Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[yanesna3]

I believe in the ICO rating, because the ICO Rating Team has obtained a primer from the upcoming ICO whitepaper of the Telegram Open Network - a crypto initiative that has been said to break the record in terms of hype and investment attention.

Yes I do believe in these ratings as they show the whole picture: the popularity of the ICO, the level of its trust and whatnot. I usually check the rating of the project before I decide whether to invest into it or not.

[seanssoh]

I am Sean Oh, COO @ Reality Reflection Seoul based AR/VR content developer and, VC backed startup company.

We are announcing our first ICO a location-based AR game called Mossland. https://moss.land
Also check this out, please. https://www.vrfocus.com/2018/01/reality-reflection-announces-pre-ico-for-new-ar-title/

I would like to talk with ppl who are interested in our project. I can execute massive marketing to the social media and community websites, but I haven't started yet. I would like to find ppl who would help build a Mossland community first rather than those who only see a return on investment.
 
Find me in Telegram chatroom http://t.me/mossland_eng
I live in Korea but will stay awake all night to meet you guys!

Thanks.

[Rexxxem]

Such ratings, as well as any rating systems in the world are indicative things. They should be paid attention, but do not make decisions based solely on these ratings

[Adam_Smith]

Great question, I myself have met many sites with similar ratings. And I do not understand what their assessments are based on. By and large this is all taken from the information that the developers themselves publish .. but still, can not you buy this rating on the sites, and some scum can have a high rating.

[lovemsngr]

I've heard about this site, but I usually use investopedia.kom, there's a lot of good analytics that I already have for choosing a coin

[Melfoy72]

Great question, I myself have met many sites with similar ratings. And I do not understand what their assessments are based on. By and large this is all taken from the information that the developers themselves publish .. but still, can not you buy this rating on the sites, and some scum can have a high rating.

And we know cases when high ranked ICO turn to scam. May be some ICO couldn't believe that so many investors bought their tokens... and just doesn't know what to do now
But the same time I trust ICObench for example. And I want to believe that some experienced guys can separate cool ICO better than I.

[TreXzar]

I like to look at the ICO ratings as a guide only for its utility only. But also just because it can be useful and has potential doesn't mean it will definitely shoot to the moon.
Heck look at dogecoin... its all a gamble, use it as a positive reason to buy, not a be all end all

[AlexanderAnthony]

I believe but not wholeheartedly, because I also uses ICO ratings, I used the icoratings.com/Ico because for me they are not there without a basis they also have connections and source they have basis and they will not post something out of guess and pulse or gut feeling. But I said that I didn't believe wholeheartedly because in every ICO I can't see a fact sheet where they graph and observe the updated report about the ICO which is very important.

[kallen11]

Yes. i like ICO RATINGS and its very important to me. ICO RATINGS given me information about an ico if it is legit or not and its also our guidelines to choose a better ico.

[cryptomorphines]

I dont really believed to these websites that has ICO rating reviews,because most of them are getting paid to these so called TOP ICOs today.I believe in search researching so i will be sure that my investment wont go to the wrong hands.

[Jafri101]

Yes alot. These ico ratings help an investor to invest wisely. He can see which icos are worth for investing. These ratings actually helps the investors and companies to overcome their hard/soft caps.

[Angelia46]

I think most of the time, these ICO rating can only be a certain reference.
Because there are a lot of ICO ratings that will increase the score, you should also refer to the people number of telegram groups and other factors.

[Jarx]

ICO ratings? Mostly not. I'm just looking the most popular ICOs and that way I do understand which projects gonna be more or less successful.

[Crumple Cat]

No, I don't believe most of them, considering that many of them are formed on the basis of comments and user ratings.
We all know how it works today.

[serkhio]

The given rating is only a reference of the investment. IMO it is not really believing, the future depends on the dev, market, fund etc.

[AllToMoon]

I don't believe in ICO ratings, but there are a lot of people who believe in it. And they could make worst ICO to make a lot of xxx, when good projects could not even sell their tokens w/o rating from top reviewers. So to follow them is not bad idea

[bongiu]

ICOs have to pay to ICObench to be featured on their main site which es kind of stupid, also, the rating system of ICObench it's completely idiotic (Benchy), not a good source of good ICOs but a good source of fresh ICOs due to its popularity. ICOratings on the other hand TENDS to be more objective when rating an ICO, I trust them more than ICObench.

[georgeforeham]

I think they are a good place to start for newbies to just browse to see what they should be looking for in an ICO (e.g. value, market competition etc).

My only issue is that most of these sites are pay to play, meaning that the ICO that throws the most money usually gets the best rating. Therefore I only see it as a way to find new ICOs.

I still think the best thing you can do is to research on this forum, ask questions and spend time.

[Ardasnails]

I believe in DYOR!

[rammanbl4]

Yes, I believe that most of the time these ICO ratings have some reference value, but you can't always rely on these ICO ratings. Because some ICO projects are paid marketing, the score is higher.