👑 CoinRoyale.com - Original Bitcoin Casino | Trusted Since 2013 ✔️

[lite]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

[Bitinity]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

Do we need to wait for it? How many people sign up can increase till the last minutes of the tournament, cant it? Because there is no time limitation on the registration. I think it is also not about how many people are signing up, but it is more about how many people are qualified at the end of the tournament. It will be useless to see more than 20 sign up but less than 20 who are qualified. Correct me if I'm wrong

[BTCevo]

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

I think so because he has clearly mentioned that he wants minimum 20 members to start this competition so he may not start if this condition not met.

This competition will start only from tomorrow if all conditions met - from 12:00AM PST Monday, March 26th, 2018 to Sunday, April 1st, 2018 11:59PM PST

So how about if there is not enough players but there is already some winners? Thisnis quite wasting if he really cancelled it

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

Where did you see 100% winning chance? As I can see there is a test mode of leaderboard with 100% winning percentage, not a winning chance. Winning percentage is calculated by winning amount/bet amount as you can read on the terms.
Leaderboard is not up to date as the tournament is not yet started, and I think it will be updated daily like the previous leaderboard unless victorhing has something new on it.

Yes the test leaderboard, that means he gets a 100% winning chance right? Which is really impossible because there is house edge, and if I am not mistaken the calculation will be profit/total wagered*100% right? So if there is 150 games, if the amount is 0.001 then you will profit 0.15 plus have a 100% winning percentage and you will be top 1, so how is this even possible?

[Bitinity]

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

Where did you see 100% winning chance? As I can see there is a test mode of leaderboard with 100% winning percentage, not a winning chance. Winning percentage is calculated by winning amount/bet amount as you can read on the terms.
Leaderboard is not up to date as the tournament is not yet started, and I think it will be updated daily like the previous leaderboard unless victorhing has something new on it.

Yes the test leaderboard, that means he gets a 100% winning chance right? Which is really impossible because there is house edge, and if I am not mistaken the calculation will be profit/total wagered*100% right? So if there is 150 games, if the amount is 0.001 then you will profit 0.15 plus have a 100% winning percentage and you will be top 1, so how is this even possible?

I'm not really sure how you understand about it, but I'm sure you understand it in a wrong way. Players do not need to win all the bets to get 100% winning percentage as it is clearly explained how to calculate the winning percentage. Winning percentage can even more than 100%, just take a look at the previous tournaments there are some players with more than 100% winning percentage.
I do not know how to make you understand about it in a better way. Maybe others will tell you or victor will answer it with more details or example.

[victorhing]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

Give it a try and let me know if you are still having an issue.

[victorhing]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

Do we need to wait for it? How many people sign up can increase till the last minutes of the tournament, cant it? Because there is no time limitation on the registration. I think it is also not about how many people are signing up, but it is more about how many people are qualified at the end of the tournament. It will be useless to see more than 20 sign up but less than 20 who are qualified. Correct me if I'm wrong

Tournament is open for play, registration will remain open.

[victorhing]

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

I think so because he has clearly mentioned that he wants minimum 20 members to start this competition so he may not start if this condition not met.

This competition will start only from tomorrow if all conditions met - from 12:00AM PST Monday, March 26th, 2018 to Sunday, April 1st, 2018 11:59PM PST

So how about if there is not enough players but there is already some winners? Thisnis quite wasting if he really cancelled it

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

Where did you see 100% winning chance? As I can see there is a test mode of leaderboard with 100% winning percentage, not a winning chance. Winning percentage is calculated by winning amount/bet amount as you can read on the terms.
Leaderboard is not up to date as the tournament is not yet started, and I think it will be updated daily like the previous leaderboard unless victorhing has something new on it.

Yes the test leaderboard, that means he gets a 100% winning chance right? Which is really impossible because there is house edge, and if I am not mistaken the calculation will be profit/total wagered*100% right? So if there is 150 games, if the amount is 0.001 then you will profit 0.15 plus have a 100% winning percentage and you will be top 1, so how is this even possible?

The text you see on the leaderboard currently is just placement text.  Once we get the first pull of tournament data the leader board will be updated.

