NPlusMiner - |MultiRig remote management|AI|Autoupdate|Pool/Algo switching

[JCS-CCT]

On Zergpool I'm not getting daily average payout.  New copy of v2.2 from release and running more than 24hs.  I haven't tried other pools.

Code:

Average BTC/D                    BTC =  | mBTC =

[1715168916]

1715168916

[1715168916]

1715168916

[MrPlus]

On Zergpool I'm not getting daily average payout.  New copy of v2.2 from release and running more than 24hs.  I haven't tried other pools.

Code:

Average BTC/D                    BTC =  | mBTC =

Is the GUI showing it?
Are you using BTC or other currency?
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/issues/63

[JCS-CCT]

Using BTC.  Yes it does show up in the GUI, but not in the Console.

Thanks

[JCS-CCT]

Just read Intel is going to be making GPUs by 2020!  The more the competition, the cheaper they'll get!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2018/04/11/intel-is-developing-a-desktop-gaming-gpu-to-fight-nvidia-amd/#559bbfd63578

[klepikolse]

Got one more issue - sometimes ccminer stops working or crashes. Does this miner check hash or something like that? Last time it froze for an hour. I can use watchdog, but it will reboot the system and reset the estimates.

btw, the difference between estimates and real income is around 30-40% for zergpool and ahashpool. Looks too much for me. Is it okay for pools to be that optimistic?

[JCS-CCT]

Got one more issue - sometimes ccminer stops working or crashes. Does this miner check hash or something like that? Last time it froze for an hour. I can use watchdog, but it will reboot the system and reset the estimates.

btw, the difference between estimates and real income is around 30-40% for zergpool and ahashpool. Looks too much for me. Is it okay for pools to be that optimistic?

Could be overclocked too much.

[manc]

Got one more issue - sometimes ccminer stops working or crashes. Does this miner check hash or something like that? Last time it froze for an hour. I can use watchdog, but it will reboot the system and reset the estimates.

btw, the difference between estimates and real income is around 30-40% for zergpool and ahashpool. Looks too much for me. Is it okay for pools to be that optimistic?

Could be overclocked too much.

This is the same point that I was making recently - 'what is stability?' ... I'll have a NemosPlus instance running for 9 days and then suddenly come up with a ccminer failure on a "known stable" algo / OC.
Power Targets are constant, ambient temp similar, surge arrestor in the electrical panel.

[manc]

Otherwise though, @MrPlus, to look at profitability a different way - what are the quickest maturing coins / algos?

For example Verge @ Ahashpool is something like 260 confirmations... so by the time the coin matures the price has a lot of time to fluctuate... whereas something that only needs 80 confirmations might have a better of chance of fetching the price you mined it at...?

[MrPlus]

Otherwise though, @MrPlus, to look at profitability a different way - what are the quickest maturing coins / algos?

For example Verge @ Ahashpool is something like 260 confirmations... so by the time the coin matures the price has a lot of time to fluctuate... whereas something that only needs 80 confirmations might have a better of chance of fetching the price you mined it at...?

This is interesting thinking. The thing is that the pool API do not provide the info to do such calculations.
Even if possible, once the block is found, you still need hours before coins are exchanged. So I am not sure it will change much.

[MrPlus]

Got one more issue - sometimes ccminer stops working or crashes. Does this miner check hash or something like that? Last time it froze for an hour. I can use watchdog, but it will reboot the system and reset the estimates.

btw, the difference between estimates and real income is around 30-40% for zergpool and ahashpool. Looks too much for me. Is it okay for pools to be that optimistic?

Could be overclocked too much.

This is the same point that I was making recently - 'what is stability?' ... I'll have a NemosPlus instance running for 9 days and then suddenly come up with a ccminer failure on a "known stable" algo / OC.
Power Targets are constant, ambient temp similar, surge arrestor in the electrical panel.

Could you provide details on the type of error of ccminer behavior you experimented?

NPlusMiner includes a Monitor option that you might wanna look at.

I have rigs running for more than 12 days as of now and not one issue.
I've seen them running for more than an month with no issue. I tend to call this stability

I totally understand that on some different configurations, it might be a bit less stable and it is interesting to hear about it to improve NPlusMiner.
Keep in mind that NPlusMiner relies on the miner programs themselves, it cannot fix everything. Depending on the error you see, it might be best to raise the issue to ccminer.

[skablast]

I mined RVN by my own , and noticed I've been quite faster with Enemy 1.08.
there is any chance to change the miner for x16r ?
At list with suprminer 1.6 that is open source ?

[nsummy]

I mined RVN by my own , and noticed I've been quite faster with Enemy 1.08.
there is any chance to change the miner for x16r ?
At list with suprminer 1.6 that is open source ?

There are instructions in the optional miner folder that tell you have to enable enemy.

[preda]

Benchmark is wrong, i do 41mh with x16r and enemyminer
It says 20mh 50% less... So can't be accurate

[skablast]

I did follow the instructions,(thanks)  also renaming enemy to ccminer... but it closed right 2 second after start benchmarking, probably  I will need to change intensity, but isn't clear (to me !)where the script find it.
I will try tonight

[skablast]

x16r works, x17 doesn't.
But I "REM" it and it works with Alexis

[JCS-CCT]

Benchmark is wrong, i do 41mh with x16r and enemyminer
It says 20mh 50% less... So can't be accurate

For x16r use suprminer (ccminersupaminer.ps1).  I've just ran a test tonight on all the x16r miners (except enemy) and suprminer was the best.  I don't trust enemy and I don't believe their benchmarks.  Note that suprminer 1.6 is beta.  Use 1.5

Suprminer
Ravencoin
Nevermore
Ravenminer

[JCS-CCT]

x16r works, x17 doesn't.
But I "REM" it and it works with Alexis

I use Alexis for x17.

[manc]

Benchmark is wrong, i do 41mh with x16r and enemyminer
It says 20mh 50% less... So can't be accurate

For x16r use suprminer (ccminersupaminer.ps1).  I've just ran a test tonight on all the x16r miners (except enemy) and suprminer was the best.  I don't trust enemy and I don't believe their benchmarks.  Note that suprminer 1.6 is beta.  Use 1.5

Suprminer
Ravencoin
Nevermore
Ravenminer

What were the % gains between them? What -i did you use?

I ran them concurrent a few weeks back and stuck with nevermore.x64 v0.22 -i 20 as it beat out the rest by ~4%.

[JCS-CCT]

Benchmark is wrong, i do 41mh with x16r and enemyminer
It says 20mh 50% less... So can't be accurate

For x16r use suprminer (ccminersupaminer.ps1).  I've just ran a test tonight on all the x16r miners (except enemy) and suprminer was the best.  I don't trust enemy and I don't believe their benchmarks.  Note that suprminer 1.6 is beta.  Use 1.5

Suprminer
Ravencoin
Nevermore
Ravenminer

What were the % gains between them? What -i did you use?

I ran them concurrent a few weeks back and stuck with nevermore.x64 v0.22 -i 20 as it beat out the rest by ~4%.

2 x 1080ti no OC

Suprminer 33.75
Ravencoin 31.14
Nevermore 26.00
Ravenminer 23.48

Using default intensity.

[tionart]

i cant figure out why this is appearing and how to fix it should i just leave it

cant download suprminer ?
here is picture

https://imgur.com/a/DAXOF1f

any suggestions ? 2.1.3 works ok
thank you!