[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[Lordas]

This thread is 90% the MPG owner posting on other accounts so obviously its cringeworthy. some shadiness happening here for sure.

Mining here and very happy. You can test my account - it was set up looong before this pool was launched.

[miningpoolhub]

Got email from admin telling me that  my siacoin sent to bittrex is gone cause of their wallet.

4days of mining gone. just left MPH for good.

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

I didn't answer that kind of message.
You siacoin is not lost. It will come back when bittrex enables siacoin wallet.

I get +100 emails daily. This is why I'm late and hard to read whole thread.
I'm tired these days answering all email questions.

[nitrobg]

The pool is fine, auto switch tools like Awesome Miner, Multipool Miner and Megaminer cause you to lose your shares due to fast switching between algos and PPLNS reward system. You're better off mining on the Hub feature (12xxx ports) or the single algo port (17xxx ports).

[djmuk2]

Why not say 'support in forum only' - or create a separate forum thread for support issues...

I get +100 emails daily. This is why I'm late and hard to read whole thread.
I'm tired these days answering all email questions.

[clt]

Hi guys,

May I ask why all of my vertcoin balance is moving to Credited for exchange instead of Credited? I'm using MPH for like 2 days. I used autoexchange feature for monacoin like 1 hours to see how it is performing then undo my changes. But now newly mined vertcoins are showing in Credited for Autoexchange column (Other coins are fine they just act like they are supposed to do).

Thanks.

[SuperDerpBro]

Can/should i take the wallet address out of the mpm bat if i am only using mph and have my auto exchange set to litecoin?

[crypper]

New miners, please read!
This pool seems to be fine. There are a lot of complaints in this thread re: not getting expected hashrate and/or coins. I believe those complaints are mostly  caused by: 1. lack of transparency in autoswitches and autoexchanges, 2. lack of support and informative faqs, 3. not really user friendly and often confusing website (admin seems to be working on improvements though).
I myself am new to this pool (not to mining in general) and unfortunately encountered problems from day one, when I chose to mine Lyra2 coins. They do have problems with this algo which is actually not their fault but rather seems to be miner's fault (again they are aware of the problem and could have made it clear on either the first page of the thread or on the website). I'm now mining BTG and am getting expected hashrate and coins.
So if you doubt this pool, just do your own tests with a single coin first, then proceed with multyalgo mining (profits from which is really hard to track).

PS: if admin is interested I can point to areas where improvement is needed and at least one bug I have found on the website (incorrectly reported hashrate)

[alnash]

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

Hi,

Could you add to auto-switches groups yet another Nvidia group -- with equihash, lyra2re2 and lyra2z together?

As far as I can see, for auto algo-switches at the moment it's possible to have either equhash+lyra2re2 or lyra2re2+lyra2z.

[fynxgloire]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I switched to suprnova and have not looked back.
Of course there are some days where supr nova will NOT find any shares but then the next day it makes up for it and pays out more.
Using djim34 cuda miner and waaay better payout at suprnova in my opinion.

[Temporel]

Miners that do their own algo profitability calculations should use the fixed algo coin switching ports (17xxx).

this is what I am using but I just saw something weird. Equihash choose Zclassic even if was clearly more profitable to mine ZEN or even Zcash, it wasnt even close, ZEN was 50% more profitable...

There is no simple and absolute way of determining the most profitable coin to mine. 

wrong, its actually pretty simple and in that case, zclassic shouldnt have been even an option for the entire day.

[crypper]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I am using djm34 fork, but I often get several invalid shares.

used it for a few days and went back to ewbf.

Really? could you please post a screenshot of your EWBF mining Zcoin?

[pubix]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I switched to suprnova and have not looked back.
Of course there are some days where supr nova will NOT find any shares but then the next day it makes up for it and pays out more.
Using djim34 cuda miner and waaay better payout at suprnova in my opinion.

Personaly I found supernova the worst - I had really bad luck with suprnova, with all coins I tried.

The differences were huge, so when I find I coin I want to mine, suprnova is my last choice.

Don't want to bash suprnova, it's just my expirience overthere. I'm sticking with mph.

[freofreo]

Hi guys,

May I ask why all of my vertcoin balance is moving to Credited for exchange instead of Credited? I'm using MPH for like 2 days. I used autoexchange feature for monacoin like 1 hours to see how it is performing then undo my changes. But now newly mined vertcoins are showing in Credited for Autoexchange column (Other coins are fine they just act like they are supposed to do).

Thanks.

Sometimes I have to redo changes in AE page twice to make it work correctly. You can move mined coins from Credited for AE to Credited. Goto your coin's wallet you'll the transfer box. But it takes quite a while to transfer coins and you might have to repeat your oder a few times though.

Coins already on their way to exchange cannot be tranferred.

[Temporel]

Did anyone manage to fix reported rate @ MPH for Zcoin with ccminer?

Tried:
-ccminer x64 2.2.3 cuda 9
-ccminer x86 djm34 2.2.x (.1 or .2) (which is the one suggested by MPH @ the Zcoin pool page)
-ccminer x86 "some other fix version" forgot which fork

With all the above getting around 50-60% ccminer rate

With ccminer x86 djm34 non cuda 9 I get worse ccminer performance (around 2800, down from 3050 with others) but way better reported rates (up to 2500)

Any ideas?
Should I just check how much I'm getting with one vs the other and just ignore what's being reported?

