Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[luca3030]

I usually take my personal opinion to an ICO to determine if this project legit or not, rather than believing in ICO ratings.

[rollingstorm45]

partly,
because now a lot of projects that spend money just to improve their rating for the purposes of a black campaign to win the hearts of investors

[mc.craigsvictor]

Most of people are checking ico ratings even i do also .I believe in ICO ratings since some of them  are really helpful to us to join or where to join ICOs.

[kungfupandacoin]

I think you should not based it on ratings. You should know what good projects are but sometimes good marketing will lead to more prospects.

[btcefeyigit]

the last thing you know when you start to recognize the digital money exchange is ico. ico is the most reliable investment in this market. absolutely believe it.

[mariaana]

I believe partly in ICO ratings.  There are ICOs that gain a good rating from websites but is never accepted widely by investors.  Ratings may give a partial good impressions on ICO but I still have much faith in how they follow their road map and the appeal it can get to be accepted as a new token.  There are ICO that gets a low rating at the beginning but pick up as it proves that its new project concept is viable and acceptable.

[panjay]

Beleive in some extent, yes.
I mean we use this site to just compare the result and whether the result is good or not we will stick to our bias confirmation,

[jack1111]

ICOrating.com was right in evaluating some of the projects that I watched, like Genesis Vision, Cappasity, INS ecosystem. The investment rate was high, and these projects made high return after their ICOs.

[cafe84178]

I think the question is how these Institutes rate the ICOs.  The current ratings are not standardized, most of them not transparent, and we don't know who rated the score.

It's only a matter of time for those with really great know-hows stand out from the others.

[goldexp83]

yes and no, I always double check and see who are the people behind the revies

because sometimes also the most experienced reviewers make mistakes or are sponsored to make a positive one

is better to check multiple  and independent sources

[crisnel26]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I wouldn't say that i would believe in ICO ratings but i would consider it as factor in projecting the path or success of a project. I also consider different sites that gives their opinions or ratings about a certain ICO. Its also a factor when a white paper is so detailed.

[SamsungBitcoin]

I am not totally depending on ico ratings because some high rating ico is not a legit one there are going on the top because they are creating more alt to vote for their ico. I do my own analysis and by reading their white paper and reviewing the background of their team could helps me to decide which is the best ico for me.

Example of best ico for this yesr is VLB token all the characteristics of being great is on their white paper. They have real based project that will gives good impact to the auto/car industry and they already have ongoing presale, they are giving bonuses for early participation of 30% until march 12, 2018 and beyond that they will giving 20% bonus until their ico. https://vlb.io

[Rana590]

I think rating is also major information to know a project. I believe in ico rating. Many people search about project and then they rate on it. So in my opinion ico rating is a great factor.

[myrliska1313]

First of all, there should be an independent analysis of the project, the team and everything else, such sites serve in a sense as secondary advisers

[anobtc]

I use Ico rating as a factor to research a project. But i recommend you use your knowledge to do that, give your opinion to decide that ICO is potential or not, and then invest   Be independent, you need it more on this crypto world

[iconoclast]

The ICO rating sites are nearly worthless. I have seen scams that were easily detectable being given positive reviews by 7 ICO rating sites. You should only trust your own due diligence.

[luca3030]

Yes I believe in ICO because most of them are really paying their clients. but we still need to be careful because not all ICOs are trustworthy.

[pasagir]

I think that it's right to evaluate the project on 3-5 different rating sites.

[wpalczynski]

It can be helpful I guess, for example to discover ICO's you haven't heard of but you should only trust your own research before investing.

[nytstalker]

ICO's Ratings is just a advice that project will work but we do our own research about the project.