E3V3A
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
April 15, 2013, 11:17:38 AM |
|
Yes, they are all gone, sorry. At this point, a new production run would take 4-8 weeks, and who knows if BFL will be making ASICs by then (or ever). It's just too uncertain for us to invest all that money and risk getting stuck with a bunch of units.
Hi, I've been looking at this board, and must say I'm quite impressed of the "cleanness" and quality of your design. I'd like to get one for FPGA experiments, but that would require the accompanying VHDL/Verilog code to program it with. Do you have it available somewhere? (What experiments have you done with it?) Or perhaps I have misunderstood, and it is not possible to re-program these FPGAs while on board? In addition it seem that you do not deliver outside the US? Anyway, don't worry about the ASICs, they will not be able to deliver anything in the next 4-8 weeks. BFL has shoot themselves in the foot by poor design choice and need to redesign. This has cost them dearly, and we can question if they can even afford to continue this project, without mining for themselves first. Which is probably what they are doing right now, if anything. Also, the majority of people doesn't wanna dump 1500+ USD to an overpriced ASIC, they just wanna try the technology out of curiosity, which is where your board is perfect.
|
|
|
|
phk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 15, 2013, 03:25:53 PM |
|
Also, the majority of people doesn't wanna dump 1500+ USD to an overpriced ASIC, they just wanna try the technology out of curiosity, which is where your board is perfect.
Isn't this an advertisement for GPU approach, not FPGA? At least with GPU, when your interest wanes, you can still play Solitaire.
|
|
|
|
shad
|
|
April 15, 2013, 03:46:27 PM |
|
hi having some troubles with my board after running since dez2011 i think first i am getting 2013-04-15 17:31:21.901 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000 2013-04-15 17:31:22.060 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000 2013-04-15 17:31:22.120 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000 2013-04-15 17:31:22.280 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000 2013-04-15 17:31:22.339 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000 2013-04-15 17:31:22.499 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
then mpbm wants to reset clockrate 2013-04-15 17:32:04.386 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz... 2013-04-15 17:32:04.479 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed) File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed self._update_job_interval() File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps) ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
2013-04-15 17:32:05.051 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz... 2013-04-15 17:32:05.212 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed) File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed self._update_job_interval() File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps) ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
last but not least the firmware will be reloaded, sometimes only FPGA0 comes up, and FPGA1 isn't mining some ideas? i didn't ever change the setup, and that version of mpbm is running for a long time
|
15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
|
|
|
shad
|
|
April 19, 2013, 02:00:29 PM |
|
changed power supply, problem solved
|
15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
|
|
|
ifeltsweet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 20, 2013, 01:06:40 PM |
|
I was under the impression that schematics are open sourced after visiting the website. However upon closer inspection I found those are only simplified schematics.
Is there any chance of you releasing the full schematic into the community?
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
|
April 21, 2013, 07:23:18 AM |
|
It would be even more sexy if somehow your PCB's could be modified for the Avalon chips that are now on sale.
|
|
|
|
Signus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2013, 08:17:56 AM |
|
Also, the majority of people doesn't wanna dump 1500+ USD to an overpriced ASIC, they just wanna try the technology out of curiosity, which is where your board is perfect.
Isn't this an advertisement for GPU approach, not FPGA? At least with GPU, when your interest wanes, you can still play Solitaire. Actually this is where FPGA's have an advantage. They're not useful for the average user, but for hobbyists and anyone with a lot of data can reprogram it for anything. That's why FPGA's are so versatile and exceed ASIC's. You can reprogram an FPGA to work for SHA256 or even scrypt or for doing dictionary generation. It would be even more sexy if somehow your PCB's could be modified for the Avalon chips that are now on sale.
Many people do not understand that FPGA's are not the same as ASIC's, even though I know you're just dreaming of the possibility.
|
|
|
|
shad
|
|
April 21, 2013, 11:25:19 AM |
|
Actually this is where FPGA's have an advantage. They're not useful for the average user, but for hobbyists and anyone with a lot of data can reprogram it for anything. That's why FPGA's are so versatile and exceed ASIC's. You can reprogram an FPGA to work for SHA256 or even scrypt or for doing dictionary generation.
