NPlusMiner - |MultiRig remote management|AI|Autoupdate|Pool/Algo switching

[ravenj]

Hi,

HSRminer repository is empty. Can't download miner.

[1715209890]

1715209890

[1715209890]

1715209890

[1715209890]

1715209890

[1715209890]

1715209890

[Just_a_miner]

Hi,

HSRminer repository is empty. Can't download miner.

Fixed.

[MrPlus]

Hi,

HSRminer repository is empty. Can't download miner.

Fixed.

Thank you!

[jcabello7]

Great work MrPlus!!!

Just I see that my earnings tracker it's only working with zpool and ahaspool. With blazepool it says 0mBTC/day ever, and for Zergpool sometimes is 0, sometimes negative numbers.
Screenshot:
https://gyazo.com/17a080fcde0dd82cffd679d2e3b1a392

What could be the problem?

New version of HSRminer is finally working with 980TI+1080TI! Awesome!!!

What is the most profitable pool for you? Are you mining just in 1 pool or different pools at same time?

Thanks!

[MarinoOG]

I switched to nicehash pool but i have issue with XMRig. It opens, starts mining for 10 sec and than it closes. I cant figure out what is causing closing of XMRig. Any idea?

[JukNi]

Hi,

Could you add countdown timer for that 300/180/30 sec times? It would be nice to see how much more to go?
Something like this https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmwHZ3fXi4jhgaZ3e_61KUFMmaCjqQ

Code:

Function Start-Countdown
{ #>
    Param(
        [Int32]$Seconds = 300,
        [string]$Message = "Mining for 300 seconds..."
    )
    ForEach ($Count in (1..$Seconds))
    {   Write-Progress -Id 1 -Activity $Message -Status "Waiting for $Seconds seconds, $($Seconds - $Count) left" -PercentComplete (($Count / $Seconds) * 100)
        Start-Sleep -Seconds 1
    }
    Write-Progress -Id 1 -Activity $Message -Status "Completed" -PercentComplete 100 -Completed
}

Start-Countdown -Seconds 300 -Message "Mining..."

(c) Martin9700 @ www.spiceworks.com

[Chosscoin]

Good morning:

I am using this software, and I have a question for the developer:

Is it possible to change the BTC address of NiceHash, and put a different one to the rest of the pools?

I would like to mine in NiceHash in my internal Wallet, and put the external address only for the rest of the pools.

Another question:

Zergpool is reliable?

[ruplikminer]

I stopped and restarted the miner. But after about one hour it's sitll not showing the various algos and possible profits

http://prntscr.com/ijgz0g

is it normal?

[MagicSmoker]

I stopped and restarted the miner. But after about one hour it's sitll not showing the various algos and possible profits

http://prntscr.com/ijgz0g

is it normal?

Add "-UIStyle Full" to your start[pool].bat file. This has been discussed several times over the last several pages, btw.

[MagicSmoker]

I have some bad news for MrPlus... the profitability averaging function which attempts to blend 24h and instantaneous profitability does not appear to confer any advantage over NiceHash and, indeed, performs about 25% worse than it.

The predicted per-day earnings displayed right before the list of algos is quite accurate after reaching 100% trust level - it says I will make about 0.666 mBTC per day and that is, indeed, what I have been making the last 3 days (more or less). If I take the average per-day earnings of the top 6 algos, however, I should be making 0.865 mBTC, which is similar to what NiceHash makes per day on this rig.

Here's a recent capture of the relevant data as an example:

Code:

Trust Level                      100% [ 00 days 12:31 ]
Average BTC/H                    BTC = 0.00002775 | mBTC = 0.028
Average BTC/D                    BTC = 0.00066595 | mBTC = 0.666
Estimated Pay Date               2/27/2018 12:00:32 AM > 0.0025 BTC
+++++


   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm       Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------       ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos     X17        35.66 MH/s    1.044 0.00104  10.062    0.02928 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan      12.94 MH/s    0.982 0.00098   9.465    0.07590 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR            NeoScrypt   3.86 MH/s    0.927 0.00093   8.936    0.24025 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Lyra2RE2  149.93 MH/s    0.795 0.00079   7.658    0.00530 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Nist5     174.32 MH/s    0.738 0.00074   7.115    0.00424 zpoolplus-
DSTM                 Equihash    1.78 KH/s    0.704 0.00070   6.789  395.58398 zpoolplus-

Again, this has been consistent for several days now, using either 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 (which differ only in the Neoscrypt miner, AFAIK). I should also note that NemosMiner 2.4.2 - which only looks at instantaneous profitability - did outperform NiceHash by about 10%, but I am going to test that again just to make sure.

