[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[coinzcoinzcoinz]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder if there aren't enough anonymous coins for the transaction. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like I suggest is quite implied and expected by user imo. This is something that Evan should improve pretty quickly.

[UdjinM6]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like that is quite implied imo. This is something that Evan should improve.

I agree. It could not only say "there is no funds for darksend" but also ask something like "would you like to send it in non-anonymous way?"

[coinzcoinzcoinz]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like that is quite implied imo. This is something that Evan should improve.

I agree. It could not only say "there is no funds for darksend" but also ask something like "would you like to send it in non-anonymous way?"

No, there should be no message at all, simply prioritize anonymous coins, if not enough exist, use non-anonymous coins for the remainder. So there should be 2 options:

1) Prioritize Anonymous coins (default)
2) Prioritize Non-Anonymous coins

With these options, you will never have an error message and it provides for all use cases.

[salmion]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like that is quite implied imo. This is something that Evan should improve.

I agree. It could not only say "there is no funds for darksend" but also ask something like "would you like to send it in non-anonymous way?"

No, there should be no message at all, simply prioritize anonymous coins, if not enough exist, use non-anonymous coins for the remainder.

Well no because you don't want to send non anonymous coins without telling people.

Your way is the most expedient and simple from a ux perspective but not from a privacy maintaining perspective.

*edit* just saw your edit and agree a toggle would work.

If you have the time why not pop a wire or two in the DCT thread. There is a new person willing to work on it..

[qwizzie]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like that is quite implied imo. This is something that Evan should improve.

I agree. It could not only say "there is no funds for darksend" but also ask something like "would you like to send it in non-anonymous way?"

No, there should be no message at all, simply prioritize anonymous coins, if not enough exist, use non-anonymous coins for the remainder.

what if that user wants to wait and mix a bit longer when he receives the ''Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds'' message ? with your method it will be automatically mixed
with normal (not mixed) amounts and therefore less anonymous. More info about available options sounds better in my ears.... lets keep the freedom of choosing what kind of transaction
we want to make but present it in a more easy to understand way. You could for example show all three options visible from the start and have users click on which option to use
or we could provide help tips during outgoing transactions.

[DeAlquezar]

Select no preference in the wallet.

change your transaction type to normal or no preference instead of darksend

OK, now is fine. Thank you very much for help

[qwizzie]

Evan / Darkcointeam : great job on a flawless working enforcement, another milestone reached.

[jiggytom]

DRK just passed LTC in 24HR volume, woo!

[coinzcoinzcoinz]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like that is quite implied imo. This is something that Evan should improve.

I agree. It could not only say "there is no funds for darksend" but also ask something like "would you like to send it in non-anonymous way?"

No, there should be no message at all, simply prioritize anonymous coins, if not enough exist, use non-anonymous coins for the remainder.

what if that user wants to wait and mix a bit longer when he receives the ''Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds'' message ? with your method it will be automatically mixed
with normal (not mixed) amounts and therefore less anonymous. More info about available options sounds better in my ears.... lets keep the freedom of choosing what kind of transaction
we want to make but present it in a more easy to understand way. You could for example show all three options visible from the start and have users click on which option to use
or we could provide help tips during outgoing transactions.

All good points. Agree with all you said.

[tokeweed]

DRK just passed LTC in 24HR volume, woo!

?

[eduffield]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder if there aren't enough anonymous coins for the transaction. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like I suggest is quite implied and expected by user imo. This is something that Evan should improve pretty quickly.

That's a cool idea. I suppose it would just warn it's going to be a non-anon transaction if it can't find anything

[qwizzie]

we are breaking through again it seems  .. i wouldnt mind reading some thoughts / analyses about
where we are right now in the market and where we could end up in the next few days.

[oblox]

DRK just passed LTC in 24HR volume, woo!

What are you smoking, no it didn't.

[jiggytom]

DRK just passed LTC in 24HR volume, woo!

