So...maybe you should post a picture about your performance graph with bitmain psu also
so we can see the different
I read the entire thread and I found somthing really interesting for all A9 Zmaster owners.
A lot issues come from the Innosilicon PSU.
I don't know about the speed but I can promiss you that the stability issue come from the PSU.
So if your performance graph look like this try a Bitmain PSU :
If my post help you, could you consider the possibility to give me some please : ZCL : t1eFdVeWk5ZTHLALz5T1uKypNmhN2TRFKot
BTCP : b1MaXXTaR9QDZoNL9n3pLkwvkREU5Xk4B6s
ZEN : znnY8CDeJkHnUbgtWcVsbgXWTPPSqn5Qf1y
I look for the graphic with new PSU but it look the same so I make a mistake.
https://imgur.com/gallery/VNhN0iaI think this not meaningfull enough.
Sorry for that!
We all make mistakes!
And it could have been vital and important findings, so thanks for trying !!!
if you try a pool like:
stratum+tcp://zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666
you will probably see a much smother curve aorund 50ksols/s.
if you try :
stratum+tcp://prohashing.com:3336
you will likely see a curve more like the one you have and perhaps even a bit more above 50ksol/s!
but...
Avarage ksol/s per hour should be more interesting!
And as few rejected shares as possible!
with nanopool.org ýou will probably see that your A9('s) resets quite often because memory fills up quite fast which I believe is because your A9 miners log fills up much faster then when using prohashing.com
That will likely also be something to consider.
You have to test different mining pools to find which pool is the best for you and understand why you earn the best at that particular pool(and poolsettings).
At the end of the day it should be maximize your earnings per hour(or day) that should be of interest!
good luck!
Thank you for you help. I will try an eu pool.
"I will try an eu pool" ? ? ?
I recommend you use "ping" to check which mining pool server is the closest to you on internet.
For example:
https://zec.nanopool.org/helpLocation Server Host
Europe zec-eu1.nanopool.org
Europe zec-eu2.nanopool.org
US East zec-us-east1.nanopool.org
US West zec-us-west1.nanopool.org
Asia zec-asia1.nanopool.org
Japan zec-jp1.nanopool.org
Australia zec-au1.nanopool.org
in windows you run "cmd.exe"
"command.exe" start up
in the command.exe window you type:
ping zec-eu1.nanopool.org
and Press "Enter"
do this for each Server Host at the mining pool of your choice.
For me in Europe pinging Europe:
ping zec-eu1.nanopool.org
Pinging zec-eu1.nanopool.org [185.71.66.20] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 185.71.66.20: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 185.71.66.20: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 185.71.66.20: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 185.71.66.20: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Ping statistics for 185.71.66.20:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 24ms
For me in Europe pinging Australia:
ping zec-au1.nanopool.org
Pinging zec-au1.nanopool.org [139.99.156.30] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 139.99.156.30: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=44
Reply from 139.99.156.30: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=44
Reply from 139.99.156.30: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=44
Reply from 139.99.156.30: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 139.99.156.30:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 320ms, Maximum = 322ms, Average = 321ms
For me in Europe pinging US West:
ping zec-us-west1.nanopool.org
Pinging zec-us-west1.nanopool.org [45.63.61.87] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 45.63.61.87: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=53
Reply from 45.63.61.87: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=53
Reply from 45.63.61.87: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=53
Reply from 45.63.61.87: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 45.63.61.87:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 174ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 175ms
For me clearly server host
zec-eu1.nanopool.org
win with latency of only "Average = 24ms"
The server with least "ms" should be the fastest for you to connect to ! ! !
Just wan't to clarify for you and other that read this
