[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[Darkz0r]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

[OdinYggd]

Found some info regarding the notice that Siacoin is unable to auto-exchange due to a wallet problem at bittrex:

https://www.reddit.com/r/siacoin/comments/7jf33l/sia_sc_2_days_wallet_maintenance_on_bittrex_is/dr65kfq/

Seems that the current siacoin wallet has performance problems when dealing with larger transaction volumes, and has been taken offline pending a fix from the devs.

This same issue could pop up on MPH, so there will be an updated wallet soon containing fixes.

[allmoney.ws]

Why a lot of AMD/nVidia variants at AUTO SWITCHES page?
How can I understand which is best for me? Please, help!

[aaronsace]

This thread is 90% the MPH owner posting on other accounts so obviously its cringeworthy. some shadiness happening here for sure.

You setup an account just to post that.

4 years of vibrant community, awesome pool operator and a great pool. NiceHash goes down and everything turns into conspiracy theories.

[Gongolo]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I am using djm34 fork, but I often get several invalid shares.

[djmuk2]

Yes you're right - I don't use multi algo so was going on the description of how to set it up and didn't spot that each line had a different port number, that does make more senses than trying to detect what algo is being used!

The Multi-algo port detects which algo you are using and routes you to the correct pool.

each algo have their own port btw.

This is how I see it:

The pool "kicks you" out (by not giving you work) until you start mining the "most profitable" algo from this list (its a loop):

:start
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us-east.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -ewal username.workername -eworker username.workername -esm 3 -epsw x -allcoins 1 -retrydelay -1
#ethminer --farm-retries 0 -G -S us-east.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -O username.workername:x -FS exit
ccminer -r 0 -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12004 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12005 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12007 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a x13 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12008 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a x15 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12009 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12012 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a qubit -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12014 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12015 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a skein -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12016 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12018 -u username.workername -p x
ccminer -r 0 -a vanilla -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12019 -u username.workername -p x
timeout 1
goto start

[dggra]

Hi,

Tried to figure out his this works but i don't get it. Hopefully someone could help me out with this.
I'm using Awesome Miner and the profability calculator goes from $200 a month to $600 a month, that's fine i guess with the different currencies mining.

But at miningpoolhub.com i only see a very small part of that. Been mining for two days with Awesome Miner and it should be atleast $15 but i only se $5 at the BTC-wallet, using auto exchange. I use one 1070 and one 1080 Ti. Should i just be patient?

[djmuk2]

This account is 100% Trolling - waste of space to be sure...

This thread is 90% the MPG owner posting on other accounts so obviously its cringeworthy. some shadiness happening here for sure.

[Lordas]

This thread is 90% the MPG owner posting on other accounts so obviously its cringeworthy. some shadiness happening here for sure.

Mining here and very happy. You can test my account - it was set up looong before this pool was launched.

[miningpoolhub]

Got email from admin telling me that  my siacoin sent to bittrex is gone cause of their wallet.

4days of mining gone. just left MPH for good.

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

I didn't answer that kind of message.
You siacoin is not lost. It will come back when bittrex enables siacoin wallet.

I get +100 emails daily. This is why I'm late and hard to read whole thread.
I'm tired these days answering all email questions.

[nitrobg]

The pool is fine, auto switch tools like Awesome Miner, Multipool Miner and Megaminer cause you to lose your shares due to fast switching between algos and PPLNS reward system. You're better off mining on the Hub feature (12xxx ports) or the single algo port (17xxx ports).

[djmuk2]

Why not say 'support in forum only' - or create a separate forum thread for support issues...

I get +100 emails daily. This is why I'm late and hard to read whole thread.
I'm tired these days answering all email questions.

[clt]

Hi guys,

May I ask why all of my vertcoin balance is moving to Credited for exchange instead of Credited? I'm using MPH for like 2 days. I used autoexchange feature for monacoin like 1 hours to see how it is performing then undo my changes. But now newly mined vertcoins are showing in Credited for Autoexchange column (Other coins are fine they just act like they are supposed to do).

Thanks.

[SuperDerpBro]

Can/should i take the wallet address out of the mpm bat if i am only using mph and have my auto exchange set to litecoin?

[crypper]

New miners, please read!
This pool seems to be fine. There are a lot of complaints in this thread re: not getting expected hashrate and/or coins. I believe those complaints are mostly  caused by: 1. lack of transparency in autoswitches and autoexchanges, 2. lack of support and informative faqs, 3. not really user friendly and often confusing website (admin seems to be working on improvements though).
I myself am new to this pool (not to mining in general) and unfortunately encountered problems from day one, when I chose to mine Lyra2 coins. They do have problems with this algo which is actually not their fault but rather seems to be miner's fault (again they are aware of the problem and could have made it clear on either the first page of the thread or on the website). I'm now mining BTG and am getting expected hashrate and coins.
So if you doubt this pool, just do your own tests with a single coin first, then proceed with multyalgo mining (profits from which is really hard to track).

PS: if admin is interested I can point to areas where improvement is needed and at least one bug I have found on the website (incorrectly reported hashrate)

[alnash]

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

Hi,

Could you add to auto-switches groups yet another Nvidia group -- with equihash, lyra2re2 and lyra2z together?

As far as I can see, for auto algo-switches at the moment it's possible to have either equhash+lyra2re2 or lyra2re2+lyra2z.

[fynxgloire]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I switched to suprnova and have not looked back.
Of course there are some days where supr nova will NOT find any shares but then the next day it makes up for it and pays out more.
Using djim34 cuda miner and waaay better payout at suprnova in my opinion.

[Temporel]

Miners that do their own algo profitability calculations should use the fixed algo coin switching ports (17xxx).

this is what I am using but I just saw something weird. Equihash choose Zclassic even if was clearly more profitable to mine ZEN or even Zcash, it wasnt even close, ZEN was 50% more profitable...

There is no simple and absolute way of determining the most profitable coin to mine. 

wrong, its actually pretty simple and in that case, zclassic shouldnt have been even an option for the entire day.

[crypper]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I am using djm34 fork, but I often get several invalid shares.

used it for a few days and went back to ewbf.

Really? could you please post a screenshot of your EWBF mining Zcoin?

[pubix]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I switched to suprnova and have not looked back.
Of course there are some days where supr nova will NOT find any shares but then the next day it makes up for it and pays out more.
Using djim34 cuda miner and waaay better payout at suprnova in my opinion.

Personaly I found supernova the worst - I had really bad luck with suprnova, with all coins I tried.

The differences were huge, so when I find I coin I want to mine, suprnova is my last choice.

Don't want to bash suprnova, it's just my expirience overthere. I'm sticking with mph.