Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 12:14:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 [1597] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 ... 1743 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Blacknet BLN | Staking | Future of zApp & ZeFi  (Read 2509631 times)
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2016, 11:53:17 AM
 #31921

hello communities' blk
I wanted to ask if there is some problem in the network blk
my wallet is still two days to block 821102
and does not go forward..
thanks for the reply
what wallet version do you have? Does it show active connections?

version 1.2.1
16 active connections
and it always stops at the same point
if you give me a list of nodes update the folder BlackCoin.conf

no answer for two days from anyone ... Huh

i used to have blk ...

i dunno what the current development is - or even if its being developed still ...

the blackcoinpool died - so that did the interest factor for me ... i am a miner afterall ...

but stopping at the exact same place? ...

where? ... near the end? ... or right at the beginning? ... windows? ... or linux? ...

if its anywhere after the first few hundred blocks - then you will find it really has nothing to do with nodes or servers ... unless the FULL nodes are completely down AND no one else is on the network with a FULL blockchain copy - then this has to be another issue altogether ...

hdd space? ... internet link? ... gotta be something else other than node links ...

#crysx

thank you for your answer
  everything in place as regards windows internet etc. etc..
latch to the block  821102 and after two days few kbytes is received

the problem are the nodes
if blackcoin died it is another matter....       https://chainz.cryptoid.info/blk/#!network

ive just checked - and the problem is NOT the nodes ...

had it been the nodes - then NONE of the wallets would sync ... as each wallet acts full node when they are open by downloading the entire blockchain ...

and has shown - and commented just above - there are MANY full nodes out there currently and much more wallets open and staking ... so this must be an internal - or local issue ...

im looking for the latest wallet - and i will sync from beginning to end ... if it gets stuck on the same block - then possibly an issue with the wallet code ... which ill look into also ...

but i think rat4 is the one who has updated the code - and looks like he has done a pretty good job ...

i may compile from his git and let you know ... though this will be either tomorrow - or a few days away ( as i am just unpacking from a move - and preparing for another big move in 5 weeks and its late night here in australia ) - so i dont think you can wait that long ...

can anyone help here - by deleting the whole blockchain ( NOT the wallet.dat or .conf files ) and starting the sync again to prove this? ...

#crysx

1715040849
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715040849

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715040849
Reply with quote  #2

1715040849
Report to moderator
1715040849
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715040849

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715040849
Reply with quote  #2

1715040849
Report to moderator
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the first distributed timestamping system.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715040849
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715040849

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715040849
Reply with quote  #2

1715040849
Report to moderator
1715040849
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715040849

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715040849
Reply with quote  #2

1715040849
Report to moderator
1715040849
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715040849

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715040849
Reply with quote  #2

1715040849
Report to moderator
maarx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 517


cloverdex.io


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 11:58:54 AM
 #31922

I did a full sync only two or three weeks ago without issues. It took a long time but it worked fine. There have been no new versions in the meantime I believe.



























.What is Cloverdex platform?.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
ANN Thread | Website
Telegram | Twitter
Whitepaper | Reddit
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2016, 12:26:30 PM
 #31923

I did a full sync only two or three weeks ago without issues. It took a long time but it worked fine. There have been no new versions in the meantime I believe.

thats great ...

im actually trying to do a compile of the codebase now - i thought i would give it a go from the rat4 git ...

fedora 23 x64 is a little precarious with compiles - so i am hoping this goes through without a hitch ... if it doesnt - then ill have to look at it another time ...

if so - ill get it running now and do a full sync ...

the issue is obviously not the nodes - but there has to be something that is causing the lockup on the same block ... though if i cant duplicate it here tonight ( will let it download the blockchain while i sleep ) - then something else is awry and needs to be located ...

its more than likely a local issue on his side ... but to make sure its not the code - a current compile / build needs to be done and a run of the resulting wallet ...

i have a little softspot for blackcoin i must admit - it was one of the coins i mined VERY heavily when blackcoinpool was still functional ...

now i just focus on granite - and the development of it and its ecosystem ... so ive got a lot of work yet this year Wink ...

