Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 06:37:02 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 110 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GBTC Bitcoin Investment Trust Observer  (Read 262325 times)
BitAddict
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 01:20:23 PM
 #961

Pray for these guys not dumping any time soon before a big rally.

According to the latest newsletter, nobody can sell from the BIT due to issues with the SEC.

Yep, I have been reading that for a while. Do you have a source or link to that newsletter that confirm it?
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 03:03:22 PM
 #962

Pray for these guys not dumping any time soon before a big rally.
According to the latest newsletter, nobody can sell from the BIT due to issues with the SEC.
Yep, I have been reading that for a while. Do you have a source or link to that newsletter that confirm it?
Interesting. From what others have written, I understand that "sell from the BIT" means "liquidating their shares", correct?

That reads like Stage 1 in the Karpelès Scale.

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
December 30, 2014, 03:46:09 PM
 #963

Yep, I have been reading that for a while. Do you have a source or link to that newsletter that confirm it?

All of the official updates sent out have the receivers name, email and date printed on the background of the document.

Participants have signed certain agreements so that is why you are not seeing "official" memos scanned and shown on imgur or scribd.
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 04:09:48 PM
 #964

All of the official updates sent out have the receivers name, email and date printed on the background of the document.
Participants have signed certain agreements so that is why you are not seeing "official" memos scanned and shown on imgur or scribd.

Ah, thanks!

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
BitAddict
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 07:06:58 PM
 #965

Yep, I have been reading that for a while. Do you have a source or link to that newsletter that confirm it?

All of the official updates sent out have the receivers name, email and date printed on the background of the document.

Participants have signed certain agreements so that is why you are not seeing "official" memos scanned and shown on imgur or scribd.

Cool to know about it!

Thanks for the info Smiley
gog1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 31, 2014, 01:25:40 AM
 #966

not much buying lately from these guys - probably a holiday thing, but will be interesting to see if it picks up again after the new year
BitAddict
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 31, 2014, 01:30:12 AM
 #967

not much buying lately from these guys - probably a holiday thing, but will be interesting to see if it picks up again after the new year

Holidays, plus they got loaded in the 50k FBI auction (it doesn't count for the Fund, though), plus they like to buy everytime price starts to go up, not when price goes down.
gog1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 31, 2014, 02:27:43 AM
 #968

not much buying lately from these guys - probably a holiday thing, but will be interesting to see if it picks up again after the new year

Holidays, plus they got loaded in the 50k FBI auction (it doesn't count for the Fund, though), plus they like to buy everytime price starts to go up, not when price goes down.

I thought the FBI coin is bought by another group related to second market but not bitcoin investment trust.

Base on the NAV and holdings, it doesn`t look like they are the one who won the auction
BitAddict
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 31, 2014, 02:46:41 AM
 #969

not much buying lately from these guys - probably a holiday thing, but will be interesting to see if it picks up again after the new year

Holidays, plus they got loaded in the 50k FBI auction (it doesn't count for the Fund, though), plus they like to buy everytime price starts to go up, not when price goes down.

I thought the FBI coin is bought by another group related to second market but not bitcoin investment trust.

Base on the NAV and holdings, it doesn`t look like they are the one who won the auction

Indeed, you are right. That's exactly what I was pointing.
That coins are not hold in NAV, but buyers are probably the same. In the FBI auction buying group owners hold their own bitcoins, they pay less fees and they probably paid below market price. That's why no one bought in this Fund after that auction, they got fully loaded for a while.
screwUdriver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 346
Merit: 102


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 06:58:47 AM
 #970

not much buying lately from these guys - probably a holiday thing, but will be interesting to see if it picks up again after the new year

Holidays, plus they got loaded in the 50k FBI auction (it doesn't count for the Fund, though), plus they like to buy everytime price starts to go up, not when price goes down.
This is interesting. The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 02, 2015, 11:17:34 AM
 #971

The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure

Given the rumors that investors cannot liquidate even after the 6-month lock-in period (see previous posts), the disastrous performance of the fund this year, and the continuing lack of the long-overdue open market for their shares,  I really do not see why someone would invest in this fund.

Indeed, those rumors must be true, because otherwise investors should be liquidating in droves.




Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
jl2012 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1097


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 02:18:24 PM
 #972

The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure

Given the rumors that investors cannot liquidate even after the 6-month lock-in period (see previous posts), the disastrous performance of the fund this year, and the continuing lack of the long-overdue open market for their shares,  I really do not see why someone would invest in this fund.


Are you sure? Just a month ago, someone spent $10M in this fund

Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 02, 2015, 03:03:05 PM
 #973

The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure
Given the rumors that investors cannot liquidate even after the 6-month lock-in period (see previous posts), the disastrous performance of the fund this year, and the continuing lack of the long-overdue open market for their shares,  I really do not see why someone would invest in this fund.
Are you sure? Just a month ago, someone spent $10M in this fund
I saw that, and I still can't see why someone would do it.

