almightyruler
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
|
 |
September 14, 2013, 08:57:05 PM |
|
How does one tell which chain they're on? My client is currently showing 75,003 blocks with a difficulty of 0.0256. I installed it for the first time about a week ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
myweblife
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
mycoin.bitbank.com
|
|
September 14, 2013, 09:15:36 PM |
|
How does one tell which chain they're on? My client is currently showing 75,003 blocks with a difficulty of 0.0256. I installed it for the first time about a week ago.
75025 |
investment&deposit your BTC on bitbankmining BTC on |
|
|
snoopdoug
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2013, 04:52:15 AM |
|
I will be working on getting it patched up before I leave town tonight but no guarantees. I will be back 9-9-2013 and have it fixed then if not tonight This is not going to be good for some people. the two chains separated over 15,000 blocks ago it seems Invalid chain:received block c6db6c62a25bec74cb52
SetBestChain: new best=c6db6c62a25bec74cb52 height=48123 trust=1174598002 date=08/24/13 07:09:53 SetBestChain: new best=00000001bc20a5faa994 height=48123 trust=1157820531 date=08/24/13 07:09:49 I agree that 00000001bc20a5faa994 is the valid block. The bottlecaps fix has been propagated to my github repo at: https://github.com/snoopcode/coinsI also added a checkpoint at height 64,000. Check it out and see if you agree with the changes. Let's keep Lebowskis alive - don't let the Dude down! |
|
|
|
|
|
Desten
|
|
September 15, 2013, 05:50:23 PM |
|
If cryptsy will be on invalid chain then dude died already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
broken_pixel
|
|
September 18, 2013, 12:12:18 AM |
|
v1.0.0.0-g32a928e-dude-abides
The wallet syncs and is generating stake.
|
GA-990FXA-UD5, 1x 7970L, 2x S1, AX1200i, RIVBE, 2x R290x, NEX1500, BTC: 1G9cQix8bMgh35MQ9wY3Rb9yNSSCtnoRmK, DGC: DFo9FcKYsutv9Vx5c5xUzkrt7VJdECZWTM, LTC: LaAN33aktPGaimN5ALL9kjHjuJekfmKfTh
|
|
|
|
broken_pixel
|
|
September 18, 2013, 12:14:52 AM |
|
At which chain is cryptsy?
I spent some btc's (lot for me) to bought some of them. And now they delisted more than 13 days.
This is not the best occasion for the exchange and for cryptos at all. Fix that asap.
I think that after that accident this cryptocoin most likely will be dead. And trust for others assforks will be knocked down a little...
Cryptsy is on the longer chain with the higher difficulty and the majority of peers. I was sent 1.8 LBW from coins-e to a wallet on a forked chain yesterday. It arrived and confirmed Ummm! What happened to my coins after Crpyptsy delisted them. HYC has been dead for a long time and is still listed on Cryptsy. |
GA-990FXA-UD5, 1x 7970L, 2x S1, AX1200i, RIVBE, 2x R290x, NEX1500, BTC: 1G9cQix8bMgh35MQ9wY3Rb9yNSSCtnoRmK, DGC: DFo9FcKYsutv9Vx5c5xUzkrt7VJdECZWTM, LTC: LaAN33aktPGaimN5ALL9kjHjuJekfmKfTh
|
|
|
|
broken_pixel
|
|
September 18, 2013, 12:24:07 AM |
|
yesi can start it and it sync's, but i mined like 130 lbw's at diggers pool, sent them to myself and they have still never shown up, that was 4 days ago.
j
post your address I will send you one to test. |
GA-990FXA-UD5, 1x 7970L, 2x S1, AX1200i, RIVBE, 2x R290x, NEX1500, BTC: 1G9cQix8bMgh35MQ9wY3Rb9yNSSCtnoRmK, DGC: DFo9FcKYsutv9Vx5c5xUzkrt7VJdECZWTM, LTC: LaAN33aktPGaimN5ALL9kjHjuJekfmKfTh
|
|
|
FinShaggy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Google/YouTube
|
|
September 18, 2013, 12:55:36 AM |
|
Wait so is this real?
|
If everyone is thinking outside the box, there is a new box.
|
|
|
Don007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
|
|
September 19, 2013, 12:29:30 PM |
|
Same here. I mined over 1000 LBW @ Digger's pool, he has the prove that he had paid it out to me but I haven't received a single Lebowski yet.. Atleast, I have none in my wallet yet (6AcyCBF9LyTym3HPNDvoNZRNu4F7GhiiCq).
I think somehome the wallet isn't fully sych'ed, however it shows it is.
|
{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!} -> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <- |
|
|
jelikish
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2013, 02:36:32 PM |
|
Anyone knows if lbw.ltcoin.net is synced ?
We need LBW re-listed on cryptsy so that we can understand who is on the correct chain and who is not.
|
|
|
|
|
Don007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
|
|
September 19, 2013, 02:40:37 PM |
|
That's Digger's pool, which I'm talking about ( http://lbw.ltcoin.net/). |
{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!} -> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <- |
|
|
jelikish
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2013, 06:39:53 PM |
|
Yeah, i transferred some coin from that pool to coins-e and it never made it. I hope it will make it to cryptsy once its re-listed.
|
|
|
|
|
myweblife
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
mycoin.bitbank.com
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:12:42 PM |
|
Same here. I mined over 1000 LBW @ Digger's pool, he has the prove that he had paid it out to me but I haven't received a single Lebowski yet.. Atleast, I have none in my wallet yet (6AcyCBF9LyTym3HPNDvoNZRNu4F7GhiiCq).
