|
RJF
|
 |
June 12, 2014, 06:11:56 PM |
|
...while the energy should be spent on making THIS product, THIS service, and this companies goal, progress.
Well said, totally agree... |
DNotesVault“First, they ignore you. Then, they laugh at you. Then, they fight you. Then you win!” – Mahatma Gandhi Prepare for your future now, check out CRISP For Retirement and our complete family of CRISP savings plans. |
|
|
Ryven Cedrylle
Member
 Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:05:10 PM |
|
is cpu mining a good idea? seems like we save the algo from one threat but open ourselves to botnet?
I don't think CPU mining will constitute any meaningful fraction of mining. At least in my experience, the people interested in 'CPU mining' are folks like me and my Intel Core Duo from 2009 that gets like 20khash per thread standing around going "when do I get to help?" Anyone with a CPU good enough to mine and who knows what mining is probably already has a better GPU dedicated to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
ycagel
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:48:54 PM |
|
Since I am not a miner, my overall concern is security and not killing a brand. If we can achieve that, I am comfortable.
YC
|
|
|
|
|
|
mintzone
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:55:40 PM |
|
Since I am not a miner, my overall concern is security and not killing a brand. If we can achieve that, I am comfortable.
YC
Gotta keep the miners happy or the entire thing is dead. Also, good  I'll put my asic towards DGB! |
DGB is my and the future's coin of choice! Don't cry if you don't invest  |
|
|
|
benjamoyne
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:02:55 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, |
|
|
|
|
|
,./,./
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:26:43 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... |
|
|
|
|
|
haggis
|
|
June 12, 2014, 10:45:48 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... I don't think so. The way to have to mine DGB to get them is as now. The advantage would be to get other bonus coins which would attract a lot more miners and help both coins to get more security. I was very sceptical at the beginning about this idea, but as Jared explained it piece by piece I now think it would be good for DGB. Most comments which are against merge mining are showing that the writer has (mostly) a vast misunderstanding about how merge mining actually works (as I had a couple of days ago, too). So please don't have an oppinion if you don't know how something works (not only on this topic ). Better ask if you're unsure about anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoLTD
|
|
June 12, 2014, 10:49:50 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... I don't think so. The way to have to mine DGB to get them is as now. The advantage would be to get other bonus coins which would attract a lot more miners and help both coins to get more security. I was very sceptical at the beginning about this idea, but as Jared explained it piece by piece I now think it would be good for DGB. Most comments which are against merge mining are showing that the writer has (mostly) a vast misunderstanding about how merge mining actually works (as I had a couple of days ago, too). So please don't have an oppinion if you don't know how something works (not only on this topic ). Better ask if you're unsure about anything. Pardon me sir, I can have an opinion on anything I like. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
haggis
|
|
June 12, 2014, 10:54:14 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... I don't think so. The way to have to mine DGB to get them is as now. The advantage would be to get other bonus coins which would attract a lot more miners and help both coins to get more security. I was very sceptical at the beginning about this idea, but as Jared explained it piece by piece I now think it would be good for DGB. Most comments which are against merge mining are showing that the writer has (mostly) a vast misunderstanding about how merge mining actually works (as I had a couple of days ago, too). So please don't have an oppinion if you don't know how something works (not only on this topic ). Better ask if you're unsure about anything. Pardon me sir, I can have an opinion on anything I like. Thank you. Pardon, but no. If you miss important information about a topic you can't find your true oppinion. You THINK you have found it but in reality you're tricking yourself. It's not meant to be offensive. Just a fact. That's why most democracies are not realy democratic, because people build their oppionion on false and lacking information. Which is why education is the most important ressource for society. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoLTD
|
|
June 12, 2014, 10:55:28 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... I don't think so. The way to have to mine DGB to get them is as now. The advantage would be to get other bonus coins which would attract a lot more miners and help both coins to get more security. I was very sceptical at the beginning about this idea, but as Jared explained it piece by piece I now think it would be good for DGB. Most comments which are against merge mining are showing that the writer has (mostly) a vast misunderstanding about how merge mining actually works (as I had a couple of days ago, too). So please don't have an oppinion if you don't know how something works (not only on this topic ). Better ask if you're unsure about anything. Pardon me sir, I can have an opinion on anything I like. Thank you. Pardon, but no. If you miss important information about a topic you can't find your true oppinion. You THINK you have found it but in reality you're tricking yourself. It's not meant to be offensive. Just a fact. That's why most democracies are not realy democratic, because people build their oppionion on false and lacking information. I will say again, I can and will have an opinion. where I see fit. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