I'll also do some suprnova tests.

I am using djm34 fork, but I often get several invalid shares.

used it for a few days and went back to ewbf.

Really? could you please post a screenshot of your EWBF mining Zcoin?

my bad , I mixed up djm with dstm...

[miningpoolhub]

Why not say 'support in forum only' - or create a separate forum thread for support issues...

I get +100 emails daily. This is why I'm late and hard to read whole thread.
I'm tired these days answering all email questions.

Good idea!
I separated forum, support and contact at main homepage.

[be5nuoTimm]

Folks,

Has there been any recent news from MiningPoolHub regarding DASH versions? 

The current wallet is 12.2.1 with 12.3 due soon.     

I believe the Dash tx fee has also been reduced, by 10x.   Will this be reflected in Miningpoolhub's system?

[alnash]

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

Hi,

Could you add to auto-switches groups yet another Nvidia group -- with equihash, lyra2re2 and lyra2z together?

As far as I can see, for auto algo-switches at the moment it's possible to have either equhash+lyra2re2 or lyra2re2+lyra2z.

Looks like you added NVIDIA - Cryptonight, Ethash, Equihash, Groestl, Lyra2RE2, Lyra2z, Myriad-Groestl, NeoScrypt, Skein
Thanks!

[OdinYggd]

Why not say 'support in forum only' - or create a separate forum thread for support issues...

People don't read the FAQs. Nor do they want to wait, they want answers and they want them now. Its a big job for one person, and no matter how you approach it there will be people complaining.

Just do the best you can, I've been mining on MPH for some months now and recently began upgrading my mining rigs to be even more profitable than before. According to a few sample runs I've made, I'm actually getting a higher payout than Nicehash says my rig would have produced. A little extra effort in setting up and tuning goes a long way, but all the people spoiled by nicehash's automation don't really know how to set a miner and are complaining about having to do things the old fashioned way.

Got email from admin telling me that  my siacoin sent to bittrex is gone cause of their wallet.

4days of mining gone. just left MPH for good.

Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.

I didn't answer that kind of message.
You siacoin is not lost. It will come back when bittrex enables siacoin wallet.

I posted a link to r/siacoin a page or so ago with details of what is going on. The gist of it is that Bittrex's wallet cannot handle the transaction volume currently going on, and rather than risk severe data corruption and loss of coin they have opted to suspend wallet operations temporarily until the siacoin dev team can provide a solution. There should be an updated siacoin wallet out in a few days, and more to come once fixes for bittrex are released.

Might be worth updating the pool announcement regarding siacoin with this info and the reddit link, that way people aren't left wondering.

[thepez]

FWIW I think the multi algo works like this.

You set your miner software up with either multiple pools or multiple calls to the miner software in a batch file where each call runs a different algo. All the pools/calls use the SAME multi algo port and id details.

The Multi-algo port detects which algo you are using and routes you to the correct pool. IF the algo is not the most profitable of the set then the Multia-algo port closes the connection, this then makes the miner move onto the next pool (needs failover-only set) or causes the miner command line to exit and run the next one in the batch file.

So you configure the miner software to loop round trying each algo in turn against the multialgo port, the port will reject/close the connection if that is not the most profitable algo of the set.   your miner MUST support all of the possible algo's which is why there are different ports for different algo sets.

This is a good explanation, much better than on the FAQ page.  I like MPH but the frontend is a mess in useability terms and it could definitely do with better explanations.  It would save a lot of newbie questions and confusion here.  Not being able to easily see at a glance what you are mining at any given moment desperately needs to be fixed.  I understand however that big improvements are pending.

Definately better then the FAQ.   Took me 2 days of pissing around to figure out how everything worked.  The site usability is horrific (I'm a 20+ yr developer) and the explanations of how things work are scattered throughout different areas of the site.   Kinda looks like my old admin back-end pages from the 1990s. 

On the other hand, I've been happy with the pool so far even though it takes forever to confirm the coins.  They seems to have a good system for choosing what coin to mine.

[Temporel]

FWIW I think the multi algo works like this.

You set your miner software up with either multiple pools or multiple calls to the miner software in a batch file where each call runs a different algo. All the pools/calls use the SAME multi algo port and id details.

The Multi-algo port detects which algo you are using and routes you to the correct pool. IF the algo is not the most profitable of the set then the Multia-algo port closes the connection, this then makes the miner move onto the next pool (needs failover-only set) or causes the miner command line to exit and run the next one in the batch file.

So you configure the miner software to loop round trying each algo in turn against the multialgo port, the port will reject/close the connection if that is not the most profitable algo of the set.   your miner MUST support all of the possible algo's which is why there are different ports for different algo sets.

This is a good explanation, much better than on the FAQ page.  I like MPH but the frontend is a mess in useability terms and it could definitely do with better explanations.  It would save a lot of newbie questions and confusion here.  Not being able to easily see at a glance what you are mining at any given moment desperately needs to be fixed.  I understand however that big improvements are pending.

Definately better then the FAQ.  

except its wrong about many things (djmuk's theory)