[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[gondel]

Hi,
Payment also received with the help of byt411
Thank you man for all the help.
And Stunna when you want to make it paid per acivity level?
Thanks!
BR
Gondel

[bitsmichel]

Payment received, thanks you a lot!

[asdlolciterquit]

Payment riceived, thank you a lot Stunna.

first payment received! i really like this primedice!

[Xch4ng3]

Payment received. First time dealing with Stunna and had no problems so he has my vouch for running a smooth service like this.

[BowieMan]

And Stunna when you want to make it paid per acivity level?

Umm, effectively he already is paying you per activity level, isn't he? I mean, how would it profit him if people weren't posting a lot? I think right now it's already a pretty perfect and balanced way of rewarding people for posting, while rewarding people with a higher rank!

[Swordsoffreedom]

And Stunna when you want to make it paid per acivity level?

Umm, effectively he already is paying you per activity level, isn't he? I mean, how would it profit him if people weren't posting a lot? I think right now it's already a pretty perfect and balanced way of rewarding people for posting, while rewarding people with a higher rank!

Yep it is already set to a member level
But reading a few pages back since this thread grows fairly quick you can see it might change in a few terms to something else.

[onlinepro]

And Stunna when you want to make it paid per acivity level?

Umm, effectively he already is paying you per activity level, isn't he? I mean, how would it profit him if people weren't posting a lot? I think right now it's already a pretty perfect and balanced way of rewarding people for posting, while rewarding people with a higher rank!

Just pointing this out for you:

I do have plans to switch to a flat payment/pay per activity within 1-2 terms after I figure out pricing.

[Baitty]

Recieved payment, thank you Stunna. I don't have to reenroll because I'm on the list, love the new system.

[chaosPT]

And Stunna when you want to make it paid per acivity level?

Umm, effectively he already is paying you per activity level, isn't he? I mean, how would it profit him if people weren't posting a lot? I think right now it's already a pretty perfect and balanced way of rewarding people for posting, while rewarding people with a higher rank!

Now is totally perfect but it will cost him more .

[Gladdy]

Working through these now, a lot of help was provided from Micro with his thread on services.

I will be denying certain users payment, I'd like to ask you all if I am acting justly in doing so.

Here are some of the users who will be denied:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310214

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=28364

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105473

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152305

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152501

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243

Please review these and let me know if I am being fair when I say they do not deserve payment. This is obviously a very small % of the people in the campaign, compared to prior months the amount of abuse/spam has decreased significantly.


On top of that thanks to the form I was able to track users who changed their signature during the campaign to other campaigns to collect their payments.

One abuser was Skele (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165337):

http://puu.sh/a1VGP/2493bf2b81.png   (Screenshot I took mid campaign)

He will be denied pay and left negative trust. He is currently listed as a campaign member of updownBT as well. I wanted to give Skele benefit of the doubt and figured it was possible he just switched between campaigns and accurately reported his post count but he is reporting a starting post count even lower than what we have recorded and his current 654 which means he is counting the posts from both campaigns and cheating myself and updown and has been doing this for months likely. Next month I will be checking more often, I only did one check for this type of abuse.

I'm on the fence about how to handle each account I will just post my basic instincts on how to handle the situation and general opinion.  I trust your judgement Stunna so what you decide to do is fine with me and I appreciate you taking the time to consider others opinions.

I browsed the posts briefly from page to page for the most part, just to get an idea of the quality.  At very least the

1st:Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.

2nd: Is spamming and should stop.  From the posts I read no real discussion taking place by this member so it feels like it could be a bot to me and I'm surprised no mods caught on yet.  I thinking that is not the point of the campaign to promote another site in a repetitious manner.

3rd:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 and or have post deducted accordingly.  English may not be this members first language and posts can be confusing at times and could be considered spam.

4th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 

5th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.


6th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 

Skele was scamming and does not deserve payment.  People that do that ruin the campaign for everyone else who plays by the rules.  

I agree that should be pay and be warning else it will be just free advertise for stunna isn't ?

[MICRO]

Working through these now, a lot of help was provided from Micro with his thread on services.

I will be denying certain users payment, I'd like to ask you all if I am acting justly in doing so.

Here are some of the users who will be denied:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310214

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=28364

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105473

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152305

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152501

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243

Please review these and let me know if I am being fair when I say they do not deserve payment. This is obviously a very small % of the people in the campaign, compared to prior months the amount of abuse/spam has decreased significantly.