BlazingHashes
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 11:05:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benjamoyne
|
|
June 12, 2014, 11:49:29 PM |
|
Digibyte have said over the past 4 or 5 pages, IF we do merge mine Mine Digibyte = Get Digibyte and other coinMine other coin = Get other coin only no DigibyteWe don't lose value, the thing is, if we look on the long-term. than is good that you only mine digibytes... I don't think so. The way to have to mine DGB to get them is as now. The advantage would be to get other bonus coins which would attract a lot more miners and help both coins to get more security. I was very sceptical at the beginning about this idea, but as Jared explained it piece by piece I now think it would be good for DGB. Most comments which are against merge mining are showing that the writer has (mostly) a vast misunderstanding about how merge mining actually works (as I had a couple of days ago, too). So please don't have an oppinion if you don't know how something works (not only on this topic ). Better ask if you're unsure about anything. Pardon me sir, I can have an opinion on anything I like. Thank you. Pardon, but no. If you miss important information about a topic you can't find your true oppinion. You THINK you have found it but in reality you're tricking yourself. It's not meant to be offensive. Just a fact. That's why most democracies are not realy democratic, because people build their oppionion on false and lacking information. I will say again, I can and will have an opinion. where I see fit. Thank you. I don't think any offense is meant or that your opinion is not valued, all opinions are valued, thats the whole idea of having a community forum. The point Haggis is trying to get across is that we seem to be having people jump in, without reading the last couple of pages and missing important updates. It's hard to group the developers opinions and reasons, without updating the first post constantly. But at the end of the day, if your opinion is we will lose value, I respect your opinion and your reasons behind it. Thats why we have a discussion forum after all. |
|
|
|
|
kalenen
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 404
Merit: 250
Beware
|
|
June 13, 2014, 01:21:42 PM |
|
Why are transfers so slow? I sent DGB from my wallet 3hours ago and still 0 confirmations?!?
|
|
|
|
|
,./,./
|
|
June 13, 2014, 01:35:55 PM |
|
Why are transfers so slow? I sent DGB from my wallet 3hours ago and still 0 confirmations?!?
maybe you have wallet version 1.0.0 |
|
|
|
|
kalenen
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 404
Merit: 250
Beware
|
|
June 13, 2014, 02:02:47 PM |
|
Why are transfers so slow? I sent DGB from my wallet 3hours ago and still 0 confirmations?!?
maybe you have wallet version 1.0.0 Checked and i got 2.9.1 Last time was also slow, took about 4 hours to transfer. |
|
|
|
|
,./,./
|
|
June 13, 2014, 02:21:11 PM
Last edit: June 13, 2014, 03:50:51 PM by ,./,./ |
|
Why are transfers so slow? I sent DGB from my wallet 3hours ago and still 0 confirmations?!?
maybe you have wallet version 1.0.0 Checked and i got 2.9.1 Last time was also slow, took about 4 hours to transfer. the low hashrate is the problem. the pools/minners don't find a block when a pool find a block you get a confirmations. check your wallet he don't synchronizing. (block 134372) so if a block find 134373 you get a confircation yesterday it was the same problem.... (and also Wednesday) I hope so that digibyte launch tomorrow the multi algoritme....... (with digishield:D) always believe in digibyte//jared! |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoLTD
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:04:39 PM |
|
Request DGB to be added to poloniex I just realized that Poloniex now has a 'request for coin tab' and filled out the information for DGB to be added. May be a show of faith for any one interested to do the same. As the more places its accessible, the better. Happy Friday everyone. Edit: My post dident have quite the required information to make this easy, here is the link directly: https://www.poloniex.com/coinRequest |
|
|
|
|
SSG69
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:43:03 PM |
|
I hope so that digibyte launch tomorrow the multi algoritme....... (with digishield:D)
Why do you think tomorrow? Give these guys some space and time to test and maybe even to take a step back and evaluate. This is nothing that can be pressured. I would prefer a mature product over half baked patch work. regards |
|
|
|
|
|
,./,./
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:50:14 PM |
|
I hope so that digibyte launch tomorrow the multi algoritme....... (with digishield:D)
Why do you think tomorrow? Give these guys some space and time to test and maybe even to take a step back and evaluate. This is nothing that can be pressured. I would prefer a mature product over half baked patch work. regards I hope |
|
|
|
|
22langer22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:04:07 PM |
|
Why are transfers so slow? I sent DGB from my wallet 3hours ago and still 0 confirmations?!?
maybe you have wallet version 1.0.0 Checked and i got 2.9.1 Last time was also slow, took about 4 hours to transfer. the low hashrate is the problem. the pools/minners don't find a block when a pool find a block you get a confirmations. check your wallet he don't synchronizing. (block 134372) so if a block find 134373 you get a confircation I hope so that digibyte launch tomorrow the multi algoritme....... (with digishield:D) also believe in digibyte//jared! yesterday it was the same problem.... (and also Wednesday) I dont think I can launch tomorrow, need to give everyone time to update to the new wallet. Most importantly the exchanges need time to update. |
|
|
|
|
|
