|
MagicSmoker
|
 |
February 20, 2018, 08:52:39 PM |
|
Okay, a 3rd and fatal issue - the currently running miner is not closed before the next miner is started, and, in fact, both miners attempt to run concurrently for at least 1 minute, maybe longer but I closed the NPlusMiner window to avoid crashing the display driver from two miners fighting. Furthermore, closing the NPlusMiner window did not close the first miner; it did close the second, however. EDIT - also, checking the miner.log file for clues I see that the hashrate for the X17 algo is absurdly high: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos X17 476.58 MH/s 10.906 0.01091 127.977 0.02288 zp...
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 655.27 MH/s 8.444 0.00844 99.095 0.01289 zp...
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00382 zp...
If a single GTX 1080 can bring in 10.9 mBTC per day I need to get more of them pronto! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrPlus (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2018, 08:55:09 PM |
|
I figured it out already: use the clone/download button and select download as a zip for those who are still wondering.
Please note that 1.3 is opened for test. Not a release. Use at your own risk. Thanks for the ones willing to take the risk. Feedback on your tests will help. Couple of things I can tell you so far, even as it is doing the benchmarking again... First: I am trying this out with an XVG address on ZPool, not BTC, because it makes tracking earnings easier and eliminates the additional 5% fee charged for converting to BTC. However, your earningstracker batch file seems to assume only BTC as a payout option. Second: the first time I ran my slightly modified startzpoolplus.bat (with an XVG address and some of the algos deleted) only 8 of the 17 algos I had selected were queued up for benchmarking; here is the beginning of the miner.log if it helps: **********************
Windows PowerShell transcript start
Start time: 20180220151144
Username: JSJ-RYZEN\jsj
RunAs User: JSJ-RYZEN\jsj
Configuration Name:
Machine: JSJ-RYZEN (Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.16299.0)
Host Application: powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle minimized -command &.\NPlusMiner-v1.3.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0' -SelGPUCC '0' -Currency USD -Passwordcurrency XVG -Wallet DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -PoolName zpoolplus -WorkerName ID=eleusis1 -Type nvidia -Algorithm hsr,xevan,tribus,phi,c11,skein,equihash,x11evo,sib,bitcore,x17,blakecoin,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,blake2s,lyra2z
Process ID: 3964
PSVersion: 5.1.16299.248
PSEdition: Desktop
PSCompatibleVersions: 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 5.1.16299.248
BuildVersion: 10.0.16299.248
CLRVersion: 4.0.30319.42000
WSManStackVersion: 3.0
PSRemotingProtocolVersion: 2.3
SerializationVersion: 1.1.0.1
**********************
Transcript started, output file is .\Logs\miner.log
PS>TerminatingError(Invoke-WebRequest): "Unable to connect to the remote server" <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Loading BTC rate from 'api.coinbase.com'..
Loading pool stats..
Loading miners..
Downloading ccminerAlexis78..
Downloading CcminerAlexis78cuda9..
Downloading CcminerAlexis78Phi..
Downloading ccminerpolytimos..
Downloading CcminerTpruvot..
Downloading CcminerTpruvotcuda9..
Downloading CcminerTpruvotx64..
Downloading DSTM..
Downloading PalginHSR..
Launching Prerun: .\Prerun\default.bat
1BTC = 11650 USD
+++++
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos Skein Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00034 zpo...
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00025 zpo...
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.01722 zpo...
ccminerpolytimos X17 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.04775 zpo...
ccminerAlexis78 Sib Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.01620 zpo...
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.01875 zpo...
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00761 zpo...
ccminerpolytimos C11 Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00683 zpo...
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
0.00 PH/s 00:00:00 00:00:00 Once Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a skein -o
stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/20/2018 15:14:42
Sleep 300 sec
I added bold a bunch of "<<<<<<<<<<<<<" next to what seems like the most-relevant entry. 1 - you are right, Earning tracker considers only BTC. Values might be right in XVG but the BTC symbol is hardcoded. 2 - Seems like the connection error is about version checking. No big deal. 3 - Don't get why it's not benchmarking all selected algos. Need to investigate. 4 - On this one version upgrade (Not true for all versions) you could copy your stats folder over to avoid benchmarks if on the same rig. |
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 08:57:30 PM |
|
1 - you are right, Earning tracker considers only BTC. Values might be right in XVG but the BTC symbol is hardcoded.
