Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2019, 09:42:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [1st Feb 2016]  (Read 130989 times)
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1036


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2015, 10:04:38 AM
 #1301

You might as well add sidehack to this, considering how he's opened up sales for his usb miner!
Or not. It's your list, after all.

I'll consider it. If I do update this then a number of companies will come off or go to some other list as they've been dormant too long / closed. After Yiazo (which is one of those), the next smallest company does a few $M turnover.

This guide hasn't been updated for a while if I presume correctly it might be a good time to remove some of the dormant companies off the list.
At the least Asicminer is a dead asset.

At this point I might as well leave it as it is as there are so many companies to cull. There'd only be 6-8 left, Bitmain, Bitfury, Spondoolies, Canaan Creative, KNC, Technobit (sort of), HashCoins (sort of), XBTech (sort of). Might just be better to leave it as an archive.

True enough it has been quite the year, it would be better to revive it if their is new activity in the future but your right at present this works best as an archive for people to reference.
That said since its basically an archive Thanks for all the Fish in this thread Dogie retroactively Smiley
1563313362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563313362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563313362
Reply with quote  #2

1563313362
Report to moderator
1563313362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563313362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563313362
Reply with quote  #2

1563313362
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1563313362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563313362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563313362
Reply with quote  #2

1563313362
Report to moderator
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 01:50:46 PM
Last edit: February 01, 2016, 03:29:53 PM by dogie
 #1302

If I've got some time this week then I'll update the thread. Can anyone think of any companies outside of the list that have actually delivered anything? Seems strange that there hasn't been one new company in the last 11 months. At the same time, the following companies will be sent to some form of archive:

AMT, HashFast, Cointerra, BFL, Bitmine, RockMiner, BTCGarden, Yiazo, XBTech, Bitrane and ASICMiner.


o_solo_miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1055


-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-


View Profile
February 01, 2016, 01:58:11 PM
 #1303

 Angry And please put a - 100 on Technobit !

They do not refund or send miners!
I will say, Technobit is now a big SCAM!



http://ckpool.org "THE Pool" from the creator of CGMiner & CKPool / Payout System:SPLNS / ZERO FEE!
------------------------------------------- join now -----------------------------------------------
http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers with the best block notify system
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 03:26:32 PM
 #1304

Updated for 1st Feb 2016.

notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2016, 06:17:20 PM
 #1305

Interesting to see it updated not a ton in still active.   On hashcoins it appears they got credit for a miner never made.  It lists Zeus which was a miner we never even saw on market, or in prototypes.  They removed it from active and went to Uranus which does not exist.

You might pull it from their miners as they really should not get credit for a miner that never was sold and did not appear to even be made.  All it ever was was a picture of a big case to my knowledge which I could be wrong.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 07:45:11 PM
 #1306

They're not getting credit, its attributing a miner name to a company so its recognised.

notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 02, 2016, 08:24:53 AM
 #1307

They're not getting credit, its attributing a miner name to a company so its recognised.

Ahh ok I see the small print looking at it again "Integrator of HashFast and other chips. Offered preorders for two products which did not materialise."

Thanks for explaining.
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1453

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
February 02, 2016, 02:20:51 PM
 #1308

Wonder how I'd rank on here.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2016, 02:44:10 PM
 #1309

Wonder how I'd rank on here.

I'm not sure, I'm not a fan of adding the smaller OEMs on the current system. (like Yiazo) because the size criteria doesn't count string enough. A company like Bitfury - with otherwise identical performance - is far less likely to run off with your money without recourse. 9 points doesn't really do that justice.

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 05:46:26 PM
Last edit: December 17, 2017, 02:26:53 PM by dogie
 #1310

Quote
[02/01/2015 23:59:59] *** Show messages from: 03 January 2015 - 27 January 2015 ***
[27/01/2015 12:10:34] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: hi
[27/01/2015 12:16:10] dogie: whats up
[27/01/2015 12:16:21] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: all good.
[27/01/2015 12:16:29] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Some development in the funding front

[27/01/2015 12:16:36] dogie: do tell
[27/01/2015 12:16:47] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: It will help me if you'll the trustworthiness guide
[27/01/2015 12:16:57] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I'm using it in my investors deck

[27/01/2015 12:18:02] dogie: if I what the trustworthiness guide?
[27/01/2015 12:18:25] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: update it
[27/01/2015 12:18:36] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: 100 or near 100 score will help

[27/01/2015 12:20:16] dogie: you're as close as it gets, there is only one number off and you can use it as a selling point
[27/01/2015 12:20:53] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I need to be above BitFury
[27/01/2015 12:20:57] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: and I believe I deserve it.

