BR0KK
|
|
August 23, 2012, 10:13:55 AM |
|
had that when i was trying my Rpi for a Miner Computer .... I was connected to it via SSH. After a little while (a day of mining) the SSH Connection broke down (randomly)...
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
August 23, 2012, 11:10:00 AM |
|
Warning (try 1): error sending control message: Broken pipe Any idea what is causing errors like this? They are not showing up in the logs as far as I can tell, just on the screen. Sometimes quite often. However, it doesn't exit and it seems to mine without problems. That are USB errors. The ZTEX API retries it and if another attempt work no error is printed in the log.
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 24, 2012, 06:39:34 AM |
|
im getting alot of these since yesterday: Summary: Bus bus-0-0 : 10 miners Bus bus-0-1 : 7 miners Total : 17 miners
Disconnect all devices or enter `q' for exit. Enter `h' for help.
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-4: Using LongPolling URL http://eu.eclipsemc.com:8337/LP bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-3: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3468E00-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3469756-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346D523-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346E12C-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 2 new nonces, luckFactor=0,72 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-2: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-3: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-4: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 2 new nonces, luckFactor=0,72 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 2 new nonces, luckFactor=0,72 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 6 new nonces, luckFactor=2,15 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-3: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-4: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 5 new nonces, luckFactor=1,79 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 7 new nonces, luckFactor=2,51 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 4 new nonces, luckFactor=1,43 bus-0-0: poll loop time: 124ms (USB: 42ms network: 82ms) getwork time: 211ms submit time: 212ms bus-0-1: poll loop time: 114ms (USB: 46ms network: 68ms) getwork time: 220ms submit time: 207ms Total hash rate: 3400,0 MH/s Total submitted hash rate: 3432,7 MH/s -------- bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-3: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash ...... im at EMC Pool and inaba (the pool operator) changed the way shares are accepted. They are >1 Diff?
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
September 24, 2012, 07:20:11 AM |
|
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-3: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A34644C6-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash ...... im at EMC Pool and inaba (the pool operator) changed the way shares are accepted. They are >1 Diff? Ask the pool operator what this message means. If it is caused by a to low difficulty it can be ignored.
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 24, 2012, 07:13:25 PM |
|
Looks to me like that software does not support > difficulty 1 shares.
Thats his answer ?
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 24, 2012, 09:50:35 PM |
|
Looks to me like that software does not support > difficulty 1 shares.
Thats his answer ? and i'm facing massive USB Connection errors out of no reason (i cant think of one, since it worked flawless for several month now). My Setup: A Windows 7 VM on a MAX OSX Mountain Lion Host ( Since i'm totally unable to get BTC miner < or anything else that can mine with OSX> working natively on MAC) A 7 Port USB Hub. A Silex SWX2000W+ device Server (All boards connected to this device server) It worked realy good for at least 4 month now .... All of a sudden, after a small Software update and a brief restart of my MAC all my board are facing massive USB Connection errors .... If i connect them to the device server or directly to my mac they wont be stable at all. After some time <in the clocking phase or while mining for hours with no problem> they randomly shut down with libusb connection errors. --> Im buying a video card tomorrow .... need to ged rid of the MAC / VM solution.
|
|
|
|
randomguy7
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:55:32 PM |
|
Looks to me like that software does not support > difficulty 1 shares.
Thats his answer ? and i'm facing massive USB Connection errors out of no reason (i cant think of one, since it worked flawless for several month now). My Setup: A Windows 7 VM on a MAX OSX Mountain Lion Host ( Since i'm totally unable to get BTC miner < or anything else that can mine with OSX> working natively on MAC) A 7 Port USB Hub. A Silex SWX2000W+ device Server (All boards connected to this device server) It worked realy good for at least 4 month now .... All of a sudden, after a small Software update and a brief restart of my MAC all my board are facing massive USB Connection errors .... If i connect them to the device server or directly to my mac they wont be stable at all. After some time <in the clocking phase or while mining for hours with no problem> they randomly shut down with libusb connection errors. --> Im buying a video card tomorrow .... need to ged rid of the MAC / VM solution. Does it help when you pull the power plugs from the boards and then plug them in again (while keeping the usb cables connected!)?
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 25, 2012, 09:37:23 PM |
|
ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Set frequency to 200,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: added 2 new devices found.
Summary: Bus bus-0-0 : 5 miners Total : 5 miners
Disconnect all devices or enter `q' for exit. Enter `h' for help.
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Using LongPolling URL http://127.0.0.1:9332/long-polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 4 new nonces, luckFactor=1,43 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 6 new nonces, luckFactor=2,15 bus-0-0: poll loop time: 57ms (USB: 57ms network: 0ms) getwork time: 1ms submit time: 1ms Total hash rate: 1000,0 MH/s Total submitted hash rate: 1071,3 MH/s -------- New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling i dont need to reset the boards. they are just dying one by one. Sometines a Single FPGA and then two to four. (all randomly x and y boards). I Checked the HUPS and the Cables ... everything is at least bought from "good quality" vendors (Hubs are from Belkin and trust) cables are shielded etc... I'm thinking about buying a small Netbook or a router (i have tried TPlink but ddnt succeed ...) that's going to be my miner ...
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
September 26, 2012, 11:52:33 AM |
|
ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Set frequency to 200,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: added 2 new devices found.
Summary: Bus bus-0-0 : 5 miners Total : 5 miners
Disconnect all devices or enter `q' for exit. Enter `h' for help.
