Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:21:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 [1717] 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9722505 times)
choose-username
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 04:44:14 PM
 #34321

Please help if you can, read more in my signature.

Hope there will be no trojan like this for DRK. People just don't understand stuff enough.
He even had antivirus installed, but it did not detect the trojan.

I am moving my stash to cold storage paper wallet.

I'd like to help, but problem is that on internet people are suprisingly clever at making up stories, so I dont know if yours is true and unfortunately cant help.
1714922519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714922519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714922519
Reply with quote  #2

1714922519
Report to moderator
1714922519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714922519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714922519
Reply with quote  #2

1714922519
Report to moderator
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714922519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714922519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714922519
Reply with quote  #2

1714922519
Report to moderator
splawik21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005


DASH is the future of crypto payments!


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 04:46:29 PM
 #34322


Automatic Checkpoints

This week has been a busy one. As we discussed last week, we’ve come up with a strategy to shield Darkcoin from future issues with unintended blockchain forks by adding an automatic checkpointing system. This will allow us to move ahead quickly with development and innovation without risking the occurrence of another forking event like the one we had at the launch of RC2.

To expedite the implementation of automatic checkpointing, we engaged Hiro, of Hirocoin fame. He had experience with this system and we knew he could implement it quickly and correctly.

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Masternode Payment Fix

The Masternode payment system is working nearly perfectly on testnet. Some of the issues we’ve addressed are:

    Ghost Masternodes - Masternodes which the network continued to list as active even after the Masternode had been taken offline
    Instances in which Masternode messages were not fully propagating throughout the network


Modifications were also made which will add some flexibility to the Masternode voting system. This should result in more blocks being paid out to Masternodes.

At present, about 95% of Masternode payments on testnet are executing properly. The remaining 5% are failing due to inconsistencies in the Masternode lists held by individual clients. There could be a few reasons for these inconsistencies, and we should be able to get closer to a 100% success rate after some more debugging.

To see the payments as they happen on testnet, check out: http://tdrk.poolhash.org/

How Masternode Voting Works

We’ve seen some questions asked about the precise manner in which the Masternode voting system functions. Many people don’t realize that we have an innovative system built into the blockchain solely for the purpose of voting on Masternode payouts. It could be thought of as something like a “blockchain within a blockchain”.

Before getting into the nuts and bolts, it should be said that although the word “voting” implies some willful intervention on the part of the user, this is absolutely not the case. Voting is performed by the client software in a fully automated process that is hard-coded into the system. It cannot be manipulated by the user.

The voting system functions as follows:

Block 14217

Blockheight Pubkey Votes
14214 Xaddr1 2
14215 Xaddr2 3
14216 Xaddr3 2
14217 Xaddr4 1

If you mined this block, your client added the pubkey for 14217. It's also allowed to increment each existing vote by one if it agrees with it. So the code goes something like this:

On block 14214 was the pubkey to be paid Xaddr1?

    If yes increment votes from 1 to 2
    If no and votes=1, change pubkey to the correct one and don't vote (this only can happen if no voting has happened and it looks incorrect)

On block 14215 was the pubkey to be paid Xaddr2?

    If yes increment votes from 2 to 3
    If no, don't vote


On block 14216 was the pubkey to be paid Xaddr3?

    If yes increment votes from 1 to 2


Added block 14217, pubkey Xaddr4, votes 1

Timeline Update


At this point we are comfortable setting a firm release date for RC3. Release dates for versions beyond that will be updated as circumstances dictate and as development progresses.

    RC3 (June 18th): Fully implemented Masternode payments (20% of each block), automatic checkpointing, fixes for network forking issues
    RC4 (Mid July): Improved anonymity and removal of 10 DRK Darksend limitation
    Code Audit: We will release details on this as they become available
    RC5: Address any security issues or major bugs discovered in the audit



Assuming all goes well with RC5, we will do a bit more testing and then open source the project.

BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
droptable
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:11:45 PM
 #34323


thx!

DΛRKCOIN -> is now -> DΛSH
----------
not DashCoin, not DarkDash, not anything. The Name has been / is changed the tech stays the same
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:19:40 PM
 #34324

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks.

luigi1111
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:28:07 PM
 #34325

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks.

If I understand what happened last time, a bunch of forks appeared of the updated code. So, while I think Evan believes he's fixed the issues that were causing these forks, checkpointing ensures there can only be one updated fork in case something else unforeseen comes along.
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:30:28 PM
 #34326

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks.

If I understand what happened last time, a bunch of forks appeared of the updated code. So, while I think Evan believes he's fixed the issues that were causing these forks, checkpointing ensures there can only be one updated fork in case something else unforeseen comes along.

That makes sense, thanks. Smiley

fernando
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:34:33 PM
 #34327

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks.

If I understand what happened last time, a bunch of forks appeared of the updated code. So, while I think Evan believes he's fixed the issues that were causing these forks, checkpointing ensures there can only be one updated fork in case something else unforeseen comes along.