[27/01/2015 12:21:01] dogie: "we'd love to sell in hand hardware every time, and be the highest rated company in the marketplace"....
[27/01/2015 12:21:09] dogie: "but for that we need this round"
[27/01/2015 12:21:57] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: something like
[27/01/2015 12:22:02] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: not exactly
[27/01/2015 12:22:13] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: We're moving to lower burning rate mode
[27/01/2015 12:22:26] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: proving the design first and then raising to build
[27/01/2015 12:22:41] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I do want to show that we're the best brand, IMHO, in this market
[27/01/2015 12:22:47] Adam - dogie: Its not going to be decided until you announce next gen, either in stock or not

[27/01/2015 12:22:50] Adam - dogie: brb 30
[27/01/2015 12:23:47] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: well, I find it unfair
[27/01/2015 12:24:02] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: and out the guidelines set by you
[27/01/2015 12:24:19] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I believe we deserve clear 100 score by your rules

[27/01/2015 13:02:09] dogie: you've been treated identically to BFL who are also in the state of transition, nothing is different for you
[27/01/2015 13:03:22] dogie: and to be honest if there was an update now is you're ethics - other infraction for what happened with the commission.
[27/01/2015 13:05:04] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Our ethics regarding the commission are spotless. You're not treated in any other way.
[27/01/2015 13:05:50] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: We're not in state of transition. We're in funding struggle from day one. Nothing changed.
[27/01/2015 13:06:04] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: And I don't care for the comparison with BFL.

[27/01/2015 13:10:24] dogie: ... from preorder model to in hand exclusively model
[27/01/2015 13:10:58] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: all our stock is in hand and I'm openly declaring that we won't do pre-order on our next gen.
[27/01/2015 13:11:02] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: What else do you want ?
[27/01/2015 13:11:18] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: We'll either get funded, survive and do 3rd gen or not
[27/01/2015 13:11:32] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: it doesn't change the fact that we're not pre-order company any more
[27/01/2015 13:11:37] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: not even mix
[27/01/2015 13:12:00] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I've stated it endless times. 3rd gen is too risky to take pre-orders
[27/01/2015 13:13:10] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: It's the easy route which I avoid. I believe that with our market reputation, selling 0.2 J/GH miners at 0.15 $/GH delivery in 4 months would have been VERY easy. But I'm not doing it. I'm rewarded by you for a "Mix"

[27/01/2015 13:14:09] dogie: at the same time you're asking me to reward you for something you've not done yet, like giving you a world record in 100m because you've told me you're going to run it in 8 seconds, before you run it
[27/01/2015 13:14:22] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: come'on
[27/01/2015 13:14:30] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Are we taking pre-orders Huh
[27/01/2015 13:14:35] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Are we intend to take pre-orders Huh
[27/01/2015 13:14:52] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Let's say we're closing Spondoolies and just selling 2nd gen gear.
[27/01/2015 13:15:00] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: Are we MIX or not Huh

[27/01/2015 13:15:11] dogie: still mix
[27/01/2015 13:16:39] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I don't have anything more to say. Your guide is incorrect and so are your criteria.
[27/01/2015 13:17:02] dogie: the rating is based on the criteria, they cant both be wrong
[27/01/2015 13:17:35] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: We're not doing " 8/20   = Mixed - sells some in hand hardware and some preorders, or utilises split payments"
[27/01/2015 13:17:45] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: We're   20/20 = No - does not use preorders
[27/01/2015 13:18:00] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: You've changed the criteria after the fact, specifically to give us mix
[27/01/2015 13:18:04] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I find it unethical.
[27/01/2015 13:20:39] dogie: its meaning has never changed, I clarified the ratings so there was no doubt in the last round
[27/01/2015 13:21:01] Guy - Spondoolies - CEO - +3: I said what I had to say. Unethical.
[27/01/2015 13:33:36]  dogie: how can it be unethical, there is no reason for me to lie or falsify it either way

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 05:46:36 PM
 #1311

That's going back a bit, but in relation to the "everything is a conspiracy" claims from Guy when why I wouldn't change the score specifically for Spondoolies. He then tried to discredit me claiming I had even changed the system specifically for him when it had not and the exact same situation had been both documented, explained and applied four months prior (to BFL). While simultaneously claiming everyone else was being "unethical" and denouncing me from the industry, Guy hid behind the threat of an NDA and refused to reveal or mention why he was so suddenly demanding a score of 100/100.

