https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/COPA-v-Wright-Judgment.pdfLast May 20, a British court issued a 230-page memorandum proving, with arguments and evidence, that all the allegations that CRAIG WRIGHT sought to promote over the past years were false in an attempt to prove that he was the designer of Bitcoin and the inventor of the name “Satoshi Nakamoto.” The case was presented by a group of specialized researchers, and the trial lasted five weeks before the court issued its final decision invalidating all of CRAIG’s claims, despite all the defense team’s attempts to prove them.
The point that made me laugh and amaze me at the same time is that among the arguments used by the defense lawyers was that if someone else had worked on designing Bitcoin, he would certainly have appeared in his defense, which is an argument that I find extremely ridiculous and indicates the defense team’s lack of knowledge.
I shared the news two days ago in the Scam section. But I thought I would republish it here to draw more attention to the topic.:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg64125677#msg64125677
