DirectBet – LIVE Sportsbook & Racebook. Now Accepting Ether !

[DirectBet]

Alright, it's a new day and I beat that 1.83 with:
http://www.directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=DJMi3ZGQ58bMjJUu1saMCS4P9vzDoy7TyK
2.36 odds for 0-0 halftime score!!

OK now that more than 24 hours have passed you can claim another prize !

Winner # 20 !

0.020 BTC was sent to your wallet.

Next Prize : 0.021 BTC

Odds to Beat : 2.36

Who's Next ?

[jambola2]

Argentina has already passed the semi-finals , so shouldn't this bet be Settled Lost ?

Secondly , could you help me find any bets I had made in the past about Netherlands ?
I think I had made a bet of them reaching semi-finals / finals , but it was a long time ago and I can't find the transaction among all my other bets.

Thanks,
Jambola2

[DirectBet]

And now I'm bitching about the problems with DB.

There was no problem with your Fischer bet as I explained in more details in my previous posts.

Your bet was not confirmed because the odds were lower than the minimum that you requested.

You had an option to lower the minimum required odds and get your bet confirmed but you elected to cancel the bet.

Per your request, your bet was then canceled and refunded long before the game ended.

We are not afraid to admit when there is an error in our system. Yesterday we voluntarily awarded you with a free 0.074 BTC bet after you discovered a bug in our system. This was not the first time that we comped you.

Even if there was a problem, which certainly wasn't the case here with your Fischer bet, we will never pay you out on a bet that you couldn't get confirmed due to an error on our website. We are not liable to bets that you were not able to place.

We believe that we have treated you fairly, as is evident by the fact that you keep coming back every day to bet at DirectBet.

We were also very happy to receive a compliment from you yesterday when you e-mailed us " I do like your site ".

Peace !

[DirectBet]

Argentina has already passed the semi-finals , so shouldn't this bet be Settled Lost ?

Yes, it is now, thanks for letting us know.

Secondly , could you help me find any bets I had made in the past about Netherlands ?

Sent via PM.

[s1ng]

Event : Brazil v Germany
Your Selection : Under 0.5 Goals @ Best Available Odds On Receipt.
Amount Received : 2498 DOGE.
Confirmed Odds : 7.6

bad luck 

this time gonna be my luck i think 
Amount Received : 0.00734142 BTC
Confirmed Odds : 7.2
Event : Germany v Argentina
Your Selection : 0 - 0 @ Best Available Odds On Receipt.

[saif92]

Event : Brazil v Germany
Your Selection : Under 0.5 Goals @ Best Available Odds On Receipt.
Amount Received : 2498 DOGE.
Confirmed Odds : 7.6

bad luck 

this time gonna be my luck i think 
Amount Received : 0.00734142 BTC
Confirmed Odds : 7.2
Event : Germany v Argentina
Your Selection : 0 - 0 @ Best Available Odds On Receipt.

I think this is not going to happen again because Germany will play attacking game and try to finish this in regular time its high scoring match

[bOSsmarie]

Good day,

just got some problem on my bet today on Shakhter Karagandy v FC Shirak

i bet that Shakhter Karagandy win both halves and they did with score 4-0

First half was 3-0
2nd half was 1-0

and i dont know why the result was a push?

was is supposed to be a win? and i only receive a refund of my bet..

[DirectBet]

just got some problem on my bet today on Shakhter Karagandy v FC Shirak

Corrected. Check your wallet. Sorry about that.

[ts11111]

And now I'm bitching about the problems with DB.

There was no problem with your Fischer bet as I explained in more details in my previous posts.

Your bet was not confirmed because the odds were lower than the minimum that you requested.

You had an option to lower the minimum required odds and get your bet confirmed but you elected to cancel the bet.

Per your request, your bet was then canceled and refunded long before the game ended.

We are not afraid to admit when there is an error in our system. Yesterday we voluntarily awarded you with a free 0.074 BTC bet after you discovered a bug in our system. This was not the first time that we comped you.

