Bounty and too many participants

[RajaCripto]

if talking as a bounty hunter would really object to the many followers of bounty campaign, because it will reduce our income.

[1714171162]

1714171162

[1714171162]

1714171162

[mammoniter]

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

That is why I focused more on signature campaigns instead of multimedia campaigns since that type of bounty usually have a lot of participants since it is much easier and as I observed the harder tha campaign is the fewer the participants and the better the reward will be.

[psychie]

Yes, bounty is getting popular that why more people wants in joining bounties. I agree that the more participants that lesser the reward we will get.

[Nyo hai]

Yes indeed a lot of bounty that makes the rules very strict because  they look for the best and quality for following the project bounty

[Avatar2030]

The more people participate in bounty, the more opportunities for wider dissemination of information about ICO. If for someone becomes unprofitable to participate in bounty campaign he will leave and another will come to his place who will agree to carry out orders for a smaller payment. Therefore you shouldn't worry for this sphere as everything is regulated by itself.

[Tiklohor]

Yes, I agree that too many participants. and it is time for companies to think about restrictions.

[tentara pelajar]

That means bounty really worth doing and giving advantage. I think the participating in bounty is the "small players". I am sure that "big players" will be investors or both. Just calm down everything will be fine even though many participants on bounty and surely will more and more bonty will be present.

[Crypto.Expert]

It is not right that the rewards are getting lower and lower and the investors are off too, the bounty rewards are fair and doing the bounties are encouraging the investors to invest in there coin.

[dnxfgjhk]

All reward activities must be limited by participants in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It's also a good idea to give the bounty hunter a rating for the project to choose the best fit for their company, but I can't imagine how it will work.

[Specialforce]

Well that bounty is good but do not expect big profits in their because the share on iy was percentage but if the parcipants failed to do the work their will be kick and you will gain a lot of profits

[tinystone26]

I don't think campaign managers will spend time in choosing a perfect participants because as I know they are busy in their works and telegram question of the people who are asking about their campaign. No offense with this but I think if you want to get more profit you must join a campaign that has a strict manager with a limited slot only that you get a big profit into it.

[akina]

i think if so many people participants its good, i mean the project of that bounty is good and not scammer, because profesional people in this forum know about where is bounty scammer and not scamer so, we just follow it and learn about that

[cliber]

For me, the more new participants, the more morale we work in seeing bounty. If we assume that by adding new participants in each bounty project it will be reduced in return, it seems our assumption is not good. Because in all activities bounty aims to facilitate.

[trucltt18072002]

There are some bounties limits the participants, they depend on the allocation that they have. Some says the higher the community the higher the chance to make the project auccessful and vice versa.

[olumyd]

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

That is why I focused more on signature campaigns instead of multimedia campaigns since that type of bounty usually have a lot of participants since it is much easier and as I observed the harder tha campaign is the fewer the participants and the better the reward will be.

I once proposed that if bounty managers want to make campaigns more stringent, then they may decide to use a merit system like that which is done on BTT. It could help the quality of campaigns, especially signature campaigns.

[drogba773]

People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. Merit system already limited signature campaigns

[Morkhart]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns.

[Pagaralambesemah]

yes maybe the board should be able to choose who the right person to choose from. I as a new member already feel it, I am afraid in the future earnings will shrink. but it's back again in each other's fortune

[sjyku]

I doubt any change in the near future. How do you choose the best actor for social rewards? Even a boy can cope with social rewards, so there are always a lot of participants. Another thing that creates content.

[kusach01]

Just like a period ago about 4-5 months ago. In airdrop campaigns. There are some very high value airdrops and people pay attention to them. And now most airdrop is not worth much as before.