Continue avoidance and BS-ing. Lier.

...
and if spondoo relies on dogie's ratings for selling their miners, business would seems to be quite dreadful..
Certainly not. Still, it's a lie and I can't let it go without setting the record straight.

The amount of BS and lies one person dog can write poop.

What you don't say is that you changed your own criteria especially for us.

At least you admit you cooked the criteria in December. "In December I added more descriptive text" ...

Show me a proof that you've posted an explanation about your "pre-order" criteria relating to next gen "business model" BS before December. Dogie, you're simply a lier.

That's okay, you can keep lying about not changing your ranking criteria specifically for us.

I believe our NDA is actually doing you a favour. It prevents you from further humiliating yourself.
Then you'll have no problem releasing me from the NDA, right? Or are you going to hide behind it again?
No matter how many times you'll ask, I won't release you from your NDA, which you gladly signed.
You insist on keep lying about changing your criteria specifically for us, I keep insisting on the NDA.

If you're asking if we can afford our entire gen3 planned capacity without injecting more funds via additional investment or pre-selling mining capacity to accredited investors, the answer is no. The same goes for every other company in the space.

Dogie, the amount of BS you're capable of producing is simply amazing. ... I see you now as a negative force in this industry.

Am I the only one who smells desperation when the biggest mining HW manufacturers goes apeshit on a dog meme?

Guy Corem
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1029


Spondoolies, Beam & DAGlabs


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 06:04:49 PM
 #1312

Due to the fact that Adam Allcock sued Spondoolies-Tech, I can't reply.
As I said before, when the dust will settle, I'll give my version of the events happened.
I can just add that I'm very sad and worried about Adam.

Guy

New Mimblewimble implementation: https://www.beam.mw
Spondoolies is back with the SPx36: https://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/spx36
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 06:16:16 PM
Last edit: August 27, 2016, 12:17:50 AM by dogie
 #1313

I'll give my version of the events happened.
The events happened and were documented as was the evidence, your personal feelings aren't relevant. The beauty of a public trial is that discovery is public knowledge, nothing to hide behind any more.


I can just add that I'm very sad and worried about dogie.


armedmilitia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 503


We're going to need a bigger heatsink.


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 08:49:36 PM
 #1314

The events happened and were documented as was the evidence, your personal feelings aren't relevant. The beauty of a public trial is that discovery is public knowledge, nothing to hide behind any more.
Woah. There's going to be a trial? This is about the unpaid referrals, right?

Always use escrow. OgNasty is pretty sweet.

Help me out with compiling a list of mining datacenters!
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2016, 09:11:13 PM
 #1315

The events happened and were documented as was the evidence, your personal feelings aren't relevant. The beauty of a public trial is that discovery is public knowledge, nothing to hide behind any more.
Woah. There's going to be a trial? This is about the unpaid referrals, right?

Correct and correct.

Did you get anything out of them yet, apart from the occasional patronizing quip?

We filed at the Kiryat Gat Miagistrates Court on the 11th Jan, served to their lawyers (who rejected it) shortly after, and again by registered mail on 18th Jan. They've yet to file a response. The case is open to the public which means anyone can request documents from it...

Quote
Finding the case online:
https://www.court.gov.il/NGCS.Web.Site/HomePage.aspx
In the top right text box enter "19105", then "01-16" in the next text box.
Click the far left button

Categories are on the right, show that the defendant is Spondoolies-Tech and that I'm suing for $114,420 in unpaid debts and interest.

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
September 25, 2016, 12:07:39 AM
 #1316

Unsure why this 66 page thread moved in its entirety to investigations? (pmed GM)

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2016, 02:44:40 AM
 #1317

Unsure why this 66 page thread moved in its entirety to investigations? (pmed GM)

Still no reply from GM, guess he didn't like my criticism of Blockstream.

Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!