Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[FeverMore23]

Absolutely no. Why? There are so many scam ico right now. Don't trust anyone and always do your own research

[kumarrajuiitd]

I'm looking at sites with ICO ratings just to understand which ICOs are currently undergoing. If I'm interested in any project then I will conduct my own research.

As ICO rating is speculative and hence cannot be accurate but it can give some rough idea on the basis of previous market work. An investor should collect information from other resources also and then proceed on. At present I am studying ENLTE. It is doing well as users are increasing with good potential. For more details visit web.enlte.com

[itnawn8z888]

I use ICO ratings to assist me when doing ICO research. I don't take it to the heart. There are some ICO with great rating and fail and ICO with a bad rating that succeeds.

[alttravel]

I trust the rating only that is presented on the site icodrops.com. The other sites do not provide accurate information about crypto projects. But it's best to analyze the crypto project yourself and put your estimates before investing.

[gimineot]

I don't believe in ICO rating sites, i think most of  scores are bought by projects and you should not decide what to buy based on scores.
I am using this sites to discover new ICO-s and make my own research.

[asdksakz9999]

Yes, I believe that most of the time these ICO ratings have some reference value, but you can't always rely on these ICO ratings. Because some ICO projects are paid marketing, the score is higher.

[ZBer_Cut]

The Reting is only one of assessment sources, and not main. I think that rating only an occasion to pay attention to ICO, but no more.

[jerimarsella]

Yes in my opinion as a website that gives the ranking for ICO in progress it was very helpful for me. With a look that I can consider the ICO project who get good grades. Keep I check this very important birthday because some of the projects that are considered to have good grades but the sales are not even good, so before we choose the projects it's good on the check.

[Dmitry_K]

For me the ICO rating is not the main criterion, for me rating is just a benchmark, but that does not mean that the project will be really successful.

[pokemon43]

I think rating is also major information to know a project. I believe in ico rating. Many people search about project and then they rate on it. So in my opinion ico rating is a great factor.

[crisanto01]

At some point, I believe in it until such time that I will read some information that it should not be trusted and considered since it is manipulating too, but as of the moment one of my basic info relies in the ICO ratings.

[BestSSS]

The ICO rating in most of its cases is plausible. He gathers from many leading channels and bloggers who thoroughly study projects. I trust this rating and often it does not subsume.

[Mr.Been]

I usually use those sites to get general information about ICO, I don't care if they give 4 or 5 stars.
Most of them were paid by the project to review or rate the ICO of a project, which will make people has diminished trust to an ICO. I usually take my personal opinion to an ICO to determine if this project legit or not

[Kovanyy89]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

the rating does not guarantee that the project will be strong. For example, ICO Egretia - the project has an average rating, but the team will collect the hard cap in 2 minutes! And investors will profit.

[Babyjamz3026]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I do not use those kind of websites. I do research of ICO's on my own. After you find out what ICO is providing you can watch its rank on those sites. For me, it is nothing but an additional help.

[AlbertoMelo]

It's one poit to start . but no matter how good are the ratings if you dont believe in the project

I use them as reference , if there are more sites judging as good ICO should be a good sign
dont feel confident when one site give 5 stars and other 2 . something must be wrong

[SOGabriel]

I want to believe that ICO rating sites have criteria they use in conducting their reviews, ranging from the team members, project quality, whitepaper and some other factors... I think some rating site such as icobench coukd be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.

[sahabond]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

have read the topic and decided to write an opinion. disclaimer - this is not an advertisement, only my opinion. is there a website rating icodrops.com. the founders put a rating only on the basis of factual information. they also show in which projects they invest their own money and keep statistics of projects that they have marked very well. I believe in their analysis and trust their opinion.

[Andrew Clinton]

In my opinion, those sites are for informational purposes only and may be used for reference! You and only you will decide how to invest. But however, those sites summarize and update information and that has a part in our success👍

[Copulative]

as for me, I focus exclusively on some adequate experts, on whom I signed in telegrams. buff 10 for example.