Here is how win % is calculated - (Win % is calculated (win amount/ bet amount))

[BTCevo]

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

Where did you see 100% winning chance? As I can see there is a test mode of leaderboard with 100% winning percentage, not a winning chance. Winning percentage is calculated by winning amount/bet amount as you can read on the terms.
Leaderboard is not up to date as the tournament is not yet started, and I think it will be updated daily like the previous leaderboard unless victorhing has something new on it.

Yes the test leaderboard, that means he gets a 100% winning chance right? Which is really impossible because there is house edge, and if I am not mistaken the calculation will be profit/total wagered*100% right? So if there is 150 games, if the amount is 0.001 then you will profit 0.15 plus have a 100% winning percentage and you will be top 1, so how is this even possible?

I'm not really sure how you understand about it, but I'm sure you understand it in a wrong way. Players do not need to win all the bets to get 100% winning percentage as it is clearly explained how to calculate the winning percentage. Winning percentage can even more than 100%, just take a look at the previous tournaments there are some players with more than 100% winning percentage.
I do not know how to make you understand about it in a better way. Maybe others will tell you or victor will answer it with more details or example.

Yes, I really quite confused about it, let say if we bet 1 btc and have 1.1 payout that means we got 110% right? And if we bet 0.1 btc and get 1 btc payout that means it should be 1000%? Is this how we calculated it? In the end you should need to be profit to get into the leaderboard right? And it is accumulated for 150 games so I think this will be quite hard to aim big percentage. And btw is there any minimal amount to bet? People can use 100 sat to hit higher multiplier and get huge percentage right?

[lite]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

Give it a try and let me know if you are still having an issue.

Well, i just signed up and everything is working good. thanks! i hope i win something nice in this tournament.

The text you see on the leaderboard currently is just placement text.  Once we get the first pull of tournament data the leader board will be updated.

Here is how win % is calculated - (Win % is calculated (win amount/ bet amount))

How often will leaderboard be update?

[victorhing]

I tried to sign up, gave my email and username after submitting the form i get this error "this site can't be reached". am i in or should i wait for a fix and try signing up again?

There is a term saying that "In order for the tournament to be official, there must be a minimum of 20 participants."

Currently, how many people signed up for this competition?

I'm waiting on Victor to give us an update on this.

Give it a try and let me know if you are still having an issue.

Well, i just signed up and everything is working good. thanks! i hope i win something nice in this tournament.

The text you see on the leaderboard currently is just placement text.  Once we get the first pull of tournament data the leader board will be updated.

Here is how win % is calculated - (Win % is calculated (win amount/ bet amount))

How often will leaderboard be update?

The leaderboard will be updated daily starting tomorrow.

[victorhing]

I just checked about your march madness and this is indeed really good event to end this march but you said that it should be played by min 20 players. So are you saying that you are going to cancelled it if there is not more than 20 players although there are already few winners up there? And btw about your daily leaderboard, is thay up to date? Because I saw there is 100% winning chance which mean there is a player win all of their bet in 150 games? Is this even possible thing to do?

Where did you see 100% winning chance? As I can see there is a test mode of leaderboard with 100% winning percentage, not a winning chance. Winning percentage is calculated by winning amount/bet amount as you can read on the terms.
Leaderboard is not up to date as the tournament is not yet started, and I think it will be updated daily like the previous leaderboard unless victorhing has something new on it.

Yes the test leaderboard, that means he gets a 100% winning chance right? Which is really impossible because there is house edge, and if I am not mistaken the calculation will be profit/total wagered*100% right? So if there is 150 games, if the amount is 0.001 then you will profit 0.15 plus have a 100% winning percentage and you will be top 1, so how is this even possible?

I'm not really sure how you understand about it, but I'm sure you understand it in a wrong way. Players do not need to win all the bets to get 100% winning percentage as it is clearly explained how to calculate the winning percentage. Winning percentage can even more than 100%, just take a look at the previous tournaments there are some players with more than 100% winning percentage.
I do not know how to make you understand about it in a better way. Maybe others will tell you or victor will answer it with more details or example.

