Bounty and too many participants

[Makinson]

There are projects that specify the tokens you will receive. Then increasing the number of participants will not affect your bonus.

It should affect what bonus a person could get because there is only a limited amount that they give out. They also have periods where they lock the tokens and drip the tokens so people can't dump down the market.

[1715377043]

1715377043

[1715377043]

1715377043

[1715377043]

1715377043

[1715377043]

1715377043

[ronaldo_oc]

I agree, it even makes me uncomfortable, some participants try to use someone else account to cheat. Thus, it is really important to have restrictions on the number of participants and strict requirements for accounts, so that bounty hunters could receive a generous reward because bounty program now is a very popular for any kind of business promoting.

[Revvo1]

I think you are very much correct with your view. However, that part of making bounty rules more stricter, won't even do you good, not talking about the whole. I can say the latest campaigns rules are getting stricter self. Then when people are finding it kinda hard now, how will anyone of us survive soonest? Let have a rethink about this.

[Lataman]

I think even the newbie peoples can have a chance to participate in bounty . It is the time for them to learn more about alt coins and become  investors in ICO in future. Besides, some companies have already limits for participants.

[novogum]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Now in the bounty company joins a lot of bots. Thus, there is a multi-account. It essentially kills the bounty company. This is especially noticeable in Twitter and Facebook companies. A lot of branches on the forum to combat multiaccounts, but this bot is not getting smaller.

[Flamebellow]

I believe we suffer from multi-account users and I think bounty managers and forum administration must do something to reveal all of them and kick-off from bounties , or even from forum . Just look at this thread "THE SCAMMER Guinness world record on bitcointalk 1 man 1000 accounts" - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4139632.msg38185053#msg38185053 and you'l understand the magnitude of the problem .

[jamesclark]

I do feel like we are in need of some kind of restrictions put on the number of participants because participating in projects is getting more and more popular in the crypto world.

[onemillionusd99]

I think we should have a tighter rule for bounty participants, because today many non-quality participants

[danbitcoin1]

The amount of participants will keep increasing I expect, the rewards are still high though if you pick a decent ICO, especially for content and sig campaigns.

[chelle5]

If you want to advertise in the whole world you have to need more participants. How can you grow if only few people working around you? I think you need more participants. In terms of reward you can earn the same maybe much better, so don't worry about new participants they do what you can not do.

[jonas5222000]

Its okay for me if the bounty participants in social was limiting only with almost 1000 or 2000 participant because the lesser participant the higher you chance to get profit,and as i know many people was using now dummy account to join in social so i think its unfair for us ,so now i was hoping for the good of many bounty hunters.

[jaeden1024]

There are to many participants but different choices they want to participate in a bounty campaigns.  Facebook, Twitter, signature and even in translation campaign. They gives are more rewards so don't lose hope be part of all.

[gogrowglow]

 I think it is hard to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high.  It is a sign that more and more people every day get acquainted with cryptocurrency.   Bounty campaigns are becoming more and more involved. Projects that have good ideas and potential will attract investors to enter the cryptocurrency market.  Many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in the ICO too.

[JoMarrah Iarim Dan]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I am one of so many participants in bounty. Yes I admit that some of the bounty I joined are soany participants especially in facebook and twitter campaign and sometimes signature campaign also. In some cases even though there are so many participants some participants are not accepted or do not have stakes. I can't blame anyone why bounty has so many participants. They / we are accepted because we are qualified. Like me, what if they really need money too ?

[XiaoRui]

I think it is hard to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high.  It is a sign that more and more people every day get acquainted with cryptocurrency.   Bounty campaigns are becoming more and more involved. Projects that have good ideas and potential will attract investors to enter the cryptocurrency market.  Many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in the ICO too.

I agree with you, today many people are interested in crypto currency, it's good or bad, it's hard to say, because the less people know, the more we have the profit, the more people know, we do our work better.

[okour999]

yes too much joins the bounty especially on fb and twitter as well as on the signature so it's a little bit different in the coin because of too much bounty in the bounty but it's pretty good too many to blame because if you go badly know just got a good deal just bounty

[runor]

Gentlemen!  Do not forget that the number of ICO projects is also increasing, thereby increasing the number of places for bounty hunters!

[aliba]

I am looking at the spreadsheet of every bounty program that launched so many bounty participants who follow it this way I think is not too problematic, the problem is nowadays very many bounty programs are not successful in ico and this will delay our profit or our income in bounty campaign.

[Singbatak]

I am agree to you, the best Campaign to join has a limit participant. Certainly you have a great deal of sharing, and the spreadsheet is always updated. But I think it is not wrong to join a campaign with many participant as long as it is legit. If your reward is low, it is better to hold it until the value is high.

[kim owen]

Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.