BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 24, 2013, 02:42:49 AM |
|
I finally got cgminer 3.7.2 from kr105 to compile on linux with gpu mining enabled, however, it does not seem to be submitting the shares generated to the pool. my LW (local work generated) number increases but Accepted, Rejected, HW errors, and WU all are 0. any ideas? thanks
have you set your cgminer.conf correctly?
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
CoinGeneral
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
The General
|
|
December 24, 2013, 08:54:27 AM |
|
"Dragon Coin"
Would have sounded a lot better. BlakeCoin sounds like you named it after yourself.
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 24, 2013, 09:01:03 AM Last edit: December 24, 2013, 09:53:58 AM by BlueDragon747 |
|
"Dragon Coin"
Would have sounded a lot better. BlakeCoin sounds like you named it after yourself.
lol it is named after the hash function the coin is based on https://131002.net/blake/
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
December 24, 2013, 10:04:54 AM |
|
Does the zTex 1.15y bitstream work on zTex 1.15x?
I'm pretty sure the 1.15y will NOT work on the 1.15x. The original bitcoin miner has different bitstreams and firmware for the 1.15y and the 1.15b (of which the 1.15x is a variant), so my guess it that its incompatible. The ztex are very well documented though, so a port would very likely be possible (probably just needs a change to the UCF pinout and recompilation). Not high on my list of priorities at the moment though, sorry. Perhaps sometime in the new year. Ok, will check back later. I have 5 1.15x that will be hashing for blakecoin the day it comes out!
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
garicup
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
December 24, 2013, 04:01:12 PM |
|
This coin needs better promotion
|
|
|
|
kramble
|
|
December 24, 2013, 04:11:06 PM |
|
This coin needs better promotion
Seems to be building nicely. Sometimes slow but sure is better than fast pump&dump (doge, I'm looking at you, and your kittehcat wannabes). Pool is up (could do with another as its currently way over 51%), got block explorer, exchange will come, plus the gamilicious goodies that the creator has in mind. This one is a keeper IMHO.
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 25, 2013, 02:29:46 AM |
|
Thanks for all your help with Blakecoin kramble you have done some really awesome work on the FPGA, I will try to get another pool up for the new year Merry Christmas everyone
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 25, 2013, 10:24:08 AM Last edit: December 25, 2013, 12:07:22 PM by BlueDragon747 |
|
I had the question of why faster hash rate is better fast hashing is not the same thing as more coins or faster rounds, the wallet will always want to retarget the difficulty to get a result on average of 3 minutes per block the higher hash rate should make for better averages for block finds (larger set) e.g more guesses of block hash at a given difficulty should give more chances of a random block find also the speed from the Blake-256 algorithm does not mean that it uses more power in fact the modified Blake-256 uses less than scrypt and about the same for SHA-256 on the GPU and on the FPGA again Blake is very close to SHA-256 about 3w less but the external power adapter could account for this difference Blake-256 has much better parallelism than SHA-256 and with Scrypt it is almost a linear hash function very little parallel structure watch the youtube presentation to see how it works (the modified Blake-256 used in Blakecoin only uses 8 rounds - 64G function calls) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgpJNRnx6eY so it just does more hashing per watt than Scrypt/SHA-256, more shares on a pool should give everyone a better average what the wallet does not like is huge spikes in the hashing which can lead to long rounds but with a quick 20 block retarget it never lasts that long Hope that makes things clear
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
Mek
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 6
mtc.mekweb.eu - mega transistor clock
|
|
December 25, 2013, 01:56:11 PM |
|
I am using reaper to solo-mine BLC. All the posts here are dealing with cgminer. Is there a way to set up reaper for pool mining?
|
My Scrabble game: skrebl.eu My database of electronic parts: elparts.mekweb.eu My DIY electronic kit - mega transistor clock: mtc.mekweb.eu
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 25, 2013, 03:13:08 PM Last edit: December 26, 2013, 04:01:11 AM by BlueDragon747 |
|
I am using reaper to solo-mine BLC. All the posts here are dealing with cgminer. Is there a way to set up reaper for pool mining?
reaper submits a lot of stales on the pool which cgminer does not, reaper is best for solo mining but use cgminer on the pool will get you more accepted shares
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
luffy
|
|
December 25, 2013, 08:48:15 PM |
|
in my wallet i see:  { "version" : 80900, "protocolversion" : 70001, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 30.00183031, "blocks" : 41927, "timeoffset" : -10, "connections" : 4, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 1884.01392316, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1387981174, "keypoolsize" : 90, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "unlocked_until" : 0, "errors" : "" }
in the pool i see: Current Difficulty 3137.48393601 Est. Next Difficulty 2790.12679628 (Change in 2790.12679628 Blocks) Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network) 3 minutes 22 seconds Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool) 4 minutes 30 seconds Est. Shares this Round 1569 (done: 4761.89%) Next Network Block 41944 (Current: 41943) Last Block Found 41883 Time Since Last Block 7 hours 50 minutes 21 seconds
why such difference? i have downloaded all the blocks!
