Economic Devastation

[wearefucked]

Anarchism for me is not about total chaos. It simply means freedom to transact individually and individual choice, i.e. not granting a monopoly on force to someone I individually did not hire to do it for me.

Where there are conflicts in individual choice, then the person with more competitive resources (e.g. knowledge capital in the Knowledge Age vs. monetary capital and political influence in the Industrial Age) wins.

As for a military, yes we will have to band together for that (or at least we did and I am not clear how technology might empower the individual on this), but I prefer a more temporary arrangement where I am free to change affiliations at-will, to prevent a DEEP STATE from becoming entrenched.

And agreed, that realism applies. We must operate within the world as it is, not in an anarchism that doesn't exist.

Also mea culpa my prior post was not humble to reflect the fact that there is no absolute anarchism nor absolute top-down collectivism. I am trying to promote solutions to balance out the fact that society has moved too far into top-down monopolies at this juncture. (sorry but my competitive adrenalin boils when I see people rejoice in top-down nirvana)

[1715185211]

1715185211

[1715185211]

1715185211

[1715185211]

1715185211

[arteleis]

Anarchism for me is not about total chaos. It simply means freedom to transact individually and individual choice, i.e. not granting a monopoly on force to someone I individually did not hire to do it for me.

Where there are conflicts in individual choice, then the person with more resources wins.

Oh yeh dude.. no pure anarchism is beautiful and has nothing to do with chaos.. dont think I said that..

  It as you said. "simply means freedom to transact individually and individual choice" but also is a prequel to anarchist society whereas there are clusters of leadership.. men will still be sheep no matter what their belief and even in anarchistic clusters.. there will still be a alpha running the lil cell..

  Gonna have to disagree with this "Where there are conflicts in individual choice, then the person with more resources wins." depending on your definition of resource.. if you're talking financial, influence, power etc i would have to disagree.. but if youre talking spirit, awareness, love then Id have to agree.  No anarchistic society could survive without this base understanding... lol "Hey man dont be a douchebag you fuckin prick" and then base no laws persay... but general understanding of punishment based on the douchebag rule.  would be a deadly world.


 I think the definition of anarchism is without government? I don't believe it is without leadership necessarily..  Always been that preachy anarchist fuck that told me I didnt know what the fuck I was doing by going to work everyday... What Im saying is.  With bitcoin.. altcoins.. freedom.. anarchy... globalism.. capitalism... socialism..  there is always an inherent centre.. in this game based on the trust of that damn developer... building fantastic technological marvels.. giving folks tools of anonymity to please the investors while users still login from their moms computers... lol and save all the convos... haha (reference to poor ol ulbricht)

[arteleis]

when i succeed in anarchism ill have a catamaran.. bush plane.. a few docks and a few cabins and cabanas.. all owned.  no banks attached.. its how ya get there is the question of anarchist or globalist ideals and the true meanings of each.

[laris2]

Everything is going to be fucked up pretty soon, including btc

[wearefucked]

arteleis, that lazy prick who claimed to be anarchist was a Marxist using anarchy as a diversion (cover) for the fact that he doesn't want to work and compete.

Analogously you are hiding your Marxist tendency behind all the love touchy-feeling fuzzball. Resources are acquired by working hard and competing (which is a form of love). In the Knowledge Age, those resources will be knowledge and thus a benefit to society. You are conflating this with those corrupt fuckers who got rich in the Industrial Age by forming oligarchies and colluding with the government regulators (e.g. the banks and TBTF, etc).

[wearefucked]

Eric Raymond just removed all of these posts. Hahaha. The open source progenitor can't tolerate open source.

Write him off. He is an old man. He made his significant contribution and is respected for that.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6717#comment-1503160

Okay but elsewhere Eric wrote that anonymity is harmful; I rebutted. Anonymity is generally necessary because the cyclical end game of society is irrational. At that linked post I argue against the social value of perfect morals extortedexhalted below; and argue that enabling such morals have an Orwellian cost.

PSEUDONYMITY: For other people, handles are a means of identity construction for one or multiple social roles. They wouldn't mind per-role reputation tracking but want the freedom to experiment without consequences to their meatspace identity. Unfortunately this can shade into...

