|
sdersdf2
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 02:27:35 PM |
|
I think the point of the bot is to distort the bid/ask orderbook so traders can't see where the resting orders are, it is a dirty trick.
Could you elaborate on that? What are they trying to accomplish? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 15, 2014, 02:32:12 PM |
|
when you stuff the orderbook with lots of these little orders others can't see what orders are being placed and you can't judge buying demand. I think the point of the bot is to distort the bid/ask orderbook so traders can't see where the resting orders are, it is a dirty trick.
Could you elaborate on that? What are they trying to accomplish? |
|
|
|
|
GambleX
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GambleX Exchange/Gambling
|
|
March 15, 2014, 02:44:18 PM |
|
Hey guys!
Gamblex has added Darkcoin to our exchange and our gambling site. It will be fully implemented, that means we will also sell shares that distribute a part of the Darkcoin fee revenue to stakeholders.
Check out our thread and maybe Invest!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=498311.msg5676745#msg5676745
|
|
|
|
|
traumschiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:04:52 PM |
|
The same bot is trading on VTC/DRK @ cryptsy btw...
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:09:34 PM |
|
Apparently the block explorer isn't updating and I calculated the target block using that, so it's much sooner. Sorry about that. All of the main pool have updated already. Please update asap!
hard fork remain 99 blocks(at 34140) |
|
|
|
|
elbereth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:15:50 PM |
|
darkcoind shows 0.9.0.0-beta but I still get 08902 in getinfo, normal?
And I have restarted the daemon of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schwede65
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:19:23 PM |
|
darkcoind shows 0.9.0.0-beta but I still get 08902 in getinfo, normal?
And I have restarted the daemon of course.
you (re)started the old version my wallet says: v0.9.0.0-unk-beta |
|
|
|
|
elbereth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:21:41 PM |
|
I did restart the correct version, but something else must be off with my git version... grrr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elbereth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:27:57 PM |
|
I did again the same steps and the darkcoind -? shows 0.9.0.0-beta but sending getinfo to the newly started daemon with same file leads to the wrong version: $ ./darkcoind -?
DarkCoin version v0.9.0.0-beta
$ darkcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 80902,
"protocolversion" : 70002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 34046,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 302.00460829,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1394017965,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
This is what I get on windows with darkcoind-qt: {
"version" : 90000,
"protocolversion" : 70002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
sdersdf2
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:57:28 PM |
|
when you stuff the orderbook with lots of these little orders others can't see what orders are being placed and you can't judge buying demand.
Can't you just scroll down the buy order queue - what's to stop anyone from doing that? |
|
|
|
|
|
Kuriso
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:00:04 PM |
|
Srry to say that, but I'm SO HAPPY to see your problem.
I got the exact same problem, asking all over the internet in various language and seems to be the only one until now.
I have 3 290 that do exactly the same: start at 2500 then get back to 2100 (all in the exact same second) after 10 minutes. I'm under Bamt, and it only do that with the 290 AND darkcoin. No problem in Scrypt, no problem in Darkcoin with my other kind of cards.
If you (or others) found a workaround, do not hesitate to share. I'll be glad to offer a few Darkcoins to someone able to fix this.
The quote train was getting a little long there lol. I'm sure we're not alone. I'm using windows 7 . . so clearly it's not our platforms. This leaves something specific to 290's or the miner/kernel. Anyone have a clue? Which 290 series are you running? I have 5 Sapphire 290 Tri-x OC that I can normally get 2.4-2.5mh/s but right now I can only run 4 cards. I have them running great at 2.345+/- or 9.290mh/s combined on all 4. I'm having issues with my mobo and had to RMA ram. My rejects are .01% on 2 cards and 0% on the other 2. WU 0.033-0.0334/m per card. I'm using the Sph-SGminer in Win 8.1 Enterprise 2.345+/- Settings"kernel" : "darkcoin", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-engine" : "1000:1000", "gpu-memclock" : "1300:1300", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "19", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "gpu-fan" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "78", "temp-cutoff" : "80", "no-pool-disable" : true, "failover-only" : true, "expiry" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1" 2.4-2.5mh/s Settings"kernel" : "darkcoin", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-engine" : "1020:1000", "gpu-memclock" : "1500:1300", "gpu-powertune" : "10", "intensity" : "22", "thread-concurrency" : "32765", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "2", "temp-overheat" : "78", "temp-cutoff" : "80", "no-pool-disable" : true, "failover-only" : true, "expiry" : "1", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1" |
|
|
|
|
|
lulutis2000
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:00:11 PM |
|
what do u think about this coin? |
|
|
|
|
Fior Sirtheoir
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:10:49 PM |
|
New to using ubuntu How do I get the 1.3 miner installed. PM if someone can give me some instruction or point me in a direction, or reply. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Standhaft
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:21:01 PM |
|
what do u think about this coin? just a copy. nothing interesting about it |
DRK - Xi9PB8XXN9Gn4HFG7NtzsXNiBQC4jdFvnH
|
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:56:04 PM |
|
how do you defend against attackers who try to DOS by requesting to be part of a joined transaction but then fail to sign off on the transaction? This is the big problem with coinjoin that prevents it from scaling well. have you guys solved it somehow?
There is a penalty for leaving the connection before the darksend completes. And how does that work? |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
eduffield (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:22:10 PM |
|
how do you defend against attackers who try to DOS by requesting to be part of a joined transaction but then fail to sign off on the transaction? This is the big problem with coinjoin that prevents it from scaling well. have you guys solved it somehow?
There is a penalty for leaving the connection before the darksend completes. And how does that work? You put up a collateral transaction that only the current master node can cash to get into the pool. If you misbehave in any way, the master node will cash it. Each time that costs 0.1DRK, so it could add up pretty quick if you're attacking it. Masternode's are chosen randomly using a deterministic algorithm that can't be tampered with. This has a nice side effect, people will want to run full nodes to get the random fees. So we should have a pretty strong base of nodes. |
Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
|
|
|
|
|
|
tifozi
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:33:31 PM |
|
Looks like these 2 have not updated. 213.229.88.102:7903 6.1 days 0% 101.3% 50.8MH/s 17 134ms United Kingdom 502de55-dirty
q30.qhor.net:7903 6.9 days 1% 99.0% 33.2MH/s 8 161ms Germany 502de55-dirty
Hopefully the admins do it quick. Don't know about the private nodes. |
|
|
|
|
|
