Ahab_the_great
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2014, 06:54:36 PM |
|
IF you donated to the right address then thank you though i have not seen that unique amount yea like i said i really truly don't care what people think it was awfully quite till i showed up now here comes the same names i did my homework on every one of these profiles and to the begging i was asking you guys to speed shit up but once i found out how the crypto world really is i haven't asked for a dime no pun intended lol i have one partner who believes in me and he is the only one besides my crew and a few exchanges who know the actual road map and i plan to keep it that way by all means if you love coding so much please send me what you have then i will recompile that. my part would of been done until noah the last time i spoke to him told me i was using the wrong source but then would not provide the correct one if you look back i explained this and ask someone to post it no one responded of course not because few want me to fail as if my ego would be hurt i did not create dime trust if i did it would be ran much smoother I am here to clean and advance the coin current state by all means if you are to help then help if not just join the fud monkeys i saw how people chewed out other devs who even showed their face so i no longer get pissed at the spam of hate I'm here to get things done in the fastest way possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Ahab_the_great
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2014, 07:10:02 PM |
|
i see it you sent it on the 20th thank you for believing in me and the team but do you want update the source and i recompile it ? what do you want to do that is more important then the money at this point
|
|
|
|
Ahab_the_great
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2014, 07:19:22 PM |
|
I just want to help dimecoin succeed. I have my code on a fork of the github repo, though I haven't been able to compile it to test: https://github.com/Melech/dimecoinIt's just a copy of quark 0.9.2.1 that I tried to merge with dimecoin 1.5(quark 0.8.3). I haven't added anything new. so all you did was replace everything with dime coin and dime or were you successful in implementing the algorithm dime coin living is all i ask for i have put money and other's money and time into the back end of the coin the only thing holding up the plans are the wallets once we get that out of the way all the other projects will come to the light will upgrading affect the android wallets at all?
|
|
|
|
Ahab_the_great
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2014, 07:41:25 PM |
|
i'm planning on implementing a very low inflation rate as well 0.2 should be right anything around one hundred million or lower a year after all our coins have been mined if you could please add on if not i will just takes a bit more time obviously also i see you put *set BitcoinUnits::maxAmount == 100,000,000,000 DIME
there should not be any limit on how many you can send even though in a year or two you wont see people sending billions to each other naturally as the value rises
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2014, 12:15:32 AM |
|
What do you mean by implementing an inflation rate? a PoS system?
For what it's worth... it will be many years before all the coins are mined. If 200bil were mined the first year, and it halves each year... 200b, 100b, 50b, 25b, 12b, 6b, 3b, 2b, 1b... that's 8 more years before mining rate drops below 1 billion per year.
I'm not certain the point of having a maxAmount, but I copied it from quark. Quark had it set to 210mil, which is definitely too low for dime. I believe this is supposed to keep a single transaction from being too large in size.
Ignore him, he's a nutter, the guy that has cliamed to be making 10 features a month for six months but not a single one materialised. He's a scammer, probably a liar and certainly incompetent without any ability to even make a simple change. He also has connections to the old scam developer. So work out whether to trust anything from his maggot infested mouth.
|
|
|
|
lulupon
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
November 27, 2014, 07:38:32 AM Last edit: November 27, 2014, 08:53:05 AM by lulupon |
|
|
BTC Address : 1ASUDTboPQsG9t2DE3Y29jnDSEgwybFc32
|
|
|
lulupon
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
November 28, 2014, 09:54:17 AM |
|
I finally got the windows wallet to compile. Now I just need to work out a few bugs
Niceworks!! If you want to testing for TX or any other things, please tell me your dimecoin wallet address. I'll send a little amount of DIME to you. And, I'm so sorry for asking some question to you. Did you change below code in soruce? That is very important information about DIMECOIN network. I hope, you have not changed that things. Thank you!! base58.hclass CBitcoinAddress : public CBase58Data { public: enum { PUBKEY_ADDRESS = 15, SCRIPT_ADDRESS = 9, PUBKEY_ADDRESS_TEST = 119, SCRIPT_ADDRESS_TEST = 199, };
main.cpp// The message start string is designed to be unlikely to occur in normal data. // The characters are rarely used upper ASCII, not valid as UTF-8, and produce // a large 4-byte int at any alignment. unsigned char pchMessageStart[4] = { 0xfe, 0xa5, 0x03, 0xdd };
Dimecoin Block Explorer : http://dime.lulupon.net Dimecoin P2P Mining Pool : http://pool.lulupon.net:54093 Dimecoin Web Wallet : https://dimewallet.lulupon.net
|
BTC Address : 1ASUDTboPQsG9t2DE3Y29jnDSEgwybFc32
|
|
|
zl0x
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2014, 12:15:10 PM |
|
Yeah thanks man, please give us your dimecoin address
|
|
|
|
lizzer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2014, 01:10:34 PM |
|
how much profit i can make this shitsoin?
|
|
|
|
BootstrapCoinDev
|
|
November 28, 2014, 06:53:35 PM |
|
I am not even able to sell it ...lol
Yup, no buy support, sell orders near 1 satoshi.
|
|
|
|
|
zl0x
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2014, 09:17:26 PM Last edit: November 28, 2014, 09:51:13 PM by zl0x |
|
I still dont understand .. why is there active development going on. The coin is dead right?
