Bounty and too many participants

[michael23]

I think that despite the large number of participants in the company's bounty can still bring you good profits. But in the future it will be a problem. After six months or a year, the number of participants will need to be limited, because when people start to pay $ 20 per signarute, all people will begin to resent and refuse to participate in the bounty companies.

[sukey2008]

That is how it should be ENU. As many people as possible should be able to get hold of whatever they put in the work for. Investors will invest, hunters will hunt. There should be incentive for every act here. Distribution is good. Embrace it. Thats how things will look with time when the mass adoption comes.

[goelzz]

indeed the participant's bounty social media (FB & Twitter) is too much so that the fee for bounty spelled out very small when compared with signatures, blogs and more.
I think for bounty social media should be limited participants, so the participants are not too much and the results are not bad either.
maybe bounty managers may consider this suggestion

[JeromeL]

My opinion is that in bounty campaigns it is necessary to enter the mandatory KYC identification because more and more participants lead to the participation of multi-accounts. This would increase the rewards for bona fide participants.

[financialgoal]

Bounty participant s are getting much, especially for the social media. I think the managers need a way to balancing some things so that things can go well and the rewards could be shared evenly.

[criptoman83]

I came to bounty last fall, then it was easy to make $ 300-500 for a Twitter and Facebook campaign. Now such earnings are the dream.  But I managed to earn some money, so I'm not very upset. Now i write articles, participate in signature campaigns and trade on the exchanges.  In light mode!

[Ayobami99]

Well,  its natural for something like this to happen,  eventually people who can think out of the box will be able to earn better

[maksimukr1989]

the increase in the number of participants in the bounty is a pattern that follows from the dissemination of information about the cryptocurrency.the growth is not so great.Generosity is also a job where you have to be diligent and not lazy.Most do not want to strain and work.  so don't worry participate in generosity.I wish you all successful projects

[vuongnguyen3020]

Today too many people engage in Bounty, and the fraudulent ico rifle is rampant in the Crypto market. We will be more difficult to participate in the Bounty campaign and the amount of tokens we receive will be less than in the past.

[Slaxx]

If you think there are too many participants in bounty campaign, most especially for those who are yet to come into it. They are missing a lot of opportunities.

[Oladejielisha]

I guess, As at now 50 per cent of people in the world are into cryptocurrency, then tell me how there will not be too much of people participating in each bounty and the counting is increasing day by day which brings about less amount received from each bounty.

[xanto]

There are such bounty campaigns, where less than 100 people participate in social campaigns, you are simply looking bad. There you can earn good money.

[orangy]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I am learning.

[vitkamenev]

Yes, now it is not so easy to choose companies that will bring more profit. But this can and should be done. In any case, competition is growing. But we don't know what will happen when there are really many participants in each campaign. Perhaps managers will do something, perhaps something else..

[Jamesdila1]

5 months ago there were only just 500+ participants to social media bounty of a good project. but now there are more than 3000+ members i can see in spreadsheets. anyway its good thing that crypto is spreading faster than ever. also we are getting less rewards. but i think even $50 from one social media bounty campaign also enough .for signature bounty i think 30% of total bounty allocation is enough. but still there are lot of project. join 10 projects once and do them. still you will earn $1000+

[Abugbilla]

Some bounties give a specific number of participants they want to have in their campaigns, others dont. And i think those who give a specific number to people are often taken more serious from my point of view. But if we are to limit the number of people in each campaign, the advertisement might not go very far.More over, some people will always be left behind and wont get enough campaigns to join.

[mayukus4life]

Inasmuch as participants are increasing for bounties so also there is a proportional increase in the number of bounties being churned out, I do not see it as a problem because if it's only fewer persons participating the much-needed publicity might not be achieved. These bounties are somehow cumbersome also, just take for example bounties that require 4 tweets a day, several Facebook posts, comments on bitcointalk. How many can someone partake in? Space is much to accommodate many, some will get tired most especially if the rewards are not redeemed on time, then they back out.

[kiboloves]

In recent months, there are a lot of Twitter and telegraph users in the bounty activities, which will certainly reduce the token distribution of the bounty participants. We all know that FB has banned ICO's business a long time ago, which has to be said to be related to the unlimited social media in the bounty activities, and I recommend reducing the shangj of social media promotion.

[Hisreal]

As a matter of fact, there are abundance battles which restricts their members. In spite of the fact that it isn't that huge of an arrangement truly. Financial specialists would have a tendency to contribute and, can, in the meantime join abundance. They know too well that on the off chance that they do trust the undertaking then it is smarter to toss your cash than getting some free little cash being apportioned in various crusades to a great deal of members. Likewise, members would tend to discover another battle in the event that they think there are excessively numerous members as of now so as such it tends to restrict themselves instead of actualizing a remark them.

[AnisahSiti]

this is because the task to do is very easy. especially for social media and telegram present. and the payment is still very legit. this is indeed a dilemma. but some managers and platforms began to limit. but the most I do not like is, many participants who follow more than 1 account.