2 - Seems like the connection error is about version checking. No big deal.
3 - Don't get why it's not benchmarking all selected algos. Need to investigate.
4 - On this one version upgrade (Not true for all versions) you could copy your stats folder over to avoid benchmarks if on the same rig.
See the edit I did to my previous post - I'm also experiencing the same issue as others where the currently running miner isn't closed before the next one is started... or, perhaps, ever closed at all... |
|
|
|
|
|
MrPlus (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2018, 08:58:52 PM |
|
Okay, a 3rd and fatal issue - the currently running miner is not closed before the next miner is started, and, in fact, both miners attempt to run concurrently for at least 1 minute, maybe longer but I closed the NPlusMiner window to avoid crashing the display driver from two miners fighting. Furthermore, closing the NPlusMiner window did not close the first miner; it did close the second, however. EDIT - also, checking the miner.log file for clues I see that the hashrate for the X17 algo is absurdly high: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos X17 476.58 MH/s 10.906 0.01091 127.977 0.02288 zp...
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 655.27 MH/s 8.444 0.00844 99.095 0.01289 zp...
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00382 zp...
If a single GTX 1080 can bring in 10.9 mBTC per day I need to get more of them pronto! Any others seeing this. If so, can you share your rig details? |
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 09:07:00 PM |
|
4 - On this one version upgrade (Not true for all versions) you could copy your stats folder over to avoid benchmarks if on the same rig.
I did just that and it looks like the table columns are compressed or otherwise not formatted properly: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.356 0.00036 4.188 0.01446 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.54 MH/s 0.318 0.00032 3.731 0.00426 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.316 0.00032 3.716 0.02295 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78c... Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.264 0.00026 3.099 0.06269 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.253 0.00025 2.974 0.11416 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.250 0.00025 2.938 0.00487 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.246 0.00025 2.886 0.01167 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.242 0.00024 2.843 0.00423 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein ...42 MH/s 0.233 0.00023 2.742 0.00034 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.224 0.00022 2.628 0.01290 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash ...85 H/s 0.221 0.00022 2.595 429.79544 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.209 0.00021 2.453 0.01386 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.176 0.00018 2.068 0.01177 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.127 0.00013 1.490 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.080 0.00008 0.939 0.00001 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.057 0.00006 0.672 0.00352 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt ...marking ...rking ...king ...king 0.18308 zpoolplus-
Note Skein and Equihash hashrates, as well as the "benchmarking" stats for NeoScrypt in particular. |
|
|
|
|
dwellhurtyswan
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 09:12:22 PM |
|
Hey Mr. Plus:
I am also experience the issue with two miners being opened.
I also experience not all miners benchmarking on the first go around. If you run the reset profit script then re-launch the miner it will then see all algos and attempt to benchmark everything you selected.
I can also confirm recieving benchmark statistics that are wildly inaccurate (IE 14 GH/s for neoscrypt). I haven't witnessed this issue on x17 or this current master release specifically but I have on neoscrypt and tribus many times on previous releases.
Win 10 rig with 8 1080TI. Nothing else special about it. Up to date.. Nvidia 390 drivers and purely used for mining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrPlus (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2018, 09:16:57 PM |
|
Hey Mr. Plus:
I am also experience the issue with two miners being opened.
I also experience not all miners benchmarking on the first go around. If you run the reset profit script then re-launch the miner it will then see all algos and attempt to benchmark everything you selected.
I can also confirm recieving benchmark statistics that are wildly inaccurate (IE 14 GH/s for neoscrypt). I haven't witnessed this issue on x17 or this current master release specifically but I have on neoscrypt and tribus many times on previous releases.
Win 10 rig with 8 1080TI. Nothing else special about it. Up to date.. Nvidia 390 drivers and purely used for mining.
I'm failing to repro the two miners opened Thinking of taking Plagin away for NeoScrypt. Seems to be a lot issues with it. Need more testimonies for decision. |
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 09:22:53 PM |
|
I'm failing to repro the two miners opened
Thinking of taking Plagin away for NeoScrypt. Seems to be a lot issues with it.
Need more testimonies for decision.