#crysx

MedaR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2380
Merit: 1026



View Profile
January 31, 2016, 12:44:38 PM
 #31924

Are they working on http://blackhalo.info/  and nght trader?
I can see this is not finish yet!
Also are there anny changes in staffs?

You can rent this space
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2016, 12:49:46 PM
 #31925

I did a full sync only two or three weeks ago without issues. It took a long time but it worked fine. There have been no new versions in the meantime I believe.

thats great ...

im actually trying to do a compile of the codebase now - i thought i would give it a go from the rat4 git ...

fedora 23 x64 is a little precarious with compiles - so i am hoping this goes through without a hitch ... if it doesnt - then ill have to look at it another time ...

if so - ill get it running now and do a full sync ...

the issue is obviously not the nodes - but there has to be something that is causing the lockup on the same block ... though if i cant duplicate it here tonight ( will let it download the blockchain while i sleep ) - then something else is awry and needs to be located ...

its more than likely a local issue on his side ... but to make sure its not the code - a current compile / build needs to be done and a run of the resulting wallet ...

i have a little softspot for blackcoin i must admit - it was one of the coins i mined VERY heavily when blackcoinpool was still functional ...

now i just focus on granite - and the development of it and its ecosystem ... so ive got a lot of work yet this year Wink ...

#crysx

compiled and running ...

upto block 2500 and counting ... so a little bit to go Wink ...

will see how it fares in the morning ...

nite all ...

#crysx

smaxz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 253


VeganAcademy


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 01:06:44 PM
 #31926

current blockcount is 1025414 fyi

- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
Glucose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 861
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 01:33:32 PM
 #31927

Going low but looking at the chart I see its risen alot recently and is just retracting some of that gain.   It does depend on what time period you consider most relevant.    If the chart is right then most of the volume was on the rise which is very bullish for the future.   But I dont know the market overall just going on wisdom showing bittrex.   The biggest rises are probably related to dollar, yen and rates altering like Japan just did but thats just my take, Japan is related to China money flows a fair bit afaik

yeah i have also seen a hike in Black-coin prices on 26th Jan around , and that's made me buy it , i find it a old coin and i believe it will entertain the values.

Maybe it was a mistake of yours to buy blackcoin on 26th Jan.

The Chinese were pumping almost every altcoins. So it was just an artificial pump.. But hopefully, the value shouldn't go too low..

And Blackcoin is quite a strong altcoin so you can hope it will take some value again in the future (too bad it has been pumped & dumped at the beginning, a lot of people lost their trust in it after it happened)
zuepfi11
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 03:34:29 PM
 #31928

for windows users: to get more than 16 connections, open your windows-firewall and add blackcoin-qt to allowed programms
zuepfi11
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 04:05:20 PM
 #31929

Are they working on http://blackhalo.info/  and nght trader?
I can see this is not finish yet!
Also are there anny changes in staffs?


david dzimbeck wrote on reddit few days ago:

Well I'm working on the NightTrader exchange... I'm still sort of trying to decide between green addresses, atomic trading (which wont work in all coins) and microtrading. The current design is microtrading using Blackcoin as the collateral. However I have a very realistic concern that slower speed will prevent people from using the decentralized exchange. So I'm still thinking about solutions. Use is the most important thing to create the network effect. The new POS 3.0 protocol should have received more attention. I think BLK has a strong enough support that it will be recognized if Bitcoin really goes mainstream and you never know. Bitcoin went from 30 dollars to 1 dollar. And then back up. Its impossible to know the future. I would love to see the multipool implemented again but with locktimes to freeze the miners gains to push the coins price back up.

My battle is speed. CURRENTLY NT can do microtrades but im worried that if its not lightning fast people will reject it for centralized "ease of use"

So people would rather have their money stolen from them than to trade with latency... thats one of my concerns.

