Bitcoin Forum
January 20, 2020, 07:56:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision (Old Thread)  (Read 76951 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (466 posts by 52 users with 39 merit deleted.)
Do_zzze
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 01:18:30 PM
 #1561

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
BorisTheBulletDodger
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 19


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 01:25:30 PM
 #1562

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?

pretty sure Craig Wright will come up with some far fetched theory that he is the inventor of quantum computing and that he made his shitcoin quantum safe already. Why do you even care? You cunts are so brainwashed that you believe any bullshit that he feeds bsv cult members anyway.

I Dodge Bullets
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 2660


https://bitcoin.watfordfc.com


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 01:33:14 PM
 #1563

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?

pretty sure Craig Wright will come up with some far fetched theory that he is the inventor of quantum computing and that he made his shitcoin quantum safe already. Why do you even care? You cunts are so brainwashed that you believe any bullshit that he feeds bsv cult members anyway.

I swear it looks like he just copy/pastes some random text about bitcoin from the internet and text spins it, but I can't prove it (yet). Most of his posts (like several other now-banned profiles that used to comment here) are just these out-of-context newsbite essays, with something about BSV tacked on the end of it.

  ▄▄█████▄▄███████▄▄
███████████
     ▀▀███▄
█████████████        ▀██▄
█████████████          ██▄
███████████            ██▄
██▀▀█████▀▀              ██
██                       ██
██                       ██
▀██                     ██▀
▀██                   ██▀
 ▀██▄               ▄██▀
   ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀█████████▀▀
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████
▀██████████████████████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀██████████████▀
▀██████████▀
▀████▀
▀██▀
MAIN CLUB
PARTNER of
W A T F O R D  FC
Industry Leading Crypto Sportsbook
|
DAILY
PROMOS
& BOOSTS
|
PLAY
POKER
& CASINO
|
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄██████████▀▀▀▀███████▄
▄█████████▀     ████████▄
▄██████████   ████████████▄
█████████        ██████████
█████████▄▄   ▄▄███████████
███████████   █████████████
▀██████████   ████████████▀
▀█████████   ███████████▀
▀████████▄▄▄██████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
[/cent
Do_zzze
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 01:41:38 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2019, 01:52:21 PM by Do_zzze
 #1564

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?

pretty sure Craig Wright will come up with some far fetched theory that he is the inventor of quantum computing and that he made his shitcoin quantum safe already. Why do you even care? You cunts are so brainwashed that you believe any bullshit that he feeds bsv cult members anyway.

I swear it looks like he just copy/pastes some random text about bitcoin from the internet and text spins it, but I can't prove it (yet). Most of his posts (like several other now-banned profiles that used to comment here) are just these out-of-context newsbite essays, with something about BSV tacked on the end of it.

Copy / past !!!?? Do you have a problem with me writing here ?
Only you and your friends are allowed to write here? You make the law of underwear like at home ?
At least what I write is constructive not like your defamatory and completely obsessed comments like you and your friends do in a scathing and pathetic way Cry

I'd be happy to see that your profile will be blocked from publication because of defamatory and repeated trolling! would be so funny that I'd like to be a little mouse to see your reaction on the moment of "access denied to bitcointalk".

https://tenor.com/view/existential-crisis-screaming-meltdown-dan-is-not-on-fire-why-gif-7560587
Viper1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 287


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 02:03:27 PM
 #1565

I swear it looks like he just copy/pastes some random text about bitcoin from the internet and text spins it, but I can't prove it (yet). Most of his posts (like several other now-banned profiles that used to comment here) are just these out-of-context newsbite essays, with something about BSV tacked on the end of it.
It's more like he takes threads like this and crafts his own "version".




BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT
LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV
DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1867


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2019, 02:46:52 PM
 #1566

Copy / past !!!??
Not doing yourself any favors when it comes to proving you typed the previous paragraph, especially considering the complex syntax in the penultimate sentence prior to your question.

Do you have a problem with me writing here ?
Only you and your friends are allowed to write here? You make the law of underwear like at home ?
How come you add a space before your question marks here, yet you don't do the same in your question about BSV protecting itself?

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?
Original paragraph for reference.

By the way... can you tell me what you meant by "book" in the following fragment?
"it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant"

What book?

hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2019, 02:55:20 PM
 #1567

Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe!

Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that.


Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs.

I ll give u a hint

How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use.

Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that
You've been here long enough to not be so clueless.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Spam_transactions

The network was being spammed to inflate the transactions in order to attempt to justify increasing the block size. And yes, it costs money and they were willing to do that. When they didn't get their way, miraculously they started bitcoin cash and the spam on bitcoin went away. Go figure.


No, not spam again. Rather expensive pointing out / voting for having enough exzess capacity that is needed for exponential growing social networks.

Yes, I m long enough here to get that

Learn, ppl only change things for the good after they got hurt - or better, by figuring out where is better incentives
"We can phase in a change later if we get closer to needing it."

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it’s working OK."

"The current threshold is 200KB per block, or about 1000 transactions per block.  I think it should be lowered to 50KB per block.  That would still be more than 100 times the average transactions per block.

The threshold can easily be changed in the future.  We can decide to increase it when the time comes.  It's a good idea to keep it lower as a circuit breaker and increase it as needed."


That's what Satoshi himself had to say about block sizes and "spam". Looks to me like he was more in favor of incremental changes as opposed to just opening it all up. So neither Bitcoin Cash or SV seem to have followed that direction. Neither has Bitcoin to be frank. But SV claiming it's the "original vision" is just laughable.

Ugg, how much was the costs of fees sending a txs those early times?

Ok, u get it now, for 0 costs - yes u need spam protection.

The rest is a no brainer

But good you had sth to laugh about, it may free up thinking

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1108


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2019, 04:39:45 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2019, 04:59:42 PM by Phinnaeus Gage
Merited by nutildah (2), Slow death (1)
 #1568

THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING

Quickly, the only coin which can scale, we cant have that, Hell, No.

I think he was referencing another post. Its this thing called "sarcasm," which I know is an intellectual subtlety that goes undetected by BSV muppets.



Sayonara BTC was nice knowing you, but things to do and places to go.
Next one Ethereum another sitting lame duck.

Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.



https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/activeaddresses-btc-eth-bch-bsv.html#6m

Tell Craig he should have been researching how to imitate organic growth, not just single metrics that can be easily faked.

I have"intellectual subtlety" down to a science ...


Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe!

Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that.


Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs.

I ll give u a hint

How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use.

Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that



THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING

Quickly, the only coin which can scale, we cant have that, Hell, No.


Sayonara BTC was nice knowing you, but things to do and places to go.
Next one Ethereum another sitting lame duck.

Yes. The only use case for lame ducks I know is:

Hodle it for a while and eat it, Peking style


 Grin

I see what you did there (note the Bitcoin orange sauce) ...


I swear it looks like he just copy/pastes some random text about bitcoin from the internet and text spins it, but I can't prove it (yet). Most of his posts (like several other now-banned profiles that used to comment here) are just these out-of-context newsbite essays, with something about BSV tacked on the end of it.
It's more like he takes threads like this and crafts his own "version".





Nice catch!

Why do you absolutely want me to leave this place and go elsewhere? Answer me directly, we will waste less time.

Your organization has representatives? who are they (name)?

sorry I dont respond to people with offensive tone, have a great day sir

Where is my offense as a hypotetic shareholdery i ask you a simple legal question for a guarantee to know a name to whom my business consensus will provide a consistent portfolio and you write to me "i offend you"?

Now it's going to be really offensive to compare with the original request. This way you may compare with sudden consistency. Is it a communication error in your area of evolution because you are not qualified or are you really stupid or is it congenital?

Dude does due diligence regarding the above and other cryptos but stands unwavering when it comes to BSV. Madness?

IAO Launchpad Coming Soon
Do_zzze
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 27, 2019, 05:53:34 PM
Last edit: October 28, 2019, 02:04:11 AM by Do_zzze
 #1569

Copy / past !!!??
Not doing yourself any favors when it comes to proving you typed the previous paragraph, especially considering the complex syntax in the penultimate sentence prior to your question.

Do you have a problem with me writing here ?
Only you and your friends are allowed to write here? You make the law of underwear like at home ?
How come you add a space before your question marks here, yet you don't do the same in your question about BSV protecting itself?

After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.

How can BSV protect itself?
Original paragraph for reference.