You got my vote to replace Palgin's hsrminer_neoscript with whichever ccminer variant you already have runs neoscrypt. And the formatting issue I just described seemed to get fixed after benchmarking completed. Not that it was a big issue in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
dwellhurtyswan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 09:41:40 PM |
|
I'd also vote to remove Palagin. It seems hes gone mia from the dev side and it consistently just causes issues. I've been playing with justaminers fork but have been using klaus-T for the past few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 10:10:07 PM |
|
I'd also vote to remove Palagin. It seems hes gone mia from the dev side and it consistently just causes issues. I've been playing with justaminers fork but have been using klaus-T for the past few weeks.
Yep, klaust works best for me out of the ccminer variants I have tried, but I think there might be another one of them that is even better at Neoscrypt (alexis78?). Also, Palgin's miner already has a 1% devfee and that can really hurt you if you are only mining for a few minutes each time it is loaded; that 1% could potentially turn into 20%. Finally, Palgin's miner starts off strong on all my rigs, but then after some random period of time exceeding 1hr the hashrate drops dramatically - by at least 10% - and this is reflected on the pool side (also, Palgin seems to be notorious for overstating hashrate in his miners, from what I've read here). |
|
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 10:15:56 PM |
|
Just to make things interesting I am running NPlusMiner 1.3 on one of my single GTX 1080 test rigs and NemosMiner 2.4.2 on the other one to see which algos they choose and how the estimated profitability changes. There is a huge variation of the latter between them, but they are often choosing the same algo...
E.g. - X17 runs at 13.23 MH/s on Rig 1 (NPlusMiner) and is projected to earn 0.335 mBTC per day, while it runs at 13.39 MH/s on Rig 2 but is only projected to earn 0.206 mBTC per day... So a slightly higher hashrate results in a much lower projected earnings?!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
February 20, 2018, 10:31:22 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2018, 11:13:35 PM by MagicSmoker |
|
Okay, something else seems to not be working right. I just noticed that the algo listed as most profitable was not only not being currently run, it was not even switched to at the next update: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.311 0.00031 3.640 0.01261 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.75 MH/s 0.310 0.00031 3.626 0.00414 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.298 0.00030 3.495 0.02166 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.282 0.00028 3.297 0.06694 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.281 0.00028 3.286 0.12660 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.256 0.00026 3.003 0.00499 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein 680.42 MH/s 0.239 0.00024 2.801 0.00035 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.224 0.00022 2.618 0.01289 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.223 0.00022 2.607 0.00389 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.212 0.00021 2.488 0.01009 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.211 0.00021 2.476 0.16770 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.211 0.00021 2.465 409.73627 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.201 0.00020 2.349 0.01342 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.186 0.00019 2.177 0.01146 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.157 0.00016 1.842 0.01044 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.126 0.00013 1.472 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.089 0.00009 1.044 0.00001 zpoolplus-
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.75 MH/s 00:00:13 00:00:13 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/20/2018 16:31:55
Sleep 180 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.75 MH/s 00:00:16 00:00:16 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/20/2018 16:34:55
Sleep 180 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stats ' Tribus ' -> 74.85 MH after 1163 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading BTC rate from 'api.coinbase.com'..
Loading pool stats..
Loading miners..
Idle: 1
Speed Exited Active Cnt Command
----- ------ ------ --- -------
1.27 MH/s 00:00:19 00:00:36 Once Bin\NeoScrypt-Palgin\hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o
stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
1BTC = 11709.98 USD
+++++ DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya
zpoolplus Balance= 0.25198962 2,520%
Trust Level 8%
[ 00 days 00:29 ]
Average BTC/H BTC = 6.53107357 | mBTC = 6,531.074
Average BTC/D
BTC = 156.74576559 | mBTC = 156,745.766
Estimated Pay Date 2/20/2018 4:30:00 PM > 0.01 BTC
+++++
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.85 MH/s 0.326 0.00033 3.817 0.00435 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.308 0.00031 3.604 0.01249 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.295 0.00030 3.458 0.02143 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.270 0.00027 3.166 0.06428 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.256 0.00026 2.998 0.00499 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.244 0.00024 2.860 0.11018 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein 680.42 MH/s 0.243 0.00024 2.840 0.00036 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.222 0.00022 2.604 0.01282 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.215 0.00022 2.522 0.00376 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.211 0.00021 2.474 0.16756 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.208 0.00021 2.434 404.53610 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.201 0.00020 2.349 0.01342 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.199 0.00020 2.336 0.00948 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.184 0.00018 2.153 0.01133 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.143 0.00014 1.673 0.00948 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.111 0.00011 1.305 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.089 0.00009 1.044 0.00001 zpoolplus-
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.85 MH/s 00:00:19 00:00:19 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
Phi was the most profitable algo but tribus was still running. Next update, neoscrypt is loaded even though it isn't anywhere close to being the most profitable. Finally, tribus is deemed most profitable and the correct miner is loaded...  EDIT - A possible clue! The Phi port was disabled on Zpool once again, though I am not sure exactly when. The last Phi coin in my exchange queue came in around 1 hour before I wrote the original post (about 2 hours at the time of this edit). |
|
|
|
|
EVERYUSERNAMEISTAKEN
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 11:03:08 PM |
|
I'm failing to repro the two miners opened
Thinking of taking Plagin away for NeoScrypt. Seems to be a lot issues with it.
