Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 09:16:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Algorithmically placed FPGA miner: 255MH/s/chip, supports all known boards  (Read 119439 times)
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 10, 2012, 08:04:05 AM
 #201

Hmm so vs current speeds (200MH/s ?) that extra 45MH/s (22.5% ?) will take 38 days (at current difficulty) to earn 1BTC
So is the pricing per mining device or a per user price?
So really what I should have asked is "Does it even exist" ?

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
BR0KK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 11, 2012, 02:15:11 PM
 #202

Looking forward to hear some Info about the  prices Smiley Hope its affordable for small scale mining farms

ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 03:33:35 PM
 #203

That wouldn't make me happy though. ...the source code of the program you used to place the elements.

Hey, I want a pony too, but I can manage to be happy without one. Smiley

What's for the farm?

scnr  Grin
eldentyrell (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 10:09:07 PM
 #204

My ztex board finally arrived yesterday; I've posted very-preliminary power numbers.  I still have at least one power-reduction trick up my sleeve, but I don't think it's going to close the gap.  You should expect my design to give fewer MH/J than ztex's design; that much is certain.

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
antirack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489
Merit: 500

Immersionist


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 10:47:30 PM
 #205

I assume you did your test run on the Ztex 1.15x (single FPGA), not the 1.15y (quad FPGA) board?

If you need a quad board for a while, let me know. There is a slight chance I could also place 4 15A regulators instead of the 8A stock ones on a board for your tests.
eldentyrell (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 11:03:08 PM
 #206

I assume you did your test run on the Ztex 1.15x (single FPGA), not the 1.15y (quad FPGA) board?

Correct.  It's secondhand.

If you need a quad board for a while, let me know. There is a slight chance I could also place 4 15A regulators instead of the 8A stock ones on a board for your tests.

Hrm, don't think that'll be necessary, but out of curiosity, how do you do this?  Is there a pin-compatible 15A version of the chip ztex is using?  Do you desolder the old one (yikes!)?  Doesn't this necessitate changing some of the other components in the power supply circuitry, like the inductor loop?

On the upside, if this is possible, maybe ztex will start offering 15A boards as an option.  Or somebody might go into business reworking the 8A boards, although I'm not sure that's cost-effective... board rework is really expensive.

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
antirack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489
Merit: 500

Immersionist


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 11:22:27 PM
Last edit: May 13, 2012, 12:29:11 AM by antirack
 #207

I am producing a batch of Ztex 1.15y boards under license, so I have blank PCBs which are supposed to go in the SMD line coming week or so. I don't think that the regulator I have been looking at (datasheet sent to you via email) is pin compatible, but I would think with a little bit of soldering it can be made to work (I could be completely wrong). Same for other components that need to be changed in the power chain.

In absolutely worst case, supplying the FPGAs their power from a different source might be a possibility for a test run. Either way, if it is possible or not to hack a Ztex PCB this way needs to be confirmed by my colleague, who is putting the boards together. But my offer stands, I would volunteer to send you a (modified if possible or stock) 1.15y out of my production run so you have something to test.

I don't think the Ztex products are designed for anything higher than 8A/FPGA, so this would only be for engineering tests, retrofitting is not what I had in mind. Stefan would probably be the very best person to put something together for you, when I come to think of it. Or any of the other FPGA makers who design their own products, like ngzhang, FPGAMining LLC or the new UK company (not sure if you have a preference for Ztex though).

Edit: In fact I believe the designers/manufacturers are watching this thread for YOU to post some useful numbers so that they know what power requirements to use for any future products (I believe it has even been mentioned in one or two of their threads).

spiccioli
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
May 13, 2012, 07:05:04 AM
 #208

Hi,

the enterpoint unit, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78239.0 , has four 12A regulators, are they enough?


spiccioli
eldentyrell (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2012, 06:03:55 PM
 #209

the enterpoint unit, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78239.0 , has four 12A regulators, are they enough?

A 12A regulator is enough power iff 265 MH/s is enough performance.

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
eldentyrell (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2012, 06:14:54 PM
 #210

Either way, if it is possible or not to hack a Ztex PCB this way needs to be confirmed by my colleague, who is putting the boards together. But my offer stands, I would volunteer to send you a (modified if possible or stock) 1.15y out of my production run so you have something to test.