HOOLIGANS: For still others, handles operate as a mechanism to enable or license antisocial behavior (this is predicted by Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory). The problem this raises is how to suppress HOOLIGANS while enabling ANONYMITY and PSEUDONYMITY.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6717#comment-1503163

Eric note you unbanned me as of the Rifkin thread. Note that alleged "FUD" I was spouting in 2011, is coming to fruition.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6717#comment-1503164

My vague recollection was that Eric and I were arguing about relevance of global author identities for VCS (and for me its implicit point about anonymity and pseudonyms), but I only find this and the following quote.

Network-wide identities: Presently, Roundup identities are login-name/password pairs. It should move to being based on email addresses coupled with ssh and PGP keys – network-wide credentials the way DVCSes handle identity. The standalone justification for this is to reduce the number of credentials Roundup users need to manage.

[wearefucked]

I added:

In Singapore they cane you if you don't conform, or even the death penalty for third degree murder (abuse the domestic helpers, feeding them worse than the house dog, then wonder why they snap). You give this much power to the State, and one day another Mao will rise when the economics of the State become intractable.

[arteleis]

arteleis, that lazy prick who claimed to be anarchist was a Marxist using anarchy as a diversion (cover) for the fact that he doesn't want to work and compete.

Analogously you are hiding your Marxist tendency behind all the love touchy-feeling fuzzball. Resources are acquired by working hard and competing (which is a form of love). In the Knowledge Age, those resources will be knowledge and thus a benefit to society. You are conflating this with those corrupt fuckers who got rich in the Industrial Age by forming oligarchies and colluding with the government regulators (e.g. the banks and TBTF, etc).

haha yeh he was a lazy prick.. haha My feeling was like dude... youre in a booth... preaching anarchy.. which isn't meant to be preached.. but dont have the patience or perhaps intelligence to explain the material you're preaching with your unscarred.. unscathed... perfect lil manicured lookin hands... while I paid 80 bux to see bands singing about freedooom.... while paying 5 bux for water they ran out of... whole thing was fucked..

  And yes.. Resources are acquired by working hard.. and competing even... but are not necessarily in the form of material wealth or assets... exactly.  As you say. Patience and intelligence; rather wisdom is a virtue when leaving the idea of resources being a financial gain behind.  For instance.  In a true anarchist society.  We are all in the bush.. We have all built our cabins.  Cut the trees down ourselves.  live in evergreen shelters while the logs dried.. and when building your cabin.. you don't have the knowledge how to build the sub floor or perhaps roof to keep from falling through or keep the rain from entering.. so you ask the neighbour closest.. who says.. yeh man.  no worries.. ill show you how i thatched the roof and although you could wait 9 months for you logs to dry.. i know a helicopter pilot that will drop your material for 12 grand.. all i ask is to use your crown land to grow some more weed, and help me with my current crops... this is what it should be like.. NOT

  Well man you're roof is gonna cost ya dude.. like all your vegetables you grow for the next 5 years.. also want your first daughters virginity.. probably gonna have to get you to give me half your fish.. and them large stones ya got everywhere? well can ya row them over to my place for a retaining wall?  If ya do this.. for sure.. Ill give ya supper tonite..

   Going back to the "Dont be a douchebag ya fucking prick" golden rule of anarchy.. haha really cant work with assholes and thered be no laws to stop folks from raping innocence for their power.. But yeh.. this whole fucking thing aint fair. cryptos are entrenched in tech beauty like metal gods picking up their guitars the first time and recording epic solos... but difference is.. the solo really doesnt matter... its value is determined by traders that never even heard it.  Whole thing is a crying shame.  Sorry suppose goin a bit off topic here.

[arteleis]

and likely true enough i have marxist tendancies as a good human being but same as the rest the ideals are fatally flawed so ya know.. ultimately.. id still be fighting for whatever side put the gun in my hand.. and said 'fight with us.  you're family will be spared.'

[wearefucked]

Bottom line is the system that enables the most meritorious competition will win. It doesn't need and won't be a perfect system.

If you want to prosper the most, make sure you align yourself with that future.

Our inborn humanitarianism will come forth naturally from that prosperity.

Any one who wants to argue that the winning paradigm is moving to Asia and aligning with the shift in top-down finance to China between now and 2033, is not going to get a serious objection from me. I have suggested similarly.

I also think there is a parallel opportunity developing in the Knowledge Age, anonymous internet, and anonymous digital crypto-currency. I could be wrong about that, but my general predictions have all been coming to fruition.

[arteleis]

Bottom line is the system that enables the most meritorious competition will win. It doesn't need and won't be a perfect system.

