[ANN] Zettelkasten - ZTTL, New Algo: BurgerHash V6 🍔, CPU-SOLO-mineable

[masulum]

Wow its very simple to mining, good job dev..


You have a plans to open translation bounty?

i reserved for Indonesian, let me know if needed.

[zettelkasten]

0 Active connections for me.

are there any nodes to add to sync the wallet?

wallet wont sync

haha, sorry guys, my 2 main nodes are fully maxxed out at 125 connections each.  
I didn't expect the launch to be so successful.

I have PM'ed a few fellow devs that should help out temporarily, and I'm observing what peers have port 51339 open so I can add them.

I will soon hardcode a dozen or more seed nodes to the wallets and rebuilt.

I'll be back!

[alby1976]

Cool.
I like the idea of CPU mining, as I don't have 50 GPUs.

I have 2 laptops, is it possible to run this on both, without having 2 different wallets?

[zettelkasten]

Cool.
I like the idea of CPU mining, as I don't have 50 GPUs.

I have 2 laptops, is it possible to run this on both, without having 2 different wallets?

Not yet.
The miner is integrated in the wallet, so you are required to run the wallet with every CPU you want to use for mining.

Anyway, I can already see the GPU-miner on the horizon...

[dunedainbob]

Mining from linux daemon works fine for me.

[zettelkasten]

New algos always get lots of attention. Especially ones with no premine, no ICO, and fair launch. I follow this forum closely every day, when 99% of ANNs are for ICOs, MN copy presale scams, and scrypt/cryptonote clones with 10% premines, projects like yours tend to stand out 

I know how shitty the altcoin-sphere is but I underestimated how fed up most of the people are...
...although I should have known better.

Anyway, this is of course fantastic and my faith in humanity is kinda restored.

 

[mattpatto]

Can I setgenerate true -1 or do I need to use the inbuilt minder?

[zettelkasten]

Mining from linux daemon works fine for me.

Thanks for the feedback.

I'm glad it works.

Can I setgenerate true -1 or do I need to use the inbuilt minder?

Yes, Linux daemon should work fine.

More daemons and wallets for other systems coming soon.

...and website / blockexplorer too.

Meanwhile lets observe SpreadDoubleKetchup and see how it performs.

[alby1976]

And it is up and running.
WOW, network hashrate 24.99MH/s already.

I'll add my 112kH/s. 

[goccat]

Never seen a project where the windows wallet has to have port forwarding to sync... a bit odd.

[zettelkasten]

Never seen a project where the windows wallet has to have port forwarding to sync... a bit odd.

Not to sync, I was talking about full nodes. We don't have enough of them.
Too many people are trying to connect to just 2 of my full nodes.
Only a tiny amount of people have opened their port to turn their nodes into FULL nodes.
That's why my two full nodes are a bit overwhelmed.

Also: I have UPNP disabled since it's a security risk.

You don't want your wallet to silently open ports for you.
Even then, you will probably have to enable it in your router to allow UPNP.

But it's better to do all that manually.

Anyway, problem is getting solved...

[alby1976]

Is there a way to see what is happening, apart from 'your hashrate'?, so that I know it is working.

[zettelkasten]

Is there a way to see what is happening, apart from 'your hashrate'?, so that I know it is working.

Good point.

I will add more textual and graphical feedback to the miner soon.

I want to keep developing the in-wallet-miner even after we enter GPU-phase.
It will be quite the task to create and integrate both an AMD (OpenGL) and NVidia (Cuda) in-wallet-miner.

But that's a cool goal to have, right?

[gold969]

Is there a way to see what is happening, apart from 'your hashrate'?, so that I know it is working.

Good point.

I will add more textual and graphical feedback to the miner soon.

I want to keep developing the in-wallet-miner even after we enter GPU-phase.
It will be quite the task to create and integrate both an AMD (OpenGL) and NVidia (Cuda) in-wallet-miner.

But that's a cool goal to have, right?

 all this is excellent, but tell me why I again lost the connection? 0 active connections ...

[goccat]

Never seen a project where the windows wallet has to have port forwarding to sync... a bit odd.

I have UPNP disabled since it's a security risk.

You don't want your wallet to silently open ports for you.
Even then, you will probably have to enable it in your router to allow UPNP.

But it's better to do all that manually.

I don't know if I'm some kind of luddite but when I launch a wallet I expect it to connect and start downloading blocks without any work on my behalf. This is the first wallet I've come across where I'm expected to do some port forwarding just to get synching and that honestly feels purposely obtuse.

[goccat]

 all this is excellent, but tell me why I again lost the connection? 0 active connections ...

Because the dev built some kind of backasswards product that requires port forwarding to sync blocks. What decade is this? Shit, in what decade did you have to port forward to DOWNLOAD?

[zettelkasten]

I don't know if I'm some kind of luddite but when I launch a wallet I expect it to connect and start downloading blocks without any work on my behalf. This is the first wallet I've come across where I'm expected to do some port forwarding just to get synching and that honestly feels purposely obtuse.

I think you misunderstand.

You are not required to open a port to sync, but enough full nodes (with open port) need to exist or else we are maxxed out.

I already have nearly 300 people connecting to my 2 nodes, don't you get it?

More full nodes (that allow incoming connections) need to be set up, and then the problem will resolve itself.

So currently I am creating more nodes, but this will take time / money and more than anything else: more volunteers to run full nodes themselves

Anyway, help is coming!  

[goccat]

I stood up a Linux daemon with 51339 open and synced nearly instantly. I stood up 2 windows wallets without 51339 and they both failed to sync until I forwarded 51339. You have a problem with your wallet and that's the primary reason why everyone here is complaining about a peers list.

/edit: my daemon currently has 7 active connections... if the network is this starved of full nodes, I'd be well above 7 conns

[zettelkasten]

I stood up a Linux daemon with 51339 open and synced nearly instantly. I stood up 2 windows wallets without 51339 and they both failed to sync until I forwarded 51339. You have a problem with your wallet and that's the primary reason why everyone here is complaining about a peers list.

A Linux daemon on a VPS will run by default in server-mode.

A windows-app on a Desktop-PC will be restricted by the system itself, it will by default not allow incoming connections.

Not even the newest windows bitcoin wallet does that.  

Once more:

It has nothing to do with your system, but whether you allow both incoming and outgoing connections, or ONLY outgoing.

If you are only "leeching" on other nodes, then at one point all available connections of all full nodes will be used up.

The solution is to not only leech but to also seed (open your port).

[goccat]

The solution is to not only leech but to also seed (open your port).

addnode entries in the conf file don't result in my win clients connecting to my daemon. My daemon STILL has only 7 connections. I'd stand up more daemons with open ports on other vps boxes but I just don't trust what is occurring. I'm halting this daemon.

I'm a nub or whatever, but this launch has me questioning things I've had the luxury of not questioning for any other launch.