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:44:55 AM Last edit: December 26, 2013, 03:15:40 AM by BlueDragon747 |
|
I think the pool has some issue atm I have asked kr105 to take a look
Edit: Should be working fine now
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
luffy
|
|
December 26, 2013, 07:48:39 AM |
|
yes, diff is the same but the pool is still 2 or 3 blocks ahead, or the wallet is behind. i think it is not a big deal
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 26, 2013, 08:07:22 AM Last edit: December 26, 2013, 12:59:33 PM by BlueDragon747 |
|
yes, diff is the same but the pool is still 2 or 3 blocks ahead, or the wallet is behind. i think it is not a big deal yeah the broadcasts of blocks does take time to get to all nodes/wallets on the network and the pool server is likely in a data-center plus it is working on new blocks Edit: could be issue with pool server I will ask kr105 to have a look
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
Mek
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 6
mtc.mekweb.eu - mega transistor clock
|
|
December 26, 2013, 10:13:58 AM |
|
cgminer is not working for me. I downloaded it from pool web page. At first it complained about missing "libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll" which I downloaded from the net and put it in program directory, then cgminer succeeded to open. I ran it with command line arguments as described on the pool page like cgminer --blake256 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.blakecoinpool.org:3333 -u workerusername -p workerpassword (I created the worker previously via pool page). I am getting repeated errors "pool 0 JSON stratum auth failed: (null)". I think something is not working, how to fix it? Also, it is always mining on my slow GPU "Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000". But my computer also has an NVIDIA card which is much faster (well, at least was in reaper). I cannot seem to get cgminer switch to the nvidia card - the "-g" command line switch is not working. cgminer -ndev says: [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 vendor: Intel(R) Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 name: Intel(R) OpenCL [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 0 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 vendor: NVIDIA Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 name: NVIDIA CUDA [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.1 CUDA 6.0.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 1 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 GeForce GTX 670M [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Unable to load ati adl library [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 1 GPU devices max detected [2013-12-26 11:12:44] USB all: found 6 devices - listing known devices [2013-12-26 11:12:44] No known USB devices
What should I do to mine on the nvidia card?
|
My Scrabble game: skrebl.eu My database of electronic parts: elparts.mekweb.eu My DIY electronic kit - mega transistor clock: mtc.mekweb.eu
|
|
|
awais3344
|
|
December 26, 2013, 10:16:45 AM |
|
cgminer is not working for me. I downloaded it from pool web page. At first it complained about missing "libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll" which I downloaded from the net and put it in program directory, then cgminer succeeded to open. I ran it with command line arguments as described on the pool page like cgminer --blake256 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.blakecoinpool.org:3333 -u workerusername -p workerpassword (I created the worker previously via pool page). I am getting repeated errors "pool 0 JSON stratum auth failed: (null)". I think something is not working, how to fix it? Also, it is always mining on my slow GPU "Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000". But my computer also has an NVIDIA card which is much faster (well, at least was in reaper). I cannot seem to get cgminer switch to the nvidia card - the "-g" command line switch is not working. cgminer -ndev says: [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 vendor: Intel(R) Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 name: Intel(R) OpenCL [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 0 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 vendor: NVIDIA Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 name: NVIDIA CUDA [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.1 CUDA 6.0.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 1 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 GeForce GTX 670M [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Unable to load ati adl library [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 1 GPU devices max detected [2013-12-26 11:12:44] USB all: found 6 devices - listing known devices [2013-12-26 11:12:44] No known USB devices
What should I do to mine on the nvidia card? auth fail just means you entered the wrong username/password combination for the pool. your username should be yourpoolusername.workername
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ NEOSCOIN +POD Developers +Active Community - V2 Coming Soon! Live In-App Trading, Live Pool Stats - IRC - Arbitrush Anonymous System soon!! NEOSCOIN ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 26, 2013, 10:28:15 AM |
|
cgminer is not working for me. I downloaded it from pool web page. At first it complained about missing "libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll" which I downloaded from the net and put it in program directory, then cgminer succeeded to open. I ran it with command line arguments as described on the pool page like cgminer --blake256 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.blakecoinpool.org:3333 -u workerusername -p workerpassword (I created the worker previously via pool page). I am getting repeated errors "pool 0 JSON stratum auth failed: (null)". I think something is not working, how to fix it? Also, it is always mining on my slow GPU "Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000". But my computer also has an NVIDIA card which is much faster (well, at least was in reaper). I cannot seem to get cgminer switch to the nvidia card - the "-g" command line switch is not working. cgminer -ndev says: [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 vendor: Intel(R) Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 name: Intel(R) OpenCL [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 0 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 vendor: NVIDIA Corporation [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 name: NVIDIA CUDA [2013-12-26 11:12:44] CL Platform 1 version: OpenCL 1.1 CUDA 6.0.1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Platform 1 devices: 1 [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 0 GeForce GTX 670M [2013-12-26 11:12:44] Unable to load ati adl library [2013-12-26 11:12:44] 1 GPU devices max detected [2013-12-26 11:12:44] USB all: found 6 devices - listing known devices [2013-12-26 11:12:44] No known USB devices
What should I do to mine on the nvidia card? try this version and edit the cgminer.conf with your details then just run just cgminer without any switches http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-alt-pool.7zfor nvidia cards you need a cuda miner to get the real performance, opencl does work but not fast, no cuda miner has yet been ported to Blake-256
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
Mek
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 6
mtc.mekweb.eu - mega transistor clock
|
|
December 26, 2013, 11:03:37 AM |
|
Thanks for clarifying, guys. I made the conf file edits and now cgminer runs without errors. How can I set it up for the nvidia card to see how it performs? In reaper I was getting around 250 MH/s, but I fear that cgminer will be much slower.
|
My Scrabble game: skrebl.eu My database of electronic parts: elparts.mekweb.eu My DIY electronic kit - mega transistor clock: mtc.mekweb.eu
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
December 26, 2013, 11:35:54 AM |
|
Thanks for clarifying, guys. I made the conf file edits and now cgminer runs without errors. How can I set it up for the nvidia card to see how it performs? In reaper I was getting around 250 MH/s, but I fear that cgminer will be much slower.
try adding this to the cgminer.conf it should force platform 1 which is your nvidia card "gpu-platform" : "1",
|
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
|