By the way... can you tell me what you meant by "book" in the following fragment?
"it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant"

What book?


Hey Papi, I write in my mother tongue and translated on Internet, syntax is reported, not everyone writes English fluently in the world that's how it is. If I make a space more or less between my words then am I a Martian for you, okay.

hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2019, 08:39:46 PM
 #1570

New app on bsv

Thx Jimmy  for efforts

https://mobile.twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1188530397921103873

Winning

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1269


youtu.be/7oLdYay0PnE ... hahaha! FU (c)D(c) CSW


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 08:45:59 AM
 #1571

Miners are running the show, the backbone, the creation of blocks, the verification of everything

If they don't do all such, they might get orphaned and risk losing chunks of money or even entire long term investments.

It is redicules to believe some reconciliation with thick clients (slow nodes) on RasPI piss would do anything good

Watch this

https://mobile.twitter.com/ZeroNoncense/status/1188187298652930049?s=20



Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.
What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe!

Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that.


Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs.

I ll give u a hint

How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use.

Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that
You've been here long enough to not be so clueless.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Spam_transactions

The network was being spammed to inflate the transactions in order to attempt to justify increasing the block size. And yes, it costs money and they were willing to do that. When they didn't get their way, miraculously they started bitcoin cash and the spam on bitcoin went away. Go figure.


No, not spam again. Rather expensive pointing out / voting for having enough exzess capacity that is needed for exponential growing social networks.

Yes, I m long enough here to get that

Learn, ppl only change things for the good after they got hurt - or better, by figuring out where is better incentives

"... "Information wants to be free" is an expression that means all people should be able to access information freely. ..."

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free

...

HINT: Freedom of speech and freedom of expression becomes unfree when/if it has to be paid for, as per. the entire BSV model.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

This thread utilizing self-moderation or twetch users having to effectively pay for content which is already freely available elsewhere, for example.

BSV doesn't solve any real world problems, it creates problems.

BSV is fascism.

Guess I'm a Genuine "Bitcoin OG" <2010 | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project ... satofxsc3xjadxsm.onion shindo45rxrk3737.onion naka7nzsu3binfim.onion motoixfjxnf4joga.onion | "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey"
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1269


youtu.be/7oLdYay0PnE ... hahaha! FU (c)D(c) CSW


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 09:00:09 AM
Last edit: October 28, 2019, 09:24:19 AM by BitcoinFX
 #1572

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

While I am unsure on the matter, I think nChain has the largest portfolio of patents in the crypto currency and Blockchain space. Not knowing your definition of "patent troll" -- not exactly a dictionary term -- I really have no way to respond to your question.

Incidentally, the title of 'your dev' is a complete non-sequitur, seeing as 'dev' is pretty universally applied to 'the peeps who write the code'. An activity that CSW (am I safe in assuming it is him to which you refer?) pays others to do. And, of course, that whole 'your' thing.
 
Though whatever the outcome of that little sidebar, it sheds exactly zero light upon the questionable relevance of the quoted tirade by BitcoinFX.

Try again? Or let BitcoinFX speak for him/herself?



"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

This ^

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

"Open BSV License
Copyright (c) 2019 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

1 - The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
2 - The Software, and any software that is derived from the Software or parts thereof,
can only be used on the Bitcoin SV blockchains. The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b"
and
the test blockchains that are supported by the un-modified Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.



Version 0.1.1 of the Bitcoin SV software, and prior versions of software upon which it was based,
were licensed under the MIT License, which is included below.

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
Copyright (c) 2009-2015 Bitcoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2009-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin ABC developers
Copyright (c) 2018 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE."


...

Which came first the chicken or the egg ?

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

It's time to BUILD, a solid legal case against BSV. - SWIM

...

- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/07/blockstream-commits-patent-nonaggression

...

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (5/8) Movie CLIP - Invincible Sword Goddess (2000) HD
- https://youtu.be/X5SaZ8EmSpw *Satire*

Cheesy

You fail to establish any relevancy for your spouting. You also seem to have a rather flawed understanding of IP law. Lesson one: patents and copyrights are two completely different things.

Exactly what point do you think you are making by quoting the Open BSV License?

Patent Troll ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll
- https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/patent_troll

Roll Eyes

Do you honestly think I don't know the difference (or similarities) between a patent and copyright.