If you want to prosper the most, make sure you align yourself with that future.

Our inborn humanitarianism will come forth naturally from that prosperity.

yeh i believe i may have misundertood marxism by listening to the poly psy friends over the years that would never get to the point.. talking about labour parties.. rebellion.. union.. cause for the working man..

But the fuckers wouldnt be working.. and would never get to the point.. so just wikied marxism.  kinda needed to know the definition.  perhaps i am a marxist simply by working hard and believing in the general rule that good men will conquer the bullshit, by eating the bullshit.. and continually building a better society..

"Marxism is a worldview and a method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict, that uses a materialist interpretation of historical development, and a dialectical view of social transformation. Marxist methodology uses economic and sociopolitical inquiry and applies that to the critique and analysis of the development of capitalism and the role of class struggle in systemic economic change.

In the mid-to-late 19th century, the intellectual tenets of Marxism were inspired by two German philosophers: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxist analyses and methodologies have influenced multiple political ideologies and social movements. Marxism encompasses an economic theory, a sociological theory, a philosophical method, and a revolutionary view of social change.[1]

There is no single definitive Marxist theory; Marxist analysis has been applied to diverse subjects and has been misconceived and modified during the course of its development, resulting in numerous and sometimes contradictory theories that fall under the rubric of Marxism or Marxian analysis.[2]

Marxism builds on a materialist understanding of societal development, taking as its starting point the necessary economic activities required to satisfy the material needs of human society. The form of economic organization or mode of production is understood to give rise to, or at least directly influences, most other social phenomena – including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology. Thus, the economic system and social relations are called a base and superstructure. As the forces of production (most notably technology) improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress. These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in the form of class struggle.[3]

According to Marxist analysis, class conflict within capitalism arises due to intensifying contradictions between highly productive mechanized and socialized production performed by the proletariat, and private ownership and appropriation of the surplus product in the form of surplus value (profit) by a small minority of private owners called the bourgeoisie. As the contradiction becomes apparent to the proletariat, social unrest between the two antagonistic classes intensifies, culminating in a social revolution. The eventual long-term outcome of this revolution would be the establishment of socialism – a socioeconomic system based on cooperative ownership of the means of production, distribution based on one's contribution, and production organized directly for use. Karl Marx hypothesized that, as the productive forces and technology continued to advance, socialism would eventually give way to a communist stage of social development. Communism would be a classless, stateless, humane society erected on common ownership and the principle of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".

Marxism has developed into different branches and schools of thought. Different schools place a greater emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism while de-emphasizing or rejecting other aspects of Marxism, sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxian concepts. Some variants of Marxism primarily focus on one aspect of Marxism as the determining force in social development – such as the mode of production, class, power-relationships or property ownership – while arguing other aspects are less important or current research makes them irrelevant. Despite sharing similar premises, different schools of Marxism might reach contradictory conclusions from each other.[4] For instance, different Marxian economists have contradictory explanations of economic crisis and different predictions for the outcome of such crises. Furthermore, different variants of Marxism apply Marxist analysis to study different aspects of society (e.g. mass culture, economic crises, or feminism).[5]

These theoretical differences have led various socialist and communist parties and political movements to embrace different political strategies for attaining socialism and advocate different programs and policies from each other. One example of this is the division between revolutionary socialists and reformists that emerged in the German Social Democratic Party (SPD) during the early 20th century. Similarly, although the Bolsheviks of Russia declared Leninism and later Marxism–Leninism to be the only legitimate development of Marxism, the Mensheviks and many other social democrats worldwide considered them totalitarian deviations."

  One thing i do know is that this vague concept has not only empowered men of nations destroyed by economic chess.. to create the rebellions to turn their governements over to foreign powers and interests but also fueled the movements supporting things like the original post i made regarding minority races birthrates diminishing based on incarceration.. and the seemingly genetic program of the world order to lower crime by killing off what may have been or may not have been pure blood of ancient Gods or heros... Many a pantheon would not have existed to some extent if abortions were wide spread amongst certain populace.. again ima white german dude taught my whole life in school to be ashamed of my skin color.. my heritage.. my origin.. my pagan roots... in a inherently christian.. although now being diluted and destroyed.. Godless and fully indoctrinated society of drones.. who are taught to work.. breed in small numbers.. while accepting all of the mass immigration.. ridicule if christian.. (literally been laughed at for believing in Christ) violence... societal degragation... the entire time.. working.. employing.. building economy with no predjiduce or racist bone in my body.. whole thing is fucked..