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Using LongPolling URL http://127.0.0.1:9332/long-polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 4 new nonces, luckFactor=1,43 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 3 new nonces, luckFactor=1,08 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 1 new nonces, luckFactor=0,36 bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: f=200,00MHz, errorRate=0,00%, maxErrorRate=0,00%, hashRate=200,0MH/s, submitted 6 new nonces, luckFactor=2,15 bus-0-0: poll loop time: 57ms (USB: 57ms network: 0ms) getwork time: 1ms submit time: 1ms Total hash rate: 1000,0 MH/s Total submitted hash rate: 1071,3 MH/s -------- New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Set frequency from 200,00MHz to 204,00MHz Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling New block detected by long polling Warning (try 1): libusb0-dll:err [control_msg] sending control message failed, win error: Ein an das System angeschlossenes GerΣt funktioniert nicht.
New block detected by long polling i dont need to reset the boards. they are just dying one by one. Sometines a Single FPGA and then two to four. (all randomly x and y boards). I Checked the HUPS and the Cables ... everything is at least bought from "good quality" vendors (Hubs are from Belkin and trust) cables are shielded etc... I'm thinking about buying a small Netbook or a router (i have tried TPlink but ddnt succeed ...) that's going to be my miner ... Check the PSU. They often die slowly / become unstable over time if they run permanently at high temperatures (liquid electrolytic capacitors).
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
September 26, 2012, 11:59:48 AM |
|
Looks to me like that software does not support > difficulty 1 shares.
Thats his answer ? If Inaba means that BTCminer does not support difficulty >1 checking he is right. This is obsolete because it is done by the bitcoin server / pool. Maybe I will add this on the next release. You can ignore these warnings.
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 26, 2012, 02:03:17 PM |
|
Thx for the answer ill try other power supplies.
|
|
|
|
slush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
September 26, 2012, 02:12:36 PM |
|
If Inaba means that BTCminer does not support difficulty >1 checking he is right. This is obsolete because it is done by the bitcoin server / pool.
You probably cannot be more wrong with this. All pools were working with diff1 shares for almost two years, but with rising hashrates of miners, submitting diff1 shares is wasting of resources - too much traffic and pool load for no reason. So all modern pools are slowly implementing dynamic difficulty for their workers. Submitting low-diff shares to the pool may be considered as a flooding and may be a reason for ban. Please add checking difficulty for next release, it is literally five lines of code.
|
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 28, 2012, 10:16:41 PM |
|
changed the power supplies.
and now im testing if it works ....
i really do have to make some connectors for my pc power supply. Couldn't be that hard to do it myself?
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 29, 2012, 09:01:48 PM |
|
I'm still getting (not your fault): 001-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346E2B9-1: Error: connect timed out: Disabling URL http://pit.deepbit.net:8332 for 30s But after a few of these in a row the whole cluster shuts down (problem with BTCMiner)!?
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
BR0KK
|
|
September 30, 2012, 10:54:56 AM |
|
it should switch to your backup pool, if you enabled one in your config?
@Ztex Yes my power supplies died ore wer slowly dying. After six month of contious mining.
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
September 30, 2012, 11:44:21 AM |
|
How do you enable backup pool with BTCMiner?
EDIT: Nevermind found it! '-b host name pass'...
|
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
Turbor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
BitMinter
|
|
September 30, 2012, 11:49:06 AM |
|
How do you enable backup pool with BTCMiner?
-b http://us2.eclipsemc.com:8337 Turbor_XXXX XXXXXX Turbor_XXXX is your worker and XXXXXX your password
|
|
|
|
antirack
|
|
September 30, 2012, 10:25:28 PM |
|
Check the PSU. They often die slowly / become unstable over time if they run permanently at high temperatures (liquid electrolytic capacitors).
What effect does a dying or unstable PSU have? Dropping voltage, interruptions, anything else?
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
October 01, 2012, 08:10:59 AM |
|
If Inaba means that BTCminer does not support difficulty >1 checking he is right. This is obsolete because it is done by the bitcoin server / pool.
You probably cannot be more wrong with this. All pools were working with diff1 shares for almost two years, but with rising hashrates of miners, submitting diff1 shares is wasting of resources - too much traffic and pool load for no reason. So all modern pools are slowly implementing dynamic difficulty for their workers. Submitting low-diff shares to the pool may be considered as a flooding and may be a reason for ban. Please add checking difficulty for next release, it is literally five lines of code. At difficulty=1 the get-work frequency is approximately twice as high as the submit-work frequency. I hope this is not considered as flooding too.
|
|
|
|
ztex (OP)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
ZTEX FPGA Boards
|
|
October 01, 2012, 08:24:42 AM |
|
Check the PSU. They often die slowly / become unstable over time if they run permanently at high temperatures (liquid electrolytic capacitors).
What effect does a dying or unstable PSU have? Dropping voltage, interruptions, anything else? Liquid electrolytic capacitors loose their capacity over the time if they run permanently at high temperatures. This causes voltage drops or interruptions at the load step after configuration. Possible effects are: * Full loss of configuration ==> bitstream upload errors * Partial loss of configuration ==> FPGA delivers wrong results ==> dowclocking * device disappears from the USB if PSU interrupts (e.g. due to undervoltage or overload protection) The same effects occur is PSU is to weak or output capacitance of PSU us to small.
|
|
|
|
|