Completely moronic.

BSV is a copy of a copy of original Bitcoin (BTC) which was forked at BCH block height #556767. It's in the BSV 'source code' repo.

Totally moronic.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

"You ain't even lord of your yard." - SWIM

...

STORMZY - SHUT UP
- https://youtu.be/RqQGUJK7Na4 *Satire* *NSFW* Lips sealed

Guess I'm a Genuine "Bitcoin OG" <2010 | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project ... satofxsc3xjadxsm.onion shindo45rxrk3737.onion naka7nzsu3binfim.onion motoixfjxnf4joga.onion | "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey"
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 11:42:42 AM
 #1573

This is an endless Loop for some private blokes - u can decide for yourself what you think bitcoin 'is'

We just say, derive it from the Original Definition - > Satoshi White Paper

it follows strictly

BSV is the Original Bitcoin -


- Triggers trolls, I know - cannto fix that

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1269


youtu.be/7oLdYay0PnE ... hahaha! FU (c)D(c) CSW


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 12:02:20 PM
Last edit: October 28, 2019, 12:31:03 PM by BitcoinFX
 #1574

This is an endless Loop for some private blokes - u can decide for yourself what you think bitcoin 'is'

...snip...


CSW #Faketoshi #Fraudtoshi is a Patent Troll, a proven liar and a plagiarist.

- https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1184066737953746947

It's unfortunate to have to link to CoinGeek 'content', however CC Forum is being slow to upload the conference videos. (The link will be replaced if/when CC Forum uploads the video to youtube).

Here is the video of CSW presenting that he plagiarized Satoshi and at the same time effectively admitting that he is in fact not Satoshi ...

- https://youtu.be/oSXk_xFBJPU?t=736

He doesn't even attempt to back track on it, even the interviewer seems surprised and the body language speaks volumes.

Completely moronic.

You cannot enforce patents on open source software.

"UPDATE: I emailed Northumbria University and they confirmed that, contrary to what CSW claimed in his interview two weeks ago, they do NOT have his 2008 dissertation (which according to Craig shares "whole paragraphs" with the Bitcoin whitepaper) on file.

Color me shocked. https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1184501513252753411 … "

- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1188146890459746305

Roll Eyes

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting.

Guess I'm a Genuine "Bitcoin OG" <2010 | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project ... satofxsc3xjadxsm.onion shindo45rxrk3737.onion naka7nzsu3binfim.onion motoixfjxnf4joga.onion | "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey"
Bitcoin SV
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 41


View Profile
October 28, 2019, 12:34:34 PM
 #1575

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting.
What in heaven's name are you talking about?

Where is a proof that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin?

Prove me wrong or piss off from BSV, trolls! Still waiting.


3KDJhw9LewyXdfvZ4JQktkTDLfutPbyTxv
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 12:53:10 PM
 #1576

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting.
What in heaven's name are you talking about?

Where is a proof that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin?

Prove me wrong or piss off from BSV, trolls! Still waiting.



There is no 100% proof  - never will.

just watch his latest interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xap67QIrBNc

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
Piston Honda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1043


Juicin' crypto


View Profile
October 28, 2019, 12:59:21 PM
 #1577

lol it is hilarious seeing ppl trying to defend this traaaaaasssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! HAHAHAHA

www.dlsag.com ~ 1ex.trade
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 01:42:02 PM
 #1578

lol it is hilarious seeing ppl trying to defend this traaaaaasssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! HAHAHAHA

Bitcoin does defend itself - by pure design / economics

SegWit / LN / whatelse is not sustainable

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1269


youtu.be/7oLdYay0PnE ... hahaha! FU (c)D(c) CSW


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 02:48:40 PM
Last edit: October 28, 2019, 03:23:16 PM by BitcoinFX
 #1579

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting.
What in heaven's name are you talking about?

Where is a proof that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin?

Prove me wrong or piss off from BSV, trolls! Still waiting.



There is no 100% proof  - never will.

just watch his latest interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xap67QIrBNc

I do not like a villain either. Roll Eyes

Currently looking at CSW's claims in regards to leaving Bitcoin because of Silk Road etc.,

Here is a recent post of mine that was deleted from the moderated BSV thread in the alt. boards of this forum ...

