Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 12:44:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 66 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [1st Feb 2016]  (Read 131291 times)
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:17:20 PM
 #61

^^ Lol, not even going to bother quoting that. Well aware of what you've said, but its still bullshit.

Its an open economic market, if you think its overpriced then don't buy. Its like blaming your local butcher for selling chicken at $10/lbs when walmart has it for $8/lbs. Just don't buy there. But to then cry at the local butcher, while buying his chicken.... there is no logic there.

I suggest you start here.
I don't buy.
D'oh.
Then what are you complaining about... The market sets the prices with supply and demand, like the exchanges. Should I start rating bitstamp F because they were selling bitcoins overpriced at $1200 using hindsight?
Quote
Bitcoin Miners: more willing to take it up the asic and say harder, than a Hentai Anime Girl
My issue with your OP post is that you ignore this fact and even hide it in obscurity since most people are as ignorant as you on the subject and don't even see they are losing BTC ... tis funny also.

I'm happy with my hardware that isn't losing BTC Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715172282
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715172282

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715172282
Reply with quote  #2

1715172282
Report to moderator
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 09:01:36 PM
 #62

I think buyers should calculate themself if its worth to buy miners. A link to a proper calculator might be helpful for noobs though.
At the end... only because Asicminer was the first in the market, and started with the target to do what they did, means that they destroyed mining? It was simply inevitable. It doesnt matter who did it. It would have happened anyway.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 10:31:37 PM
 #63

I think buyers should calculate themself if its worth to buy miners. A link to a proper calculator might be helpful for noobs though.
At the end... only because Asicminer was the first in the market, and started with the target to do what they did, means that they destroyed mining? It was simply inevitable. It doesnt matter who did it. It would have happened anyway.
Exactly :/ I'd have to rate every company equally responsible and then we'd just have everyone between F- and E. What's the point of that? I'm very surprised a 1k activity member is saying such weird things, I guess he just longs for the days when an FPGA was the best you could buy.

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:47:09 PM
 #64

I think buyers should calculate themself if its worth to buy miners. A link to a proper calculator might be helpful for noobs though.
At the end... only because Asicminer was the first in the market, and started with the target to do what they did, means that they destroyed mining? It was simply inevitable. It doesnt matter who did it. It would have happened anyway.
Yes.

But giving the company that has done this the longest, and made massive profit overcharging people, an "A+", really make a "Trustworthiness Guide" a sham.

Sounds more like "they bought an A+ by lining my wallet" ...

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.

Thread fail - bye.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 11:15:37 PM
 #65

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.
Quoted here for the future. You ARE asking me to downvote every company that offers up a price unfavourable to you. Remember, ASICMiner made its money for its shareholders (people in the community). And for the record, I've never held ASICMiner stock and nor do they 'line my wallet'. I have a man purse.

aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1450
Merit: 1013


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 11:25:17 PM
 #66

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.
Quoted here for the future. You ARE asking me to downvote every company that offers up a price unfavourable to you. Remember, ASICMiner made its money for its shareholders (people in the community). And for the record, I've never held ASICMiner stock and nor do they 'line my wallet'. I have a man purse.

Heh - it's destined to be a lightning rod thread. No matter what you do, somebody won't like it.

In that vein, perhaps BFL doesn't really deserve a Z- because, despite everything, their products actually work. Maybe a Z would be low enough? (Never again for me, BFL, even though it works just fine. There are things that can never be forgiven).
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 11:45:25 PM
 #67

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.
Quoted here for the future. You ARE asking me to downvote every company that offers up a price unfavourable to you. Remember, ASICMiner made its money for its shareholders (people in the community). And for the record, I've never held ASICMiner stock and nor do they 'line my wallet'. I have a man purse.
Heh you brought up another issue about Asicminer ...

Look at that graph I posted ... see if you can see how it clearly shows they ripped off the community who had stock in the early days ... and doing that right back at the start ...

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 11:53:37 PM
 #68

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.
Quoted here for the future. You ARE asking me to downvote every company that offers up a price unfavourable to you. Remember, ASICMiner made its money for its shareholders (people in the community). And for the record, I've never held ASICMiner stock and nor do they 'line my wallet'. I have a man purse.
Heh you brought up another issue about Asicminer ...

Look at that graph I posted ... see if you can see how it clearly shows they ripped off the community who had stock in the early days ... and doing that right back at the start ...
Those people were misinformed when making investment decisions then. ASICMiner from the start published they wanted the farm of all farms. All their early hardware was sold at auction anyway, so WE set the prices. I had B1 B2 and B3 blades, I have no problem with the prices I paid because I offered to pay them.

railzand
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250

Lux e tenebris


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 08:11:33 AM
 #69

I still think your excellent op needs more newby-proofing.

Sth along the line of big bold letters, more caveats, calculators,

links to warnings about the 99.99% likelihood of losing btc when buying from any asic mfg. without reselling on ebay. (bitmain was the 0.01% for some weeks)

As it stands many newbs will cursorily look at your work, buy the next ASICminer offerings and blame you, albeit wrongly, for losing their precious.

SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2014, 06:07:33 PM
 #70

I think buyers should calculate themself if its worth to buy miners. A link to a proper calculator might be helpful for noobs though.
At the end... only because Asicminer was the first in the market, and started with the target to do what they did, means that they destroyed mining? It was simply inevitable. It doesnt matter who did it. It would have happened anyway.
Yes.

But giving the company that has done this the longest, and made massive profit overcharging people, an "A+", really make a "Trustworthiness Guide" a sham.

Sounds more like "they bought an A+ by lining my wallet" ...

"The market has made their price OK to rip people off due to their ignorance, give them an A+" is what he is saying.

Thread fail - bye.