On top of that thanks to the form I was able to track users who changed their signature during the campaign to other campaigns to collect their payments.

One abuser was Skele (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165337):

http://puu.sh/a1VGP/2493bf2b81.png   (Screenshot I took mid campaign)

He will be denied pay and left negative trust. He is currently listed as a campaign member of updownBT as well. I wanted to give Skele benefit of the doubt and figured it was possible he just switched between campaigns and accurately reported his post count but he is reporting a starting post count even lower than what we have recorded and his current 654 which means he is counting the posts from both campaigns and cheating myself and updown and has been doing this for months likely. Next month I will be checking more often, I only did one check for this type of abuse.

I'm on the fence about how to handle each account I will just post my basic instincts on how to handle the situation and general opinion.  I trust your judgement Stunna so what you decide to do is fine with me and I appreciate you taking the time to consider others opinions.

I browsed the posts briefly from page to page for the most part, just to get an idea of the quality.  At very least the

1st:Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.

2nd: Is spamming and should stop.  From the posts I read no real discussion taking place by this member so it feels like it could be a bot to me and I'm surprised no mods caught on yet.  I thinking that is not the point of the campaign to promote another site in a repetitious manner.

3rd:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 and or have post deducted accordingly.  English may not be this members first language and posts can be confusing at times and could be considered spam.

4th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 

5th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.


6th:  Brief overview of posts seem low quality but on topic.  Should try harder to add more to the conversations they take part in and avoid being considered as a spammer.  Member should be warned at least and have post deducted accordingly or be banned.
 

Skele was scamming and does not deserve payment.  People that do that ruin the campaign for everyone else who plays by the rules. 

I agree that should be pay and be warning else it will be just free advertise for stunna isn't ?

Actually some of them are banned by moderators on this forum.

Its not good advertising when people see somebody with pd sig only posting to boost count and not contribute to topic.
Than people think of pd as a cause of spamming on forum, and that is not good.

[dquancey]

Received my payment.

Much appreciated Stunna.

[FUR11]

Stunna said that the rates and conditions will most likely stay the same for the next round. If he increased the rates I guess it would be OK to just do so, but if he is cutting down, I believe he should advertise this in advance and not during a round. I don't doubt him but I just wanted to point this out 

[Yuki1988]

Thanks for payment Stunna.

But bymistake you sent me 0.8 inspite of 0.4.

I sent you pm please pm me your addy.

Please take a look at the Stunna post quoted below.

Small handful of users were paid twice. If you received a double payment please send the second payment back here:

1BeGHXFt2wtMBEBkSFw2Wc7p8EK7bpZuVY


Much appreciated.

[madmat]

Thanks for payment Stunna.

But bymistake you sent me 0.8 inspite of 0.4.

I sent you pm please pm me your addy.

Please take a look at the Stunna post quoted below.

Small handful of users were paid twice. If you received a double payment please send the second payment back here:

1BeGHXFt2wtMBEBkSFw2Wc7p8EK7bpZuVY


Much appreciated.

I have been paid twice, I will send it back tomorrow.

[franckuestein]

Still waiting for enrollment confirmation..

If you filled correctly the form (Enrollment section and then send + another send) you're in so you just have to wait and check the list tomorrow or in 48h to know if you're there.

Be patient guy! Devs paid us yesterday so maybe they're going to check everything tomorrow.

[ChuckBuck]

I, too, am not on the currently enrolled list even though I followed this campaign's sign up directions, step by step.

Not sure when the OP is going to update the list to confirm me and any others that did the same.

[barangunel]

I, too, am not on the currently enrolled list even though I followed this campaign's sign up directions, step by step.

Not sure when the OP is going to update the list to confirm me and any others that did the same.

I filled first form (enrollment) I wrote my first post number, profile id and sent form. OK, I am waiting

well you got almost 1 month to payment day, keep calm :p

[Serpens66]

should I give stunna every month a trust rating ? Or just once?
Every month one positive from every user here would be too much?  I don't know the trust system very well.

[SirChiko]

should I give stunna every month a trust rating ? Or just once?
Every month one positive from every user here would be too much?  I don't know the trust system very well.

Every month seems like too mutch, maybe only when you stop participating in it or every second month.