[beinadvance]

   Type: NVIDIA

Miner              Algorithm          Speed     mBTC/Day      BTC/Day      USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----              ---------          -----     --------      -------      ------- ---------- ----
DSTM               Equihash     693,10  H/s        0,361      0,00036        3,414  520,77856 nicehash-
EthashClaymore     Ethash        47,52  H/s        0,000      0,00000        0,000    0,00689 nicehash-
CcminerTpruvot     Skunk       Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,00532 nicehash-
HSRminer           NeoScrypt   Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,18549 nicehash-
XMRig              CryptoNight Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking  154,30102 nicehash-
ccminerpolytimos   Blake2s     Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,00000 nicehash-
ccminerAlexis78Sib X11gost     Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,01277 nicehash-
ccminerpolytimos   Lbry        Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,00006 nicehash-
ccminerpolytimos   Nist5       Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,00356 nicehash-
ccminerpolytimos   Lyra2RE2    Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0,00555 nicehash-

why Ethash in H / s and why all of the zeros?

[MrPlus]

I have some bad news for MrPlus... the profitability averaging function which attempts to blend 24h and instantaneous profitability does not appear to confer any advantage over NiceHash and, indeed, performs about 25% worse than it.

The predicted per-day earnings displayed right before the list of algos is quite accurate after reaching 100% trust level - it says I will make about 0.666 mBTC per day and that is, indeed, what I have been making the last 3 days (more or less). If I take the average per-day earnings of the top 6 algos, however, I should be making 0.865 mBTC, which is similar to what NiceHash makes per day on this rig.

Here's a recent capture of the relevant data as an example:

Code:

Trust Level                      100% [ 00 days 12:31 ]
Average BTC/H                    BTC = 0.00002775 | mBTC = 0.028
Average BTC/D                    BTC = 0.00066595 | mBTC = 0.666
Estimated Pay Date               2/27/2018 12:00:32 AM > 0.0025 BTC
+++++


   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm       Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------       ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos     X17        35.66 MH/s    1.044 0.00104  10.062    0.02928 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan      12.94 MH/s    0.982 0.00098   9.465    0.07590 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR            NeoScrypt   3.86 MH/s    0.927 0.00093   8.936    0.24025 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Lyra2RE2  149.93 MH/s    0.795 0.00079   7.658    0.00530 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Nist5     174.32 MH/s    0.738 0.00074   7.115    0.00424 zpoolplus-
DSTM                 Equihash    1.78 KH/s    0.704 0.00070   6.789  395.58398 zpoolplus-

Again, this has been consistent for several days now, using either 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 (which differ only in the Neoscrypt miner, AFAIK). I should also note that NemosMiner 2.4.2 - which only looks at instantaneous profitability - did outperform NiceHash by about 10%, but I am going to test that again just to make sure.

Earning Tracker has memory and reads the past. So is accurate if your mining capability are close to constant.

The estimates in the algo list however, have no memory. These are instant estimations provided by the pool based on CURRENT total pool hashrate and CURRENT coin value. These cannot be accurate in anyway because 1) the total pool hashrate is not constant and 2) the coin value is not constant and the one we should use is what it will be 10 to 12 hours later which off course... no one could really guess.

We use estimations to take decisions TRYING TO predict the future.
We use past data to tell how many BTC/D we've been making.

The estimation bit does not apply to NiceHash as they pay the instant price depending on what bidders are willing to pay. Meaning that on NH, there is no 10 to 12 hours problem to solve. NiceHash do not provide estimate, they tell you how you've been doing and project to tell you when you get paid the same way the Earning Tracker does.
I have not tried NH for a while now. So cannot tell if NH gives higher profits than other pools right now. However, I can tell even if it is now. It won't in a couple days.

Lastly. Yes, you will find find short periods of time where following current_estimate will give better results than Plus. But in the long term... Plus shows better results. (At least for my rigs.)