What are you smoking, no it didn't.

well, at least on https://bitcoinwisdom.com/

[tokeweed]

we are breaking through again it seems  .. i wouldnt mind reading some thoughts / analyses about
where we are right now in the market and where we could end up in the next few days.

it's just starting to trend upwards, so now is a really good time to get in.  not sure on how and where this will all end up, but hopefully it becomes a long, steady uptrend for months to come.

edit:  but be careful tho, it could be a fake out too (saying that more to emphasize that everyone be careful when trading, rather than being pessimistic).

[LucD88]

To sum up recent events of the past 24 hours:


1) Leak of possible merge between DRK & SDC, discussed by the community, Evan pulled the plugs. (cancelled)


2) Rumor of OKCoin.com adding DRK on their (FIAT) exchange.


3) DRK featured on FOX 26 news (6-nov-2014):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YQnYpc52ks


4) DRK discussed on Bloomberg TV (6-nov-2014):
http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2014-11-06/can-bitcoin-stocks-hold-up-against-the-feds


5) Evan testing first InstantX (INSTANT) transaction successfully in ~2 SECONDS:

I just got multiple masternodes to form consensus, lock inputs, literally took 2 seconds to lock the transaction in place... then I tried to spend the same inputs for a higher fee. Works!

2014-11-07 01:13:18 ERROR: CTxMemPool::acceptableInputs()::InstantX : invalid transaction, conflicts with existing transaction lock CTxIn(COutPoint(365de7e2831dc8b85c2c94fef5f2b98e86a95e301879c5b3460db69df757deb9, 0), scriptSig=3046022100e2ca0a35ab1373)

6) Enforcement enabled, 100% compliant:

Enforcement is a success! We officially have 100% payment compliance and no forks on the network anywhere.

Quote and add in case I missed something, please bump!

[patrolman]

5) Evas testing first InstantX (INSTANT) transaction successfully in ~2 SECONDS:

I just got multiple masternodes to form consensus, lock inputs, literally took 2 seconds to lock the transaction in place... then I tried to spend the same inputs for a higher fee. Works!

Quote and add in case I missed something, please bump!

That should read 'Evan'

[KryptoFoo]

we are breaking through again it seems  .. i wouldnt mind reading some thoughts / analyses about
where we are right now in the market and where we could end up in the next few days.

Nice breakout from long term downtrend on good volume. Next resistance levels at 009 (previous reaction high) and then 01. RSI not overbought. With lots of twitter activity, darknet news swirling about, instantTX on the way, enforcement successfully activated, masternode payments going up to 30% soon, I think we sustain enough momentum here to challenge those levels this weekend. Hopefully we can work through that and see those resistance levels become support.

[coinzcoinzcoinz]

I wanted to send my DRK to bittrex and I see a message "Unable to locate enough Darksend.... funds".
Anyone know what happened?

Select no preference in the wallet.

Quick question, why is darksend the default option for this?

because most people use this cryptocoin for the anonimity, using Darksend gets you that anonimity.

The default should prioritize anonimous coins, then non-anonymous coins for the remainder if there aren't enough anonymous coins for the transaction. Current implementation is sub-optimal (everyone newbie will have the same question and will be freaked out). This has been an annoyance for me as logic like I suggest is quite implied and expected by user imo. This is something that Evan should improve pretty quickly.

That's a cool idea. I suppose it would just warn it's going to be a non-anon transaction if it can't find anything

Yes let's do that, and then user still has the option to cancel transaction in warning dialog and anonymize more coins.

[qwizzie]

we are breaking through again it seems  .. i wouldnt mind reading some thoughts / analyses about
where we are right now in the market and where we could end up in the next few days.

Nice breakout from long term downtrend on good volume. Next resistance levels at 009 (previous reaction high) and then 01. RSI not overbought. With lots of twitter activity, darknet news swirling about, instantTX on the way, enforcement successfully activated, masternode payments going up to 30% soon, I think we sustain enough momentum here to challenge those levels this weekend. Hopefully we can work through that and see those resistance levels become support.

great read.. thanks (i was wondering about those resistance and support levels)