 But why i like cryptos.. even though full of lies...  cheating.. tricks... financial and advertising wielding... there is still those who believe the technology and the freedom of the crypto user is the goal.. these are the hardcore programmers who are literally still in it.. because code is blind.. there is no marxism.. anarchism.. capitolism... racism... sexism... C dont give a fuck who you are..  Its all been built (post bitcoin sha-256 - totall nuther conversation) to ultimately free us as I believe is also your goal..

  Good conversations bro.  Me and you may be similar.. I will never profess entirely to know something without being given the chance to a better man to disprove my theories..  Which is exaclty what the core of the alt revolution is doing.  Without question.. trolls.. lol newbies who can even open an exe without a self extraction.. haha this whole game wouldnt exist..

 but overall.  fuck you. (in general to every prick who has poisoned this beatiful thing called cryptocurrency - not you dude) every single one of you that has preyed off the good hearts and weakness of men trying to free themselves from the money power and corporate curriculum we are all taught from preschool throughout university... the crypto game is as beautiful as it is ugly.. and im in the opinion.  Only us good fuckers will be left standing after the dust of bullshit has faded into the desert.  (-;

[wearefucked]

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Asia is not lacking the capacity to rapidly shift into the Knowledge Age
From:    wearefucked
Date:    Mon, April 6, 2015 5:30 am
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <armstrongeconomics@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Armstrong wrote a post addressing my latest emails to him:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/04/06/economic-evolution-the-sixth-wave/

I appreciate his rebuttal and I would like to make my final rebuttal. Armstrong can have the last world on his blog, but I suspect I will have the last word in terms of the outcome.

I agree that there is a danger that society could descend into a Dark Age and the internet could get shut off. However, I think this is not likely globally for numerous reasons.

1. There are billions of people who still know how to live off the land (and I live with them to make sure I will always eat besides I even know how to dig up native root crops in the tropics). It is the western cities that are most in danger of not eating and descending into riots and looting. However, the aftermath of super typhoon Yolanda exemplified what can happen even in a resourceful country when there is too widespread of devastation and warlords take advantage of the power vacuum. Yet those who had armed themselves and stockpiled some stored food, would have fared okay. The locals were banding together to protect each other, and the warlords were only effective at night and on the remote highways.

2. The global youth use the internet. You can't go any where in the world, where the youth don't know how to use a smartphone and the internet. Shutting off the internet is politically implausible, even in wartime. Just as those illiterate, remote Ethiopian kids learned to program Android on their own with no instruction in 47 days, the youth would ingeniously figure out how to turn the internet back on. They could probably do it with an adhoc mesh network with Wifi on smartphones. Ham operators would chime in with relay repeaters for long-range backbones, etc..

3. Commodites have inexorably declined in relative value in the economy:

Economy of Knowledge

Since recorded history began, the knowledge production share of the economy is inexorably increasing, which is why the cost (i.e. relative value) of hard resources has inexorably declined over the centuries (see the chart). Iron was a precious metal 323 B.C..

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/images/cfn396_1.gif

4. I agree with Armstrong that shift is monumental and challenging, but I think he hasn't been paying attention to the fact that shift is already occurring. Asia is rising with call centers and the education is all private schools over here and cash (no student loans). The youth are already making that pragmatic shift over here (while the western youth fall into the pit of socialism, morals, debt, ideological diatribes, etc). And they are first generation from the shift from farming. So they have their parents at home on the farm to provide the backup that Armstrong notes is lacking in the West. They have strong families, strong local communities, etc..

It will be a waterfall collapse of the west to Asia adopting the Knowledge Age and libertarianism combined with strong governments which are much smaller % of GDP (roughly 20% versus 70% in the west, once cost of regulations are factored in).


Sorry folks, I am correct.

Goodbye fuckers!   (its a joke, duh)

[wearefucked]

It is time for me to say goodbye (fuckers!  ). I really mean it this time.

I am scrambling my password and I intend to not come back for any reason whatsoever.

Time for me to return to a real life. I wish everyone the best.

[arteleis]

It is time for me to say goodbye (fuckers!  ). I really mean it this time.

I am scrambling my password and I intend to not come back for any reason whatsoever.

Time for me to return to a real life. I wish everyone the best.