There is 4 ways to solve it. Each with their drawbacks.

Lightning network built in for core coins. Amazing idea but requires tremendous amount of coding. And not all coins have locktimes.

Green Addresses. (maybe even integrated with contracts) Great but requires a bit more trust since the exchange can collude for individual transactions which limits the amount of theft but not theft in its entirety

Microtrading. Slower but 100% trustless when using BlackHalo contracts, however it might bloat the blockchain and if popular can slow things further.

Atomic trading. Most coins dont have locktimes, still not so fast... but faster than microtrading.
fortune-gold
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 31, 2016, 08:01:21 PM
 #31930

Are they working on http://blackhalo.info/  and nght trader?
I can see this is not finish yet!
Also are there anny changes in staffs?


david dzimbeck wrote on reddit few days ago:

Well I'm working on the NightTrader exchange... I'm still sort of trying to decide between green addresses, atomic trading (which wont work in all coins) and microtrading. The current design is microtrading using Blackcoin as the collateral. However I have a very realistic concern that slower speed will prevent people from using the decentralized exchange. So I'm still thinking about solutions. Use is the most important thing to create the network effect. The new POS 3.0 protocol should have received more attention. I think BLK has a strong enough support that it will be recognized if Bitcoin really goes mainstream and you never know. Bitcoin went from 30 dollars to 1 dollar. And then back up. Its impossible to know the future. I would love to see the multipool implemented again but with locktimes to freeze the miners gains to push the coins price back up.

My battle is speed. CURRENTLY NT can do microtrades but im worried that if its not lightning fast people will reject it for centralized "ease of use"

So people would rather have their money stolen from them than to trade with latency... thats one of my concerns.

There is 4 ways to solve it. Each with their drawbacks.

Lightning network built in for core coins. Amazing idea but requires tremendous amount of coding. And not all coins have locktimes.

Green Addresses. (maybe even integrated with contracts) Great but requires a bit more trust since the exchange can collude for individual transactions which limits the amount of theft but not theft in its entirety

Microtrading. Slower but 100% trustless when using BlackHalo contracts, however it might bloat the blockchain and if popular can slow things further.

Atomic trading. Most coins dont have locktimes, still not so fast... but faster than microtrading.


exact
is a slowing wanted I was right to think that the problem are the nodes
There are slow but too slow.. Cry
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2016, 11:27:30 PM
Last edit: January 31, 2016, 11:38:19 PM by chrysophylax
 #31931

Are they working on http://blackhalo.info/  and nght trader?
I can see this is not finish yet!
Also are there anny changes in staffs?


david dzimbeck wrote on reddit few days ago:

Well I'm working on the NightTrader exchange... I'm still sort of trying to decide between green addresses, atomic trading (which wont work in all coins) and microtrading. The current design is microtrading using Blackcoin as the collateral. However I have a very realistic concern that slower speed will prevent people from using the decentralized exchange. So I'm still thinking about solutions. Use is the most important thing to create the network effect. The new POS 3.0 protocol should have received more attention. I think BLK has a strong enough support that it will be recognized if Bitcoin really goes mainstream and you never know. Bitcoin went from 30 dollars to 1 dollar. And then back up. Its impossible to know the future. I would love to see the multipool implemented again but with locktimes to freeze the miners gains to push the coins price back up.

My battle is speed. CURRENTLY NT can do microtrades but im worried that if its not lightning fast people will reject it for centralized "ease of use"

So people would rather have their money stolen from them than to trade with latency... thats one of my concerns.

There is 4 ways to solve it. Each with their drawbacks.

Lightning network built in for core coins. Amazing idea but requires tremendous amount of coding. And not all coins have locktimes.

Green Addresses. (maybe even integrated with contracts) Great but requires a bit more trust since the exchange can collude for individual transactions which limits the amount of theft but not theft in its entirety

Microtrading. Slower but 100% trustless when using BlackHalo contracts, however it might bloat the blockchain and if popular can slow things further.

