Justicemaxx
|
|
June 19, 2016, 08:28:49 PM Last edit: June 25, 2016, 08:14:46 AM by Justicemaxx |
|
Then there's like written in the thread in DAO about all that is going on, I agree 100%+: the user Grybold "In General, for myself decided the following:
About DAO and Ether: 1. Broadcast as a platform for smart contracts is undoubtedly the next step cryptoviruses. 2. The draft DAO is truly a revolutionary idea. 3. The revolutionary aspect of this idea will be revealed in full, when will be funded, then work funded projects.
About the break: 1. Hacking has undermined the credibility of the project TheDAO on the part of investors. 2. The idea which is going to implement TheDAO will be developed, by whom and in what form will understand in the near future, breaking this bump that came across on the road. 3. The volatility of the Ether ... it's just volatility, because the injured one, albeit the largest project on the platform of the Ether.
About decentralization: 1. The idea of decentralization is a great idea, but now she follows a path of becoming, we (cryptologist) have not yet exploited to the full, we run and test, trying to understand the capabilities that it includes. 2. TAO is an implementation of a decentralized system of relationships created by PEOPLE, designed to benefit people on a global scale, therefore, being innovative in the technological and social scale, it is a priori fraught with problems (bugs), sometimes critical, and our goal is to bring these problems to a minimum. 3. When it detects critical problems can slow the development of the system (stress - to slow, not stop, because the idea of decentralization, a simple break-do not destroy) these problems should be eliminated, i.e. to find the cause and to make sure that this does not occur in the future. 4. Yes the hacking was performed according to the rules of the basic smart contract, but we (the crypto community) see that the hacking was caused by a mistake in the contract, this smart contract triggered incorrectly, this should not be. If you forgot to lock the door and you get robbed, it is your fault that you forgot about security, but this is your house, a TV and a kitchen set do not automatically go to the one who entered your house through nezapertoy the door and robbed the apartment. 5. Investments in decentralization is first and foremost a trust, it motivates the development of ideas and projects with it (decentralization) related that the money invested is a form of trust, so at this stage, investors need to regain that trust. 6. Since in this case the trust is invested, they should be back where they were stolen, showing that in a critical situation the community is able to respond adequately to, not replacing the concept of decentralization and the critical mistakes at the stage of development of the system.
About future events (IMHO): 1. The ether is not in danger, because it is not compromised, 2-3 weeks and the new high $ and the cue ball will see, and after Polovinnaya the cue ball will go higher. 2. After soft-hard fork (most likely it will hold) the project team theDAO will continue its efforts to create a DAO Link. Some investors will withdraw the tokens in the air, I guess the output token will be accompanied by their combustion. Some investors tokens will not withdraw, I think that will remain 60-70% of tokens from the total number generated. 3. The complete elimination of the current smart contract (unless you consider that all the new transports, this will clean unnecessary) and especially the project TheDAO regard as extremely unlikely. 4. Possibly followed by the creation of a new contract created in accordance with the code of audit, this contract will move all remaining tokens. 5. A further approach to writing smart contracts will be accompanied by a serious code audit, gradually, within 2-3 months we will see good growth rates DAO tokens, which will signal the restoration of confidence. 6. Followed by even greater appreciation of the DAO ecosystem because the new DAO will have to consider the mistakes of the pioneers theDAO. 7. As one would expect the development of ideas will continue, the current break will be considered as an event which retarding influence on the development of the Institute of TAO, how slow we have the chance to see it in the near future, as well as to affect".
|