i don't think you can use it for scrypt, at least not this boards without any memory, but i guess many people would like to see a scrypt firmeware
|
15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
|
|
|
|
legendster
|
|
May 02, 2013, 09:35:30 AM |
|
I was hoping to develop my own board for personal mining ... I was looking for all the Circuit component's values on the board with any other circuit diagram that is available with any of you guys. Can ANYONE PLEASE help me ? I sent a similar message to the OP. *Fingers Crossed*
|
██████████ ████████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ ██████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██ | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ ▄▀ ▄▀█ ▄▀ ▄▀█ ██████████ █ ██████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ ▄▀ █ █ ▄▀ ██████████▀ ██████████▀ █ █ █ █ ▄▀ █ ▀▀▀▀█ ▄▀ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀█ ▄▀ ▄▀█ ▄▀ ▄▀ █ █████████ █ ██████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ ▄▀ █████████▀ ██████████▀
| Blockchain Database | | ▄▄▄ ▄▄▀ ▀▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▀ ▄▀▄ ▀▄▄ █▄█ █████████████████ █ █ █ █ ▄▀ ▌ █ █ ▄ █ ▄ █▀ ▄▌ ██ █ ▀▄ █ ▄▀ █▀█ ▌ ▌ █ █ █ █ ▌ ▌ █ █ █ ██ ███████████████████ ▀▀▄ ▀▄▀ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▀ | Dev friendly SDK Platform | ▄▄▄▄ ▄▄█ █▄▄ ▄▄█ █▄▄ ▄▄█ ▄▄▄ █▄▄ █ ▄▀ ▀▄ █ █▀ █ █ █ ▀█ ▀▀█ █ ▄█▀█▄ █ █▀▀ █▀▀ █ ▀███▀ █ ▀▀█ ▀▀█ █ █ █ █▀▀ ▀▀█ █ █ █ █▀▀ ▀████████▀ █▄▄▄▄█ █ █▄▄▄▄█ █ ▄▀ █▄ ▄█ ▀▄ █ █▀▄ ▀ ▄▀█ █ █ █ █ ▌ ▀ ▐ █ █ █ █ █▄▀▄▌ ▀ ▐▄▀▄█ █ █ █ ▀ █ █ █▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █▀▀▀▀▀▀█ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | User-friendly Token Creation | | | |
|
|
|
sirky
|
|
May 09, 2013, 04:25:54 PM |
|
So I may have missed this somewhere, but was mining capability every implemented into CGMiner?
|
|
|
|
Zeronic
Member
Offline
Activity: 243
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2013, 04:32:01 PM |
|
So I may have missed this somewhere, but was mining capability every implemented into CGMiner?
Yes, CGMiner or BFGMiner do not support X6500
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
|
May 15, 2013, 03:43:57 AM |
|
So I may have missed this somewhere, but was mining capability every implemented into CGMiner?
Yes, CGMiner or BFGMiner do not support X6500 Wait, it was NOT implemented, right? I am still using MPBM on all of mine.
|
|
|
|
fpgaminer
|
|
May 15, 2013, 04:15:26 AM |
|
Last I checked it was implemented in at least one of them.
|
|
|
|
LiveJay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2013, 07:41:14 AM |
|
How about selling the FPGA design + code? Then folks could "roll their own".
Yup... Why not open source it... let the community pool it's resources and get these going. Yes, I think this is a good idea and have been planning to talk with the others about it for a while now. Been too busy lately even to send around an email, so I certainly haven't looked at OSHW licenses and tried to figure all that out. Any experts on that stuff around here? Any traction on this? I'd be interested. -Jay
|
|
|
|
Pheal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2013, 07:55:31 PM |
|
How about selling the FPGA design + code? Then folks could "roll their own".
Yup... Why not open source it... let the community pool it's resources and get these going. Yes, I think this is a good idea and have been planning to talk with the others about it for a while now. Been too busy lately even to send around an email, so I certainly haven't looked at OSHW licenses and tried to figure all that out. Any experts on that stuff around here? Any traction on this? I'd be interested. -Jay +1
|
|
|
|
|
torusJKL
|
|
June 22, 2013, 07:22:07 AM |
|
I have 3 X6500 sucessfully running with bfgminer. But they are not recognized automatically. I had to add this to the miner.conf file: "scan-serial" : [ "x6500:AH00WTG2", "x6500:AH00WO4E", "x6500:AH00WUK4" ],
|
|
|
|
wmikrut
|
|
June 26, 2013, 02:11:26 AM |
|
Has anyone got this to work with BFGMiner's current version in Windows?
I see my X6500's installed in the control panel in Windows. I can use MPBM to mine -- but that program is a little -- bulky.
When I run the bfgminer -D -d? -T command I do not see my devices listed. I tried manually editing the .conf file and added :
"scan-serial" : [ "x6500:A5CCCUQY", "x6500:A5XXX8IO" ],
But that doesn't work either. The documentation on the x6500 in the readme file is a little lacking in getting the x6500's to work.
|
I will NEVER ask for any kind of funds up front in a buy/sale of anything on bitcointalk.
BM-2cTFihJKmSwusMAoYuUHPvpx56Jozv64KK
|
|
|
purelithium
|
|
July 04, 2013, 09:42:40 PM |
|
Has anyone got this to work with BFGMiner's current version in Windows?
I see my X6500's installed in the control panel in Windows. I can use MPBM to mine -- but that program is a little -- bulky.
When I run the bfgminer -D -d? -T command I do not see my devices listed. I tried manually editing the .conf file and added :
"scan-serial" : [ "x6500:A5CCCUQY", "x6500:A5XXX8IO" ],
But that doesn't work either. The documentation on the x6500 in the readme file is a little lacking in getting the x6500's to work.
Make sure you have the latest WinUSB driver installed as per this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78192.msg1330416#msg1330416
|
Like my post? 1H7bfRYh7F89mfmFgsRCdn4awDaUHQmYqY
|
|
|
|