Atomic trading. Most coins dont have locktimes, still not so fast... but faster than microtrading.


exact
is a slowing wanted I was right to think that the problem are the nodes
There are slow but too slow.. Cry

hehehe ... morning to you mate ...

i think you really need to understand WHY your system is locking on a specific block rather than just blame nodes ...

mine is still syncing - BUT - its blasted way past the block that you get stuck on ...

in fact - the blockchain is almost finished downloading here ...

you dont have to take my word for it - as you obviously dont really understand that nodes are NOT the problems you are facing ... i dont mean to sound rude - but nodes are the least of your issues ...

my wallet is here now ( at the time of writing ) ...

Code:
{
"version" : "v1.2.1-7-gd1a4e22",
"protocolversion" : 60017,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 615856,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"moneysupply" : 74836480.32469408,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "0.0.0.0",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 242.36806749,
"proof-of-stake" : 869415.37418247
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1436453689,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}

block 615856 - and still downloading the blockchain without issue ...

here is the peer list ...

Code:
[
{
"addr" : "168.235.155.40:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:49232",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282100,
"lastrecv" : 1454282100,
"bytessent" : 61682003,
"bytesrecv" : 179600239,
"conntime" : 1454244019,
"timeoffset" : -54,
"pingtime" : 0.49040600,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025383,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "198.205.118.181:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:50064",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282099,
"lastrecv" : 1454282099,
"bytessent" : 14532949,
"bytesrecv" : 56622591,
"conntime" : 1454244020,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"pingtime" : 3.30778500,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "87.100.131.44:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:48650",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 15460452,
"bytesrecv" : 26434699,
"conntime" : 1454244024,
"timeoffset" : 6,
"pingtime" : 0.74281200,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "73.240.78.63:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:47644",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 33964967,
"bytesrecv" : 110775104,
"conntime" : 1454244026,
"timeoffset" : 5,
"pingtime" : 0.35520500,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "94.23.210.119:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:36280",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 18309299,
"bytesrecv" : 31409700,
"conntime" : 1454244038,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"pingtime" : 0.42686400,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "98.167.1.60:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:55244",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 10703046,
"bytesrecv" : 41277483,
"conntime" : 1454244045,
"timeoffset" : 2,
"pingtime" : 3.31325700,
"pingwait" : 1.65576600,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "87.98.182.171:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:44776",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282110,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 21508877,
"bytesrecv" : 32751099,
"conntime" : 1454244046,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 0.39101500,
"pingwait" : 1.59945000,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "85.25.207.141:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:40904",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 8485219,
"bytesrecv" : 12222910,
"conntime" : 1454244051,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 0.44682100,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "95.17.116.220:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:60708",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 11190576,
"bytesrecv" : 20645272,
"conntime" : 1454244053,
"timeoffset" : -9,
"pingtime" : 0.49109300,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "195.154.74.65:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:49630",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282109,
"bytessent" : 6025781,
"bytesrecv" : 13476430,
"conntime" : 1454244056,
"timeoffset" : -15,
"pingtime" : 0.38415200,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025385,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "86.172.200.22:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:55802",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 8673122,
"bytesrecv" : 27395714,
"conntime" : 1454244058,
"timeoffset" : -13,
"pingtime" : 0.49611600,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025385,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "14.45.38.226:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:48948",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282111,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 23028097,
"bytesrecv" : 47602310,
"conntime" : 1454244093,
"timeoffset" : 11,
"pingtime" : 0.39581500,
"pingwait" : 1.54538600,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025386,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "109.146.218.209:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:35756",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 11291472,
"bytesrecv" : 34715387,
"conntime" : 1454244119,
"timeoffset" : 1,
"pingtime" : 0.74296800,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025387,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "121.199.75.170:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:42706",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282097,
"bytessent" : 15577065,
"bytesrecv" : 49052739,
"conntime" : 1454265599,
"timeoffset" : -10,
"pingtime" : 4.02699200,
"pingwait" : 1.54535800,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025705,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "86.160.31.81:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:43184",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282089,
"lastrecv" : 1454282090,
"bytessent" : 2984931,
"bytesrecv" : 6467783,
"conntime" : 1454271133,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"pingtime" : 0.53866500,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025794,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "93.81.128.216:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:39330",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454282109,
"lastrecv" : 1454282110,
"bytessent" : 1963245,
"bytesrecv" : 5262550,
"conntime" : 1454275924,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 0.68520600,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025865,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
}
]

