Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[barsharkol12]

Yes, one of my reference is their ICO ratings. This shows wither their company is doing well in ICOs but sometimes it depends on the investors how they will rate this company. Ratings is just only a guide, there are some preferences like the potential of their project to be a success.

[Akitot]

Yes, most of the ICO encourage all their member and every campaign joiners to vote for their team because it will serve also as data for others who want to join and invest with them.

[Radnie]

Yes i believe on ICO ratings. The ratings and feedback that they are showing to people are very useful and in fact most of the times i grabbed their advises. But also we need to remember this that our decision will be the final answer at the of the day. Thanks

[Snaic]

Of course, it is not worthwhile to trust the ratings of individual campaigns. It is necessary, if possible, to look at other ratings, and also necessarily check and research ICO projects of interest. This is the only way to add a more or less objective view of the project.

[Malam90]

ICO ratings ( like like ICObench, ICOrating.com ) help to identify a good ICO for new and old investors. Basically New investors get help to diagnosis a good token to invest their money in a safer coin.

[Konthol Ngaceng]

As long as I follow the development of ICO and see ICO rating then everything goes according to plan and this makes me believe with ICO rating, so I make ICO rating as the main reference to invest ICO.

[sdas90]

I believe that ICO ratings and I always watch ICO ratings.it is one of the most important for the ICO but we need to compare them.ratings are made by expert people and who have enough knowledge abut these ICO.

[mr.niwangz]

For me I do not believe in rating because we do not know if the ICOs are legitimately better if we are to observe their activities or do research so we can see if they are due to their project.

[Synaesthesia]

I usually follow the ICO rating websites to choose good projects. However, they also can pay website to increase the their rating. So, I also spend more time to research whitepaper, contact to team to understand about the project and give the choice

[breeze170]

Yeah I do. I believe ico ratings are overall great reference to start reading, there are many links to specific icos and also how much money or coins they already collected etc. Nice place to start..

[baghdatis1990]

       The two sites mentioned are an important point of reference when choosing an ICO. Even the two I consider them the most important websites about ICOrating. But these sites just have to give you insight to review projects considered good on ICO sites. You need to document yourself very well when you choose to invest an ICO. Some sites are not enough. You need to analyze team members, partners and any other small details that may be important.

[ace4549]

Yes, I believe. According to our Founder of Indigen blockchain, the price that he set was also depends on the value of bitcoin.
He said that, if the price of bitcoin will raise up, the ratings of our coins will also raise up then vise-versa. All ratings of the ICO that was been shown in the public was undergo to extreme study.

[Sean25pogi]

Yes, I believe in the companies who provide ICO ratings they are legit companies and have a basis in their judgement; therefore it is very helpful to investors to determined where to invest.

[MaiQwaN]

I do not think that ICO ratings can be completely trusted. Experience shows that they do not study projects carefully. Often their advice is surprising and can lead to losses. Therefore, I prefer to double-check them.

[Megashaw]

An ico rating website can be usee as a guide sometimes.
But you still have to do your own research anyway cos some of them are being paid by the project developers to make their project look good.
But I think a close to perfect website that I knw whose ico rating is usually real and free from compromise is icodrops.com

[Ninjacointop]

I think this tool is used by lazy people. The project should be studied independently, and Rating sites should be used as a supplement and viewed as an alternative point of view.

[weav]

I will invest on my own research , because i am not sure if i can trust these sites. Maybe a combination of both is the best way to go , but it would be so easy to just buy a good rating.

[Dhruvv1]

In my opinion, Ratings are the last factor in ICO research. We can't rely just only on the ratings. Mostly ratings based on the info provided by the ICO to specific website. No doubt ratings are useful. But, While we looking for invest I used to consider it's in the last. If I found the project good for me then I surely invest in ratings dose not affect my decision. 

[iBlitz22]

Most of the time it was use as a reference but sometimes it was just an information to show if the ICO was good or bad. But we cannot actually say that the ICO was good or bad even if it has a high score on ratings because we still have to use a lot of resources just to make sure that it is really good or not.

[Chanock]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Rating and benchmark for one ICO is one of the basis of investor if the ICO is great and legitimate. Through rating and benchmark you will find out if the ICO become successful in the future. Rating is very useful because its give additional trust to the ICO.