The Plus logic is not perfect and i'm happy to ear these constructive feedbacks.
Keep it coming. They might help find the magic logic one day

[jcabello7]

I have some bad news for MrPlus... the profitability averaging function which attempts to blend 24h and instantaneous profitability does not appear to confer any advantage over NiceHash and, indeed, performs about 25% worse than it.

The predicted per-day earnings displayed right before the list of algos is quite accurate after reaching 100% trust level - it says I will make about 0.666 mBTC per day and that is, indeed, what I have been making the last 3 days (more or less). If I take the average per-day earnings of the top 6 algos, however, I should be making 0.865 mBTC, which is similar to what NiceHash makes per day on this rig.

Here's a recent capture of the relevant data as an example:

Code:

Trust Level                      100% [ 00 days 12:31 ]
Average BTC/H                    BTC = 0.00002775 | mBTC = 0.028
Average BTC/D                    BTC = 0.00066595 | mBTC = 0.666
Estimated Pay Date               2/27/2018 12:00:32 AM > 0.0025 BTC
+++++


   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm       Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------       ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos     X17        35.66 MH/s    1.044 0.00104  10.062    0.02928 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan      12.94 MH/s    0.982 0.00098   9.465    0.07590 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR            NeoScrypt   3.86 MH/s    0.927 0.00093   8.936    0.24025 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Lyra2RE2  149.93 MH/s    0.795 0.00079   7.658    0.00530 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos     Nist5     174.32 MH/s    0.738 0.00074   7.115    0.00424 zpoolplus-
DSTM                 Equihash    1.78 KH/s    0.704 0.00070   6.789  395.58398 zpoolplus-

Again, this has been consistent for several days now, using either 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 (which differ only in the Neoscrypt miner, AFAIK). I should also note that NemosMiner 2.4.2 - which only looks at instantaneous profitability - did outperform NiceHash by about 10%, but I am going to test that again just to make sure.

Are you sure? My earnings are a bit lower, usually I got 0,76mBTC using ahaspool and ahashpool24hr. Now 0,55mBTC using ahashpoolplus. But maybe is fault of ahashpool, because last 2 days I earned 0,65mBTC using ahashpoolplus+zergpoolplus+blazepoolplus+zpoolplus.
We need to check mining at same pools at same time, plus version vs standard. But I only have 2 GPU's and are differents, so I can't test it.

[MrPlus]

Release - NPlusMiner 1.3.3
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

Earnings Tracker
   - Bug fix - Divide by zero error
   - Bug fix - Handle cases when pool API returns blank results
BrainPlus
   - Changed scheduling to reduce pool API load
   - Changed polling interval from 120 to 60 sec (More reactive)

[MagicSmoker]

Earning Tracker has memory and reads the past. So is accurate if your mining capability are close to constant.

The estimates in the algo list however, have no memory. These are instant estimations provided by the pool based on CURRENT total pool hashrate and CURRENT coin value. These cannot be accurate in anyway because 1) the total pool hashrate is not constant and 2) the coin value is not constant and the one we should use is what it will be 10 to 12 hours later which off course... no one could really guess.

We use estimations to take decisions TRYING TO predict the future.
We use past data to tell how many BTC/D we've been making.

The estimation bit does not apply to NiceHash as they pay the instant price depending on what bidders are willing to pay. Meaning that on NH, there is no 10 to 12 hours problem to solve. NiceHash do not provide estimate, they tell you how you've been doing and project to tell you when you get paid the same way the Earning Tracker does.
I have not tried NH for a while now. So cannot tell if NH gives higher profits than other pools right now. However, I can tell even if it is now. It won't in a couple days.

Lastly. Yes, you will find find short periods of time where following current_estimate will give better results than Plus. But in the long term... Plus shows better results. (At least for my rigs.)