so far - its ALL working and working well ...

its not completed the full blockchain download - but from the looks of it - its running as a wallet should be running ...

there is something inherent that is happening on your end ( isp or system issue or firewall or something else ) that is causing your lockup ...

im NOT trying to be obnoxious - im trying to show you that you need to look further than the network ( of which hundreds are using currently - and happily staking - which is another reason it CANNOT be nodes ) ...

if this is windows you are using - which im assuming it is as most of these issues are usually seen in this os - then maybe there is an inherent issue with the windows specific wallet ... or possibly with the os itself - especially windows 10 - which is known to have huge issues running miners also ...

i dont use windows ( and wont unless i HAVE to ) - so my help has to stop here - unless there is other info you can provide of your setup and system and anything else that may be of use to decipher what it is thats causing this ...

i can only wonder right now ...

-------

edit 1 - my apologies ... the block you get stuck on is still yet to come ... i remembered it being block 28xxxx but in fact yours gets stuck on block 82xxxx ... so mine still has a few to go yet ...

so will wait and see how this goes ... ill let you know what the result is later this afternoon ...

so maybe just ignore / postpone what i wrote above ... for the moment anyhow? ...

Wink ...

edit 2 - maybe show us what is in your .conf file ( deleting the rpcuser and rpc password out of the display here ) to see if there is anything there that could be causing it ...

just covering all avenues here mate ...

tanx ...

#crysx

chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 09:00:32 AM
 #31932

hi all ...

the wallet is still syncing - but doesnt seem to have ANY issues whatsoever ...

the sync takes a while - as the blockchain is huge and takes a while to download fully ...

below is the current status of the sync - which proves there is nothing wrong with the code or the operation of the wallet with regards to syncing ... the nodes - as has been stated earlier - really are not the issue here ...

so for those of you that are convinced its the nodes - then well - look below and make you own judgement ...

i have also been syncing the ethereum blockchain at the same time - and on a couple of adsl2+ links - its pretty bad download times ... so apologies for the length of time this has taken ...

block 1017849 and counting - with no issues so far ...

Code:
{
"version" : "v1.2.1-7-gd1a4e22",
"protocolversion" : 60017,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.46907246,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 1017849,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"moneysupply" : 75225893.42068864,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "0.0.0.0",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 242.36806749,
"proof-of-stake" : 845106.08691375
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1436453689,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}

and the current peers ...