That makes sense, thanks. Smiley

Yes, in the next couple of months there will be a lot of changes. This is just an extra precaution to avoid things going crazy like they did ten days ago if everything fails. As Evan has said, once everything is more stable and we don't introduce features constantly, he will remove it.
eltito
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 105



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 05:35:04 PM
 #34328

We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.

Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks.

If I understand what happened last time, a bunch of forks appeared of the updated code. So, while I think Evan believes he's fixed the issues that were causing these forks, checkpointing ensures there can only be one updated fork in case something else unforeseen comes along.

Right.  With a centralized server, all nodes have a static reference point to go back to.  Even if they get off on the wrong chain, a static checkpoint server will force them back to the correct one within a minute or two (the average user would most likely never notice anything was wrong).  

If I correctly understand what TsuyokuNaritai describes, if a node got off on the wrong chain, it would verify against a block coming from the wrong chain.  The system would be pointless.
richy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

KryptoBonds, Bonds Industry now in Blockchain


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2014, 06:26:04 PM
 #34329

you are not buying the coin you are buying the dev... . and in the case of evan i am shure you get the best "quality" possible... thank you so much for your continued efforts in making this happen evan...

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
thExit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2014, 06:45:27 PM
 #34330



I just felt so sorry for some "investor" that bought the last ATH and then came back to complain.
This is what I learned in investing 101 but it seams some people did not attend that class.

It is fairly well known that a first test of previous ATH is a Major level of resistance. 


Hi Icebucket, that's well put, I also liked your entries on the darkcointalk.org forum, that is a simple yet coherent strategy. It's a shame most of the trading platforms/software does not allow custom indicators (not yet:) but one can still use the good old standard indicators such as EMAs. There is no need to make trading complicated, the use of sophisticated indicators/methods may give results contrary to expectations. As I have some experience in trading Forex (started in 2008, started making profits in 2011:) I beg everyone to remember about position-sizing, not to involve too much of one's deposit, too much of risk exposure may be a killer. Buying altcoins is more like buying shares, you buy and eventually the value of your coins will decrease, but you don't get a margin call when you are at minus 70% of your initial balance:) I know investing in crypto-currencies is high risk vs. high reward, so people would split their trading capital into 3 or 4 parts and get into the market with four orders 25% of deposit each (I'm not saying that you are doing that, Icebucket P.S. great nickname, a good idea on a hot friday:) but on Forex such money management would blow up your account in one day. Or if you are lucky, make you rich fast:) All is good as long as you have a sound strategy, and don't get scared when the price does not move in your favour. I find crypto-currency trading very interesting, as many Forex methods also apply here, and the market is fresh and vibrant, with so much energy. Amazing:) I wish you good trading.
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 06:48:52 PM
 #34331

Moving up in the world



edit

Darkcoin has been averaging, guestimate, about $3m / 24hrs in volume over the past 8  weeks ~ $150m - $200m has changed hands.
Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 06:52:38 PM
 #34332

Moving up in the world



Nice volume, more than LTC that's great !
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:03:27 PM
 #34333

Quote from: Evan Duffield @ darkcointalk.org
So I've already implemented half of what I need for cold storage of the masternode funds. That secondary key that's in the config will be shared between the cold and hot daemon.

Cold storage for Masternodes is on the way. Smiley

source: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/page-16

Why is this stuff becoming more arousing than porn? I think I need to book myself onto a program of some sorts.
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:14:10 PM
 #34334

Moving up in the world



Nice volume, more than LTC that's great !
And verily did the BTC-e crowd cast their gaze upon such numbers, and there was wailing and gnashing of teeth.
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:22:59 PM
 #34335

Sad news chaps...

I have put a few hundred coins on sale because I will soon need to pay for some bills in July.

They are on the market for 0.1 BTC  Cry

tombtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 471
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:44:05 PM
 #34336



Bitfinex data is getting more and more interesting!
Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:45:33 PM
 #34337

Sad news chaps...

I have put a few hundred coins on sale because I will soon need to pay for some bills in July.

They are on the market for 0.1 BTC  Cry



Few hundred for 0.1 BTC ? Typo ?
Lebubar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:46:55 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2014, 09:52:52 PM by Lebubar
 #34338

Sad news chaps...

I have put a few hundred coins on sale because I will soon need to pay for some bills in July.

They are on the market for 0.1 BTC  Cry



NNNNNNNNNNnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooo, you can sell all you want but not this.

I might sell a few when the price hits $300/DRK.
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:46:59 PM
 #34339

Sad news chaps...

I have put a few hundred coins on sale because I will soon need to pay for some bills in July.

They are on the market for 0.1 BTC  Cry



 Grin you're funny dude. Also I want to sell too for 0.099 BTC Cheesy
Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 07:48:44 PM
 #34340

 Cheesy I didn't get the joke.
Pages: « 1 ... 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 [1717] 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!