Dimecoin is alive, good Mh/s on pools and some trade on crypsty, take a look https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/DIME_LTCSometime he rise up, i recently sell at 0.00000005, right now we have 555 ltc of buyer at 0.00000002 on crypsty. But i am wondering if crypsty stop to support this coin, what happen To be honest, i'm quietly supporting Dime since begining, i'm not in any hope, but i trust that dime could be very more valued. When he go up i sell a little, if no i just stack and it work well. See, even in this situation who appear pretty confused, in fact confused since time ago.. dime should be dead, and dime is still alive. There is smth Chuck Norris in this coin This coin appear resistant to me, + asic resistant, fast, easy to mine and little fee when trading, is this all i need. + When i see those guys who invest time in dime, working to add pools exchange wallet etc, it making something real with this coin and the little community who still on it.
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 12:15:18 AM |
|
now dime is not linked to LTC, I fear a demise.
It did well mainly because the old the community guy kept it alive
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 02:20:45 AM |
|
I would check, but quark and dime are a bit alien to me.
pchMessageStart[0] = 0xfe;
and the others should be the same, I guess that applies to testnet, too.
But it also looks like tour genesis block is wrong, or you have taken the checkpoints of quark into the code, but they don't belong to dime.
It would be easier to upgrade from 0,8,2 and add the missing bits.
Put some nodes in connecting to the explorer's IP and to your own daemon, Insert getnetworkhashps, update the checkpoints.
You should be good to go.
I'd stay with the Dime client, and work forward.
Problem is that the files are unfamilar to me me. I know bitcoin, quark/dime is different with how it arranges the spread of files.
If you find out how different, let us all know.
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 02:46:17 AM |
|
dime does not have chainparams.cpp or h, so perhaps there is a conflict there.
chainparams is where the unixtime, nonce, genesis goes in btc, but not with dime. So you have to somehow make sure the client knows where to look.
It would be far easier binning quark, and updating dime.
it is saying there is an issue with checkpoints, and the blockhash's don't match. You probably have two sets.
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 02:54:07 AM |
|
dime does not have chainparams.cpp or h, so perhaps there is a conflict there.
chainparams is where the unixtime, nonce, genesis goes in btc, but not with dime. So you have to somehow make sure the client knows where to look.
It would be far easier binning quark, and updating dime.
it is saying there is an issue with checkpoints, and the blockhash's don't match. You probably have two sets.
Start again, it is quicker. Stay with dime, forget quark. Your blockhashes are in conflict. Actualy, ignore my advice, and contact that Max guy. He could be a helpful type.
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 03:09:45 AM |
|
nDefaultPort = 11973; nRPCPort = 8372;
45, 46 chainparams.cpp
they are not dimecoin ports
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 03:16:55 AM |
|
Blah Blah
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? You trash talk Ahab all the time, yet have nothing useful to contribute yourself. At least Ahab is trying... The last hour trying to help you explained you had a conflict with blockhashes and wrong ports.olus you had different folders.to dime So carry on by yourself. rpc and p2p ports for dime ... google them
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 03:20:10 AM |
|
nDefaultPort = 11973; nRPCPort = 8372;
45, 46 chainparams.cpp
they are not dimecoin ports
Check \contrib\pyminer\pyminer.py(219): if 'port' not in settings: settings['port'] = 8372 Check \contrib\wallettools\walletchangepass.py(2): access = ServiceProxy("http://127.0.0.1:8372") Check \contrib\wallettools\walletunlock.py(2): access = ServiceProxy("http://127.0.0.1:8372") Last time i assist, they are quarkcoin's ports.
|
|
|
|
dimecoinfan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2014, 03:28:46 AM |
|
Blah Blah
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? You trash talk Ahab all the time, yet have nothing useful to contribute yourself. At least Ahab is trying... The last hour trying to help you explained you had a conflict with blockhashes and wrong ports.olus you had different folders.to dime So carry on by yourself. rpc and p2p ports for dime ... google them The problem I was having had nothing to do with block hashes or ports. You don't have any idea what you are talking about. You said, "But it also looks like tour genesis block is wrong, or you have taken the checkpoints of quark into the code, but they don't belong to dime." Which is stupid... it tells me you didn't even look... I copied the genesis block and checkpoints before my first github commit... I even added a new checkpoint! You have 2 source codes intermingled. The error messages told you there was an issue, and this is because you have a bunch of new folders mingled in with other folders and they are conflicted. Just keep up with it, and I will leave you alone, just a bit annoyed off that you ask questions then act like a petulant child with a rather childish agenda.
|
|
|
|
|