The Plus logic is not perfect and i'm happy to ear these constructive feedbacks.
Keep it coming. They might help find the magic logic one day

Yes, I understand both how NiceHash works and that the estimated profitability for each algo is just a snapshot of that instant in time. I mentioned the latter because I keep my eye on the top 4-6 and they are consistently predicting >0.850 mBTC per day, yet I am just as consistently only earning <0.7 mBTC per day.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to evaluate a tool such as your NPlusMiner because it is difficult to separate out pool/algo effects from profitability estimation effects. I do have separate, nearly identical testing rigs which I could set up to mine to the same pool using different BTC addresses but it will take at least 1 week to get statistically significant results and I'm not sure I want to tie them up for that long doing an experiment that doesn't seem likely to be too rewarding. Still, I'll consider pitting your latest version - 1.3.3 - against NemosMiner 2.4.2 (selected because it switches based on instantaneous probability; more recent versions seem to be copying you, or vice versa, really can't tell who's poaching from whom here  ).

[MrPlus]

Earning Tracker has memory and reads the past. So is accurate if your mining capability are close to constant.

The estimates in the algo list however, have no memory. These are instant estimations provided by the pool based on CURRENT total pool hashrate and CURRENT coin value. These cannot be accurate in anyway because 1) the total pool hashrate is not constant and 2) the coin value is not constant and the one we should use is what it will be 10 to 12 hours later which off course... no one could really guess.

We use estimations to take decisions TRYING TO predict the future.
We use past data to tell how many BTC/D we've been making.

The estimation bit does not apply to NiceHash as they pay the instant price depending on what bidders are willing to pay. Meaning that on NH, there is no 10 to 12 hours problem to solve. NiceHash do not provide estimate, they tell you how you've been doing and project to tell you when you get paid the same way the Earning Tracker does.
I have not tried NH for a while now. So cannot tell if NH gives higher profits than other pools right now. However, I can tell even if it is now. It won't in a couple days.

Lastly. Yes, you will find find short periods of time where following current_estimate will give better results than Plus. But in the long term... Plus shows better results. (At least for my rigs.)

The Plus logic is not perfect and i'm happy to ear these constructive feedbacks.
Keep it coming. They might help find the magic logic one day

Yes, I understand both how NiceHash works and that the estimated profitability for each algo is just a snapshot of that instant in time. I mentioned the latter because I keep my eye on the top 4-6 and they are consistently predicting >0.850 mBTC per day, yet I am just as consistently only earning <0.7 mBTC per day.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to evaluate a tool such as your NPlusMiner because it is difficult to separate out pool/algo effects from profitability estimation effects. I do have separate, nearly identical testing rigs which I could set up to mine to the same pool using different BTC addresses but it will take at least 1 week to get statistically significant results and I'm not sure I want to tie them up for that long doing an experiment that doesn't seem likely to be too rewarding. Still, I'll consider pitting your latest version - 1.3.3 - against NemosMiner 2.4.2 (selected because it switches based on instantaneous probability; more recent versions seem to be copying you, or vice versa, really can't tell who's poaching from whom here  ).

Whichever version you use, you can still use "ahashpool" as a pool name to follow current_estimate.

-poolname ahashpool => current_estimate
-poolname ahashpool24hr => actual_24hr
-poolname ahashpoolPlus => Plus Logic

This is true as well for other pools.

[beinadvance]

I will repeat

EthashClaymore     Ethash        47,52  H/s        0,000      0,00000        0,000    0,00689 nicehash-

how to fix h/s in mh/s

[ruplikminer]

I stopped and restarted the miner. But after about one hour it's sitll not showing the various algos and possible profits

http://prntscr.com/ijgz0g

is it normal?

Add "-UIStyle Full" to your start[pool].bat file. This has been discussed several times over the last several pages, btw.

I did it since the beginning... but it's not showing ...

http://prntscr.com/ijk26r

[blackoreo]

I stopped and restarted the miner. But after about one hour it's sitll not showing the various algos and possible profits

http://prntscr.com/ijgz0g

is it normal?

Add "-UIStyle Full" to your start[pool].bat file. This has been discussed several times over the last several pages, btw.

I did it since the beginning... but it's not showing ...

http://prntscr.com/ijk26r

After miner starts hit s on keyboard and wait till refresh.

[Chosscoin]

Good morning:

I am using this software, and I have a question for the developer:

Is it possible to change the BTC address of NiceHash, and put a different one to the rest of the pools?

I would like to mine in NiceHash in my internal Wallet, and put the external address only for the rest of the pools.

Please could you help me? Only I need mine in my Internal Nicehash Address when the NplusMiner choose NiceHash's Pool

Thanks