Need more testimonies for decision.
For what it's worth, I've had a fairly good experience with HSRminer, particularly with Just_a_miner's fork. I like to restart it once every 8 hours or so and it'll often produce the hash rates I see on client-side. I've heard good things about KlausT if you're willing to mess with intensity, but I haven't tried that myself. Stock KlausT is underwhelming IME. NH's Excavator (1.4.4 I believe?) is also excellent for Neo when it comes to 1080Tis/TitanXPs. Not sure what their licensing details are, but might be worth replacing HSRminer if it's (relatively) easy to integrate. |
|
|
|
|
romajc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 11:12:47 PM |
|
I'm confused as to the difference between Nplusminer and Nemos2.5... their newest clone. Did they merge or something?
|
|
|
|
|
DankNetCode
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2018, 11:55:08 PM |
|
I'm confused as to the difference between Nplusminer and Nemos2.5... their newest clone. Did they merge or something?
From what I understand, it's the logic in how Nplus decides which is the most profitable algorithm. Not sure if Nemos is incorporating MrPlus' most recent changes to his miner, because if he is, the net results are going to be very similar. |
|
|
|
|
DankNetCode
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 12:07:36 AM |
|
I'm failing to repro the two miners opened
Thinking of taking Plagin away for NeoScrypt. Seems to be a lot issues with it.
Need more testimonies for decision.
I had the two miners open when I was benchmarking Neoscrypt. After I removed the NeoScrypt algo, everything else seemed to work as well as NemosMiner typcially has. Palgin's HSRminer also didn't close when the benchmarking should have been finshed, but I've often found that to be the case with other algos/miners in NemosMiner as well. When benchmarking, if the miner doesn't close after the second interval it will likely run until you stop it. When I see that, I shut the script down and restart, that usually resolves the issue.... although it didn't in the case of HSRminer. So ya, +1 here to remove it until you can figure out what the problem is. It's too bad, it's the fastest Neoscrypt miner I've tested. |
|
|
|
|
romajc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 01:41:50 AM |
|
I moved Neoscrypt from palginhsr to ccminerKlaust. Just edit the "#" in the miners folder. Pretty easy.
|
|
|
|
|
romajc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 01:44:10 AM |
|
Also, Blazepool profits aren't working for me. I also had to add to the blazepoolplus.bat "keccak"{$Divisor *= 1000} in order for it to work correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
l1one1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 03:10:09 AM |
|
MrPlus,
So I am having an issue getting the Earnings Tracking to show up. I have 2 rigs running nplus now but both are not showing. 1 on Zerg and another on Blaze.
On my screens I see BTC price
++++++
Running:
then all the miner info
I have seen from screenshots that is where the info is supposed to be.
I must have gone over the Readme a half dozen times double checking. You state it is started by default. This is what I have tried to so far.
1. I have included -UIStyle Full in my plus.bat .
2. I have tried pressing the e button and waiting for next refresh and getting nothing. 1 rig is on direct keyword and the other is via Teamviewer.
Any help would be appreciated.
l1one1
|
|
|
|
|
cryptomoblo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2018, 08:52:34 AM |
|
What happens when 100% trust level is reached? Seeing issue that these values didn't get updated anymore (balance and average btc/d and btc/h). Seeing same issue with nemosminer. Pool stats not getting updated anymore so it keeps mining the ALGO that was on top the last time it refreshed the stats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