Well goodbye I guess. Thanks for the chat..  l8s hopefully they didnt get your Ip lol

[wearefucked]

hopefully they didnt get your Ip lol

Everybody knows who I am. Hiding my IP comes later when I release open source. Now this is really goodbye. Yeah nice chat mate; we do seem to agree.

Crypto-currency will be hot again next year or no later than 2018. Be ready. Bottom in the BTC price probably $100 - $150. Other altcoins will rise. New technologies. New breakthrough paradigms. Exciting.

[CoinCube]

It is time for me to say goodbye (fuckers!  ). I really mean it this time.

I am scrambling my password and I intend to not come back for any reason whatsoever.

Time for me to return to a real life. I wish everyone the best.

Your posts today were quite strong.
Our recent back and forth if continued would likely have transitioned into a repeat of one already concluded.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=365141.msg4916516#msg4916516

1) We agree that an equilibrium location exists while disagreeing over its exact positioning.
2) We agree that we are no where near equilibrium now and moving in the wrong direction.
3) We are in complete agreement regarding the causes and nature of the problem as well as its seriousness.
4) We agree that the proposed solution of anonymous cryptocurrency is potentially viable but disagree regarding its downsides. This disagreement likely results from point #1 above.

Since you won't be able to reply I will leave it at that.
Good luck.

[OROBTC]

...

wearefucked

I think all of us hope to hear from you again soon.  Please do make sure we hear more about your software in due course.

(I had to scramble my password at Zero Hedge via SHA-256 to actually FORCE myself out)

Good luck and best wishes.

*   *   *

arteleis quoted wiki on Marxism:

There is no single definitive Marxist theory; Marxist analysis has been applied to diverse subjects and has been misconceived and modified during the course of its development, resulting in numerous and sometimes contradictory theories that fall under the rubric of Marxism or Marxian analysis.[2]

LOL!  Peru (the "other country" that I follow, married to a Peruvian, business there, etc.) has every kind of Marxist that exists.  Especially strong are the Trotskyites.  Trotsky broke away from the "Party Line".  In Peru Trotskyites are fractured into many schools of Trotskyite Marxism.  It's actually amusing to see the self-righteous Marxists there discussing "their" (personal) views...

[l3552]

I will be leaving too so it appears that I should let some remarks.

From what I've read on this forums, I wish the world had a better chance coming from here. Contrary to what was said prior to this post the numbers of "hackers" even capable of conceptualizing all this debate are damn little. Maybe thousands have the brain plasticity but they don't have the morals, sanity and experience, nor the time needed to get some.

As stated before, any idea not based on truth is null, so a human society based on a trade system without face is null and not solution in any level. It can be a desperate stand like a masked hero, as pointed more than a time by CoinCube, but it will be bond on devils servitude as soon as it is seem as a variable on his chess game and you can be damn sure it already has. Some
outlined this clearly.

Also, It was asserted by some great examples that the cause of the possible future devastation is the unstoppable intermittent boom and burst of the masked monster hidden on bad economic/political decisions. Each person according her mythology called this concept. The masked monster was treated as Marxism, representation, top-down approach, money nature, psychopathy. All characteristics, not the essence of the "alienator".

The solution proposed by some of the MOST INTELLIGENT peers is to take the same monster, which feeds on alienation, and serve him on a plate where it can't be bursted. This is the most important part of all the discussions going on this forum. It is kept simple here, but take it into consideration and you gonna see the horizon much further.

The solution have to be human, able to succeed, to fail; to seed, to grow, to die. Must importantly It have to have face.

"It is not only fine feathers that make fine birds."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9uo0I9fZ4I

[one_final_summary]

http://blog.mpettis.com/2015/02/when-do-we-decide-that-europe-must-restructure-much-of-its-debt/#comment-122952

The Post-Industrial Age will not be the “Knowledge Age” as you say. The primary input in the Industrial world was fixed capital. The primary input in the Post-Industrial world will be human capital. Human capital is not knowledge and consists of far more than that. Also, economies of scale never existed in the data and we’re already out of the Industrial world.

