|
Slipknot79
|
 |
June 12, 2014, 04:45:41 PM |
|
battle of walls  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
fernando
|
|
June 12, 2014, 04:52:48 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
predatorkill
|
|
June 12, 2014, 04:58:23 PM |
|
I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.
I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.
havn't thought of centralization, good point sir |
|
|
|
|
naxin
|
|
June 12, 2014, 05:03:28 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it  Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. |
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 05:04:33 PM |
|
I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.
I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.
havn't thought of centralization, good point sir Mining pools are centralised too, right? You can always solo mine, or p2pool mine. Or trust a collective pooled. There will always be good and bad actors. |
|
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
June 12, 2014, 05:10:45 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) agree..possibly on remote/local wallet.(centralisation right) btw. already rebought all my coins fu*k the loss i WANT drkcoins. Think that this prices today are seen be us the last time in history of darkcoin. Prepare for rush to 20 june LOL |
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
tungfa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1023
|
|
June 12, 2014, 05:14:58 PM |
|
 DarkCoin Mac OS X Update v0.9.10updated 12 June 2014, built with latest OpenSSL 1.0.1hURL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.0.zipmirror: https://www.dropbox.com/s/abanwlp72yz7zur/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.zipzip shasum: 7df7f3e4964ee897fdf6bda81d455f80eccd69c0🌟 Fellow Mac user! If you appreciate this release please support me by sending a DRK coffee tip, any amount is appreciated!
DRK: XtwzEuurDTNeVK5a26AzzZDdVkkPkAQ7EuNote: If your wallet fails to update to the latest block, carefully do the following:
0. Reminder: always have a backup of your wallet.dat
1. make sure that your DarkCoin.app resides in your Applications folder and is closed
2. delete peers.dat and remove all addnode= entries from your darkcoin.conf (if you have one)
3. fire up Terminal.app and paste this to reindex the Blockchain:/Applications/DarkCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/DarkCoin-Qt -reindex (pm me your username to appear here), thank you! 2014-05-05 +1.45662795
2014-05-13 +5
2014-05-14 +30
2014-05-16 +0.01
2014-05-18 +1
2014-05-21 +0.1
2014-05-21 +0.4
2014-05-27 +1
2014-05-27 +2 (thx bloxton)
2014-05-28 +5
URL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.0.zipdoes NOT work Tx for the dropbox (working) |
|
|
|
|
|
predatorkill
|
|
June 12, 2014, 05:16:48 PM
Last edit: June 12, 2014, 05:30:09 PM by predatorkill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ntrn500
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:10:25 PM
Last edit: June 12, 2014, 06:29:58 PM by ntrn500 |
|
Compiled on Linux, the latest commit (bfb4e53d104b2a4caae04f18db195ed521a75d85). The wallet works fine, but the version it shows on "About DarkCoin" is v0.9.4.13-1-gbfb4e53-beta and "getinfo" shows version 91000. I guess that everything is fine but the confusion comes from a negligible bug?
./build/build.h:#define BUILD_DESC "v0.9.4.13-1-gbfb4e53"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesse Livermore
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:12:46 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP. |
I own a DASH Masternode.... And you should too.
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:15:38 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP. I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions! |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:25:35 PM |
|
I've got to imagine a shared MN would be something to the likes of sending X percentage of coins to the MN DRK address, that address runs the node. Any payments from the reward are divided up proportionally to the amount of DRK sent less some sort of maintenance fee (2%). Definitely an interesting take on generating passive income for those that fall short of the 1K threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
Donho
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:26:10 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP. I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions! if it'll really be trustless like he said (which would be really awesome) then there's no need for caution. But as I see it a trustless solution would have to be coded into the Coin by Evan, it's not something a third party could do. Something like allowing a multipart Masternode tx input. At least I can't think of third party trustless solution to this |
|
|
|
|
|
Delita Heiral
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:27:56 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP. Bump again, ive wanted to do this since nodes went live but dont have the experience <3 |
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:28:41 PM |
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. I'm already working on it Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing. Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP. I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions! if it'll really be trustless like he said (which would be really awesome) then there's no need for caution. But as I see it a trustless solution would have to be coded into the Coin by Evan. Something like allowing a multipart Masternode tx input. Thats the thing. For a MN to work, it MUST have a 1k deposit on an address 0. Meaning, that whatever solution for a "trustless" handover of DRK, these will have to be pulled together as one single transfer, in one single tx id. So the bottleneck here is the 1k deposit. You cant add multiple inputs to make 1k. Making a multisig 1k would only end up in a mess-up. You only need 1 bad actor to screw it all up. |
|
|
|
|
tungfa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1023
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:39:08 PM |
|
Thats the thing. For a MN to work, it MUST have a 1k deposit on an address 0. Meaning, that whatever solution for a "trustless" handover of DRK, these will have to be pulled together as one single transfer, in one single tx id.
So the bottleneck here is the 1k deposit. You cant add multiple inputs to make 1k.
Making a multisig 1k would only end up in a mess-up. You only need 1 bad actor to screw it all up.
[/quote]
I would be careful as well !
I can see a lot of people running into trouble with this and sure then they will all come back here crying about
- their lost coins
- not working MN
- and such …>
I think it is good that it has to be 1000 coins and is pretty complicated and technical that really only the tech pro's are doing it !
i have the coins but not the knowledge to run it save and secure !
Better save than sorry !
|
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:51:52 PM |
|
Thats the thing. For a MN to work, it MUST have a 1k deposit on an address 0. Meaning, that whatever solution for a "trustless" handover of DRK, these will have to be pulled together as one single transfer, in one single tx id.
So the bottleneck here is the 1k deposit. You cant add multiple inputs to make 1k.
Making a multisig 1k would only end up in a mess-up. You only need 1 bad actor to screw it all up.
I would be careful as well !
I can see a lot of people running into trouble with this and sure then they will all come back here crying about
- their lost coins
- not working MN
- and such …>
I think it is good that it has to be 1000 coins and is pretty complicated and technical that really only the tech pro's are doing it !
i have the coins but not the knowledge to run it save and secure !
Better save than sorry !
If you have the coins, no reason not to run it now that we have cold wallet support, your coins wont be online anyway, why not put them to work? There is 0 risk of loosing your coins now, worst that can happen is someone takes down your node and you are offline for a while but who cares! The point is no one will be loosing their coins from running a masternode if you have the 1K to do it on your own. On the other hand, for people pooling DRK together to run a shared masternode there is the trust issue between the operator and the shareholders but that is a completely different issue and has nothing to do with DRK. |
|
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
June 12, 2014, 06:55:29 PM |
|
I prefer to take the cedit buy what is needed and put 100% my mn OR ifI have trust friend to do it with him... really..drk worth more and more so the game is much risky.
|
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
|
|
|
