Bounty is dead :(

[ttookk]

Awww, come on, Bounties were never really alive. I made like 3100 STRAT once, which at the time was like 0.4 BTC, which was around 300$, IIRC. Not *that* much money, right? FYI, this turned out to be worth 12 BTC at another point in time.

My point is this: you look at those numbers and lament about how bounties just don't pay as much anymore, but the truth is, that at their time in the past, they didn't pay that great either. What made them actually worthwhile was learning when to sell them (Something I never really mastered…).

[waynechong1995]

Not projects could pay you ridiculous amount against fiat/usd as the market is really saturated and unfit for a strong evaluation towards the market, I would out of 20 only one would the one you hoped for, tokens worth in thousands, but the rest will either has lots of problems ranging from distribution to price expectation

[deeofficialx]

I think the number of bounty participants have increased exponentially so reward has also been divided multiple times resulting in smaller rewards, i think we should only join the campaigns that have huge rewards so that we all can get decent rewards, nowadays bounty campaigns with small budgets have become valueless.

Indeed Now the number of participants is very growing very high. I've also experienced getting a little bounty because of the huge number of participants. And for a big reward issue it's like it should be that we'll get a bounty that can be said a lot if the big rewards and participants are plenty too.

I once ask an admin of this particular ICO, "Why not limit the number of participants so the bounty hunter could at least gain what they should have? The Bounty started before the ICO (1 months before the ICO), but the ICO will start 2 months from now (all in all, 3 months plus the duration of the ICO, maybe 1 month), if you don't limit the number of participants, the bounty rewards will fall off."

He just said, "That's part of the plan."

So, I don't think that having a big rewards means we will get high rewards even if we do good. It is always about the Team itself, and the participants.

[ClackKendi]

Why do you say bounty like that? Currently I am still in bounty programs and receiving bonuses from this program, there is no reason to say that the bounty is dead, however when choosing bounty you must be very careful.

[fadlyzuld]

Guys hello to all, maybe somewhere that already created such a thread, but I'll try to ask again Recently, I increasingly see that people get quite ridiculous amounts for participating in the bounty, for example, when compared with what was 5 months old back, the amounts are absolutely ridiculous. Do you think this is a temporary phenomenon? Or is the bounty dying? Thanks to everyone, I really want to hear the opinion of people of the rank of Hero and Legendary.

I don't think is go to dead, it's depend of you, what you can with your capacity, example you have big group, you can join some bounty have Telegram group campaign or reddit with enough karma to post and comment

[CoinAgain]

I would disagree, nevertheless that there is many scam projects, there are many good enough, that one can earn up to $2500 from bounty only monthly

Really? what project can earn $2500 monthly?

[MaryKiTy22]

You were wrong to say bounty is dead, I'm also a bounty participant and I'm also getting bounty bonuses when I join the signature campaign, luckily the bounty still exists and give us the bonus page. spread life

[bundo]

I think the number of bounty participants have increased exponentially so reward has also been divided multiple times resulting in smaller rewards, i think we should only join the campaigns that have huge rewards so that we all can get decent rewards, nowadays bounty campaigns with small budgets have become valueless.

Because not all bounty have rules that limit the number of participants, The natural thing happens and it is true that you say it.

[Tlongbottom]

It’s clearly not dead. There are more and more people joining, which means less per user, but from an ICO standpoint, they have to love more people getting involved with advertising the project. The people for a fixed pool means that everyone gets less theoretically. This increase exposure, but it also keeps a large amount tokens out of a people’s hands and maybe this prevents a small group from dumping the price.

[CleverOracle]

I think the number of bounty participants have increased exponentially so reward has also been divided multiple times resulting in smaller rewards, i think we should only join the campaigns that have huge rewards so that we all can get decent rewards, nowadays bounty campaigns with small budgets have become valueless.

Because not all bounty have rules that limit the number of participants, The natural thing happens and it is true that you say it.