Yes, I really quite confused about it, let say if we bet 1 btc and have 1.1 payout that means we got 110% right? And if we bet 0.1 btc and get 1 btc payout that means it should be 1000%? Is this how we calculated it? In the end you should need to be profit to get into the leaderboard right? And it is accumulated for 150 games so I think this will be quite hard to aim big percentage. And btw is there any minimal amount to bet? People can use 100 sat to hit higher multiplier and get huge percentage right?

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

[panjul07]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

[poplolnman]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

I think victor says it clearly the counting system are on how much bet amount and the winning percentage accumulated . Even with your scenario to do 149 bets with minimum bet amount , it would difficult to get a high winning percentage .

[cazkooo]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

If the math is right then that would be the best way to win this tournament. It would be much better in the end to not join and just wait for the leaderboard in the last 3 days. If it is worth it to consider this strategy then Im sure someone would use it to win. Smart people is going to win this tournament not the lucky guy unfortunately

[benzergo]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

If the math is right then that would be the best way to win this tournament. It would be much better in the end to not join and just wait for the leaderboard in the last 3 days. If it is worth it to consider this strategy then Im sure someone would use it to win. Smart people is going to win this tournament not the lucky guy unfortunately

my friend tried this method last year. minimum wager requirements was .03BTC, ended up losing .12BTC 'cause he didnt win on the first try. so you also need luck. lucky and smart would win this tournament.

[sasor11]

how to participate?

[cazkooo]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

If the math is right then that would be the best way to win this tournament. It would be much better in the end to not join and just wait for the leaderboard in the last 3 days. If it is worth it to consider this strategy then Im sure someone would use it to win. Smart people is going to win this tournament not the lucky guy unfortunately

my friend tried this method last year. minimum wager requirements was .03BTC, ended up losing .12BTC 'cause he didnt win on the first try. so you also need luck. lucky and smart would win this tournament.

Indeed you need to have some luck because it is a game of probability which means having better probability will ensure you to get the first rank. As of now this might be the best chance to win the tournament. The probability on the first try however stays the same or probably someone could cheat by having multiple account? Im not sure about this

[benzergo]

how to participate?

You need to have an account in coinroyale.com and register for the dice madness tournament.

[lite]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

If the math is right then that would be the best way to win this tournament. It would be much better in the end to not join and just wait for the leaderboard in the last 3 days. If it is worth it to consider this strategy then Im sure someone would use it to win. Smart people is going to win this tournament not the lucky guy unfortunately

my friend tried this method last year. minimum wager requirements was .03BTC, ended up losing .12BTC 'cause he didnt win on the first try. so you also need luck. lucky and smart would win this tournament.

Indeed you need to have some luck because it is a game of probability which means having better probability will ensure you to get the first rank. As of now this might be the best chance to win the tournament. The probability on the first try however stays the same or probably someone could cheat by having multiple account? Im not sure about this

It's all luck what we need to win it. creating multiple account and cheating is possible, however it won't be feasible as one has to reach this minimum requirement to be eligible and i'm sure victor can catch cheaters with different techniques and ban them.

minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered.

how to participate?

Sign up here(https://coinroyale.com/dice-tournament).

[BTCevo]

Theoretically what you say above could happen.  Although with all the promotions we have run using this format we have yet to see anything even close to a 1000%. Most 1st place finishers generally come in around 130% range.

That is why there is minimum betting requirements of 150 rounds and 0.05 BTC wagered. So a player can not play just 1 round and have a sky high winning percentage.

Actually your requirements is not so effective, whales who are interested with the prize can easily win this because they can just made 1 bet with a bit higher multiplier (lets say bet 0.05 with 3x multipler). If they win it = 200% winning percentage (if my math is not that bad), then will only need to make the other 149 bets with the minimum bet amount. I'm sure whales wont be afraid to risk 0.05btc for 1.2btc

Yes, this is quite good reason big whale will play for it and that is why I ask for minimal bet, if there is no minimal bet then this strategy might happen and big whale will always win this eventually. But if only he is lucky and hit it on the first try then he might get the first prize

But how is this calculated victor? Accumulated from 150 games or after 150 games it counts towards the percentage?