Bounty and too many participants

[Pr.Victus]

Sometimes investing in ICO will bring much more profit than participating in the company's bounty. In addition, to participate in them need to spend a lot of time. Most often this does not pay off.

[Hektur]

Sometimes investing in ICO will bring much more profit than participating in the company's bounty. In addition, to participate in them need to spend a lot of time. Most often this does not pay off.

So why are you still participating in bounties, when it is not profitable for you?

I hate bounty hunters who hate their own job/hobby.
Bounty is love not a duty!

[pidonkmo]

My perception of this is every day always born a newcommers in this forum that too many participants represent the value of the gift tokens but the percentage of prizes is so low then joining the bounty with too many participants is not good because you will do hard work but the stakes will be very low due to the small amount of tokens given to it. The good news is that more people know about crypto. the bad news is that the gifts we get are getting smaller. but I think it depends on our own efforts.

[dpoisoner]

I agree with you. The reward is getting smaller. But the choice is yours. I do not enter into such bounty programs.

[Disclaimert]

today more and more bounty projects are ongoing and so are the participants who join the bounty projects. sometimes too many participants who follow a bounty project so that the benefits gained by the participants to be a little.

[aedankreios]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

since bounty campaign has an allocation per campaign (twitter , facebook, signature ) i think it is hard to limit those participants because that allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high.

i totally agree with you. earning with bounties has been proven and its been even more popular so its given that every bounties campaign will have many participant but to limit i think that will not happen, earning those tokens are divided base on the allocation as per ranks of participant.

[Drakula]

The bitcointalk has opened a road for everyone to earn money without investment. We saw a new method from bitcointalk global moderator a few months ago.Global moderator Merit introduced the system.For this reason, rank change is not easy.For this, the junior member is now want to campaign for Facebook and Twitter bounty.So now there are many participants on facebook and twitter campaign.Many people can not signature campaign because there is no change in rank. So everyone is moving forward Twitter and Facebook campaigns.

Yep one way to earn free tokens are joining bounty campaigns. Campaigns have their own standards to filter out participants and to make sure there is quality in every post. Joining campaigns is easy and very promising. Just be wise, patient, and compliant.

[Lakash]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

bounty campaign is really becoming more and more popular. it is bacause of the rewards that are being given after the campaign. if there will be regulations that will be followed and implemented, there will be stricter bounty campaign.

[jenktosar]

yes there too many people now and it has made the bounty rewards to reduce. I think everyday more and more learn about cryptos and how to make free money in cryptos and they will discover bounty and join. I see a lot more people joining the bounty in few months to come.

[eMaxie]

I do not think that it's such a problem. Yes, lots of people participate in bounties and thus leads to decreased stakes or whatever they call it. But if the project is legit then it's definitely worth trying. As for me, I try to participate only in bounties that I find most promising and perspective like that one

[lucian999]

too much is involved in the bounty because the bounty is too big for bitcoin signature but it is quite a bit because the manager is too busy but the bounty is really good because you really have to earn a little after a long time bounty hard work and perseverance

[masbimz]

Yes I already know the phenomenon, and I feel the effects of too many campaign participants, rather than positive, so many know about the crypto world, and I do not mind the results that I have a little or a lot

[DDamiRR]

Yes, now in many bounty campaigns come a lot of participants. But still, sometimes come across such bounty, where few participants. I hope for me these bounty will be successful)

[itsmamedoff]

I think it is the policy of each dev that regulates the rule of bounty, we can not do anything because it proves more bounty participants then the more likely the project will be successful so we can only surrender

[Mr. Sorry]

If my opinion is now many bounty projects that limit the participants who will join the bounty. One of them is a sylon that limits signature participants so that later payment can be more leverage.

[notthepuma]

Yes, this problem is really very common, but I know that you can still find a bounty in which there will not be so many participants! In my opinion d all the same it is necessary to choose the bounty of a strong project, which will not be a scam!

[DariaBriklaiz]

You can take part bounty which has limits dor participants. And nobody will make obstractions for you to earn on bounty good money. Bounties is already strict

[Xmm]

The choice is always yours! Choose those companies where the least number of people, either put up with it and do a good job)

[VazLorde]

I think if bounty is crowded by investors and participants will increase the percentage of success

[Papaczed]

You can take part bounty which has limits dor participants. And nobody will make obstractions for you to earn on bounty good money. Bounties is already strict

I dont participate on bounty thst has too many participants because i know to myself that i  will not earn a good profit when the bounty has too many participants so i just participated on bounty that has a limited participant only.