.am must have "grso.c" added to "minerd_SOURCES", it shouldn't be there. At least some of the functions can get in-lined and confuse the compiler less, if all compiled at once.

quark.c just #includes "bunch of .c file". it shouldn't be also made separately. Anyway, you're log shows that it is brought in from #includes and compiled separate.

Edit Makefile.am, run autogen.sh, "make distclean", configure with CFLAGS, and make.

I know someone else had posted windows builds. I don't have a working system to test it, would require setting up probably cygwin...  I can try it all out in a vm, but i wouldn't optimize around it.

[Spoetnik]

already tried adding it numerous times dude

trust me this shit is messed up.. if you can compile it feel free to gimme advice

so far i've gotten, "well some builds may be broken"

lol

so people may want to know their screwed if they see the getting started page on the SRC pool i'm on for example
whether it says to go grab it and compile it etc

people passing around failed messy broken git code links s pretty lame !
luckily no one seems to care hahha


and someone posting misc builds proves nothing.. doesn't mean it was current from GIT

[robolove]

almost perfect exchange unfotunately so far it is missing one quite important ingredience..... there is no volume.....
and without volume it is quite a problem....
but I must admit that it is well done but they should offer something to attract people and liquidity, I tried to bought several coins but of course so far without success. And I am thinking of sending my funds away....
In this initial period they should offer eg trading of new coins which are not possible to trade anywhere else or low fees or some special news for cryptocoin community otherwise I dont know why I should put my money and enable them liquidity with my funds....

Agree 100 %. The pathetic trade volume is a serious problem. Also, the difficulty has halved over the past 24 hours. In other words, the support from both miners and traders is decreasing fast. Those are very bad signs for the future of Quarkcoin.

[eule]

Sounds like someone switched off a botnet (or his boss found out). The hashrate on the few p2pools I checked, including mine, is rather stable. Also, was the diff really above 950? I don't look for the diff often, didn't notice that.

[stonefoz]

already tried adding it numerous times dude

trust me this shit is messed up.. if you can compile it feel free to gimme advice

so far i've gotten, "well some builds may be broken"

lol

so people may want to know their screwed if they see the getting started page on the SRC pool i'm on for example
whether it says to go grab it and compile it etc

people passing around failed messy broken git code links s pretty lame !
luckily no one seems to care hahha


and someone posting misc builds proves nothing.. doesn't mean it was current from GIT

NO NO NO, IT IS NOT ADDED.

[victzhang]

almost perfect exchange unfotunately so far it is missing one quite important ingredience..... there is no volume.....
and without volume it is quite a problem....
but I must admit that it is well done but they should offer something to attract people and liquidity, I tried to bought several coins but of course so far without success. And I am thinking of sending my funds away....
In this initial period they should offer eg trading of new coins which are not possible to trade anywhere else or low fees or some special news for cryptocoin community otherwise I dont know why I should put my money and enable them liquidity with my funds....

Agree 100 %. The pathetic trade volume is a serious problem. Also, the difficulty has halved over the past 24 hours. In other words, the support from both miners and traders is decreasing fast. Those are very bad signs for the future of Quarkcoin.

I didn't notice a big change in the difficulty. Recently it is always fluctuating around 500 (sometimes ~400, sometimes ~600). Also, the supply is decreasing dramatically due to the reduced block reward. So, to some extent,  it is expected that the trade volume also goes down.