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Reasons why Satoshi left

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=175.0

... Sirius, Theymos and others didn t.

 Roll Eyes

TBH that thread is one of the reasons I initially left this forum and Bitcoin (returning in 2013).

I don't know if that thread is a reason the real Satoshi left. However, forums are places for open (and private) discussions concerning many subject topics, hence the reason why forums (or threads) should not be used to help spread 'false' narratives and/or mis-information!

Note that I did not post anything in that thread and neither did the 'Satoshi' forum account either.

The thread originator is this guy ...
- https://www.askgamblers.com/forum/topic/3057-dragons-tale-an-introduction/
- https://bensonsamuel.com/tag/andrew-tepper/

~ Who potentially owes people (including myself) a lot of money (bitcoin) for running a then unlicensed?!? and untested ('live' in-development / play-testing), gambling environment with highly questionable (unprovable!?!) odds, whilst clearly presenting a more dubious sense of morality here ... etc., ?!?

I cannot speak for Sirius, Theymos and others posting in that thread (Gavin Andresen included!).

Moreover though, two wrongs don't make a right!

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.0
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.msg49823597#msg49823597

P.S. I only do truth, I have nothing to hide!

P.P.S. If CSW ever 'proves' he is/was one of Satoshi he/they (and/or) his companies are also going to potentially be owing myself (and many others) a lot of money (bitcoin).

Wondering if anyone knows of any links (even tenuous) between this fellow, CSW and/or Calvin Ayre ?

Basically, it seems quite remarkable to myself that DT was available so soon after Bitcoin's release.

So, CSW's own affirmative defense in his self proclaimed creation of Bitcoin and others usage for 'bad' things is ...

Ignorantia juris non excusat
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

Diminished responsibility
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminished_responsibility

...

Affirmative defense
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_defense
The insanity plea ? or Burden of proof ?

Cheesy

...

Hello everyone! I have some interesting thoughts to put forward about Hal Finney being Satoshi. (I don't know if they are new or not)

I would say that Craig Wright is a liar and maybe Hal Finney is the creator of Bitcoin because:

* Hal Finney died because of complications with ALS in 2014. (Bitcoin was created in 2009)
* Only a dying person has no interest in fame or money and that is why he hid is name and worked for a greater cause, to revolutionise and discourage centralised banking systems.
* Why would someone like Craig Wright try to be 100% private and then all of a sudden become public? He also only became public AFTER Hal Finney's death.

"Craig Wright - Lying about Hal Finney once more. 🤦‍♂️

Craig recently claimed in public that "cypherpunk-affiliated developers like Hal Finney held patents".

Nope. It's a lie, Craig. A few of Hal's emails are referenced in 8 patents, that's all. But he had no patents himself."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1187762788430684166

...

"Craig Wright - Do. Not. F*ck. With. Hal. Finney.

After putting his shit on the Bitcoin legacy of OGs like @marttimalmi, he's now going after Hal Finney.

Don't do that, Craig. You're making a #Faketoshi fool of yourself again."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1173953365342117893

...

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

...

R.I.P. Hal.

...

They're Dead Dave - Red Dwarf - BBC
- https://youtu.be/6Hrwut2dV0k

...

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.msg51291248#msg51291248

My life is quite hard sometimes, because I've remained an honest broker (seemingly unlike TraderCobb) and most certainly CSW.

I'm a 'last man standing' and I intend to firmly remain a Cypherpunk 'Nightmare' ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

I do care. Prove me wrong ! Still waiting. Still just getting started.  Kiss

...

Daft Punk - Harder Better Faster (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/gAjR4_CbPpQ

Guess I'm a Genuine "Bitcoin OG" <2010 | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project ... satofxsc3xjadxsm.onion shindo45rxrk3737.onion naka7nzsu3binfim.onion motoixfjxnf4joga.onion | "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey"
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2019, 03:54:30 PM
 #1580

Bcoreans and SegWit devs just fear to get removed

Out of their power

https://mobile.twitter.com/bsvdragon/status/1113797376248934401?s=21

Triggerd.

Social media trolls as well (writing such spam posts above would just cost too much)

Metanet kills all that free trolling

Cannot wait....


Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
Pages: « 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!