I agree with you, bounty participants should be limit per campaign but the developer of the project won't do so because they want more participants on their project to gain more popularity using the campaigns. there are lot of bounty popping out so bounty is still kicking 

[erikoy]

Well we could do no more since there are too many ICO of course and the demand for cryptocurrency is highly raising so we could expect also that there could be more and more bounty participants in the near future. Anyway it is not only through bounty campaign we could earn since the basic of cryptocurrency profiting is to invest on it or buying low amount for crypto and sell it to higher price depending on that crypto volatility.

[mariaana]

It is not really a matter of rank because those who are lower in rank get exclusive bounty invitation.  Bounty is not really dead as you said.  It is a matter of how you choose a certain bounty to join.  It is rather difficult to know if the bounty campaign you are joining is successful or not.  Nowadays,  it is not easy to join signature bounty because it is hard to rank up in bitcointalk forum.  Signature bounty usually gives a fruitful reward according to my experience because of its exclusiveness.

[becak mesin]

according to me, it may happen due to some factors, such as the allocation for bounty is fewer than in prior, the number of participants is increasing, the number of bitcoin talk forum users is also increasing. such factors make the distributions not as much as like in 5 months ago. moreover, day by day there are many projects appear even scam projects. in prior, people just prefer to btt forum as like participating in bounty (signature), but now they prefer to do trading.

[Duzenn]

Why do you think the bounty thread is dead?
There are still many excellent ICO projects, and there will still be a bounty thread for these projects.

[kiw_91]

I would not say bounty is dead. But it has become much more competitive. With the sheer amount of hype, and participants. The reward is much2 less than last year. With the growth of cryptocurrency and the budget of the bounty is stagnant, that is why you fell like u're getting much2 less. With participants with legendary or similar ranks does not really feel it, but with Jr. Member / Members, the amount is getting much smaller. I would suggest to avoid doing bounty full time if u have a low ranking account.

[hoanganhbk]

i don't think so. but now, bounty reward is so smaller than before. Bounty campaign should have limit participants to prevent cheat or small reward.
I usually do about 15 bounty programs, if any end, i will find another to go on.
Finding good bounty program is problem with us. Anyone has idea or trick with this?

[Mancung]

When there is alwaysa new ico coming, actually bounty will never die. Maybe just the reward getting smaller and smaller, since now there is too many participants with small rewards.
Is there anything we can do about it ?? To make bounties rise again

[engrshu]

I think the number of bounty participants have increased exponentially so reward has also been divided multiple times resulting in smaller rewards, i think we should only join the campaigns that have huge rewards so that we all can get decent rewards, nowadays bounty campaigns with small budgets have become valueless.

I agree with this, the increase in the number of bounty hunters has a big effect on the bounty rewards, especially for a small time project. I suggest that same with the bounties for btc, the numbers of participants must be limited so that the reward is still profitable even for a low rank hunters.

[Getmon]

Guys hello to all, maybe somewhere that already created such a thread, but I'll try to ask again Recently, I increasingly see that people get quite ridiculous amounts for participating in the bounty, for example, when compared with what was 5 months old back, the amounts are absolutely ridiculous. Do you think this is a temporary phenomenon? Or is the bounty dying? Thanks to everyone, I really want to hear the opinion of people of the rank of Hero and Legendary.

If what you noticed was a huge increase in the participation rate of bounties, you are wrong in your follow up question, if bounty is already dying. The increase in participation is an indication that bounty is growing up. Instead of low participation rate, there is already a higher rate as compared to the days before. On the part of the bounty participants, this may not be a good news because the bounty payments will definitely decrease.

[grabpopcorn536]

Bounty se can not die, because ICO rely on it to promote themselves, is the way to reach buyers in the fastest way. Current bonuses are not satisfactory by the number of participants in a bounty as much. Limited bonuses. What you say is absolutely correct. this is my thinking.