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
jl2012 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1097


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 03:17:36 PM
 #974

The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure
Given the rumors that investors cannot liquidate even after the 6-month lock-in period (see previous posts), the disastrous performance of the fund this year, and the continuing lack of the long-overdue open market for their shares,  I really do not see why someone would invest in this fund.
Are you sure? Just a month ago, someone spent $10M in this fund
I saw that, and I still can't see why someone would do it.

Many people, like you, could't see why someone would buy bitcoin when it dropped from $32 to $2. They said bitcoin was a complete failure. Today, even with the "disastrous performance" in 2014, bitcoin is still 150x better than the $2 bottom.

Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 02, 2015, 04:42:54 PM
 #975

The 2nd market BIT is generally a very large whale. When the price is increasing their investors will buy more, causing additional upwards price pressure
Given the rumors that investors cannot liquidate even after the 6-month lock-in period (see previous posts), the disastrous performance of the fund this year, and the continuing lack of the long-overdue open market for their shares,  I really do not see why someone would invest in this fund.
Are you sure? Just a month ago, someone spent $10M in this fund
I saw that, and I still can't see why someone would do it.

Many people, like you, could't see why someone would buy bitcoin when it dropped from $32 to $2. They said bitcoin was a complete failure. Today, even with the "disastrous performance" in 2014, bitcoin is still 150x better than the $2 bottom.

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 06:48:12 PM
 #976

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?

Your mother or grandmother can own Bitcoin without needing to read the forums for three weeks to figure out security.

Not everyone who invests in Bitcoin has a horizon of 60 days to get rich.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 10401


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 07:06:22 PM
 #977

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?

Your mother or grandmother can own Bitcoin without needing to read the forums for three weeks to figure out security.

Not everyone who invests in Bitcoin has a horizon of 60 days to get rich.

Isn't it true that the investment fund is aimed more at larger players and potentially institutional investors that may want legitimacy.. that is why second market has minimums that are beyond what individual investors would seek.

In other words, second market is NOT really aimed at mom or grandma.

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Silverspoon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 07:27:26 PM
 #978

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?

Your mother or grandmother can own Bitcoin without needing to read the forums for three weeks to figure out security.

Not everyone who invests in Bitcoin has a horizon of 60 days to get rich.

Why would my mother want to invest in a tanking currency through a proxy (which also stops her from selling it)?
Mom may have her issues, but she ain't stupid Angry
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 02, 2015, 09:28:50 PM
 #979

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?
Your mother or grandmother can own Bitcoin without needing to read the forums for three weeks to figure out security.
Not everyone who invests in Bitcoin has a horizon of 60 days to get rich.
Well, seen from the outside, SMBIT is starting to look more risky than buying bitcoins at Bitstamp and keeping them there.  At least, Bitstamp has no lock-in period and has a handy open market in-house.

Investors who bought SMBIT shares in September 2013, at 13 $/share, and are firm believers in the long-range success of BTC, may not be bothered by those problems.  But I am trying to imagine someone who invested in January at 90$, could have liquidated in July at 60$, but has been forced to hold and now sees the shares worth only 30$.  I can't believe that all of those January investors are hold-at-any-cost types. 

I wonder if these "problems with the SEC" are blocking withdrawals also from the other funds (PBP, Exante, etc.)

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
screwUdriver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 346
Merit: 102


View Profile
January 03, 2015, 07:10:40 AM
 #980

OK, ignore the "disastrous performance" if you will.  There is still the fees, failed promises, and (apparently) having to watch the share value drop without being able to take the money out.  Now, remind me, what were the advantages of buying fund shares instead of buying bitcoins directly?
Your mother or grandmother can own Bitcoin without needing to read the forums for three weeks to figure out security.
Not everyone who invests in Bitcoin has a horizon of 60 days to get rich.
Well, seen from the outside, SMBIT is starting to look more risky than buying bitcoins at Bitstamp and keeping them there.  At least, Bitstamp has no lock-in period and has a handy open market in-house.

Investors who bought SMBIT shares in September 2013, at 13 $/share, and are firm believers in the long-range success of BTC, may not be bothered by those problems.  But I am trying to imagine someone who invested in January at 90$, could have liquidated in July at 60$, but has been forced to hold and now sees the shares worth only 30$.  I can't believe that all of those January investors are hold-at-any-cost types. 

I wonder if these "problems with the SEC" are blocking withdrawals also from the other funds (PBP, Exante, etc.)
I would say that second market is somewhat more secure then most exchanges (bitstamp included). I imagine that second market is able to keep the vast majority of their bitcoin in cold storage which reduces the chances of theft, the rate that bitcoin can be purchased or sold is much less then an exchange which reduces the risk of it getting hacked or messing up customer accounts. It is also much less likely to run away with customer money
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 110 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!