Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 04:55:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 [593] 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079883 times)
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 08:51:15 AM
 #11841

We may see a substantial increase from blocks 258728 and 258730, which need 23 and 25 confirms.  Those were from approximately 4-5 hours after Swede's post.  

That's the soonest I'd expect to see full hashrate online, could be later.  

Will be several hours until those blocks pay out.
1710824159
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824159

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824159
Reply with quote  #2

1710824159
Report to moderator
1710824159
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824159

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824159
Reply with quote  #2

1710824159
Report to moderator
1710824159
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824159

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824159
Reply with quote  #2

1710824159
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
E.Sam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:07:31 AM
 #11842

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post).
Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.



here's how the setting page looks like, if anyone's interested...

BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 09:09:10 AM
 #11843

So do you think we have a chance to know what happened between 10 Sep (the day they announced 2Th was mining) and Today?

a) Hashing did not work and they were busy fixing it. b) Hashing worked well, but the BTC mined were lost / hacked / distributed as their bonus. c) There were no hashing at all.
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 09:10:39 AM
 #11844

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post).
Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.

Yes, building a website to show the hashing stats is one of their promises.
dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:14:31 AM
 #11845

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post).
Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.

Take a look at #11824. If they want, they can show us what they have.

E.Sam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:20:47 AM
 #11846

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post).
Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.

Take a look at #11824. If they want, they can show us what they have.

Nice, I must have missed that post.
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 09:21:11 AM
 #11847

Maybe nobody cares any more. Slush's pool has distributed 2 blocks more but nothing went to LC's address.
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 09:23:16 AM
 #11848

So do you think we have a chance to know what happened between 10 Sep (the day they announced 2Th was mining) and Today?

a) Hashing did not work and they were busy fixing it. b) Hashing worked well, but the BTC mined were lost / hacked / distributed as their bonus. c) There were no hashing at all.


I would guess:

d) Hashing worked with variable speed due to issues experienced. Due to solo mining no BTC were mined.


Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:48:29 AM
 #11849

Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC

Wtf...

E.Sam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:51:39 AM
 #11850

Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC

Wtf...

Just saw that... maybe someone trying to manipulate the market this time?
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 09:55:20 AM
 #11851

They came from btcguild.  This address: https://blockchain.info/address/14cZMQk89mRYQkDEj8Rn25AnGoBi5H6uer

Looks like they came to their senses about slush.

BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 09:55:34 AM
 #11852

Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC

Wtf...
They are from this mining address:
14cZMQk89mRYQkDEj8Rn25AnGoBi5H6uer

How did you know it's BTCGuild?
Oh, by the coinbase signature. I see now.
demzie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:04:25 AM
 #11853

Btcguild finally
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:05:44 AM
 #11854

The hashing rate of BTC Guild is 391T.

25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC, so it took more than 5 blocks for 2Th/s to get 0.7 BTC.

By checking the transaction history, however, 0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s.

Great number. Smiley But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate.
NineLives
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 10:06:02 AM
 #11855

Dear experts..

If all works well, what is the expected share rates in say 1year?

I'm trying to understand if they need to be sat on or get a good price?

Ta Smiley

Bitcoin Mining Hardware:   www.mininghardware.co.uk
KCBitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:07:07 AM
 #11856

Btcguild finally
if they have already switched, are we supposed to see their name here:
https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams
(given that they are hashing at a speed greater than 603.81 GH/s)
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:07:47 AM
 #11857

BTC Guild 391T

25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC

0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s.

Great number. Smiley But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate.

All depends how many blocks are in the payout.  I'm sure that info is somewhere...
demzie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:08:09 AM
 #11858

BTC Guild 391T

25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC

0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s.

Great number. Smiley But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate.

Great!
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 10:13:46 AM
 #11859

Most likely, they started mining on slush, and realized it was totally problematic, and switched to BTCGuild (remember, once they started slush hit a 'bad block' that didn't pay out for 6 hours - and if they had any 'instability' it would have meant losing out on payouts due to the way their payouts work)

The problem is we still can't say for CERTAIN because you can carry as large of a balance as you want and then do manual payouts of however much you want. We still need to see a consistent pattern of BTC coming in to make a determination on hashrate.

ThePeshMod
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 10:14:04 AM
 #11860

Btcguild finally
if they have already switched, are we supposed to see their name here:
https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams
(given that they are hashing at a speed greater than 603.81 GH/s)


That's only if they have created a team. Otherwise, it will be in the individual accounts section. Unfortunately, without them telling us the account ID, no way to know which one is LC.
Pages: « 1 ... 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 [593] 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!