Bounty and too many participants

[ErlindaBit]

You do not worry about too many participants. I once attended a bounty program with a few participants, and then the token sale did not work. From here I can conclude that the more communities, the token sales will be successful. So maybe token sales will affect the number of bounty participants.

[1714099943]

1714099943

[1714099943]

1714099943

[1714099943]

1714099943

[zanhef24]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

If the manager of the campaigns are having positive trust a lot of participants are coming in because they think its more legit to participate.For facebook and twitter you only have more friends on facebook for likes and share and for the twitter you should also have more followers so that your bounty rewards are in the maximum, we all know that for posting its hard to rank thats why they switch to facebook and twitter.

[wishman93]

Well, what do you think should be different? I think that today a lot of people know what bounties are and what crypto-currencies are, that's why they participate in bounty projects of different projects, someone completely ties up with crypto-currencies, I think it's not right.

[wishman93]

I don't mind a lot of participants. If a lot of people are participating, the stakes are lower, but usually the project raise more money and the end result is probably the same.

[rosebit]

It dosen't matter if too many people are into bounty since everyone will get to be paid.We really cant blame the users for joining the bounty campaigns since you can earn good tokens from it just by advertising the ICO in the social media account.

[Michail.]

It would not be bad if the managers limited the number of participants in the bounty, then you could at least make a little money.

[sabarr]

following the bounty campaign is very profitable because we can get a lot of money from it, but the fee we get will depend on the allocation and the divide by the number of participants, so the more participants the tokens we get will be less

[cynta]

I think we can not control or select participants who are interested in joining bounty campaign. because bounty organizers expect the project to be followed by as many people as possible, and the more who knows the program,,, then they hope his ICO will succeed. We can only choose which bounty  generates enough tokens for us. That's my opinion,,, hopefully not let you down.

[vendy86]

I think we can not control or select participants who are interested in joining bounty campaign. because bounty organizers expect the project to be followed by as many people as possible, and the more who knows the program,,, then they hope his ICO will succeed. We can only choose which bounty  generates enough tokens for us. That's my opinion,,, hopefully not let you down.

But the main problem here is,so many people that cheating at campaign.they using multi account to join 1 campaign.
It's not fair for people that only use 1 account for join campaign.
That why campaign manager should be more selective when accepting participant.

[Umkar]

Do you have a lot of recent bans on the forum related to the introduction of the merit system? Do you want to introduce additional restrictions so that few more would join the generosity campaigns? I do not think that in the forum that Satoshi Nakamoto created yet, you need to drive some restrictions. If the forum was conceived very democratically, then it is not necessary to create privileges for some, and prohibitions for others. Sathoshi Nakamoto probably did not dream about it.

[Negdan4ik]

choose companies where there are restrictions of participants, but do not forget that these same participants invest in this ico, I do not consider this a problem since many who participate do not know about cryptography and half.

[diangunz]

I feel that too, lots of new accounts and multiple accounts that participate in the bounty campaign, it's good that selective bounty managers sort out good accounts and limit participants to sosmed campaigns, unfortunately not all bounty managers like that

[madushanperis11]

I have personally experienced this and at the end the effort is just a waste of time for all the bounty hunters. The bounty should have a mechanism to limit the number of participants to a reasonable amount. This will also create a demand on the project where people have to go for the ICO to grab their share as the bounty is full.

[sevtan74]

Yes, you are right here, I have noticed it as well. There are so many fake accounts appeared. And there are people who want free money as well, which does not right.

[Umnikt]

From the fact that the popularity of the crypto currency and the number of interested people increases only gets better.

[Papajager]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

The situation you described mainly relates to campaigns where bounty managers are local eminent users.
Try other directions or other campaigns.
I do not know exactly how now, because I have not participated in the bounties for a long time. In such a bearish market, I have wanted to remember youth)

[RedzoneASE]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I disagree mate. For social media campaign I think that campagins do need alot of people since it the way to advertise and spread words about the ICO. In that way it is much easier to hunt for investors.

[modmalaney]

many of the participants would make the allocation obtained is increasingly reduced. Luckily for large rank account still has a chance because of the greater part of it. However for the member down naturally into will be hard to compete. but some of the bounty when it started I saw began restricting participants. pretty good for a problem of allocation of course but will be a scramble later to get the bounty.

[alttry2019]

this is not true. Looking for it carefully please. I believe some good bounties here.

[fathur01]

I think that the answer to this question has long been given. The best way to use it now is to limit the number of participants in bounty companies.