Bounty and too many participants

[evanstinger]

That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.

Precisely as my thought!
Yes, we are aware of this saturated bounty pools. As the crypto community grow bigger, this things were expected to happen. But, don't they have the same chance as everyone here to start their journey in crypto community? If the bounty managers only prefer the highest rank, it'll discourage the newcomers. Also, the 'quality' we talked here, in what kind of measurement? If it comes to article/blog writing or translations, we could judge this accordingly. But, if it comes to Twitter, Facebook or any Social Medias campaign, how can we differentiate anyone?

[Rastafarian]

So many bounties nowadays require thousands of participants and these participants in turn get few rewards since the amount of Eth invested into the campaign is too small and the participants are so many that each has to be served accordingly. Some bounties too have limited number of participants and the money invested is too small for the campaign. As it stands now, I don’t know but if bounty managers can find ways and means to limit the number of participants. It is an insinuation so please let us know yours.

[Jednopivo]

I think we might feel that at times there are too many participants as the more that take part, the less reward we get. But for ICO's the more - the better so they won't mind, and anyone feels that it's no longer worth their time and effort, it's their choice not to join in.
I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.

[AndrewBrown]

I do not think that the bounty managers are complaining because of too many participants. It is exactly what they were aiming for which is why they are doing the bounty campaigns in the first place, to get as many people involved in the project as possible and spreading the word to many potential investors which is the reason bounty allocations are high.

[Pytbo]

I think we might feel that at times there are too many participants as the more that take part, the less reward we get. But for ICO's the more - the better so they won't mind, and anyone feels that it's no longer worth their time and effort, it's their choice not to join in.
I've noticed, however, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.

I'm currently participating in a campaign that has a limit on the number of participants, and I'm very happy about it. Such campaigns are very rare. I think that this is a good approach and the campaign will be successful.

[relaxx]

yes, the more the participants are, the better for the ICO. Since they are doing more for advertisements of their project. i like, that some campaigns have limits on the number of people who join campaigns.

[Sevaev]

Although more and more participants are very profitable from the ico because they will also get a bigger presentation to get a lot of investors. And some bounties give huge profit so many people are attracted to it.

[teeevnglst]

That problem is hard to solve since the campaign itself is not that strict and thats the reason why so many people participate in it, so its a huge problem to regulate social media campaign and i doubt it will ever be change because its better for the company since social media is a  big platform to spread news from.

[huhansan]

Most people like free coins. Of course, they have to work hard and spend time doing some promotional work. Although they don't make a lot of profits, they are very good for free lunches. If a real investor, will trade directly, so that you can get coins faster and more.

[Hivecool]

Perhaps you are right that you need to tighten the bounty conditions. But most of all I'm bothered by bots. This process is quite easy to automate and it gives rise to the temptation to use bots. Especially if you look at the bounty for a telegram from some managers, there you can see up to 25k participants.

[Cocoincos]

last time its big problem, some campaigns pays 2-10$ for few month participation! I hope that admins will do something with it

[pendong101]

Yeah bounty campaigns getting more and more popular that's why rewards are getting more less cause of too many participants.

[isetter]

ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.

I do not think it is necessary. There are many unemployed and they need a job that can help them to survive. You should not be so selfish. The more people involved, the more the project will be advertised

[taktik]

ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.

I do not think it is necessary. There are many unemployed and they need a job that can help them to survive. You should not be so selfish. The more people involved, the more the project will be advertised

I think that there should be some restrictions on the number of participants and certain bodies. Since there are a lot of newcomers to the forum today, it is their number that must be limited, so do some managers.

[LickKing]

Many bounty participants are exactly what the bounty program hopes to be. There are still many projects and they don't even have participants. People are unwilling to participate in its projects.

[Galley]

Of course, the rules of the game will change over time. Regulation of the number of participants and their composition will be introduced. This is already present in companies. Yes, and the introduction of merit is a confirmation. But so far with the growth in the number of participants, the number of Bounty companies has also increased significantly, so there will be enough work for everyone. It remains only to make the right choice.

[Kertmu]

Of course, with the registration of new users, competition is increasing. About the fact that you need to do something, have already done, now you can not get a high rank. maximum probably - member

[adekogbe]

The issue of too many participants in a bounty is also down to the managers, a lot of popular projects cap their bounty participants and after a while stop accepting new members. I believe this is good to ensure people spread better over the many projects available.

[Evgeniy18582960]

I think that once all were not the best, and all developed gradually. Yes, the rewards are reduced with a large number of participants, it means that you have to work harder to get a good reward. I do not think that it is necessary to toughen the terms of participation in the company, it is necessary to give new members of our community to develop

[Chainsmokers]

it is true that today there are many bounty participants in a project. even reaching thousands of people who join. but there are some managers who apply the limited rules of bounty participants in the projects they manage, this can reduce the participants who want to follow the bounty program