Code:
[
{
"addr" : "168.235.155.40:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:49232",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316855,
"lastrecv" : 1454316849,
"bytessent" : 110477820,
"bytesrecv" : 291409336,
"conntime" : 1454244019,
"timeoffset" : -54,
"pingtime" : 0.36205800,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025383,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "198.205.118.181:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:50064",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316836,
"lastrecv" : 1454316836,
"bytessent" : 22202975,
"bytesrecv" : 72946474,
"conntime" : 1454244020,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"pingtime" : 0.39090400,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "87.100.131.44:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:48650",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316844,
"lastrecv" : 1454316843,
"bytessent" : 25403366,
"bytesrecv" : 43187546,
"conntime" : 1454244024,
"timeoffset" : 6,
"pingtime" : 0.40461800,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "73.240.78.63:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:47644",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316803,
"lastrecv" : 1454316804,
"bytessent" : 56345156,
"bytesrecv" : 145601208,
"conntime" : 1454244026,
"timeoffset" : 5,
"pingtime" : 0.80178600,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "94.23.210.119:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:36280",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316803,
"lastrecv" : 1454316803,
"bytessent" : 33896328,
"bytesrecv" : 61060688,
"conntime" : 1454244038,
"timeoffset" : -5,
"pingtime" : 0.40467600,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "87.98.182.171:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:44776",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316850,
"lastrecv" : 1454316850,
"bytessent" : 30960895,
"bytesrecv" : 47876247,
"conntime" : 1454244046,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 0.37622700,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "85.25.207.141:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:40904",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316833,
"lastrecv" : 1454316833,
"bytessent" : 13806163,
"bytesrecv" : 21030781,
"conntime" : 1454244051,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 0.39350900,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "95.17.116.220:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:60708",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316808,
"lastrecv" : 1454316808,
"bytessent" : 27046191,
"bytesrecv" : 64142569,
"conntime" : 1454244053,
"timeoffset" : -9,
"pingtime" : 0.42276900,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025384,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "14.45.38.226:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:48948",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316803,
"lastrecv" : 1454316803,
"bytessent" : 37881358,
"bytesrecv" : 85528768,
"conntime" : 1454244093,
"timeoffset" : 11,
"pingtime" : 0.31381700,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025386,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "121.199.75.170:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:42706",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316810,
"lastrecv" : 1454316816,
"bytessent" : 33707359,
"bytesrecv" : 100653818,
"conntime" : 1454265599,
"timeoffset" : -10,
"pingtime" : 0.33547000,
"pingwait" : 52.80240100,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025705,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "86.160.31.81:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:43184",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316855,
"lastrecv" : 1454316836,
"bytessent" : 14566307,
"bytesrecv" : 34634202,
"conntime" : 1454271133,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"pingtime" : 0.60352400,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025794,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "93.81.128.216:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:39330",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316855,
"lastrecv" : 1454316848,
"bytessent" : 9412642,
"bytesrecv" : 21888207,
"conntime" : 1454275924,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"pingtime" : 1.08178100,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1025865,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "89.212.230.3:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:50272",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316834,
"lastrecv" : 1454316834,
"bytessent" : 4330300,
"bytesrecv" : 6369296,
"conntime" : 1454288623,
"timeoffset" : 5,
"pingtime" : 0.42545400,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1026054,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "73.223.177.123:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:42506",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316824,
"lastrecv" : 1454316823,
"bytessent" : 21591185,
"bytesrecv" : 37158348,
"conntime" : 1454288899,
"timeoffset" : -22,
"pingtime" : 0.28462600,
"version" : 60016,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1026057,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "5.199.133.88:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:39164",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316840,
"lastrecv" : 1454316840,
"bytessent" : 10231406,
"bytesrecv" : 19753638,
"conntime" : 1454294270,
"timeoffset" : -3,
"pingtime" : 0.41160700,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1026135,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
},
{
"addr" : "195.154.74.65:15714",
"addrlocal" : "58.96.109.62:42882",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1454316801,
"lastrecv" : 1454316801,
"bytessent" : 204545,
"bytesrecv" : 372739,
"conntime" : 1454314760,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"pingtime" : 0.40580000,
"version" : 60017,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1026446,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : false
}
]

i hope this helps ...

btw - granite is now on steak cloud for mining with the current algos they have ... sha256 - scrypt - x11 ...

what i noticed also is that ONE of their payout coins is - you guessed it - blackcoin as well ... now that blackcoinpool is closed - this has to be some good news ( how is that for a plug for grn and blk - yes grn is the coin i work on ) ...

so if you have a miner that can mine sha256 - scrypt - or x11 - then you can start mining granite or blackcoin as your coin payouts ...

granite needs a 7 infront of the payout address - where blackcoin is just the payout address ( as its addresses dont clash with any other coin they have listed on the pool ) ...

http://pool.steakcloud.com/getting_started ...

njoi Wink ...

