waldistons
|
|
July 17, 2015, 11:55:08 PM |
|
Bad news, guys, just received email: C-CEX.com exchange news!
We have to free up server resources for new coins by delisting some coins which have consistently low trading volume. The following coins will be removed on 31.07.2015 if their average trading volume for the last month has not exceeded 0.2 BTC/day (or 6 BTC for last 30 days):
BTI HCSU [BTI], Bitquark [BTQ], Bubble [BUB], Crypto [CTO], DarkCrave [DCC], ExperienceCoin [EPC], CryptoFocus [FCS], Igoat [GOAT], MistCoin [MIC], MotoCoin [MOTO], ShellCoin [SHELL], SongCoin [SONG], SpinCoin [SPC], StealthCash [STX], TicketCoin [TKT], UltimateCoin [UTLE], UniversalCurrency [UNIT], WarOfCoins [WOC2], X-Coin [XCO].
Please, trade, sell or withdraw these coins before removal date, after which retrieval of any remaining balances for these coins will not be possible anymore.
We will not remove those coins if they reach minimum trading volume requirement.
Thank You for using our exchange! Sincerely, C-CEX.com Team.
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 20, 2015, 01:41:16 AM |
|
Mandatory UPDATE!!! DWG3 starts at block 1,360,000 and added checkpoints. Download links in OP.
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 21, 2015, 01:32:00 AM |
|
Who all has lost transactions and what were the amounts? Does the block explorer show your transaction??
Thanks, BTQ Dev
|
|
|
|
oldkolobok
|
|
July 24, 2015, 09:53:16 PM |
|
and c-cex updated? They seem old version
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 24, 2015, 11:34:58 PM |
|
and c-cex updated? They seem old version
I've sent c-cex.com a message to update their client.
|
|
|
|
sava7
|
|
July 26, 2015, 10:43:23 PM |
|
and c-cex updated? They seem old version
I've sent c-cex.com a message to update their client. ok, i downloaded new wallet on win8 64bit, replaced wallet.dat from pendrive and have problem, i had in my wallet dat on pendrive 22k btq, after replacing file wallet started rescanned and i can see it like that, how to fix it?
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 26, 2015, 10:47:43 PM |
|
and c-cex updated? They seem old version
I've sent c-cex.com a message to update their client. ok, i downloaded new wallet on win8 64bit, replaced wallet.dat from pendrive and have problem, i had in my wallet dat on pendrive 22k btq, after replacing file wallet started rescanned and i can see it like that, how to fix it? Email me your wallet.dat file and I'll see if I can fix the issue. My email address is bitquarkcoin@gmail.comThanks, BTQ Dev
|
|
|
|
sava7
|
|
July 26, 2015, 11:07:09 PM |
|
Looking to buy 50k+ btq, any quantities over 50k+ please pm price offers in satoshis per btq will buy largw quantities
|
|
|
|
waldistons
|
|
July 29, 2015, 08:02:14 PM |
|
OMFG, HAVE YOU GUYS SEEN THIS: Someone wishes to buy 31% of current total supply... Unfortunately, for me it's last hope gone to get some cheap BTQ before it gets delisted... But I'm keeping my buy orders open till the very end, maybe whale cancels his order
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
July 30, 2015, 02:44:57 AM |
|
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2015, 12:12:25 PM |
|
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
I forgot to add it to the source code folder, but I will add it to the github sometime today.
|
|
|
|
CommanderVenus
|
|
July 30, 2015, 11:18:28 PM |
|
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2015, 12:52:59 AM |
|
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?
I'm not sure, haven't used them in along time. I do all my trading at C-cex.
|
|
|
|
steve321
|
|
August 06, 2015, 10:55:48 PM |
|
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
August 06, 2015, 11:03:49 PM |
|
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations?
|
|
|
|
steve321
|
|
August 07, 2015, 07:35:06 PM |
|
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations? Here is a screenshot of the transaction: http://imgur.com/mkEOKGf
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
August 07, 2015, 08:42:24 PM |
|
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations? Here is a screenshot of the transaction: http://imgur.com/mkEOKGfCan you post the Transaction ID? Also have you contacted C-Cex to see if they have a problem with their wallet?
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
August 08, 2015, 02:08:32 AM |
|
I do not understand. Site and pools in network. The config addnode added addnode=bitquark.info addnode=weminebtq.com addnode=bitq.suprnova.cc But the purse is not synchronized. What is the reason? addr" : "37.59.21.58:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031414, "lastrecv" : 1437031414, "bytessent" : 430577, "bytesrecv" : 4188416, "conntime" : 1437029800, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337517, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "71.68.241.214:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031414, "lastrecv" : 1437031414, "bytessent" : 85226, "bytesrecv" : 283980, "conntime" : 1437029801, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337517, "banscore" : 0, "syncnode" : true }, { "addr" : "104.236.46.153:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031414, "lastrecv" : 1437031389, "bytessent" : 59704, "bytesrecv" : 74257, "conntime" : 1437029802, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337517, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "45.55.128.251:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031414, "lastrecv" : 1437031414, "bytessent" : 58983, "bytesrecv" : 70311, "conntime" : 1437029904, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337519, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "85.25.214.175:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031418, "lastrecv" : 1437031418, "bytessent" : 35802, "bytesrecv" : 49938, "conntime" : 1437029943, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337520, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.165.82.235:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031415, "lastrecv" : 1437031415, "bytessent" : 1911764, "bytesrecv" : 177866, "conntime" : 1437030044, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337413, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "66.172.10.28:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031388, "lastrecv" : 1437031414, "bytessent" : 18098, "bytesrecv" : 59680, "conntime" : 1437030152, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337525, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "174.63.8.191:9596", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1437031414, "lastrecv" : 1437031414, "bytessent" : 24163, "bytesrecv" : 67632, "conntime" : 1437030164, "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1337525, "banscore" : 0 } ] Good luck Thanks for this. I wonder why peer info such a moving target? Dynamic IP's?
|
|
|
|
CommanderVenus
|
|
August 08, 2015, 08:34:37 PM |
|
Oh and i want to confirm that using pywallet to remove your unconfirmed transactions works with Bitquark. It deletes all transactions from your wallet then when you -rescan it makes it so that your wallet only reflects what actually got through to the blockchain and confirmed. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35214.0Quoting this steve321 and anyone else with unconfirmed transactions.
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2015, 08:30:57 PM |
|
I should have the mobile BTQ wallet back up and going very soon. Talking with a dev about updating the app.
|
|
|
|
|