Suvy, manual labor is fungible but finely-grained (i.e. bottom-up) innovation is not, c.f. my 3 seminal essays linked from my prior comment. In the Industrial Age, the fixed capital costs were the majority of the cost of production. In the Knowledge Age, innovation is the majority of the cost of production. This epochal paradigm shift fundamentally alters finance, money, and investment (c.f. my Rise of Knowledge essay), including the Theory of the Firm. The Mississippi River won't help the USA (even if Russia doesn't nuke New Orleans). Data wasn't innovation. The salient concept apparently flew over your head. Insight trumps the rigor of math (and I do higher-level math as well). The West is toast. Asia will rise.

CoinCube,

Note my Multiple Sclerosis appears to be coming cured from the high dose Vitamin D3.  

I live in Davao which has a very strict Mayor. This is the only city in the Philippines where there is a strict speed limit of 40 kph and where even cell phone snatchers are executed by vigilantes after 3 warnings to leave the city or reform (ostensibly working for the Mayor, although this has been toned down in recent years due to international media intrigue). The mayor has watchers in every barangay.

So my actions state it is more efficient to live in a well managed city than in a chaotic, unmanaged one. However, note that I can leave this city on a whim and experience decentralized chaos just an hour or so drive from Davao. Even within Davao, nobody exactly follows the law all of the time. Drivers still drive down the wrong side of the road, make U-turns to the left from the right-most lane while their turn signal is blinking right (lol!  ), pedestrians who walk in the middle of the highway at night in places where there are no street lights, pedestrians refusing to use the overhead walkways and instead running right in front of your car, men stop their car to urinate any where along the road (right there on their tire not even in the grass), etc, etc, etc. Philippines is a chaotic zoo and I love it!  

Filipinos have it about perfectly in balance. Stop the heinous crime, but fuck the pedantic, agonizing rules and always take the most efficient route from point A to B. And thus keep your individual freedoms. It is expected as native peoples understand the Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organization. As for crimes which are dubious (such as re-posting someone's scandal, just search videos at Google for "filipina sex scandal"), the actions of the filipinos make it clear that they think it is stupid to make such a big deal over things that are just about someone's glass house reputation. Fuck the houses here are made of bamboo and grass. Please get over it Westerners! You are too anal. Take a shit and get with reality.

So my problem with your attitude CoinCube is you need to take more laxatives.  

Singapore is perfect for you with their perfectionist straight-jacket rules. Fuck that! Singapore can kiss my fucking ass.

And that is why I am going to make sure we have anonymity because I don't want my snotty, brow beating, boomer parents standing on their high horse dictating to me. I will shit where I want and when I want and I don't need no God damn toilet paper!

Pretentious people and society suffocate me.

Why are you so God damn worried if people can exist without being cattle-branded with a number and can trade cash anonymously, as they ALWAYS COULD DO THROUGHOUT 6000 YEARS OF HISTORY UNTIL NOW!

I am just wanting to retain the freedom we always had before the internet and digital age.

Why is it that you find it repugnant that we humans would have the balance-of-power against the State, that we always had for the past 6000 years? Why do you want the digital age to give more power to the State than we always had?

What is repugnant to you is the imperfection of nature and the reality of human nature. You wish to give the State more power because you wish to make the world perfect. With that IMPOSSIBLE goal in hand, you will wilfully grant the State an unchallenged monopoly on force that will turn your world Orwellian. For some reason, whiter people are more prone to this INSANE myopia. Maybe it is because the cold climates imbued them with a culture of strict discipline and always working hard. Whereas, here in the warm climates, food grows like crazy. The grass in my yard grows 3 feet every damn week!

http://i0.wp.com/armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Empires-Rise-Fall-Armstrong.jpg?resize=584%2C282

You would prefer your perfect hell instead. Fuck that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/MSSI-ResearchPaper-4_Turner_2014.pdf

Nonsense! You white fucking people live in your theoretical glass house cathedrals!

More fucking junk science. Peak oil hahaha that nonsense again. More projections of Bubble curves.

Look at Armstrong's chart above. Now that is real science with 5000 years of data, not some projections (remember the projections of global warming!).

http://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html#Knowledge_Anneals

Knowledge Anneals

Unsophisticated thinkers have an incorrect understanding of knowledge creation, idolizing a well-structured top-down sparkling academic cathedral of vastly superior theoretical minds. Rather knowledge primary spawns from accretive learning due to unexpected random chaotic fitness created from multitudes of random path dependencies that can only exist in the bottom-up free market. Top-down systems are inherently fragile because they overcommit to egregious error (link to Taleb's simplest summary of the math).

[aminorex]

http://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/MSSI-ResearchPaper-4_Turner_2014.pdf