Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 08:45:45 AM |
|
@ CfB
Can the network expand beyond the 360,000 msg per Day limit?
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 08:51:06 AM |
|
@ CfB
Can the network expand beyond the 360,000 msg per Day limit?
Yes 1. How many messages per. day is the next limit after the present one? 2. When will this limit be expanded?
|
|
|
|
|
rickyjames
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 08:55:59 AM |
|
Perhaps once NXT makes me independently wealthy, I might come back here and have several pages of things to say.
Oh, I thought you retired already  You know, bad-ass grandpa in a stroller with a shotgun, chasing crypto-kids in real life as a retirement hobby. That would be so cool!  Im in my 50s not my 60s, alas, so retirement for me is a decade away unless NXT hits a dollar a coin. I am a grandpa with a couple of Mossberg Maverick 88 shotguns stashed away, tho...
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:00:58 AM |
|
1. How many messages per. day is the next limit after the present one?
2. When will this limit be expanded?
1. This is limited by technical capabilities of services like CloudFlare. 2. When we implement Pooled Forging and Transparent Forging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pandaisftw
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:01:24 AM |
|
And why do your posts getting more and more negatively tinted?
Because me and others post here detailed arguments about checksums and every time CfB replies with one-sentence bullshit, like "aliases are pretty good too". He acts like a religious fanatic who ignores any reasons and just repeats his religious dogmas. If that's the voice of BCNext, I am scared. If they see no benefit with checksums, then they must have a reason. Why do you assume they are being irrational?
|
NXT: 13095091276527367030
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:02:31 AM |
|
I think BCNext has more important things to do instead of answering hunders of same (or new) stupid (or smart) questions.
I believe that BCNext is actually here doing all that and I am truly afraid that we might be getting close to the day that he STOPS!!!  We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:06:07 AM |
|
1. How many messages per. day is the next limit after the present one?
2. When will this limit be expanded?
1. This is limited by technical capabilities of services like CloudFlare. 2. When we implement Pooled Forging and Transparent Forging. What is the time frame for No. 2 Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:07:45 AM |
|
We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.

|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:08:47 AM |
|
And why do your posts getting more and more negatively tinted?
Because me and others post here detailed arguments about checksums and every time CfB replies with one-sentence bullshit, like "aliases are pretty good too". Relax. What, you 3 are so afraid of the cost of change, you willingly delude yourself into denial? What is it?
Ok, I'll tell u. We have plans that will make CRC on server side unnecessary. Can't tell u more right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:13:34 AM |
|
Shall we take some deep breaths here?  Nxtchg at least is worried and cares about his product. This is something that's valuable in itself. I'm glad someone is looking out to protect his future customers. Give him that, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
NxtChg
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:13:39 AM |
|
We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.
That is my worst fear.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:14:56 AM |
|
What is the time frame for No. 2
Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
allwelder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:15:33 AM |
|
When transfer nxt from A to B , after click the send money button,the browser is stuck and the java client collapsed. What is the matter ? bug?
another suggestion:need to add a copy acc button on the browser client ,this will eliminate the chance of copy wrong acc number manually.
|
|
|
|
|
rickyjames
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:18:32 AM |
|
I have to limit my reading on this forum, my paranoia is just under "don't trust the doctors."
If you are ready to take the red pill ( http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill ), read theeconomiccollapseblog.com daily for two weeks. At the end of that time, add zerohedge.com to your daily reading for the next two weeks. At the end of the month, go pour yourself a glass of whiskey and sit on your back porch staring at the woods for an hour and ask yourself just what in the hell is going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PaulyC
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:23:35 AM |
|
Does BCNext even work on this project anymore? Or did he already bought himself an island and retired? What kind of project leader suddenly goes silent and abandons his creation like this?  Did you know that BCNext actually constantly posts in this topic?  I get that feeling too. 
|
Doge Mars Landing Foundation (founder) Coined the phrase, "Doge to the Mars" and "Check that Hash!". Discoverer of the 2013 NXT nefarious wallet. Admin. FameMom [FAMOM]
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:29:04 AM |
|
What is the time frame for No. 2
Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement. Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time...
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:31:26 AM |
|
What is the time frame for No. 2
Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement. Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time... Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Luc
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:37:12 AM |
|
I suggest @info.nxtcrypto link @Luc's BTT post for each client update, so we can do a fast simple comparison with @Luc's post and confirm the sha256sum. If hacker replaced the download file and also replace sha256sum at info.nxtcrypto, it's not so easy to find it, but I think hack those 2 and Luc's account at the same time is more difficult.
See those *.asc files in the http://download.nxtcrypto.org/ directory? Those are GPG signatures of the corresponding zip files. If you download both nxt-client-0.5.3.zip and nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc in the same directory, you can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc" to verify my signature of the zip package. This gives you one independent way of checking, and a hacker cannot provide a signature for a modified zip package without somehow stealing my private GPG key. The nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc is again a GPG signed file containing the sha256 sum. You can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" to verify its content, then run "sha256sum -c nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" which will say "nxt-client-0.5.3.zip: OK" if the sha256 sum matches (ignore the warning about the extra lines, those are the gpg signature). Finally, the value of the NRSversion alias on the blockchian contains the sha256 sum of the last stable release. That gives you quite a few independent ways of verifying the package.
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
January 09, 2014, 09:39:30 AM |
|
What is the time frame for No. 2
Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement. Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time... Yes Can we implement my msg fee idea....you pay 1 Nxt in messenging fee every 1440 blocks to send messages to one other account....if you want to send to a new account you have to pay a fresh messaging fee.
|
|
|
|
|