#crysx

DrPaid
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 01, 2016, 09:18:51 AM
 #31933

Yeah in some cases using the bootstrap file is alot quicker and easier with the different forks and staking policies blackoin has gone through.
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 11:41:00 AM
 #31934

Yeah in some cases using the bootstrap file is alot quicker and easier with the different forks and staking policies blackoin has gone through.

agreed in the sense that it saves time ...

but i never use a bootstrap due to an untainted blockchain when downloading it yourself ... if it comes from a trusted source - it should be no issue - as they would not normally be the ones to taint or damage or provide a bootstrap that is malicious in any way ...

but the safe way is always the longest ...

the sync finished shortly after i commented with the previous details ...

i just hope the problem of blockckain being stuck isnt because of anything malicious ... possibly a small issue somewhere along the line ...

does anyone know how many official FULL nodes are operational for the blk network? ... if any at all? ...

#crysx

SalimNagamato
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2016, 06:54:46 PM
 #31935

Yeah in some cases using the bootstrap file is alot quicker and easier with the different forks and staking policies blackoin has gone through.

but i never use a bootstrap due to an untainted blockchain when downloading it yourself ... if it comes from a trusted source - it should be no issue - as they would not normally be the ones to taint or damage or provide a bootstrap that is malicious in any way ...

but the safe way is always the longest ...

the sync finished shortly after i commented with the previous details ...

i just hope the problem of blockckain being stuck isnt because of anything malicious ... possibly a small issue somewhere along the line ...

does anyone know how many official FULL nodes are operational for the blk network? ... if any at all? ...

#crysx

good choice... trust no one. only the coin's main net
i synced few weeks ago without any issue. forwarding blackcoin's TCP port to my wallet box helped a lot (besides it helps the coin's network)

not hashing, folding and curing (check FLDC merged-folding! reuse good GPUs)
chrysophylax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2016, 05:16:37 AM
 #31936

Yeah in some cases using the bootstrap file is alot quicker and easier with the different forks and staking policies blackoin has gone through.

but i never use a bootstrap due to an untainted blockchain when downloading it yourself ... if it comes from a trusted source - it should be no issue - as they would not normally be the ones to taint or damage or provide a bootstrap that is malicious in any way ...

but the safe way is always the longest ...

the sync finished shortly after i commented with the previous details ...

i just hope the problem of blockckain being stuck isnt because of anything malicious ... possibly a small issue somewhere along the line ...

does anyone know how many official FULL nodes are operational for the blk network? ... if any at all? ...

#crysx

good choice... trust no one. only the coin's main net
i synced few weeks ago without any issue. forwarding blackcoin's TCP port to my wallet box helped a lot (besides it helps the coin's network)

it is the safest way ...

forwarding of ports helps - but is only one of the things required to run a 'full node' ...

the conf file requires certain parameters to ensure that the wallet you have open is to allow FULL access to the network for full access to the blockchain services ... and should be active 24 / 7 ...

so what i ask is how many of these wallets that are open are actual NODES ...

im curious as to how many out there are providing services to the blk network - and how many are 'just' staking ...

#crysx

alexcfr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 02, 2016, 01:13:11 PM
 #31937

it's coming
calaber24p
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100


If this is life , then I prefer death !


View Profile
February 02, 2016, 04:41:42 PM
 #31938

Price is going to rise now , just saw a small up in price as compared to past few days , hope happy days are coming.
Anduril_FotW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 413
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 02, 2016, 10:57:46 PM
 #31939

Yep, tides are rising  Cool

"The Blade that was Broken shines again!"
ShakinHandz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 03, 2016, 02:16:39 AM
 #31940

Yep, tides are rising  Cool

yeah i also see them rising , Hope to get a good return from this old altcoin.
In polonix market i see that sellers are rigit on the price and buyers have to increase the ask to buy the blackcoin , this is really good for blackcoin.
Pages: « 1 ... 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 [1597] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 ... 1743 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!