Bitcycle
|
|
September 19, 2013, 08:51:15 AM |
|
We may see a substantial increase from blocks 258728 and 258730, which need 23 and 25 confirms. Those were from approximately 4-5 hours after Swede's post.
That's the soonest I'd expect to see full hashrate online, could be later.
Will be several hours until those blocks pay out.
|
|
|
|
E.Sam
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:07:31 AM |
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site. here's how the setting page looks like, if anyone's interested...
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:09:10 AM |
|
So do you think we have a chance to know what happened between 10 Sep (the day they announced 2Th was mining) and Today?
a) Hashing did not work and they were busy fixing it. b) Hashing worked well, but the BTC mined were lost / hacked / distributed as their bonus. c) There were no hashing at all.
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:10:39 AM |
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.
Yes, building a website to show the hashing stats is one of their promises.
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:14:31 AM |
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.
Take a look at #11824. If they want, they can show us what they have.
|
|
|
|
E.Sam
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:20:47 AM |
|
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned that it would be difficult for LC to prove their hashrate while using Slush (can't be bothered to look for post). Anyway, it seems actually quite easy using their API to integrate this info into any site.
Take a look at #11824. If they want, they can show us what they have. Nice, I must have missed that post.
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:21:11 AM |
|
Maybe nobody cares any more. Slush's pool has distributed 2 blocks more but nothing went to LC's address.
|
|
|
|
BitCsByBit
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:23:16 AM |
|
So do you think we have a chance to know what happened between 10 Sep (the day they announced 2Th was mining) and Today?
a) Hashing did not work and they were busy fixing it. b) Hashing worked well, but the BTC mined were lost / hacked / distributed as their bonus. c) There were no hashing at all.
I would guess: d) Hashing worked with variable speed due to issues experienced. Due to solo mining no BTC were mined.
|
Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:48:29 AM |
|
Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC
Wtf...
|
|
|
|
E.Sam
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:51:39 AM |
|
Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC
Wtf...
Just saw that... maybe someone trying to manipulate the market this time?
|
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 09:55:34 AM |
|
Now they're getting coins from some totally new address 0.7BTC
Wtf...
They are from this mining address: 14cZMQk89mRYQkDEj8Rn25AnGoBi5H6uer How did you know it's BTCGuild? Oh, by the coinbase signature. I see now.
|
|
|
|
demzie
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:04:25 AM |
|
Btcguild finally
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:05:44 AM |
|
The hashing rate of BTC Guild is 391T. 25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC, so it took more than 5 blocks for 2Th/s to get 0.7 BTC. By checking the transaction history, however, 0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s. Great number. But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate.
|
|
|
|
NineLives
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:06:02 AM |
|
Dear experts.. If all works well, what is the expected share rates in say 1year? I'm trying to understand if they need to be sat on or get a good price? Ta
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:07:47 AM |
|
BTC Guild 391T 25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC 0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s. Great number. But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate. All depends how many blocks are in the payout. I'm sure that info is somewhere...
|
|
|
|
demzie
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:08:09 AM |
|
BTC Guild 391T 25 * 2 / 391 = 0.127 BTC 0.7BTC could be the income of 2 blocks. So the hashing speed is 391 * 0.7 / 25 = 11 Th/s. Great number. But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate. Great!
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:13:46 AM |
|
Most likely, they started mining on slush, and realized it was totally problematic, and switched to BTCGuild (remember, once they started slush hit a 'bad block' that didn't pay out for 6 hours - and if they had any 'instability' it would have meant losing out on payouts due to the way their payouts work)
The problem is we still can't say for CERTAIN because you can carry as large of a balance as you want and then do manual payouts of however much you want. We still need to see a consistent pattern of BTC coming in to make a determination on hashrate.
|
|
|
|
ThePeshMod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2013, 10:14:04 AM |
|
That's only if they have created a team. Otherwise, it will be in the individual accounts section. Unfortunately, without them telling us the account ID, no way to know which one is LC.
|
|
|
|
|