Even if there was a problem, which certainly wasn't the case here with your Fischer bet, we will never pay you out on a bet that you couldn't get confirmed due to an error on our website. We are not liable to bets that you were not able to place.

We believe that we have treated you fairly, as is evident by the fact that you keep coming back every day to bet at DirectBet.

We were also very happy to receive a compliment from you yesterday when you e-mailed us " I do like your site ".

Peace !

There was no problem with my Fischer bet, in your eyes, because it was worth $400. You comped me $45 on the same situation that happened with a bet that was worth far less.

I like your site, but the execution is extremely poor and flawed. There are so many disadvantages for the customer, and I've exposed several.


AVOID

[Josepht]

ts11111, we all are really tired of you. You have made 24 post the last few days in this topic saying only one thing.

If you really want to accuse Direct Bet, please do it in the 'scam accusations' board. Don't spam this topic. This topic isn't meant for that.


Btw, Direct Bet, I think you really need a self moderated topic if people like ts11111 continue.

[maok]

ts11111, we all are really tired of you. You have made 24 post the last few days in this topic saying only one thing.

If you really want to accuse Direct Bet, please do it in the 'scam accusations' board. Don't spam this topic. This topic isn't meant for that.


Btw, Direct Bet, I think you really need a self moderated topic if people like ts11111 continue.

i've reported him to moderators with the reason that he simply replies to this thread to discredit a legit company like DirectBet, but they've taken no action, I suggest you do the same. Honestly I have never seen a company which is willing to take all the blame and work to improve their website like Direct Bet. Most of the other crypto bookies require you to register so you can place bets, this alone should disqualify them from occupying a better spot in any rank made and also DB offers the most broad events for betting. Automatic payouts. As I said before, standard bookies would have sent this lammer ts111 a `freak off` letter and sent him home long time ago.

[Rating Place]

In reply to DirectBet's poll that he has also made reference to in the ratings thread. My personal thoughts are different than the ratings generated at Bitcointalk.

DirectBet- You just proved my point that what I write at Peeplsplace.com is my personal opinion. No one should play at your shop.

At Bitcointalk some posters like you so your rating is a "C". My personal opinion is "D". Posters drive ratings at bitcointalk.

You should NEVER post personal information including emails. Is there anything in my post at peepsplace that is untrue?

1. You are a 1 or 2 man shop
2. You have no previous bookmaking experience.
3. You will post private information including emails and betting history.

[Rating Place]

ts11111, we all are really tired of you. You have made 24 post the last few days in this topic saying only one thing.

If you really want to accuse Direct Bet, please do it in the 'scam accusations' board. Don't spam this topic. This topic isn't meant for that.


Btw, Direct Bet, I think you really need a self moderated topic if people like ts11111 continue.

i've reported him to moderators with the reason that he simply replies to this thread to discredit a legit company like DirectBet, but they've taken no action, I suggest you do the same. Honestly I have never seen a company which is willing to take all the blame and work to improve their website like Direct Bet. Most of the other crypto bookies require you to register so you can place bets, this alone should disqualify them from occupying a better spot in any rank made and also DB offers the most broad events for betting. Automatic payouts. As I said before, standard bookies would have sent this lammer ts111 a `freak off` letter and sent him home long time ago.

While not depositing has it's advantages, there are also downfalls. If there is any type of delay between the time money is sent and the time it hits DirectBet, the bet will remain open without the possibility of canceling the bet.

Bitcoinsports (Bit365) used the same format as DiretBet, no deposits, and they went under confiscating player's funds. DirectBet is very new with no book making experience. They may be the smallest shop as far as employees. It cannot be justified that there rating is higher than "C". There have been many books that have run away with player's money.

"F" rated books
BetCas F
Bitcoinsport F
Coinbet F
Sportbet.im F
StakeBTC

[Rating Place]

This is how books are rated:

If we feel that a book is a top book, then we ask them to advertise. It only makes sense to have the top books as advertisers. Anonibet and Nitrogen are on the top of all rating's guides. These are the books that are asked to advertise. Reagan would never hurt his reputation by putting up a banner at peepsplace for a book that he felt was unsafe.