Thanks for the offer!  I think I'm set for now, though.  I only need the ztex boards for power measurements... my own mining is done with my own boards (much cheaper than ztex boards, but lower quality and less power-efficient).  My personal boards also have upgradeable power supplies and software-adjustable voltage, which is really helpful for debugging and experimentation.

Speaking of which, here's another reason for the boardmakers to consider software-adjustable voltage supplies: every piece of mining equipment can be run until either (1) it fails or (2) the value of the BTC it produces falls below the cost of the electricity used.  FPGAs last a long time, so ultimately when you buy an FPGA miner you should plan on running it until several more generations of FPGAs have come out (which will each be more power-efficient than the last, ultimately driving up the difficulty).  We're talking about 2-3 years from now.

Anyways, power consumption scales linearly with clock rate, which (for a fixed design) scales linearly with performance.  However, the power consumption scales with the square of the voltage supplied.  This means that after 2-3 years you can underclock and undervolt your FPGA and keep it running profitably for another year or two.  I'm already doing this with Virtex-2 Pros.  I know that 2-3 years out is a long time horizon for bitcoiners, and many of the boardmakers may be out of business by then, but it's worth planning for.

Stefan would probably be the very best person to put something together for you, when I come to think of it. Or any of the other FPGA makers who design their own products, like ngzhang, FPGAMining LLC or the new UK company (not sure if you have a preference for Ztex though).

Like I said, I make my own boards.  The ztex board was only because my own boards leak power.

Edit: In fact I believe the designers/manufacturers are watching this thread for YOU to post some useful numbers so that they know what power requirements to use for any future products (I believe it has even been mentioned in one or two of their threads).

Yes, they email me constantly.  I've gotten very good at finding new and creative ways to say "I'm working on it". Smiley

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 13, 2012, 08:42:03 PM
Last edit: May 14, 2012, 04:15:41 AM by sadpandatech
 #211

Would u be interested in one of the new Enterpoint Quad boards to try this bitstream on?


And have you come up with a pricing scheme or any ideas in that area yet?



cheers

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA

It is being worked on by smart people.  -DamienBlack
nedbert9
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250

Inactive


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 01:37:03 AM
 #212

That wouldn't make me happy though. ...the source code of the program you used to place the elements.

Hey, I want a pony too, but I can manage to be happy without one. Smiley

I never got a pony and I've led a miserable life.
stcupp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 09:03:49 AM
 #213

Spartan6 have a nice feature called chip DNA. It's unique 56 bit number. Device can read this, user thru JTAG also can read this. So, little program that read DNA thru JTAG and send this to server. Server makes personalized bitstream for that DNA and waits for payment. When payment is recived sends bitstream to buyer. That particular bitstream will only work with particular chip. And every one is happy, copying almost impossible.

No, the DNA register isn't useful for copy protection.   I use it to
keep track of which chips got which error rates at which
frequency/voltage, but not much else.

The DNA register is just a shift register, so if you can get the
design into fpga_editor all you have to do is disconnect two wires and
hook it up to an SRL32 instead; then you can make the design think the
chip has any DNA code you like.

I don't think Xilinx gives you a tool that turns .bit files into .ngc
files that fpga_editor can load, but I also wouldn't be surprised if
somebody else has written one.


It's also worth noting that the Spartan 6 engineering sample versions of the chips don't have the DNA register.
eldentyrell (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2012, 03:45:54 AM
 #214




The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
DiabloD3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000


DiabloMiner author


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2012, 03:51:52 AM
 #215


OH SHI-

Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


What's a GPU?


View Profile
May 21, 2012, 05:07:37 AM
 #216

10d 7h on the spot Cheesy

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
pieppiep
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 502


View Profile
May 21, 2012, 06:45:57 AM
 #217

10d 7h on the spot Cheesy
Nice!
There is a bug on the website, here it is saying 10d 12h.
-5 hours have passed since Garr255 posted.
c_k
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 21, 2012, 10:17:08 AM
 #218

It's probably just counting down to the end of the month in your time zone

BR0KK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 21, 2012, 12:19:13 PM
 #219

aww 10 Days .... Cheesy

rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
May 21, 2012, 12:52:16 PM
 #220

What a tease. You'd better release something that goes 300 mhash/s at 10 watts, if you're going to keep us in suspense like this. Tongue

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!