I wouldnt buy any mining hardware at the moment too. Its simply too risky OR not profitable from the start. But i think this thread isnt about profitability at all. Its only about rating the companies. If they deliver in time, if they deliver at all, how trustworthy were they to deliver at the end and so on.
At the end... if i would have run Asicminer... i wouldnt sell the miners for cheaper as long as there are enough buyers. It simply wouldnt make sense to throw away money.
And the buyers are responsible for themself. Thats why people buy cigarettes and still are happy even though they should know what they do to themselfes.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2014, 07:10:33 PM
 #71

I still think your excellent op needs more newby-proofing.

Sth along the line of big bold letters, more caveats, calculators,

links to warnings about the 99.99% likelihood of losing btc when buying from any asic mfg. without reselling on ebay. (bitmain was the 0.01% for some weeks)

As it stands many newbs will cursorily look at your work, buy the next ASICminer offerings and blame you, albeit wrongly, for losing their precious.
Ill think about it

SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2014, 09:34:01 PM
 #72

I still think your excellent op needs more newby-proofing.

Sth along the line of big bold letters, more caveats, calculators,

links to warnings about the 99.99% likelihood of losing btc when buying from any asic mfg. without reselling on ebay. (bitmain was the 0.01% for some weeks)

As it stands many newbs will cursorily look at your work, buy the next ASICminer offerings and blame you, albeit wrongly, for losing their precious.
Ill think about it

I think its needed to at least post one or 2 calculators that take the future diff-development into account. Im saying that because its happening occassionally that i get requests to buy avalon gen 1! chips or miners from me. People probably found my old groupbuy thread and dont realize how very much outdated this is. Giving some links at hand would be a real help to safe a lot noobs from errors. Guys that only heard that they need to buy a miner to earn money and dont know the facts.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
thenextmoney
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 11:25:06 PM
 #73

I like this thread. thank you.
Being a newbie to mining, when I read the title of the thread manufacturers trustworthiness, I in no way expected there to be info regarding profitability of said equipment. The Title is clear, how trust worthy are the manufacturers ( do they actually deliver / on time) I think this thread covers that well.
If profitability is your main concern as a buyer / miner, you should really do some due dilligence and hit up some calculators as the profitability of mining directly correlates with the price of btc.
Anyone willing to drop money into more advanced asics (bigger $$) if of a reasonably sound mind can do that research on their own.
again good thread op.
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2014, 11:32:05 PM
 #74

I like this thread. thank you.
Being a newbie to mining, when I read the title of the thread manufacturers trustworthiness, I in no way expected there to be info regarding profitability of said equipment. The Title is clear, how trust worthy are the manufacturers ( do they actually deliver / on time) I think this thread covers that well.
If profitability is your main concern as a buyer / miner, you should really do some due dilligence and hit up some calculators as the profitability of mining directly correlates with the price of btc.
Anyone willing to drop money into more advanced asics (bigger $$) if of a reasonably sound mind can do that research on their own.
again good thread op.
This is what I was thinking, thanks for writing down your thoughts. No where have I mentioned anything about $$$ or projections or income or costs. (For now), all this is is historically and recently, has company x tried to swindle people, how much karma do they have?

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 12:48:42 AM
 #75

What we really need is : Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Profitability Loss Guide

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 09:20:12 AM
 #76

What we really need is : Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Profitability Loss Guide

I've been thinking about it a lot and been watching some of the previous attempts, but its a hard and potentially misleading thing to do. There is no universally accepted difficulty prediction thread, so there would be a reasonable spread. And what exactly is the usefulness if its just going to show that no hardware will pay itself back? Can it do more damage than good if a product appears that it will make a profit and then is delayed 6 weeks?

Problems, problems.

alfabitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:26:27 AM
Last edit: February 23, 2014, 11:36:28 AM by alfabitcoin
 #77

I also think at least a note next to the bitmine that they have completed their asic A1 chip and trough site and Zefir diy community got samples and can buy chips. Marto technobit already delivered miners based on bitmine chip.
* read my prior post to see other comments. Misleading note about bitmine not honoring refunds when they have cpp, while you praise black arrow who does not issue refunds also and does not have even manufactured asic chip. Both company are delayed but bitmine has a working chip what can be bought, ba does not and maybe will in May.
dogie (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 11:56:23 AM
 #78

I also think at least a note next to the bitmine that they have completed their asic A1 chip and trough site and Zefir diy community got samples and can buy chips. Marto technobit already delivered miners based on bitmine chip.
* read my prior post to see other comments. Misleading note about bitmine not honoring refunds when they have cpp, while you praise black arrow who does not issue refunds also and does not have even manufactured asic chip. Both company are delayed but bitmine has a working chip what can be bought, ba does not and maybe will in May.
Changelog 02/20/2014
  • Added explanation regarding chip integrators having lower ratings compared to chip creators.
  • Added explanation regarding the higher weighting of more recent problems/good work.

Company changes:
  • BitMine to be reviewed 1st March on release performance (with delay compensation).
  • AMT moved to chip integrators. Set C. Promoted to C+ on delivery of first orders, taken a hit due to delays and lack of communication.
  • VMC Set D. Promoted to C+ on testing publication, with no additional problems.

alfabitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 12:09:59 PM
 #79

Again, black arrow can have b rating but only as chip integrator! They does not have asic yet? They do not offer refunds! Did not even taped out!
So how is fair that bitmine has lower grade when they have working and delivered asic chip?
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 12:11:39 PM
 #80

dogie... in case you add a link to a calculator i suggest this one: http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/
The future diff-development is calculated automatically from the past diff-rises. So its pretty noobfriendly and way more real than the calculators that dont take diff-increases into account and might mislead noobs.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 66 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!