I think somehome the wallet isn't fully sych'ed, however it shows it is.
Just send some coin to you for test Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 4 node(s) Date: 2013/9/20 06:11 To: 6AcyCBF9LyTym3HPNDvoNZRNu4F7GhiiCq Debit: -10.00 LBW Transaction fee: -0.001 LBW Net amount: -10.001 LBW Transaction ID: a867133b5c50489a78e9ca8f51ede4f601e4d158510ff277d8574f64c83d24bc |
investment&deposit your BTC on bitbankmining BTC on |
|
|
Don007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:25:35 PM |
|
Thanks for that. It seems that my client is stuck now (while synching). How can I fix this? Can I re-install my wallet or will I loose my LBW's then?
|
{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!} -> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <- |
|
|
myweblife
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
mycoin.bitbank.com
|
|
September 20, 2013, 06:58:08 AM |
|
Just recive some coin,it look my client is fine
Status: 30 confirmations
Date: 2013/9/20 14:25
From: unknown
To: 68JZK4UfpGXCaBkTkQrRQVx1fYMrJZb9iK (own address)
Credit: 10000.00 LBW
Net amount: +10000.00 LBW
Transaction ID: 36272559c4f49f5e1bf581633ef1ed35b72b338c9bf0e11ed7b214abcce66b11
|
investment&deposit your BTC on bitbankmining BTC on |
|
|
Don007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
|
|
September 20, 2013, 07:54:03 AM |
|
It looks like my client does synch, from about 400 blocks till 0. But after that there are about 3400 blocks remaining, which can't be synched or something. Does someone have a solution for this?
|
{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!} -> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <- |
|
|
mullick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 20, 2013, 06:06:24 PM |
|
Well i finally got around to working on this again last night I had done the initial fixes a few weeks ago but was waiting for a response from coins-e I got it past the initial forks and fixed the self forking issue with POS. But now it appears there is another drastic fork about 2k blocks ago. I cant seem to get on the right side of. If anyone is synced past block 81484 and on what appears to be the correct height of 82910 could you possibly send your appdata folder Minus you wallet.dat to bottlecapsfoundation@gmail.comJust your debug.log would be helpfull but due to the lack of explorer I will need a full copy of the chain to get the full hash for the good block as well as stake modifiers Here is the repo but it still needs this final fork resolved https://github.com/Mullick/coinsThanks to balthazar again for his help with caps which is making this possible |
|
|
|
|
almightyruler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
|
|
September 21, 2013, 12:54:05 AM |
|
How do you tell when a fork happens?
My client is currently showing block 83321 with a hash of 00000001d38fa9e7a43c129e2c6fdc27223bb366dc647c9511f968f1a0ab3d85
If this is the correct chain you want (ie you DON'T have this block) then let me know.
Can you get onto the right chain by forcing connect to a specific node?
|
|
|
|
|
BugSpirit
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
September 21, 2013, 05:48:22 AM |
|
I see this picture now
> getinfo
{
"version" : "v1.0.0.0-g32a928e-dude-abides",
"protocolversion" : 60006,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 1012.89809700,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 40.15227200,
"blocks" : 79338,
"moneysupply" : 1581363.25251100,
"connections" : 5,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "128.68.38.185",
"difficulty" : 0.00781238,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1374757052,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
> getpeerifo

[
{
"addr" : "198.50.233.21:7245",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1379741639,
"lastrecv" : 1379741639,
"conntime" : 1379741292,
"version" : 60006,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79335,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "70.98.114.237:7245",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1379741971,
"lastrecv" : 1379741971,
"conntime" : 1379741299,
"version" : 60006,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 83627,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "216.158.85.123:7245",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1379741971,
"lastrecv" : 1379741971,
"conntime" : 1379741349,
"version" : 60006,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 83628,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "198.199.83.168:7245",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1379741639,
"lastrecv" : 1379741639,
"conntime" : 1379741355,
"version" : 60006,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 79335,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "198.211.116.19:7245",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1379741971,
"lastrecv" : 1379741971,
"conntime" : 1379741428,
"version" : 60006,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 83629,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
So there are 2 chains, half of the peers support one of them, the other half another. Now we are to decide which one is correct. Then mine it with all you got and most of clients will follow. Do this or Donnie died in vain.
|
|
|
|
|
almightyruler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
|
|
September 21, 2013, 01:51:58 PM |
|
So you're basically starting the client fresh so that all connections are new, then use startingheight as an indicator of which chain they're on? My mix is not on the fence like yours:
"startingheight" : 84068,
"startingheight" : 84068,
"startingheight" : 84068,
"startingheight" : 84069,
"startingheight" : 84069,
"startingheight" : 84069,
"startingheight" : 84069,
"startingheight" : 84069,
I did getpeerinfo a few times and did see one at 79379, but that disappeared a few seconds later.
edit: going by the heights from your post roughly 8 hours ago...
79335 (then), 79379 (now)
83627 (then), 84068 (now)
First chain has only advanced about 44 blocks, whilst the second has advanced 441 over the same period.
This assumes that the peer which appeared briefly @79379 had the complete chain (even if it was the wrong one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