Once again, books do not pay for ratings here at bitcointalk. Books pay for banners at peepsplace where we try to convert new players from cash to bitcoin, promotional announcements in cash forums that have promotional sections, along with articles that are publicized in other media outlets.

[DirectBet]

I'm not pushing for a downgrade since forum opinion is the driving force for the the ratings.

That's another lie from Peeps Place, but unlike him, we are not just saying "you lie"... we prove it !

Today we are going to present you with another new evidence why Peeps Place is a scam.

But first we would like to make it clear that we NEVER reveal information on our clients in public, unless they go public first and spread FALSE information on DirectBet, as Peeps Place is doing.

A couple of months ago we revealed and proved for the first time that Peeps is getting paid by his top rated Sportbooks to promote them in forums.

Immediately afterwards, Peeps got upset and downgraded us from C to D in his forum (see capture below).

This is another evidence that his ratings guide is not "By the players, for the players", as Peeps is claiming, but rather "By Peeps, for the guys that pay him".

Also notice that Peeps Place, "the gold standard when it comes to rating bitcoin sportsbooks", is advising his followers in regards to DirectBet that "I wouldn't play at this shop".

What he forgot to tell them is that during the following month, he was betting frequently at DirectBet, to the point where he earned a VIP reward, a bonus that is reserved to our most loyal clients !

Peeps is lying to his own crowd !!!

Do you think that Peeps Place has the creditability to rate Bitcoin Sportbooks, given that those he rates the highest are paying him to advertise and promote them ?

Please vote in the poll at the top of this thread.

[Rating Place]

Books rated "A" and "B" are recommended. There are some "C+" books that are recommended but since they have not been in business for one year, their rating is capped at "C+".

My personal opinion of DirectBet is a "D". Poster backing of DirectBet bumped that to "C".

[Rating Place]

Reagan is the owner at peepsplace.com that puts up the banners. Reagan is not going to ruin his reputation putting up a banner of a bad book. Peepsplace opened in 2003.

[DirectBet]

While not depositing has it's advantages, there are also downfalls. If there is any type of delay between the time money is sent and the time it hits DirectBet, the bet will remain open without the possibility of canceling the bet.

That's another false statement from Peeps Place.

As I've already explained to you in a previous post, you can cancel a bet in the rare event where the transfer is delayed and you are no longer interested in it.

For more details : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393147.msg7708830#msg7708830

This is how books are rated:

If we feel that a book is a top book, then we ask them to advertise. It only makes sense to have the top books as advertisers.

You are acknowledging here that we are a top book, because you did beg several times that we will advertise on your website.

Here is the proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393147.msg7714802#msg7714802

It was only after we turned off your hustling attempts that you started discrediting us publicly.

[Rating Place]

While not depositing has it's advantages, there are also downfalls. If there is any type of delay between the time money is sent and the time it hits DirectBet, the bet will remain open without the possibility of canceling the bet.

That's another false statement from Peeps Place.

As I've already explained to you in a previous post, you can cancel a bet in the rare event where the transfer is delayed and you are no longer interested in it.

For more details : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393147.msg7708830#msg7708830

This is how books are rated:

If we feel that a book is a top book, then we ask them to advertise. It only makes sense to have the top books as advertisers.

You are acknowledging here that we are a top book, because you did beg several times that we will advertise on your website.

Here is the proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393147.msg7714802#msg7714802

It was only after we turned off your hustling attempts that you started discrediting us publicly.

lies.
1. We took your banner down that was paying 1% and you got mad. We didn't want your money any longer because of your problems.
2. As far as I know firm bets cannot be canceled. Mine sat and I couldn't do a thing about it.

[Rating Place]

DirectBet- You got mad because we took your banner down and then you started a smear campaign.